Regarding Turning Up the Heat…
Posted by
Leo Pusateri
in
Environment on
November 18th, 2007 at 08:36pm with
25 responses.
Tags: global warming.
Tags: global warming.
Click here to get Caucus of Corruption: The Truth About The New Democratic Majority by Matt Margolis and Mark Noonan.
As the myth of anthroprogenic global warming continues to be debunked, the stakeholders of the perpetuation of the global warming fairy tale, knowing full well which side their bread is buttered, are turning up the rhetoric, predicting increasingly dire consequences in frenzied, histrionic efforts to keep the hysteria going.
Look for the rhetoric to continue to escalate, as desperate times do indeed call for desperate measures.
And for the global warming alarmists, these times are undeniably desperate.
Leo Pusateri is an educator and military dad from St. Cloud, Minnesota. Leo also blogs at Psycmeisters' Ice Palace, Murtha Must Go! and True North. Follow Leo on Twitter.
25 Responses to “Regarding Turning Up the Heat…”
Caucus of Corruption
It’s nice to see you’re still maintaining your Ice Palace blog. But I’m curious… why two?
Actually, Rico… I’m on half a dozen, altogether.
I guess it’s something I enjoy doing :)
The United States opted out of Kyoto in 2001, arguing that the science was unproven and that the burden of mandatory emission cuts was unfair since it excluded fast-growing China and India.
(from the Mywaynews link)
We “opted out” of Kyoto? An interesting accomplishment since we’ve never ratified the treaty, and thus were never “in” Kyoto in the first place.
From reading these links, I realize that I may have to give some of the global warming believers credit. They seem to have actually noticed the huge increase in emissions from China, who either just passed us, or soon will.
It’s the Sun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now this is interesting. I wonder what changed between the first installment of the 2007 IPCC Report:
and the third installment just released
Now that’s what I call rapid climate change.
Whadaya mean, my comment is awaiting moderation? I didn’t use any BAD words.
I find it rather comical that you will accept scientific evident that will allow you to continue to pollute the atmosphere of Terra by virtue of your wasteful lifestyles but when confronted with any question of metaphysics you fall back on pseudo-science or groundless beliefs that are nothing more than parroted rituals steeped in misogyny and fear of what comes at the end of lives that are too short and too brutal.
Other than that love what you have done with place mate!
Spook,
I have no idea what that was about – but its published now and my presumption is that it was some sort of glitch.
With no God, how can any of this be our fault? We’re just a complex chemical reaction.
Did I get that right Marxists?
kahn,
Not only that, but if there is no God, then global warming MUST happen because all events are pre-determined by past events and there is no free will to change the course of events.
When there is independant scientific research, maybe then I will agree with the claims og gloabl warming.
Unfortunately that will never happen.
Whas’ts the old saying, if you want to know the truth follow the money trail….
Doug,
Follow the money trail only applies when the science debunks GW. All that support GW are unquestionably honest and loyal to the master Soros.
When there is independant scientific research, maybe then I will agree with the claims og gloabl warming.
Doug, I assume by “independent” you mean free from the influences of governments, NGO’s, politics and corporations who have a vested interest in the outcome. Correct?
Last night Ricorun linked to an interesting post by Steve McIntyre at Climate Audit in early 2005, in which he spelled out the problems associated with verifying methods, data, source codes, etc. in the field of climate science.
The main thrust of Steve’s post is this:
As usual with such posts, the comments afterward are every bit as interesting and informative as the article itself.
With no God, how can any of this be our fault? We’re just a complex chemical reaction.
Kahn, I missed this last night. Man, that is the $64 million question, isn’t it. Perhaps our resident “intellectual”, Cavalor Epthith Esq. has an answer.
Now this is interesting. I wonder what changed between the first installment of the 2007 IPCC Report:………and the third installment just released – Spook
Could it be that they are making it up as they go along?
Could it be that they are making it up as they go along?
Kinda looks that way, doesn’t it?
I would like for you to read this article from Meridian Magazine.
http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/070313goodprint.html.
It was written by Orson Scott Card who, by the way, is a Democrat. Card does a good job of exposing the fraud behind much of today’s global warming hysteria.
Is this the article you wanted linked?
Interesting article, French Student. Are you the same French Student that was singing the praises of the IPCC a couple days ago, or you the evil twin?
good article french. Michael Crighton wrote a book similar to what Card said about Global Warming and how it’s cooked up and basically a elaborate sham to make money. Some data indicates warming of a few degrees occurs, some don’t. Why? The data needed just isn’t there Well, some is there but it’s extremely incomplete. Any way you spin it, there is no right answer. Do humans cause Global Warming? Again, not enough data. We have plenty of projections and models but we just don’t know.
OT, Orson Scott Card. Ender’s Game. Excellent book.
nope, I did not post that one, I have been dealing with real life things since friday.
And I do not have a habit of posting at 7 am in my time zone.
nope, I did not post that one,
Didn’t think so, after your rant the other day.
I have been dealing with real life things since friday
At least you admit that AGW is not a real life problem. Maybe there’s hope for you yet.
real life as opposed to online life, spook.
Not all of us are retired, you know?
French, I knew what you meant; I just like jerkin’ your chain. Lighten up. Life’s too short to worry about the things over which you have no control.