<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Backs Common Sense Voter ID Law</title>
	<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/</link>
	<description>Where Defeat Is Not An Option</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: InDaVa</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45968</link>
		<dc:creator>InDaVa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45968</guid>
		<description>"The problem comes when you re-engineer from paper to electronic and spend millions doing it and go through all kind of learning curves to realize that you forgot that ballots could be recounted and examined and an electronic vote could not."

LMAO! You, my tired old fartbag pal, are an idiot. Oh, now you are worried about money being spent? To ensure a fair election?

Kahn, I know you didn't even look into Holt's bill. It's about accountability. States can opt-in if they'd like or not. Not confusing stuff but it would make our voting process more secure. I knew it would be too hard for your senile old brain to absorb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The problem comes when you re-engineer from paper to electronic and spend millions doing it and go through all kind of learning curves to realize that you forgot that ballots could be recounted and examined and an electronic vote could not.&#8221;</p>
<p>LMAO! You, my tired old fartbag pal, are an idiot. Oh, now you are worried about money being spent? To ensure a fair election?</p>
<p>Kahn, I know you didn&#8217;t even look into Holt&#8217;s bill. It&#8217;s about accountability. States can opt-in if they&#8217;d like or not. Not confusing stuff but it would make our voting process more secure. I knew it would be too hard for your senile old brain to absorb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kahn</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45891</link>
		<dc:creator>Kahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45891</guid>
		<description>Well yah InDaVa, I can. Paper ballots leave a paper trail. The problem comes when you re-engineer from paper to electronic and spend millions doing it and go through all kind of learning curves to realize that you forgot that ballots could be recounted and examined and an electronic vote could not.


Failure to plan on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yah InDaVa, I can. Paper ballots leave a paper trail. The problem comes when you re-engineer from paper to electronic and spend millions doing it and go through all kind of learning curves to realize that you forgot that ballots could be recounted and examined and an electronic vote could not.</p>
<p>Failure to plan on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indiana Identification Law Flashback &#187; Pirate&#8217;s Cove&#160;&#8212;&#160;Global Warming Rules!</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45875</link>
		<dc:creator>Indiana Identification Law Flashback &#187; Pirate&#8217;s Cove&#160;&#8212;&#160;Global Warming Rules!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45875</guid>
		<description>[...] a reminder from comment #49 by Danish Artist at Blogs For Victory.  Sphere: Related [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a reminder from comment #49 by Danish Artist at Blogs For Victory.  Sphere: Related [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45801</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45801</guid>
		<description>Canadian Observer

I know for a fact that Georgia does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian Observer</p>
<p>I know for a fact that Georgia does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InDaVa</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45755</link>
		<dc:creator>InDaVa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45755</guid>
		<description>"InDaVa - maybe Republicans don’t think that 8 years after 2000, this is an “emergency”. Maybe they’ve seen some states pull back from this direction because it’s a big pain.

But whatever, why don’t you try to figure out why yourself? Did you look into it at all?

Innuendo is enough I guess."

Yes, I have looked into it. Right Kahn, securing the integrity of our electoral process is just too big a pain for Republican's to deal with. A paper trail is a good thing, can't you see that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;InDaVa - maybe Republicans don’t think that 8 years after 2000, this is an “emergency”. Maybe they’ve seen some states pull back from this direction because it’s a big pain.</p>
<p>But whatever, why don’t you try to figure out why yourself? Did you look into it at all?</p>
<p>Innuendo is enough I guess.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, I have looked into it. Right Kahn, securing the integrity of our electoral process is just too big a pain for Republican&#8217;s to deal with. A paper trail is a good thing, can&#8217;t you see that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danish Artist</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45742</link>
		<dc:creator>Danish Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45742</guid>
		<description>Did you know that the plaintiffs in the lawsuit to kill the Indiana picture ID requirement couldn't find any victims? What a tragedy it is when a Democrat can't find a victim. The plaintiffs could not produce one shred of evidence that any legal Indiana resident would be prevented from casting a legal vote by a law requiring a picture ID.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that the plaintiffs in the lawsuit to kill the Indiana picture ID requirement couldn&#8217;t find any victims? What a tragedy it is when a Democrat can&#8217;t find a victim. The plaintiffs could not produce one shred of evidence that any legal Indiana resident would be prevented from casting a legal vote by a law requiring a picture ID.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: js</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45741</link>
		<dc:creator>js</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45741</guid>
		<description>you think its so odd for the dead to vote putz?

they do it in Conneticut...(Following up on the matches, UConn students examined the records of nearly 100 of the suspect voters at 10 town and city halls among those with the most cases. Guilford led the state with 39, followed by West Hartford (17), Enfield (15), Stonington (13) and Norwalk (11).)

and Ohio;

(NewsChannel5 compared the county's voter registration rolls with death records from the Social Security Administration, finding 12,688 people who have died but are still registered to vote.  Many of the dead voters passed away years ago, and a good number of them more than a decade ago)

in Washington State;

(All but two of the dead voters were in King County. Pierce County did not provide voter history despite numerous requests for the records. One dead voter was from Clark County in southwest Washington, and one was from Spokane County. Of the 24, 14 were credited with voting absentee and 10 with voting at the polls. )

and even New York...

(An analysis of state-wide records by the Poughkeepsie Journal reveals that 77,000 dead people remain on election rolls in New York State, and some 2,600 may have managed to vote after they had died. The study also found that Democrats are more successful at voting after death than Republicans, by a margin of four-to-one, largely because so many dead people seem to vote in Democrat-dominated New York City.)

so whats the problem, why cant my gramma vote too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you think its so odd for the dead to vote putz?</p>
<p>they do it in Conneticut&#8230;(Following up on the matches, UConn students examined the records of nearly 100 of the suspect voters at 10 town and city halls among those with the most cases. Guilford led the state with 39, followed by West Hartford (17), Enfield (15), Stonington (13) and Norwalk (11).)</p>
<p>and Ohio;</p>
<p>(NewsChannel5 compared the county&#8217;s voter registration rolls with death records from the Social Security Administration, finding 12,688 people who have died but are still registered to vote.  Many of the dead voters passed away years ago, and a good number of them more than a decade ago)</p>
<p>in Washington State;</p>
<p>(All but two of the dead voters were in King County. Pierce County did not provide voter history despite numerous requests for the records. One dead voter was from Clark County in southwest Washington, and one was from Spokane County. Of the 24, 14 were credited with voting absentee and 10 with voting at the polls. )</p>
<p>and even New York&#8230;</p>
<p>(An analysis of state-wide records by the Poughkeepsie Journal reveals that 77,000 dead people remain on election rolls in New York State, and some 2,600 may have managed to vote after they had died. The study also found that Democrats are more successful at voting after death than Republicans, by a margin of four-to-one, largely because so many dead people seem to vote in Democrat-dominated New York City.)</p>
<p>so whats the problem, why cant my gramma vote too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neocon</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45696</link>
		<dc:creator>neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45696</guid>
		<description>And you say that because the current Democratically controlled House and Senate have been so effective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you say that because the current Democratically controlled House and Senate have been so effective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neocon</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45694</link>
		<dc:creator>neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45694</guid>
		<description>Vote early and vote often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote early and vote often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Powe</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45693</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Powe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/28/supreme-court-backs-common-sense-voter-id-law/#comment-45693</guid>
		<description>neocon,

I know you like to imagine I wrote things that I didn't, but if you reread what I wrote perhaps you'll note that I predicted the Democratic Party gains that are coming in the House and Senate.  The White House is hardly a done deal.  There may be a President McCain but, if we're really lucky (although it's a long shot) Democrats will have 60 Democrats in the Senate to help minimize the destructiveness of a McCain administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neocon,</p>
<p>I know you like to imagine I wrote things that I didn&#8217;t, but if you reread what I wrote perhaps you&#8217;ll note that I predicted the Democratic Party gains that are coming in the House and Senate.  The White House is hardly a done deal.  There may be a President McCain but, if we&#8217;re really lucky (although it&#8217;s a long shot) Democrats will have 60 Democrats in the Senate to help minimize the destructiveness of a McCain administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
