<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Times They Are A-Changing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/</link>
	<description>Where Defeat Is Not An Option</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: carisoprodol</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-81572</link>
		<dc:creator>carisoprodol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-81572</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;carisoprodol&lt;/strong&gt;

carisoprodol soma
. soma carisoprodol
. buy carisoprodol online
. carisoprodol soma
. cheap carisoprodol
. cheap carisoprodol
. cheap carisoprodol
. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>carisoprodol</strong></p>
<p>carisoprodol soma<br />
. soma carisoprodol<br />
. buy carisoprodol online<br />
. carisoprodol soma<br />
. cheap carisoprodol<br />
. cheap carisoprodol<br />
. cheap carisoprodol<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: black and white theme party invitations</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-76880</link>
		<dc:creator>black and white theme party invitations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-76880</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;black and white theme party invitations&lt;/strong&gt;

It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>black and white theme party invitations</strong></p>
<p>It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cities in the united states with most home foreclosures</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-69888</link>
		<dc:creator>cities in the united states with most home foreclosures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-69888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;cities in the united states with most home foreclosures&lt;/strong&gt;

Good Site . Tx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cities in the united states with most home foreclosures</strong></p>
<p>Good Site . Tx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Noonan</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54338</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Noonan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54338</guid>
		<description>jayhay,

Hmmm...no, I'll take the word of black friends of mine who are disgusted with Wright and Pfleger and can't believe that Obama would belong to such a church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jayhay,</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;no, I&#8217;ll take the word of black friends of mine who are disgusted with Wright and Pfleger and can&#8217;t believe that Obama would belong to such a church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danish Artist</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54248</link>
		<dc:creator>Danish Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54248</guid>
		<description>Civil Rights Act voting:

Vote totals
Totals are in "Yea-Nay" format:
The original House version: 290-130   (69%-31%)
The Senate version: 73-27   (73%-27%)
The Senate version, as voted on by the House: 289-126   (70%-30%)

By party
The original House version:
Democratic Party: 152-96   (61%-39%)
Republican Party: 138-34   (80%-20%)

The Senate version:
Democratic Party: 46-21   (69%-31%)
Republican Party: 27-6   (82%-18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:
Democratic Party: 153-91   (63%-37%)
Republican Party: 136-35   (80%-20%)

By party and region
Note : "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.
The original House version:
Southern Democrats: 7-87   (7%-93%)
Southern Republicans: 0-10   (0%-100%)
Northern Democrats: 145-9   (94%-6%)
Northern Republicans: 138-24   (85%-15%)
The Senate version:
Southern Democrats: 1-20   (5%-95%) (only Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0-1   (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45-1   (98%-2%) (only Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia opposed the measure)
Northern Republicans: 27-5   (84%-16%) (Senators Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa, Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Edwin L. Mechem of New Mexico, Milward L. Simpson of Wyoming, and Norris H. Cotton of New Hampshire opposed the measure)

Numbers speak for themselves.  Without Republican support the Democrats did not have enough votes to make it out of either chamber since so many Democrats voted against the measure.

Senators Albert Gore Sr. (D-TN), J. William Fulbright (D-AR), and Robert Byrd (D-WV). Goldwater went on to secure his party's nomination for the presidency, and in the ensuing election, Goldwater won only Arizona and five of the Deep South states, two of which (Alabama and Mississippi) had not voted Republican since the disputed presidential election of 1876. 

Albert Gore Sr., Robert Byrd and J. William Fullbright (Clinton's hero and mentor) voted against????  Impossible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Civil Rights Act voting:</p>
<p>Vote totals<br />
Totals are in &#8220;Yea-Nay&#8221; format:<br />
The original House version: 290-130   (69%-31%)<br />
The Senate version: 73-27   (73%-27%)<br />
The Senate version, as voted on by the House: 289-126   (70%-30%)</p>
<p>By party<br />
The original House version:<br />
Democratic Party: 152-96   (61%-39%)<br />
Republican Party: 138-34   (80%-20%)</p>
<p>The Senate version:<br />
Democratic Party: 46-21   (69%-31%)<br />
Republican Party: 27-6   (82%-18%)</p>
<p>The Senate version, voted on by the House:<br />
Democratic Party: 153-91   (63%-37%)<br />
Republican Party: 136-35   (80%-20%)</p>
<p>By party and region<br />
Note : &#8220;Southern&#8221;, as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. &#8220;Northern&#8221; refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.<br />
The original House version:<br />
Southern Democrats: 7-87   (7%-93%)<br />
Southern Republicans: 0-10   (0%-100%)<br />
Northern Democrats: 145-9   (94%-6%)<br />
Northern Republicans: 138-24   (85%-15%)<br />
The Senate version:<br />
Southern Democrats: 1-20   (5%-95%) (only Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)<br />
Southern Republicans: 0-1   (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)<br />
Northern Democrats: 45-1   (98%-2%) (only Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia opposed the measure)<br />
Northern Republicans: 27-5   (84%-16%) (Senators Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa, Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Edwin L. Mechem of New Mexico, Milward L. Simpson of Wyoming, and Norris H. Cotton of New Hampshire opposed the measure)</p>
<p>Numbers speak for themselves.  Without Republican support the Democrats did not have enough votes to make it out of either chamber since so many Democrats voted against the measure.</p>
<p>Senators Albert Gore Sr. (D-TN), J. William Fulbright (D-AR), and Robert Byrd (D-WV). Goldwater went on to secure his party&#8217;s nomination for the presidency, and in the ensuing election, Goldwater won only Arizona and five of the Deep South states, two of which (Alabama and Mississippi) had not voted Republican since the disputed presidential election of 1876. </p>
<p>Albert Gore Sr., Robert Byrd and J. William Fullbright (Clinton&#8217;s hero and mentor) voted against????  Impossible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tractatus</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54235</link>
		<dc:creator>Tractatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54235</guid>
		<description>Gee, Kahn, I'm kind of disappointed you consider actual history to be "the talking point zombie side." But given your hostility toward education, I'm not surprised. What's the matter, not enough about guns in this subject to get you interested enough to learn about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, Kahn, I&#8217;m kind of disappointed you consider actual history to be &#8220;the talking point zombie side.&#8221; But given your hostility toward education, I&#8217;m not surprised. What&#8217;s the matter, not enough about guns in this subject to get you interested enough to learn about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kahn</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54116</link>
		<dc:creator>Kahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54116</guid>
		<description>Tractatus - sorry, I think for myself. Your side is the talking point zombie side. Thanks for pointing that out.

Now, on with your "chant-of-the-day".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tractatus - sorry, I think for myself. Your side is the talking point zombie side. Thanks for pointing that out.</p>
<p>Now, on with your &#8220;chant-of-the-day&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pansy</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54060</link>
		<dc:creator>Pansy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54060</guid>
		<description>When I was in high school, the principal was a drunken lout who could use the word "pinko" in a sentence without irony.

That was a very long time ago and yet his behaviour seemed hilariously dated even then.

Since we've turned Russia from an impoverished backwater to the greatest gift international organized crime ever received, may we retire the word "pinko"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in high school, the principal was a drunken lout who could use the word &#8220;pinko&#8221; in a sentence without irony.</p>
<p>That was a very long time ago and yet his behaviour seemed hilariously dated even then.</p>
<p>Since we&#8217;ve turned Russia from an impoverished backwater to the greatest gift international organized crime ever received, may we retire the word &#8220;pinko&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djp</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54055</link>
		<dc:creator>djp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54055</guid>
		<description>Many forget that in 1962 George Wallace, eventual 1964 Democrat POTUS candidate, won the governorship of Alabama on a platform of “segregation forever”. 

Indeed, and all those Wallace voters are good old conservatives.  Today they are the GOP base.  That is the success of the Southern Strategy writ large.  In 1980, it wasn't Wallace or Faubus talking about States Rights in Philadelphia, it was Ronald Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many forget that in 1962 George Wallace, eventual 1964 Democrat POTUS candidate, won the governorship of Alabama on a platform of “segregation forever”. </p>
<p>Indeed, and all those Wallace voters are good old conservatives.  Today they are the GOP base.  That is the success of the Southern Strategy writ large.  In 1980, it wasn&#8217;t Wallace or Faubus talking about States Rights in Philadelphia, it was Ronald Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djp</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54051</link>
		<dc:creator>djp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/06/02/the-times-they-are-a-changing/#comment-54051</guid>
		<description>"Democrats have tagged us for years for an alleged “southern strategy” which claims we GOPers were just appealing to racist white Southerners"

"Alleged" - hilarious.  There is nothing in dispute of the southern strategy.  The phrase "Southern Strategy" was coined by GOP pollsters.  Nixon, Reagan, Atwater and to some extent Bush I embraced.  Ken Mehlman apologized for it.  But to mark it is "alleged" - this type of revisionist history is dangerous, because many people do not remember the past personally - even the recent past - so people like mark can make these ridiculous claims and not get laughed out of the room, and then someone who heard the claim, repeats it to others, and that is how these lies propogate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Democrats have tagged us for years for an alleged “southern strategy” which claims we GOPers were just appealing to racist white Southerners&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Alleged&#8221; - hilarious.  There is nothing in dispute of the southern strategy.  The phrase &#8220;Southern Strategy&#8221; was coined by GOP pollsters.  Nixon, Reagan, Atwater and to some extent Bush I embraced.  Ken Mehlman apologized for it.  But to mark it is &#8220;alleged&#8221; - this type of revisionist history is dangerous, because many people do not remember the past personally - even the recent past - so people like mark can make these ridiculous claims and not get laughed out of the room, and then someone who heard the claim, repeats it to others, and that is how these lies propogate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
