13 Comments

• 1. Danish Artist  |  May 30th, 2008 at 6:15 am

  How many liberal nitwits have threatened to leave this country if George Bush was elected?

  5 (That I know of).

  How many left?

  ZERO! ZILCH! NADA!

  Wow, these are people with conviction!!!

  What impact will this have on the country?

  ZERO! ZILCH! NADA!

  One less liberal nitwit in this country could only be a positive event!!!

  When liberal nitwits gets banned here, it is always a positive event - sort of like tunning in a radio channel to remove the static white noise.

• 2. William Teach  |  May 30th, 2008 at 9:22 am

  They all understand that they have it good here in the USA. Our Constitution allows them to say completely idiotic things which, in other countries, could get them arrested. Plus, our laws generally keep others from popping the leftist idiots in the nose.

  Plus, so many other countries have requirements that immigrants have skills that will add to the country. Filling out lots of petitions and marching in the streets doesn’t count as a skill.

• 3. neocon  |  May 30th, 2008 at 9:55 am

  I thought Alec Baldwin was going to move in 2004 if Bush won. Anybody have his forwarding address?

  In my opinion, this is just more reason to vote for McCain.

• 4. Pain  |  May 30th, 2008 at 10:09 am

  Keep Ms Sarandon and send the Bush 20% to the third world countries of Our choosing for the next four years. We think that would give them a more global perspective. And the end of that time We, Ourselves, are sure that “party” will not mean so much to them and ideology will be less important than people.

• 5. Mark Noonan  |  May 30th, 2008 at 10:43 am

  Pain,

  You are aware, aren’t you, that in very many Third World countries, especially in Africa, President Bush is viewed as a heroic figure? While you think we don’t know about the world, it is actually you who don’t…you haven’t bothered to pay attention to our new allies in India, Georgia, Djibouti and Eritrea…nor the way people in Africa feel gratitude towards the United States, and our President, for finally taking a real interest in the lives of Africans, and doing genuinely good works amongst them.

  You really should try to learn - ignorance is a terrible thing

• 6. Leftist Nitwit Threatens &hellip  |  May 30th, 2008 at 11:07 am

  [...] Continue Reading [...]

• 7. bull  |  May 30th, 2008 at 11:51 am

  i hope she takes her idiot husband with her. also, sharon stone, alec baldwin, janine garafalo, danny glover, and many many more libs can get out too.

  all those that threatened to move to canada if bush was re-elected, why didn’t you leave? there is still time. take your convictions and go. that way we can get this country back to it’s true greatness. not failued liberal policies.

• 8. Some Assembly Required  |  May 30th, 2008 at 12:26 pm

  I say send her up… Payback for Cliene
  (sp?) Dion in Vegas.

  Also, Sharon Stone… I mean come on. Your really not helping any Blonde stereotypes sweetheart.

• 9. Pain  |  May 30th, 2008 at 12:27 pm

  5. Mark Noonan | May 30th, 2008 at 10:43 am

  Djibouti and Eritrea do not a continent make. And We find it curious that the opinions of third world nations are of importance but nations that had the good sense to stay out of Iraq [France] would appear to be meaningless to you. We do think honestly that if Bush had told the American people we are going into Iraq with 200 000 troops to make it a democracy they would have laughed him out of the White House.
  Ignorance is one thing Noonan, it can be corrected by education willful ignoring of facts in the name of loyalty to ideology is dangerous. We can admit the failings of men like Clinton and Obama or even Spitzer and Jefferson while pundits like you hardly can manage to keep your breath avoiding the truth in such matters you are so embarassed.

  Suzie Sarandon looks smarter everyday; better to leave in November when you can than try to get out the next summer when it could be impossible. Our borders remain open to all, however.

• 10. Mark Noonan  |  May 30th, 2008 at 12:42 pm

  Pain,

  Ever read the resolution for liberating Iraq?

  Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq’s war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

  Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;

  Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;

  Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

  Whereas in 1998 Congress concluded that Iraq’s continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international peace and security, declared Iraq to be in “material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations” and urged the President “to take appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its international obligations” (Public Law 105-235);

  Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and supporting and harboring terrorist organizations;

  Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolutions of the United Nations Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its civilian population thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;

  Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people;

  Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States, including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council;

  Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;

  Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and safety of American citizens;

  Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001 underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist organizations;

  Whereas Iraq’s demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that would result to the United States and its citizens from such an attack, combine to justify action by the United States to defend itself;

  Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 and subsequent relevant resolutions and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten international peace and security, including the development of weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687, repression of its civilian population in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688, and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 949;

  Whereas Congress in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1) has authorized the President “to use United States Armed Forces pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) in order to achieve implementation of Security Council Resolutions 660, 661, 662, 664, 665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677″;

  Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it “supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1),” that Iraq’s repression of its civilian population violates United Nations Security Council Resolution 688 and “constitutes a continuing threat to the peace, security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region,” and that Congress, “supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688″;

  Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act (Public Law 105-338) expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime;

  Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United States to “work with the United Nations Security Council to meet our common challenge” posed by Iraq and to “work for the necessary resolutions,” while also making clear that “the Security Council resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and security will be met, or action will be unavoidable”;

  Whereas the United States is determined to prosecute the war on terrorism and Iraq’s ongoing support for international terrorist groups combined with its development of weapons of mass destruction in direct violation of its obligations under the 1991 cease-fire and other United Nations Security Council resolutions make clear that it is in the national security interests of the United States and in furtherance of the war on terrorism that all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions be enforced, including through the use of force if necessary;

  Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested by the President to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001 or harbored such persons or organizations;

  Whereas the President and Congress are determined to continue to take all appropriate actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such persons or organizations;

  Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40); and

  Whereas it is in the national security of the United States to restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region;

  Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

  SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE.

  This joint resolution may be cited as the “Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq”.

  SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR UNITED STATES DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS

  The Congress of the United States supports the efforts by the President to–

  (a) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions applicable to Iraq and encourages him in those efforts; and

  (b) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions.

  SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

  (a) AUTHORIZATION. The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to

  (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
  (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq.

  (b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION.

  In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection (a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon there after as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that

  (1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either (A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or (B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq, and

  (2) acting pursuant to this resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorists attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

  (c) WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS. —

  (1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION. — Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
  (2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS. — Nothing in this resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.

  SEC. 4. REPORTS TO CONGRESS

  (a) The President shall, at least once every 60 days, submit to the Congress a report on matters relevant to this joint resolution, including actions taken pursuant to the exercise of authority granted in section 2 and the status of planning for efforts that are expected to be required after such actions are completed, including those actions described in section 7 of Public Law 105-338 (the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998).

  (b) To the extent that the submission of any report described in subsection (a) coincides with the submission of any other report on matters relevant to this joint resolution otherwise required to be submitted to Congress pursuant to the reporting requirements of Public Law 93-148 (the War Powers Resolution), all such reports may be submitted as a single consolidated report to the Congress.

  (c) To the extent that the information required by section 3 of Public Law 102-1 is included in the report required by this section, such report shall be considered as meeting the requirements of section 3 of Public Law 102-1.

  Ignorance is a terrible thing, Pain..and one day I hope you’ll actually learn what happened…or, more accurately, unlearn all the lies you’ve come to believe.

• 11. Tractatus  |  May 30th, 2008 at 1:56 pm

  Ignorance is a terrible thing, Pain..and one day I hope you’ll actually learn what happened…or, more accurately, unlearn all the lies you’ve come to believe.

  You just broke the Irony-meter.

  WMD…ties to Al Qaeda…conflating Iraq and 9/11…those things that were proven utterly wrong and that you, after they were proven utterly wrong, say were never offered as reasons to invade Iraq, there they are, right in the text you copied and pasted. Good job!

• 12. Horse Sense  |  May 30th, 2008 at 3:41 pm

  Losing Harvey Korman is sad. We will miss the entertainment and brillance of a truly talented performer. We will miss Harvey Korman.

  Susan Sarandon … who cares? Don’t wait until November, Susan, just go.

• 13. InDaVa  |  May 30th, 2008 at 8:15 pm

  This happens almost every Presidential election cycle.This is just another case of some former hippie saying they’ll leave the country if someone is elected. I say leave now ,and you know she has the loot, as long as she loses US citenzenship as a condition of moving out.