Liberal Rage
January 10th, 2008 at 12:15am Mark Noonan
And Andrew Sullivan reader had this to say about the New Hampshire results:
Watched the NH returns with some friends last night, and something quite unexpected happened when the AP called it for Clinton — inexplicable ANGER. I was surrounded by people in their early 30’s, registered Democrats, receptive to the Clintons in the 90’s, and I swear I thought someone was going to throw their wine glass at the tube during her ‘victory’ speech.
Just an oddity, or an indicator of just how little the left will like it if Hillary is the nominee? Could be a very interesting couple months coming up…
HAT TIP: Instapundit via NRO’s The Corner
Entry Filed under: Campaign 2008, Democrats, Kook Left
10 Comments
1. Huck Fillary | January 10th, 2008 at 4:21 am
Is the Clinton magic waning? Ol’ Slick appears bitter lately. He’s probably angry because our country’s in “such a mess.” lol
2. SEW | January 10th, 2008 at 5:52 am
Truly an awesome sight. Unhinged liberals eating far left liberals, and far left liberals eating the unhinged liberals! And a personal injury ambulance chaser thrown in for pure enjoyment. Forget about the Super Bowl, this is great fun.
3. phnx | January 10th, 2008 at 6:11 am
Obama, has excited the imagination of the youth whose hopes will be dashed when Hillary gets the nomination. Expect the groundswell of youth to disappear and not show up in November. They’ll be distracted with their IPods and video games.
4. Retired Spook | January 10th, 2008 at 7:00 am
I suspect phnx is right. The people who are voting for Mrs. Bill Clinton in the primary will vote for her in the fall if she’s the nominee. Many of the people voting for Obama in the primary will stay home in November if he’s NOT the nominee. If he gets beat in a fair and square fight in the primaries, young Obama supporters may stay involved. If the Clinton machine cuts loose with both slime barrels in the primaries, many idealistic youngsters my be turned off to politics for a long time. Either way, it’ll be interesting to watch.
5. neocon | January 10th, 2008 at 7:23 am
The Clintons, and Democrats, find themselves in quite the conundrum. Having to attack an African Americans credibility and experience after years of telling that same subgroup that it’s been the Republicans fault for their plight.
So how does Hillary tell other African Americans that she, and not Obama, is the candidate that truly understands their pain?
6. Retired Spook | January 10th, 2008 at 8:31 am
So how does Hillary tell other African Americans that she, and not Obama, is the candidate that truly understands their pain?
I’m waiting with baited breath for her to remind the black community that she is, after all, married to the first “black” President.
7. AAR | January 10th, 2008 at 8:49 am
We need to remind Obama’s young enthusiastic followers every day how the pro-war Clintons are willing to do and say anything to defeat Obama — even whining to gain the sympathy vote of older women!!!
AAR
8. Joe | January 10th, 2008 at 9:10 am
Another example of how this blog should be called “Blogs against Democ(r)ats” and not “Blogs for Victo(r)y”.
Ok. I understand you folks hate Democrats, but for cryin out loud, do you EVER have a post that highlights all the good things about the Repubs?
I see posts how Obama is not ready and Hillary is the devil, blah blah blah.
I don’t see anything saying how McCain is the right man for the job or Romney is or whoever.
All you people do is talk negative about EVERYONE who doesn’t walk in lock step with you. I do enjoy reading the posts here to see what others have to say and I do appreciate Mark’s passion for what he writes. It is just that it is Blogs for VICTORY, but you aren’t saying anything about how you are going to have victory only how the Dems will lose.
9. Rich | January 10th, 2008 at 12:13 pm
This is thread is about liberal rage Joe. If you dont like the thread, go post elsewhere. i suggest the Huffington Post so you can go so what Sean “Chavez” Penn is up to.
10. Christian Wright | January 11th, 2008 at 6:42 am
The Republicans want Clinton to be the nominee so badly, they used electrion fraud to make it so.
Analysts at the Election Defense Alliance (EDA) have confirmed that based on the official results on the New Hampshire Secretary of state web site, there is a remarkable relationship between Obama and Clinton votes, when you look at votes tabulated by op-scan v. votes tabulated by hand:
Clinton Optical scan 91,717 52.95%
Obama Optical scan 81,495 47.05%
Clinton Hand-counted 20,889 47.05%
Obama Hand-counted 23,509 52.95%
The percentages appear to be swapped. That seems highly unusual, to say the least.
I said the first order of business for the Dems when they came into control of Congress was to eliminate voting machines without paper trails, but they did not listen.