NO PROPOSALS FROM THE LEFT ON LOWERING GASOLINE/OIL!!!

IN FACT, they are looking into raising the federal gasoline tax!!! THE LIBERALS ARE ONCE AGAIN BITCHING ABOUT HIGH GASOLINE PRICES AND ARE LOOKING TO RAISE IT EVEN MORE!!! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25751775/

The liberals are saying NO to new oil supplies, new refining, new solar, new wind, new nuclear, new coal, new hydro etc. etc.

What is left? A fantasy power source that is 100% clean and 100% renewable! They want the energy companies (big oil) to research for this “turn lead into gold” technology. - THAT IS WHAT THEY SAY YES TO!

The new tone has done nothing but give liberals chances to F*CK us over into the new century. They spread the word “bipartisanship” around constantly. But to them, bipartisanship means when the right is in charge, they do what we want, anything else is unacceptable.

The problem is that Bush’s Christian roots never went very deep. Jesus taught that every tree is known by its fruit, and the fruits of the Bush presidency have proven mostly bitter. For a more rigorous examination of the Bush presidency (ca. 2004) from a biblical perspective see “Do we Finally Have a Christian Presidency?” http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/DoWeFinallyHaveAChristianPresidency.html

And just what would you call a grandstanding “speach” in Germany? Hardly a fact finding mission.

Obama’s previous support of the DC gun ban doesn’t mesh with his complementary remarks of the SC’s decision.

And I don’t care about campaign finance other than Obama’s sanctamonious stance about it previous to his famous 180.

- 2nd amendment
- FISA
- outlawing late term abortions
- invading [Pakistan]
- Fatih based charities
- dismissing public campaign finance”

-2nd Amendment: I like it
-FISA: Don’t really like it
-Outlawing late term abortions: I like it, I’m against abortions after the first trimester
-invading Pakistan: I don’t think Obama ever advocated a full on “invasion” (like Iraq), but I do support incursions if the Pakistanis continue to sit on their hands.
-Faith Based Charities: I like it if the same treatment is given to secular/atheist charities and the money can’t be used for proselytizing
-dismissing public financing: Don’t really care, McCain has been in violation of his own law for some time now. I also like Obama’s “small donor” approach.

About the “New Tone”… The President has been relatively quiet about things, usually because he tends to look stupid when he opens his mouth, but conservative operatives have been just as nasty as liberal ones these past 8 years. Frankly, I don’t think that anyone on this blog has a foot to stand on when complaining about the tone of politics today.

Got it.
neocon

Used to be that after the election we all took a break from the campaign. Even Reagan and Tipper could sit down for a cold one together after fighting like dogs and cats.

But since the great Rush Limbaugh came along with his high hard on for Clinton and the campaign was extended throughout. Then you throw in Karl Rove who once bugged his own office to make a false claim against a political opponent and we got the same kind of sleaze in the White House. Then when I guy like Scott McClellan finally finds a conscience and tells it like it is and he is thrown to the wolves by the cons - just like the Mafia.

It is clear, if you wish to get a chance at the big show, you had better be ready to take a little and give a little. The American people constantly say they hate the mud but then when the peddler comes around they lap it up like ice cream.

Hopefully, regardless of who gets elected, they will reach out and try to close ranks - after all we are all Americans. But we will have to ignore the Limbaughs of the world whose ratings are fueled by stirring up hate and discord among the population. We have to see him for who he is, an America hater.

You may not be as stupid as I think.

have a nice day
peace, neocon

Has anybody ever read a more reality-detached drama-queen response than this?

Yes, daily. From you.