1. There is not one speck of Iraqi soil that is considered sovereign US soil as our embassies throughout the world are considered.

2. Those embassies that were attacked were not located within active war zones.

just saying
have a hellac day
neocon

Have you ever heard of double negatives?

And the first rule of holes?

peace, neocon

Aside from that there was nothing else of substance in #13, not even the favorite liberal meme of accusing everyone of believing that 9/11 and Iraq are connected.

Serious nhak, I have debated these same talking points for five years now and Diane, or whatever her new name is, continues to spew the same post time and time again. All of you have grown quite repetitious and tedious however, it does expose the absence of any critical or objective thought in those empthy little heads of yours.

Your allegiance to her baseless propaganda should be embarrasing for you……..but I see you wear it with a badge of honor.

gracias
neocon

I will only quickly address #13, as I have to focus on taking from the poor and giving to the rich today. Her post #12 is simply riddled with false premises & propaganda combined with a demonstrable, and laughable hatred for America originating in her obvious indoctrination at a institution of higher education.

dedosinuna’s #13 post is intellectually vaccuous. Her assertion that there hadn’t been an attack on US soil completely disregards the numerous embassy attacks, which are all considered US soil.

Coupled with the attacks on Khobar Towers and the USS Cole and a clear defined pattern starts to emerge, one that the liberals are desperately wanting everyone to ignore.

And if you consider her post #12 to be that of logic and reasoning, you too are then exposed for your laughable ignorance and willingness to buy into propaganda.

have a delusional day
peace, neocon

I know that was your feeble attempt at humor, but it only served to remind everyone why your moniker is so appropos.

de nada
peace, neocon

“…is the same populace they count on to have such wisdom as to elevate an inexperienced candidate to the POTUS.”

I know - his inexperience in the ways of the world, basic geography, history, and foreign policy really make me nervous too. Luckily, there are term limits, so he won’t be running again. Soon, Mr Bush will be going back to Texas.

Ironic, isn’t it?

Also, their ability to regurgitate 5 year old talking points on queue further exposes their willingness to be led, fed and indoctrinated. We need more leaders, and less lemmings.

merci beaucoup
neocon

Do you even follow what your Repug leadership is saying? Turn off Limbaugh, Hannity and O’Reilly for a couple of days. You will get a reality check.

July 13, 2008 “As far as our troops are concerned, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mullen, has indicated we need troops in Afghanistan,” Senator Lugar, the ranking Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, said. “But he has no troops to send to Afghanistan.

To date $661 billion has been spent on operations in Iraq, the country that did not attack us but has oil. About $170 billion has been spent in Afganistan, the country where the terrorist set up training camps with the aid of the government to attack the U.S but has no oil.

This type of statement, heard constantly from the left, is a perfect example of their simple mindedness…they can only think about one issue at a time. They apparently can’t walk and chew gum at the same time and therefore project their handicap on our military, and the administrations.

Its as if the thousands of troops we and our allies have in Afganistan have been in their camps watching soap operas, waiting for the left and the media to “focus” again. What fools.

“Mortimer, where did all the terror related attacks on US interest overseas go and why if not for the war? When was the last time a terrorist attacked a target in the US?”

OK, so the US hasn’t been attacked by terrorists in the 7 years since 9/11 - and you somehow attach great significance to that?

Foreign terrorist attacks have always been extremely rare. Prior to 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq, how many times has the US homeland been attacked by foreign terrorists? Just once: the 1993 bombing of the WTC. After that, we had more than 8 years without a successful foreign terrorist attack here on US soil. So the fact that 7 years have passed since 9/11 without terrorist attacks on the US means nothing. One could happen tomorrow - or one could happen in 10 years. Either way, there is no connection to our having invaded Iraq.

“Yes, there have been a lot of unnecessary deaths in this war on terror, but, by far, the enemy has suffered a much greater casualty rate than the US military and they, not we, are the ones who fired the first volleys. “

We might not have fired the first volleys, but neither did the Iraqis. They had nothing to do with 9/11, so quit implying that the US war in Iraq started on the streets of NY.