<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Media Bias?  Part 116</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/</link>
	<description>Where Defeat Is Not An Option</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cavalor Epthith, Esquire, D.S.V.J.</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67950</link>
		<dc:creator>Cavalor Epthith, Esquire, D.S.V.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67950</guid>
		<description>17. HeyHey  &#124;  July 18th, 2008 at 1:43 pm

 And of course you are correct, ser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>17. HeyHey  |  July 18th, 2008 at 1:43 pm</p>
<p> And of course you are correct, ser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyHey</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67946</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyHey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67946</guid>
		<description>Not sure why my commenting on Media Bias is off topic but I'll say it again.

Again, Obama has been scrutinized for tiny insignificant things while McCain has been getting a pass from the MSM so far. His gaffes, inappropriate comments and downright flip flops go largely ignored by the so called evil MSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why my commenting on Media Bias is off topic but I&#8217;ll say it again.</p>
<p>Again, Obama has been scrutinized for tiny insignificant things while McCain has been getting a pass from the MSM so far. His gaffes, inappropriate comments and downright flip flops go largely ignored by the so called evil MSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyHey</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67939</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyHey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67939</guid>
		<description>Deleted - off topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deleted - off topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treeline</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67784</link>
		<dc:creator>Treeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67784</guid>
		<description>The media covered McCain buying rugs in Baghdad.  What are you talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media covered McCain buying rugs in Baghdad.  What are you talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67770</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67770</guid>
		<description>Actually neocon &#38; nhak,

It was Obama that stated early on he would debate McCain  "anywhere, anytime" and after McCain offer 10 ten-hall style "open forum" meetings with real people asking the questions (R, D &#38; I all included) --Obama quickly flipped..oops, I meant revised or adjusted or whatever today's word for it is --and countered with one on the economy (panel led) on July 4th &#38; the teleprompter only speech (no questions) for later on.

Talk about running scared... 
or good politics on Obamas part because he knows he wouldn't even be invited to Denver following an open debate with McCain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually neocon &amp; nhak,</p>
<p>It was Obama that stated early on he would debate McCain  &#8220;anywhere, anytime&#8221; and after McCain offer 10 ten-hall style &#8220;open forum&#8221; meetings with real people asking the questions (R, D &amp; I all included) &#8211;Obama quickly flipped..oops, I meant revised or adjusted or whatever today&#8217;s word for it is &#8211;and countered with one on the economy (panel led) on July 4th &amp; the teleprompter only speech (no questions) for later on.</p>
<p>Talk about running scared&#8230;<br />
or good politics on Obamas part because he knows he wouldn&#8217;t even be invited to Denver following an open debate with McCain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neocon</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67763</link>
		<dc:creator>neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67763</guid>
		<description>What?

I want more media coverage of Obama, and can not wait to see him refine is Iraq position further after meeting with Patreaus. 

I am sure the KOS kids and MoveOn are awaiting that refinement as well. 

The more Obama is covered by the media, the further he slips in the polls. It's a win-win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?</p>
<p>I want more media coverage of Obama, and can not wait to see him refine is Iraq position further after meeting with Patreaus. </p>
<p>I am sure the KOS kids and MoveOn are awaiting that refinement as well. </p>
<p>The more Obama is covered by the media, the further he slips in the polls. It&#8217;s a win-win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What?</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67756</link>
		<dc:creator>What?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67756</guid>
		<description>Gee, I wonder why he is getting so much coverage?
May be because McCain and the right-wingers have been making it such an issue that Obama had not been to Iraq since 2006. 

If you don't want him to to get media coverage, don't make the issue that will create it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I wonder why he is getting so much coverage?<br />
May be because McCain and the right-wingers have been making it such an issue that Obama had not been to Iraq since 2006. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want him to to get media coverage, don&#8217;t make the issue that will create it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retired Spook</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67752</link>
		<dc:creator>Retired Spook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67752</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Spook, Could you imagine what would happen if conservatives, who like to preach about personal responsibility, actually practiced personal responsibility and instead of blaming their lack of appeal to Americans on a media conspiracy&lt;/i&gt;

nhak, I assume you have statistics to show how Conservatives, as a group, do not practice personal responsibility.  I can only speak for myself, but my entire life has been an exercise in personal responsibility, from paying much of my own way through college by working several part-time jobs to enlisting in the Navy early in the Vietnam War to voluntarily leaving a secure, well-paying job at age 46 (with 2 kids in college) to start a new business (a business I still run 18 years later).  How have you exemplified personal responsibility in your life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Spook, Could you imagine what would happen if conservatives, who like to preach about personal responsibility, actually practiced personal responsibility and instead of blaming their lack of appeal to Americans on a media conspiracy</i></p>
<p>nhak, I assume you have statistics to show how Conservatives, as a group, do not practice personal responsibility.  I can only speak for myself, but my entire life has been an exercise in personal responsibility, from paying much of my own way through college by working several part-time jobs to enlisting in the Navy early in the Vietnam War to voluntarily leaving a secure, well-paying job at age 46 (with 2 kids in college) to start a new business (a business I still run 18 years later).  How have you exemplified personal responsibility in your life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neocon</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67733</link>
		<dc:creator>neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67733</guid>
		<description>When's the next debate? Has Obama decided if in fact he is ready for even one?

neocon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When&#8217;s the next debate? Has Obama decided if in fact he is ready for even one?</p>
<p>neocon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rana Quijotesca</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67727</link>
		<dc:creator>Rana Quijotesca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/17/what-media-bias-part-116/#comment-67727</guid>
		<description>the media favors Obama...  really?  REALLY???
R.E.A.L.L.Y?!?!  Have you actually been following the coverage?  They devote whole segments to one Obama flub and fail to mention a single McCain flip flop (oh, there are several).  Are you guys high???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the media favors Obama&#8230;  really?  REALLY???<br />
R.E.A.L.L.Y?!?!  Have you actually been following the coverage?  They devote whole segments to one Obama flub and fail to mention a single McCain flip flop (oh, there are several).  Are you guys high???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
