Comments on: Democrats Worried SCOTUS Ruling Could Hamper Their Election Stealing Efforts

By: Vic

Vic — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 07:25:13 +0000

ovulation+calendar

ovulation+calendar

By: scotus

scotus — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:16:50 +0000

[…] if you believe in honest and fair elections, you should be happy about yesterday??s ruling?? But ithttp://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/29/democrats-worried-scotus-ruling-could-hamper-their-election-st…Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer, and Feld: SCOTUS BlogSCOTUSblog is the US Supreme Court weblog, […]

By: Kindra

Kindra — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:51:51 +0000

software

software

By: yesterday

yesterday — Thu, 01 May 2008 16:06:09 +0000

[…] if you believe in honest and fair elections, you should be happy about yesterday??s ruling?? But ithttp://blogsforvictory.com/2008/04/29/democrats-worried-scotus-ruling-could-hamper-their-election-st…Yesterday - Google Books Resultby Fern Michaels - 2001 - Fiction In &quotYesterday&quot, a sultry […]

By: js

js — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:20:02 +0000

only a putz would think that dead people voting is legal…they dont have to violate the hatch act, and they been votin for demoncrats for decades now…just dig up you great grandads corpse and haul him up to the poll station, see if you get away with it…tryin to debate that with putz’s is like puttin tuna on apple pie…

By: OhioOrrin

OhioOrrin — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:01:11 +0000

wait a minute, I wandered into the wrong place.

cause I got my dk, er ck in hand & I’m lookin to buy dat good chinese crap, yes I am!

and don’t ask 4 my ID !

By: SEW

SEW — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:21:58 +0000

Certainly DP never felt motorists needed drivers licenses or registration ID when policing the streets in Richardson. No need for proof of insurance. Right DP? And if not, did you tell them that was OK, or take them to jail, and or issue multiple tickets and take them to jail?

Clearly the Dems want to continue with the voter fraud racket. Clearly Sharpton, Wright and Jackson want to continue with the easy money highly lucrative race card business.

Dem voter fraud must stop.

By: phnx

phnx — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:16:34 +0000

The Diana Powe MO…whenever faced with facts that can’t be refuted…change the subject.

Nice try leftist.

These are allegations against Doan. But that’s not important to you leftists, its the seriousness of the charge that counts, right???

Has she been indicted?…NO

Has Doan been convicted?..NO

Until then deal with the topic of voter fraud at hand or start your own blog…. leftist.

By: Diana Powe

Diana Powe — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:18:19 +0000

phnx,

When there are actual instances of voter fraud, by either party, instead of partisan allegations then, by all means, they should be pursued. It’s called the rule of law which is something that the Administration isn’t generally very interested in if it gets in the way of their partisan agenda. The current example, of course, is the embarrassing firing of Lurita Doan yesterday as head of the Government Services Administration after her Congressional testimony revealed her asking her subordinates after a White House presentation about Republican political prospects in the then-upcoming 2006 election, “How can we help our candidates?” That’s called violating the Hatch Act.

By: phnx

phnx — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:04:38 +0000

There you go ASSuming DP without any basis for you ASSumption.

Polling places are selectyed by the election committee, dominated by DEMS. There are no Repbluican majority districts in Philly so no polling places in “Republican locations” much less, Republican political offices.

So you ASSumption is wrong…again.

The change in the law, which took place in November 2006, AFTER the last election does nothinkn to address poll watcher intimidation. So DEM vote fraud will continue unabated in Philadelphia.

As an law enforcemnet officer, you should be opposed to such egregious breaches in the legal system, which compromise our electoral process.

But then again you are a leftist, so that explains why DEM vote fraud doesn’t faze you.