68 Comments

• 1. Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche  |  March 4th, 2008 at 12:33 pm

  Mark-

  What’s with the sudden burst of “Hillary love”? Maybe secretly you want Hillary in the White House so that your guy’s can have a second bite at the apple. Couldn’t get Bill so let’s move on to Hill?
  Why is it that the Right has such an unnatural lust to hate all things Clinton?

• 2. Obama2008  |  March 4th, 2008 at 12:46 pm

  Clinton hatred is merely thinly masked jealousy.

  While the “right wing” has made a saint out of Ronald Reagan, the rest of the country knows that he damaged this nation, lied, sold arms to Iran, attacked the middle class and labor and is responsible for many of today’s problems.

  Bill Clinton inn contrast created the largest expansion of the U.S. economy, captured terrorists who bombed the WTC and the Cole and was generally an effective president.

  Clinton was more popular than Reagan in the polls when his term was over and for most of his term.

  They just can’t handle those facts.

• 3. OhioOrrin  |  March 4th, 2008 at 1:17 pm

  ohh, I know…

  …after hillary wins in nov, Bill should be the ambassador to France.

  The Wild Bill & paparatazzi show would be legendary, even in Paris!

  pay-per-view me thinks!

• 4. SEW  |  March 4th, 2008 at 1:47 pm

  Barry Snakeoilsalesman Obama, the Uniter, will reach across the aisle, and mentioned Chuck Hagel would make a good Secretary of Defense!

  Liberal Derangement Syndrome.

• 5. Joe  |  March 4th, 2008 at 1:56 pm

  SEW… what is your point other than to call Obama names? Are you trying to show your hatred for Chuck Hagel?

  Wait a second… you people always claim that Dems have BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome). So you claim we hate Bush for no reason.

  Meanwhile… you are saying something about “Liberal Derangement Syndrome”. I guess that would be LDS. Are you saying that is what YOU have or are you saying that is what we have?

  I’m confused with you people trying to say we all have some kind of “Syndrome”.

• 6. SEW  |  March 4th, 2008 at 2:20 pm

  Just respecting your agenda to not use the H word. Or is every middle name off limits? And how is stating what the Big O stated, hatred for Hagel by me?

  Sounds like Liberal Derangement Syndrome to me. And yes you are confused, actually very confused.

• 7. Canadian Observer  |  March 4th, 2008 at 2:22 pm

  Sad fact is, for those of us on the outside looking in, regardless of who the ultimate winner in the race for President will be, any one of the contenders would be a welcome change from who you currently have embedded in the White House.

  The U.S. has no where to go but up.

• 8. Jeremiah  |  March 4th, 2008 at 2:30 pm

  The U.S. has no where to go but up.

  That would be nice, CO. If the people will turn back to God then America will have no-where to go but up.
  He blesses those who serve Him first.

  –Jeremiah–

• 9. sleepygene  |  March 4th, 2008 at 2:35 pm

  I think Hillary will win Ohio and RI by 10 and maybe eek out a win in TX in the primary but lose in total delgates there because of apportionment and the caucus factor and lose VT by 20. This would be a victroy of sorts for her but not really. Also, Tom Brokaw is reporting that Barack has 50 more superdelegates in his pocket and if true is devastating to Hillary. I hope it is true, though I respect the Clintons I would like them to go away. I think a McCain Obama race is what is needed in November.

  http://thepage.time.com/2008/03/04/tom-brokaw-says-obama-has-50-more-superdelegates-in-his-back-pocket/

• 10. congressive  |  March 4th, 2008 at 2:36 pm

  But Hillary has experience with the “red crisis phone” ringing at 3 am.

  Riiing! Riiiiing! click“Hello. This is Hillary. Monica who? Hold on…. BIILLL!!! IT’S FOR YOU…”

  Riiing! Riiiiing! click“Hello. This is Hillary. Paula who? Hold on…. BIILLL!!! IT’S FOR YOU…”

  Riiing! Riiiiing! click“Hello. This is Hillary. Oh, hi Bill. You want me to what? Don’t you have interns to do small jobs?”

  “If I were president, I’d change this number…”

• 11. congressive  |  March 4th, 2008 at 2:42 pm

  A choice between McCain and Clinton this November would be a choice between shooting yourself in the foot with a 9mm or a .38 Special.

  Cast your vote. Long live Democracy!

• 12. Canadian Observer  |  March 4th, 2008 at 2:54 pm

  8. Jeremiah | March 4th, 2008 at 2:30 pm

  You have to let go of this obsession of combining religion with politics, Jeremiah. The mix is toxic, I tell ya, it’s poison.

• 13. Jeremiah  |  March 4th, 2008 at 3:07 pm

  You have to let go of this obsession of combining religion with politics, Jeremiah. The mix is toxic, I tell ya, it’s poison.–Canadian Observer.

  Well, CO, you should have no complaint there, this country no longer does, and you see where it is getting her don’t you?

  Something, anything, could break at any time now.

  –Jeremiah–

• 14. Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche  |  March 4th, 2008 at 3:46 pm

  Jeremiah-

  That’s highly specious reasoning. Regular church attendance has never risen above 30% in this nation.

• 15. Jeremiah  |  March 4th, 2008 at 4:10 pm

  Regular church attendance has never risen above 30% in this nation.

  Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche,

  Well now, you can’t say that…can you?

  When the first surveys were conducted in ‘39, there was a steady increase until ‘55 when church attendance peaked at 49%.

  1939 41
  1950 39
  1955 49
  1962 46
  1967 43
  1972 40
  1977 41
  1980 40
  1985 42
  1990 40
  1996 37
  1999 43

  Since ‘55 there has been a steady decrease in church attendance. Liberalism has slowly eroded the family unit ever since, through the entertainment industry and internet.

  The FCC could do more, but what do they care, ya know? Our government, the Courts and everything has been corrupted to an obscene degree, which is a reflection of the decline in society and the family unit. Hillary or Obama either one will probably break the final moral threads that remain in America.

  –Jeremiah–

• 16. Elsy  |  March 4th, 2008 at 4:12 pm

  BTW guys I found some brilliant/awesome analysis on Obama’s Fundraising and other current happenings on the campaign. I haven’t seen anything like this mentioned anywhere in the MSM.
  Check out the article “Follow the Money” on http://savagepolitics.com/?p=165, “Bush’s Twin and the G.O.P.” http://savagepolitics.com/?p=172 and “Barack Obama’s Apotasy” http://savagepolitics.com/?p=101

  Check their “Political Analysis” and “Humor” sections for other striking perspectives and comedic analysis on both parties.

• 17. Joe  |  March 4th, 2008 at 4:19 pm

  Since this is an OPEN THREAD….

  Oddly enough, I didn’t see any comments on this blog about this…..

  Bush: “Wait a minute, what’d you just say? You’re predicting 4-dollar-a-gallon Gasoline?

  Reporter: “a number of analysts are predicting 4 dollar gas this spring

  Bush: Oh yeah?

  Reporter: “.when they reformulate”

  Bush: “That’s interesting. I hadn’t heard that.”

  Do you think he has ANY clue what the average person is dealing with?

• 18. sleepygene  |  March 4th, 2008 at 4:36 pm

  He has no clue Joe and thank the Lord we will be done with him soon.

• 19. SEW  |  March 4th, 2008 at 4:45 pm

  Reggie Bush controls gasoline prices? I thought that was a function of OPEC and market forces.

• 20. Joe  |  March 4th, 2008 at 4:56 pm

  SEW, it doesn’t matter what the prices are a function of and I didn’t claim any Bush reggie or otherwise set the prices.

  I’m just guessing that perhaps the President of the U.S. might… just might have som clue as to what the price of the most important commodity is doing. It is only one of the most important things affecting the American people. But why should he care, right?

  Besides, Reggie Bush had such a tough year last year, he doesn’t have time to worry about gas prices.

• 21. Sunny  |  March 4th, 2008 at 4:57 pm

  Liberalism has slowly eroded the family unit ever since, through the entertainment industry and internet. Jeremiah

  So, Jeremiah, enlighten us as to your family unitl. Married? Have children? And how has liberalism affected your family unit? Can you still attend chruch as you wish, pray as you wish, worship as you wish, be faithful to your wife and family? Exactly how has liberalism hurt your lifestyle and family?

• 22. Joe  |  March 4th, 2008 at 5:01 pm

  Duh Sunny…. it is all those liberal gays having sex that is wreaking havoc in America!!!!!

  There were no gays before the entertainment industry and the internet!

• 23. SEW  |  March 4th, 2008 at 5:06 pm

  “I’m just guessing that perhaps the President of the U.S. might… just might have som clue as to what the price [of the most important commodity] is doing.”

  Big difference in what the price is, and what the predicted price is. And clearly W[oops, middle initial] has som [sic] clue. Unless one suffers from…..B D S.

• 24. Joe  |  March 4th, 2008 at 5:13 pm

  SEW, at least make some sense.

  ok… I left the “e” off of “some”. I’m going to go out on a limb and say I’m not the only person ever to mis-spell something on this blog.

  Anyway…… yep. It is a big difference in what the price is and what the predicted price is. I don’t know what you are saying. Are you suggesting he knows the price, but not the predicted price?

  Was there a point to your post?

  Did I spell everything right this time?

• 25. Sunny  |  March 4th, 2008 at 5:18 pm

  Well, SEW, what most of us do understand, and apparently you do not is that W doesn’t have much of a clue about much of anything. With the price of gas being a pretty hot topic in this country one would think our president would have a CLUE that the talk is about it going to $4.00 this summer. However, when you do not have to pay for it, I guess it doesn’t really matter. Just let the tax payers pay for his trips around the world, to the “ranch”, to Camp David - anywhere his little heart desires to go. Never mind the cost to the American taxpayer.

• 26. SEW  |  March 4th, 2008 at 5:21 pm

  Clueless, some are predicting $60 a barrel. Some are predicting more hurricanes and AGW, even though this has been the coldest winter in 60 years.

• 27. Joe  |  March 4th, 2008 at 5:27 pm

  I assume that post #25 was trying to prove that predictions can be anything you want.

  $60 a barrel, huh? Boy… I’d love to trade some oil futures with that guy.

  There have been a couple of global warming posts in the last week or two. I’m not going to rehash them here.

  $60 a barrel and the global warming “examples” are pretty funny SEW.

  I predict the Tampa Bay Devil Rays will win the World Series this year as well.

• 28. SteaM  |  March 4th, 2008 at 5:57 pm

  4 more years of Bush!

  Chant with me: 4 more years! … 4 more years! …

  Why isn’t anyone chanting :(

• 29. Jeremiah  |  March 4th, 2008 at 6:06 pm

  Exactly how has liberalism hurt your lifestyle and family?

  Sunny,

  It doesn’t affect me and my family, because we are not Liberals, and have no desire to participate in liberalism. Although it very well could affect me my family–seeing as the Communist ACLU would like to enact “hate-crimes” laws against ministers for speaking the truth. It could also affect our churches, as the ACLU would like also to tax them. These proposals are nothing more than hatred to be directed at Christians.

  Others who are liberals and like the liberal lifestyle, also affect others in their day to day lives, and this especially affect children - some of them, many of the children never get to take their first breath our see for the first time, or feel mommy’s love and affection, no, all they get is a pair of forceps in which their little fragile heads are crushed. Mercilessly, and a mommy who is forever scarred.
  The ones who do make it to take their first breath, and start to school are given instructions on sodomy indoctrination and promiscuity. After school is hanging out with friends who indulge in drug usage and other destructive lifestyles….I see them all the time, the walk the streets looking for something to steal and then re-sale at a pawn shop somewhere, and then take the money and buy drugs and alcohol.

  So it’s not me or others who aren’t liberals, but it is is those who are liberals and the effect that is created–The Courts, The ACLU, The liberal voters, Communists such as Farrakhan, Communists such as HIllary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama, Jack Murtha, Diane Feinstein, John Kerry, Robert C. Byrd, Jay D. Rockefeller, Barbara Boxer …. just to name of few.

  –Jeremiah–

• 30. SEW  |  March 4th, 2008 at 6:08 pm

  “I predict the Tampa Bay Devil Rays will win the World Series this year as well.”

  You forgot to tie ‘Bush’ in on that.

  On another open thread topic, the Dem leadership is caving on FISA, another win for George W Bush, Commander in Chief. He always wins, the Dems always cave. But first he allows them to bend over and show their hand. Way to go W.

• 31. FmrMarine  |  March 4th, 2008 at 6:09 pm

  >>>>>You have to let go of this obsession of combining religion with politics, Jeremiah. The mix is toxic, I tell ya, it’s poison.<<<<

  Spoken like a true moronic canadian who has NO clue about geopolitical politics, but is going to tell all about W.
  Go masterbate on your hero Trudeau’s picture you add NOTHING here.
  As for hitlery the sooner we are DONE with the white trash known as the klintoons, the better.

• 32. Darva Conger  |  March 4th, 2008 at 7:46 pm

  When oil hits $120/barrel in October, the voter will not reward the GOP.

  (and they know it.)

• 33. Mark Noonan  |  March 4th, 2008 at 8:12 pm

  Darva,

  And what if its $80?

• 34. Darva Conger  |  March 4th, 2008 at 8:25 pm

  If oil is $80/barrel in October 2008 I’ll make your house payment that month.

• 35. Mark Noonan  |  March 4th, 2008 at 10:02 pm

  Darva,

  Ok.

• 36. Ricorun  |  March 4th, 2008 at 10:09 pm

  Matt: Blogs For Victory is proud to announce the launch of Blogs for John McCain’s Victory.

  Yippee!!

  Does that mean sometime soon GopBloggers.com will sometime soon work past the GOP Opts to Remain Minority thread? As interesting and instructive as it may be, it’s hardly ideologically appropriate. And while ideological appropriateness means very little to me in and of itself, this particular post is a constant reminder how truly inappropriate the GOP ideology got during the Bush years.

  Speaking of ideologically appropriate, how much sense does it make to advocate second amendment rights when you’ve been aiming at your foot for the last three weeks? Lol!

  Then again, making the post disappear is a lot easier than making the reality it represents disappear. The good news is that to the extent that anyone in the current GOP fold has the credentials to effect that change in reality, it’s hard to argue anyone is better suited than John McCain.

• 37. Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche  |  March 4th, 2008 at 10:10 pm

  Jeremiah-

  Your numbers for church attendance are interesting, particularly because you supplied no source identification for them. 50% ????? Jeremiah not even this country on it’s best Sunday ever saw half of it’s population in a church. The stats you’re quoting are based on flawed information because it is believed that when asked people will lie to the pollster and give a false positive. It’s an effect called “social desirability bias”. In short it means the person being asked will answer according to what they think society wants them to do. The actual answer to the question of how many regular church attendees there are usually hovers somewhere around 20% at any give time. Nice try my friend but no c-gar.

  http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_rate.htm

• 38. Ricorun  |  March 4th, 2008 at 10:16 pm

  Darva: If oil is $80/barrel in October 2008 I’ll make your house payment that month.

  Ummm… that’s it??!!! That’s the whole bet?! I have never come out and directly called any commenter on this site an idiot (at least without them basically agreeing to it beforehand). But in this case I am more sorely tempted than I have ever been. Jeepers Darva — what’s in it for you?? Even bragging rights are debatable because, well… you figure it out.

• 39. Jeremiah  |  March 4th, 2008 at 10:23 pm

  The actual answer to the question of how many regular church attendees there are usually hovers somewhere around 20% at any give time.

  NIP,

  You must be Canadian then?

  If you’re referring to the United States, then you need to reverse how you look at the figures you provided. The 20% is for Canada.

  –Jeremiah–

• 40. js  |  March 4th, 2008 at 10:58 pm

  Whats this about Obama-ites closing the polls before time? And refusing to let Clinton-ites vote?

  Thats got the scent of the DNC, doesnt it!!

  “Anyone gotta pack of smokes for a vote?”

• 41. SEW  |  March 4th, 2008 at 11:00 pm

  Ohio voters say NO to Snakeoilsalesman.

• 42. Freedom1  |  March 4th, 2008 at 11:02 pm

  If oil prices remain high, that’s simultaneously bad and good. Bad for obvious reasons. Good, because it will spur the development of alternative energy sources. I hope when John McCain wins the presidential election in November, he institutes a nation-wide Manhattan Project to get America off Saudi terrorist oil and on to nuclear power, wind power, solar power, hydrogen fuel cell cars, etc. A powerful, motivated Manhattan Project is one of the most positive steps America can take toward winning Islam’s War Against the West.

• 43. Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche  |  March 4th, 2008 at 11:11 pm

  Jeremiah-

  LOL Sorry missed again, I’m from the good ol US of A. Actually grew up in Lynchburg, VA. You know who else is from there to right?

  Nice touch ignoring the social desirability bias of those polls you sited. Just wishing something were true doesn’t make it so. Jeremiah you know you have in the past been taken in by things on this blog that you wished were true but in reality were spoofs, jokes, or outright falsehoods. At one point you even thought Stephen Colbert was an actual conservative.
  Again my friend you’re just putting too much faith in something you wished were true.

• 44. Kahn  |  March 4th, 2008 at 11:34 pm

  Well, Ohio speaks. Clinton survives!

  I wonder how Texas will turn out?

  What are you Democrats going to do now? Seat Michigan and Florida? make them have another election first? Let the Super Delegates decide?

  Find the text of some Obama speeches (it can be done). Delete meaningless rhetoric and look for position statements and proposals.

  Look at Clintons proposals. Do the math. Leaving Iraq will not pay for them.

• 45. SEW  |  March 4th, 2008 at 11:58 pm

  Clinton badmouths W, says she will leave Iraq, win Afghanistan. What an idiot. Too stupid to recognize Republicans kept her alive in Ohio and Texas. Does she believe liberals had a sudden change of heart and voted for her?

  Trainwreck Denver, here they come. Spend your money and have a bloodbath in Denver. Thank you Ohio and Texas. Awesome.

• 46. Kahn  |  March 5th, 2008 at 12:11 am

  If Clinton pulls ahead after Texas reports - will Obama concede and drop out?

• 47. Kahn  |  March 5th, 2008 at 12:13 am

  I’m sorry, is the fact that I’m LMAO coming through in these posts?

• 48. Kahn  |  March 5th, 2008 at 12:21 am

  You think it will be Obama-Clinton? Would she go for that?

• 49. Freedom1  |  March 5th, 2008 at 12:37 am

  “You think it will be Obama-Clinton? Would she go for that?” - Kahn

  The question for me is, would Obama go for that? I wouldn’t. Clinton is so corrupt. Obama wouldn’t be able to trust her as far as…well he just wouldn’t be able to trust her.

• 50. Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche  |  March 5th, 2008 at 1:07 am

  “Clinton badmouths W”

  Are you kidding? 70% of this country “badmouths” W. If she is badmouthing W she’s way behind the curve.

• 51. Mark Noonan  |  March 5th, 2008 at 1:22 am

  Kahn,

  Gotta admit that I’m feeling pretty good right now…and the only thing our lefties have to say is, well, nothing…they must not have gotten their talking points yet.

• 52. Kahn  |  March 5th, 2008 at 1:43 am

  Mark, they’re not sure who to get their talking points FROM!

  Ever see the “I Mudd” episode of Star Trek?

• 53. Francis  |  March 5th, 2008 at 4:40 am

  A really intriguing symptom of the passion Obama inspires: there is an exhibition on in New York now which explores how the media has been portraying him, and challenges his messianic appeal. There’s an online version at www.theassassinationofbarackobama.com

• 54. CuriousGeorge  |  March 5th, 2008 at 5:33 am

  I’m confused with you people trying to say we all have some kind of “Syndrome”.

  You people will sell your souls to socialism because you hate all things GOP. BDS abounds on the left.

  I wonder who Barry will be blaming for Texas and Ohio. Who know’s–all he’ll take is eight questions, and invoke the Magna Carta…

• 55. Freedom1  |  March 5th, 2008 at 5:48 am

  Drudge link -

  “Alter: Hillary’s Math Problem; She could win 16 straight and still lose…”

  Is this accurate?
  Either way, since Hillary’s still alive, it’s going to be a political-bloodbath for the Democrat party!

  http://www.newsweek.com/id/118240

• 56. phnx  |  March 5th, 2008 at 7:19 am

  The people have spoken…

  Sheee’s baaack.

  She’s the Comeback Kid!

  Despite Obama’s running to the courts to keep the polls open in the inner city areas, Hillary takes Ohio.

  Thanks to Rush Limbaugh’s mind numbed robots, Clinton pulls out the popular vote in Texas.

  The dems continue to fight it out, burning up more cash. Its gonna get ugly from here on out.

  Hillary’s got the Mo now, Obama’s Hope Express has been derailed temporarily.

  Now what will happen here in PA??? Hillary is favored. Hmmmmm, I hear Rush’s voice telling me to change parties and vote for Obama in the primary to further confuse the dems.

  Yes master, I will obey. Oba Ma Oba Ma Oba Ma!!!

• 57. Retired Spook  |  March 5th, 2008 at 9:04 am

  This comment from Daily KOS kinda says it all:

  Watch the blood start flowing. (2+ / 0-)

  Recommended by:
  abarefootboy, IndianaDemocrat

  And our party will be decimated by the time this is over. She’s going to get as nasty as it takes, huh? sigh. We’re going to make this very easy for John McCain. That’s my Dems! Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory once again!
  (note: obama still leads in pledged delegates. she can’t catch up unless she wins by double digits in every remaining state, but none the less, this will kill us.)

  From an article Howard Fineman just posted at msnbc.

  This race is going all the way to Denver, to the Democratic convention. There will be arguing, vicious arguing, about what to do with Florida and Michigan. What if they hold second events–do-overs–in June? What if Hillary doubles down on her criticism of Barack Obama’s readiness for office?

  I was just talking to one of Obama’s top advisers, and he was picking through what happened Tuesday night. This is a hard-eyed, unsentimental guy, and he worried aloud that Obama is a prize fighter who can’t–or won’t–deliver the knockout punch. “Barack wants to win it the way he wants to–with some class–otherwise, what’s the point?” But Hillary just wants to win, and is willing to be as nasty as it takes.

  Time to buy another case of popcorn.

• 58. SEW  |  March 5th, 2008 at 9:38 am

  Great day here in Texas. The train to Denver is ready to go. Barry Snakeoilsalesman doesn’t know what happened to Change and Hope, and Billary thinks her message, whatever that is, has finally been heard. Poetic.

  Let the battle begin. Oh yea, what are we going to do with the disenfranchised “Democratic” voters of Michigan and Florida? Howie, can you still scream? “Democrats” disenfranchising “Democrats”.

  Let every vote count!

• 59. Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche  |  March 5th, 2008 at 10:09 am

  What none of you have concidered while you’re slapping each other on your butts is this……. let’s say Hillary is the Democratic (yes thats how it’s pronounced shortbusers) nominee for president, what if Obama becomes her Vice Presidental running mate? Oh don’t say “no way” just yet because when asked last night neither one of them said a definite no to the prospect. Wow!!! What a unifier for the Democratic (there’s that word again) Party. I’ll conceed that if Obama had won Hillary would have rejected the number 2 spot on the ticket due to her high standing in the Democratic (once again, you should learn it) Party. However Obama as a rising star would have everthing to gain by a number 2 spot and it’s a sure bet he’d assend to the presidency in 8 years.
  I think you guy’s may be laughing at your own presidental defeat. Stay tuned…..

• 60. phnx  |  March 5th, 2008 at 11:33 am

  Nipsy,

  That’s exactly why I’m changing party affiliation to vote for my soulmate Barry Hussein in April.

  I have seen the light, he is the Messiah. The long promised hidden 13th Mahdi. Allua Akbar…Death to AmeriKa

• 61. Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche  |  March 5th, 2008 at 1:39 pm

  Hey phnxy-

  Well at least now we know that Obama isn’t the Antichrist. Rev. Hagee looked into his crystal balls (when’s the last time you think he’s seen them?) and has given Obama the “all clear” on demon posession.
  Whew!!! What a relief…..

• 62. Amanda  |  March 5th, 2008 at 1:43 pm

  Jeremiah,

  From http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_prac.htm:

  “Many polls indicate that the percentage of adults who regularly attend a religious service is about 40% in the U.S., 20% in Canada, and perhaps 10% or less in Europe. But when noses are actually counted, the true figures are about half the stated figures (about 20% in the U.S. and 10% in Canada.)”

• 63. phnx  |  March 5th, 2008 at 2:06 pm

  Nipsy,

  Hagee is an infidel.

• 64. Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche  |  March 5th, 2008 at 3:07 pm

  Wow phnxy-

  Infidel!!

  You know it’s getting harder and harder to tell the difference between you guys and the radical Muslims these days.
  No I’d say Hagee is just your garden variety huckster shmuck selling salvation with a side of hate to innocent, ignorant, scared people. But let’s not forget, he and your guy McCain are BFFs.

  McCain’s screwed up twice in one week and he isn’t even out of the gate yet. This is gonna be too easy.

• 65. CuriousGeorge  |  March 5th, 2008 at 4:30 pm

  I’m going to go out on a limb and say I’m not the only person ever to mis-spell something on this blog.

  It’s “misspell,” idiot…

• 66. phnx  |  March 5th, 2008 at 9:39 pm

  Nipsy,

  You’ve must have me confused with my evil twin. My guy is Barry Hussein, the hidden Mahdi.

• 67. Nietzsche-Is-Pietzsche  |  March 5th, 2008 at 11:13 pm

  Phnxy-

  Yea yea if you want to hand us the election and look like a racist while doing it please keep up that kind of talk.
  You’re only making it easier for us Democrats.

• 68. phnx  |  March 6th, 2008 at 12:00 am

  Nipsy,

  I had no idea that being a Mahdi had racial conotations. I thought it had something to do with religion. Please enlighten me.

Matt Margolis on Twitter