And then they whine and whimper becuse they don’t get respect.

It is a favorite Lefty bleat that outcomes equal policies—therefore, if the Bush Adminstration, for example, fails to capture OBL, it was a policy to let him escape.

Let’s not fall into that simpleminded trap, and claim that it was a POLICY of the Dems to cripple, undermine, and destroy the black family. Those are just the outcomes of what may very well have been the sincere, if misguided, desire to “help” by offering handouts—which destroy the human spirit—and providing subsistence-level support which has morphed into multi-generational dependence on government.

Let’s not claim that the Dems DESIRED to destroy the black family by rewarding illegitimate births and punishing the presence of a man in the household. True, these are the results of the welfare society, but it would not be fair to claim that these were the callous goals of the majority of those who vote Democratic.

The welfare state has been a disaster, a massive failure which has eroded the human spirit of those trapped in it, which has created whole generations of people who are simultaneously dependent and resentful, and created a breeding ground for hostility and hatred.

We know that black people, if given equal opportunty, CAN succeed. We have Michelle and Barack Obama as examples of this, as well as Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice. Yet the first two are revered and the second two scorned, reviled, and attacked by those of their own race.

What is the difference? The first two subscribe to and support a hate-based resentment of white people, while the latter two simply see themselves as human beings, who interact with others as human beings.

I think all we need to do is look at how Condoleeza Rice, for example, is treated by much of the black community to see the true roots of the new racism of this country. Just listen to the vitriol heaped upon her by the Reverend Wright to see what a black person has to represent to be accepted by him and his followers and fellow believers.

Did a CONSERVATIVE come up with the snotty term “Oreo” to describe any black people? Much less the even nastier definition, which is “black on the outside and white in the middle”? Did a Republican decide that being “white” on either the outside or the inside was evil?

Has a conservative sneered at people for simply getting along in a variety of cultures, as those labeled “Uncle Toms” have been by the “black community”?

Come off it, you knee-jerk Lefties. You are trying to defend the indefensible, you are trying to deflect the very true and accurate appraisals of your own movement’s vile racist atitudes by claiming them to be the fruit of conservative philosophies, you are scrambling to try to dodge the fallout from your own positions.

Nice try.

Your denial is not in Egypt

Your half witted replay is too little too late. Its pretty well been universally acknowledge that the Demoncrats were the Confederacy.

And all the BS you want to spout wont change that.

Because its the truth.

I’m sorry this is all so far above your head, js, but that’s your fault, not mine.

Hahaha.

so far you are batting a fat ZERO….

see comment 8 only means you can deny the truth, there is no thunder in that think, its just staynk

See comment #8 and try again, Chuck. Incidentally, you stole Kahn’s thunder from him–that’s usually his line that you just spewed.

Leo: Thanks for confirming just how nuts you are. I held out hope that you were just being hyperbolic, but…sadly, no.

Once upon a time, there were white men in white sheets speaking like that.

Not anymore. Now, its black men, in black suits.

Dont they ever learn?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTBiWxN4BlM

Here is another one of berry husseins supporters.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yM2M11BsA3g

This is pretty scary stuff, and, it appears to be more widespread than most thought.