<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Abortionist&#8217;s Candidate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/</link>
	<description>Where Defeat Is Not An Option</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danish Artist</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66219</link>
		<dc:creator>Danish Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66219</guid>
		<description>Wow, schwutz,

Thank you for the irrelevant rambling that had nothing to do with what I posted.

The rambling mind is a terrible thing.  Why don't you recover from your drug induced mental coma and try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, schwutz,</p>
<p>Thank you for the irrelevant rambling that had nothing to do with what I posted.</p>
<p>The rambling mind is a terrible thing.  Why don&#8217;t you recover from your drug induced mental coma and try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: js</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66174</link>
		<dc:creator>js</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66174</guid>
		<description>more smoke and mirrors....trying to hide from the truth...that what a whole day of thinking does to conservatives...

and kj...less than 1% of abortions are done for rape victims and child molestation, combined...that means more than 99% of the abortions out there are done to women who gave thier consent to have sex and allowed thier partner to get them pregnant...consent is choice...so essentially...pro choice isnt the right to chose to kill the life you created...it the right to chose not to have sex or to have sex and get pregnant...women are not being denied anything...the only ones being denied right is the human being they created after they consented to have sex...when they chose to murder thier own child....

the way the law stands...abortion on demand is the legalized execution of helpless, living human beings.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more smoke and mirrors&#8230;.trying to hide from the truth&#8230;that what a whole day of thinking does to conservatives&#8230;</p>
<p>and kj&#8230;less than 1% of abortions are done for rape victims and child molestation, combined&#8230;that means more than 99% of the abortions out there are done to women who gave thier consent to have sex and allowed thier partner to get them pregnant&#8230;consent is choice&#8230;so essentially&#8230;pro choice isnt the right to chose to kill the life you created&#8230;it the right to chose not to have sex or to have sex and get pregnant&#8230;women are not being denied anything&#8230;the only ones being denied right is the human being they created after they consented to have sex&#8230;when they chose to murder thier own child&#8230;.</p>
<p>the way the law stands&#8230;abortion on demand is the legalized execution of helpless, living human beings&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neocon</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66045</link>
		<dc:creator>neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66045</guid>
		<description>Frederick darling,

Your presumption that the darkening of skin color will lead to a more "progressive" nation exposes your EXTREME racism and ignorance. 

Seriously, that was the most racist paragraph I have ever read by anybody, and I have archived it to embarrass you at every opportunity. 

The rest of your post just embarrasingly exposes your inferiority complex and your obsession with people better than you.

You really have a lot of internal issues.
Good luck with that
have a hellac day
peace, neocon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frederick darling,</p>
<p>Your presumption that the darkening of skin color will lead to a more &#8220;progressive&#8221; nation exposes your EXTREME racism and ignorance. </p>
<p>Seriously, that was the most racist paragraph I have ever read by anybody, and I have archived it to embarrass you at every opportunity. </p>
<p>The rest of your post just embarrasingly exposes your inferiority complex and your obsession with people better than you.</p>
<p>You really have a lot of internal issues.<br />
Good luck with that<br />
have a hellac day<br />
peace, neocon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Adams</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66037</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66037</guid>
		<description>I have not encountered one 'abortion-is-murder' type, as yet, that was logically and ethically consistent. And of course, nearly every one of them happily supports a war in which many many children have been slaughtered and of course, the death penalty. No problems there. Let me not even open the can of worms argument that Repub. politicos have stripped daycare/family/social programs. In any case, I would have more respect for the 'lifers' if I saw one that actually opposed abortion, war, the death penalty etc. Im only asking for logical consistency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not encountered one &#8216;abortion-is-murder&#8217; type, as yet, that was logically and ethically consistent. And of course, nearly every one of them happily supports a war in which many many children have been slaughtered and of course, the death penalty. No problems there. Let me not even open the can of worms argument that Repub. politicos have stripped daycare/family/social programs. In any case, I would have more respect for the &#8216;lifers&#8217; if I saw one that actually opposed abortion, war, the death penalty etc. Im only asking for logical consistency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredrick Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66023</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredrick Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66023</guid>
		<description>28. Danish Artist  &#124;  July 10th, 2008 at 5:56 am


Earlier in the thread I came across the real issue here for wingnuts and that is sex; their lack of it, guilt about it and poor quality of partners when they finally do luck up and find it. Sex is nothing more than a physical act shared between two people than can result in the production of offspring. It is emotional, passionate, addictive, pleasurable and much, much fun when shared by two consenting adults. Notice that I didn't say anything about sin in that blurb there. That's because sex [and I have to couch this for all the zealots out there so you can understand that I am talking about adults here] between two consenting adults [as you can see I am against all form of sex with minors, yet I remain on the fence about incest as it relates to 1st cousins and step siblings so there's a bone for you to fight over instead of addressing the actual points of my comment] is none of my business or yours or the government's.

At its core this issue is about birth rates, congressional districts and the nation getting more progressive through turning browner every day. It is the march of time my white brothers and sisters! You have had your run and now that huge celestial pendulum with the sharp edges is coming for you and your wives and kids and your McMansions and over limit credit cards. 

Thank you for playing because those kids tow headed you have now will be trading places with the black guy that can't get a job or the Nicaraguan or Puerto Rican being picked up for day labor by 2050. Congress by then no matter how much gerrymandering you do will look like the crowd at an Arena Football game in Philly instead of the crowd eating lunch in the clubhouse grille at Merion. 

That's what you are up against and you know it. This isn't about abortion even though I feel Mark that you are sincere in your religious beliefs and that you do care to save the lives of the unborn. However, in the end this is about white privilege and the sunset on the great run that has lasted since heck 1066! Many historians have predicted an African renaissance in the middle of this century. Maybe that rebirth of the Dark Continent will come from their Diaspora in America reaching out to aid them in exploiting some great new medical cure or that renewable source of energy you are all desperately seeking? 

Who knows? All I do know is abortion really isn't the hook you think it is. This was about who is having kids in stable homes and raising future elites and upper middle class servants of the elites. Now it is a breeding race between whites and minorities as a bloc and your morality is going to cost you that race because while your trailer park tenth is breeding like flies educated white women are looking at the average white guy and laughing. 

Houston you have a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28. Danish Artist  |  July 10th, 2008 at 5:56 am</p>
<p>Earlier in the thread I came across the real issue here for wingnuts and that is sex; their lack of it, guilt about it and poor quality of partners when they finally do luck up and find it. Sex is nothing more than a physical act shared between two people than can result in the production of offspring. It is emotional, passionate, addictive, pleasurable and much, much fun when shared by two consenting adults. Notice that I didn&#8217;t say anything about sin in that blurb there. That&#8217;s because sex [and I have to couch this for all the zealots out there so you can understand that I am talking about adults here] between two consenting adults [as you can see I am against all form of sex with minors, yet I remain on the fence about incest as it relates to 1st cousins and step siblings so there's a bone for you to fight over instead of addressing the actual points of my comment] is none of my business or yours or the government&#8217;s.</p>
<p>At its core this issue is about birth rates, congressional districts and the nation getting more progressive through turning browner every day. It is the march of time my white brothers and sisters! You have had your run and now that huge celestial pendulum with the sharp edges is coming for you and your wives and kids and your McMansions and over limit credit cards. </p>
<p>Thank you for playing because those kids tow headed you have now will be trading places with the black guy that can&#8217;t get a job or the Nicaraguan or Puerto Rican being picked up for day labor by 2050. Congress by then no matter how much gerrymandering you do will look like the crowd at an Arena Football game in Philly instead of the crowd eating lunch in the clubhouse grille at Merion. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s what you are up against and you know it. This isn&#8217;t about abortion even though I feel Mark that you are sincere in your religious beliefs and that you do care to save the lives of the unborn. However, in the end this is about white privilege and the sunset on the great run that has lasted since heck 1066! Many historians have predicted an African renaissance in the middle of this century. Maybe that rebirth of the Dark Continent will come from their Diaspora in America reaching out to aid them in exploiting some great new medical cure or that renewable source of energy you are all desperately seeking? </p>
<p>Who knows? All I do know is abortion really isn&#8217;t the hook you think it is. This was about who is having kids in stable homes and raising future elites and upper middle class servants of the elites. Now it is a breeding race between whites and minorities as a bloc and your morality is going to cost you that race because while your trailer park tenth is breeding like flies educated white women are looking at the average white guy and laughing. </p>
<p>Houston you have a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pain</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66021</link>
		<dc:creator>Pain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66021</guid>
		<description>28. Danish Artist  &#124;  July 10th, 2008 at 5:56 am

 If the Right Wing are not using religion to gain and keep political power from the superstitious masses then how come religion is such a big part of your policies and yet your leaders remain willing to break every religious law in the Bible? 

"It is an eminence front, it is a put on" to quote roger daltrey. Or as your president would incorrectly state "It is appeasement!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>28. Danish Artist  |  July 10th, 2008 at 5:56 am</p>
<p> If the Right Wing are not using religion to gain and keep political power from the superstitious masses then how come religion is such a big part of your policies and yet your leaders remain willing to break every religious law in the Bible? </p>
<p>&#8220;It is an eminence front, it is a put on&#8221; to quote roger daltrey. Or as your president would incorrectly state &#8220;It is appeasement!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danish Artist</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66017</link>
		<dc:creator>Danish Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-66017</guid>
		<description>Max Putz,

just so we are clear....."Thou shall not kill." is a "superstitious religious conviction"??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max Putz,</p>
<p>just so we are clear&#8230;..&#8221;Thou shall not kill.&#8221; is a &#8220;superstitious religious conviction&#8221;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kjstrouble</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-65996</link>
		<dc:creator>kjstrouble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-65996</guid>
		<description>I am usually on the conservative side.  But as a woman, and a rape survivor, I believe that the woman has to have the right to choose up until the fetus is viable outside of the womb.  Want me to change that view?  Develop the technology that allows one woman's unwanted fetus to be removed from her body and placed either in the body of some one who wants the fetus to grow into a child - or into some sort of artificial womb for the same purpose.  We are a technologically advanced society, and you can bet if men were the ones that had to go thru an unwanted pregnancy, this would have happened by now.  

I do not believe that late term abortions should be allowed.  If the fetus has become viable (as is the case in most late term abortions) then the fetus is a baby and should be delivered live.  What the parent(s) do after that (adoption, keeping the child) are their choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am usually on the conservative side.  But as a woman, and a rape survivor, I believe that the woman has to have the right to choose up until the fetus is viable outside of the womb.  Want me to change that view?  Develop the technology that allows one woman&#8217;s unwanted fetus to be removed from her body and placed either in the body of some one who wants the fetus to grow into a child - or into some sort of artificial womb for the same purpose.  We are a technologically advanced society, and you can bet if men were the ones that had to go thru an unwanted pregnancy, this would have happened by now.  </p>
<p>I do not believe that late term abortions should be allowed.  If the fetus has become viable (as is the case in most late term abortions) then the fetus is a baby and should be delivered live.  What the parent(s) do after that (adoption, keeping the child) are their choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Power</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-65981</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-65981</guid>
		<description>One party wants to reduce the number of abortions.

One party wants intrusive government intervention into family planning and to criminalize conduct they disagree with due to superstitious religious convictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One party wants to reduce the number of abortions.</p>
<p>One party wants intrusive government intervention into family planning and to criminalize conduct they disagree with due to superstitious religious convictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neocon</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-65963</link>
		<dc:creator>neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/09/the-abortionists-candidate/#comment-65963</guid>
		<description>Frederick,

So you, as the father, have no right whatsoever, in the decision to have, or not have, the child?

Why then would you ever hold a father responsible, financially or otherwise, to support that child?

Couldn't it be legally argued then that the father, who has no right in the decision process, has no obligation to financially support that decision?

have a terra kind of day
peace, neocon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frederick,</p>
<p>So you, as the father, have no right whatsoever, in the decision to have, or not have, the child?</p>
<p>Why then would you ever hold a father responsible, financially or otherwise, to support that child?</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t it be legally argued then that the father, who has no right in the decision process, has no obligation to financially support that decision?</p>
<p>have a terra kind of day<br />
peace, neocon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
