<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Helps Obama Hide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/</link>
	<description>Where Defeat Is Not An Option</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: test &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New York Times Helps Obama Hide</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68720</link>
		<dc:creator>test &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New York Times Helps Obama Hide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68720</guid>
		<description>[...] Aaron J. Brown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptObama is staking his foreign/military policy meme on a “get out of Iraq, win in Afghanistan” proposal - the narrative will be that Obama will “end” the war in Iraq so that we can, finally, win in Afghanistan and thus repair all the &#8230;   Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aaron J. Brown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptObama is staking his foreign/military policy meme on a “get out of Iraq, win in Afghanistan” proposal - the narrative will be that Obama will “end” the war in Iraq so that we can, finally, win in Afghanistan and thus repair all the &#8230;   Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hermie</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68718</link>
		<dc:creator>hermie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68718</guid>
		<description>Remember Mark, that when goals have been met or are within reach, the libs move the goalposts and pretend their original goals never existed.

Sort of like bringing gas prices down from those 2006 amounts of $2.50/gal with a 'comprehensive energy plan'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember Mark, that when goals have been met or are within reach, the libs move the goalposts and pretend their original goals never existed.</p>
<p>Sort of like bringing gas prices down from those 2006 amounts of $2.50/gal with a &#8216;comprehensive energy plan&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Noonan</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Noonan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68670</guid>
		<description>cam,

We've defined success again and again and again...you just don't like success in Iraq, so you say we haven't defined it. 

And, no, I won't define it again - some months back I defined it for the very last time here on this blog.  Look it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cam,</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve defined success again and again and again&#8230;you just don&#8217;t like success in Iraq, so you say we haven&#8217;t defined it. </p>
<p>And, no, I won&#8217;t define it again - some months back I defined it for the very last time here on this blog.  Look it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tractatus</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68665</link>
		<dc:creator>Tractatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68665</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I really tend not to listen to people on current events who have been proven wrong on all past events.&lt;/i&gt;

So you don't listen to yourself or your fellow wingnuts, then? Good to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I really tend not to listen to people on current events who have been proven wrong on all past events.</i></p>
<p>So you don&#8217;t listen to yourself or your fellow wingnuts, then? Good to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cam</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68658</link>
		<dc:creator>cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68658</guid>
		<description>The surge appears to have acheived some success.  At least the relative calm that is being reported happened after the surge.  However, the long term effect of the surge has yet to be determined.  Further, the actual cause and effect relationship between the two has not been established.  There certainly are other explanations for the relative calm in Iraq.  The insurgents and militias may have decided to try a different tact, that is to wait out the eventual withdrawal or reduction of American forces.  It may be a case of "keeping the powder dry"  Regardless it is amazing that over a period of 5 years the conservatives said we should hold judgement on this war but now that there has been a couple of months of relative calm they quickly call it success.  Sounds similar to "Mission Accomplished"

And still, no one has defined success in Iraq and no one who talks about success has any idea about what to do next.  While they propose that this was all about democracy. At the moment that anyone like Al Maliki tries to exercise it the chorus of "you owe us" and "we'll leave when we are good and ready" betrays the real motives here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The surge appears to have acheived some success.  At least the relative calm that is being reported happened after the surge.  However, the long term effect of the surge has yet to be determined.  Further, the actual cause and effect relationship between the two has not been established.  There certainly are other explanations for the relative calm in Iraq.  The insurgents and militias may have decided to try a different tact, that is to wait out the eventual withdrawal or reduction of American forces.  It may be a case of &#8220;keeping the powder dry&#8221;  Regardless it is amazing that over a period of 5 years the conservatives said we should hold judgement on this war but now that there has been a couple of months of relative calm they quickly call it success.  Sounds similar to &#8220;Mission Accomplished&#8221;</p>
<p>And still, no one has defined success in Iraq and no one who talks about success has any idea about what to do next.  While they propose that this was all about democracy. At the moment that anyone like Al Maliki tries to exercise it the chorus of &#8220;you owe us&#8221; and &#8220;we&#8217;ll leave when we are good and ready&#8221; betrays the real motives here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neocon</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68652</link>
		<dc:creator>neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68652</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis Rana,

I consider all polls to be essentially worthless, but our resident liberals consider them to be gospel (oops, maybe a bad choice of words), especially if those polls support their position. 

So I thought I would throw this poll out to see what responses I received. You did not disappoint.

Thanks
neocon

P.S. And re: your "simplification" of the surge. I really tend not to listen to people on current events who have been proven wrong on all past events.

And if you're suggesting that our military was just an unexpected benficiary of other events that turned the tide in Iraq, then you are definitely drinking the kool aid.

bottoms up
peace, neocon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis Rana,</p>
<p>I consider all polls to be essentially worthless, but our resident liberals consider them to be gospel (oops, maybe a bad choice of words), especially if those polls support their position. </p>
<p>So I thought I would throw this poll out to see what responses I received. You did not disappoint.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
neocon</p>
<p>P.S. And re: your &#8220;simplification&#8221; of the surge. I really tend not to listen to people on current events who have been proven wrong on all past events.</p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re suggesting that our military was just an unexpected benficiary of other events that turned the tide in Iraq, then you are definitely drinking the kool aid.</p>
<p>bottoms up<br />
peace, neocon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Conservative</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68648</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68648</guid>
		<description>I wrote a great article about this on my blog 
http://www.thenewconservatives.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a great article about this on my blog<br />
<a href="http://www.thenewconservatives.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenewconservatives.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rana Quijotesca</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68640</link>
		<dc:creator>Rana Quijotesca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68640</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/21211/what-mccain-gets-wrong-about-the-surge-and-iraq/" rel="nofollow"&gt;You should read this with an open mind&lt;/a&gt;; I know you won't but it was worth a try...  The main crux of the article is that saying that the surge was entirely (or even mostly) responsible for the current situation is a gross simplification, considering the sheer vastness of variables involved.  In fact, Nouri Al-Maliki &lt;a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzNhYTJmMmUyOTViM2FmNWFkYTJkOTQ5MjIzZmYzYTU" rel="nofollow"&gt;doesn't give the surge any credit for the reduction in violence&lt;/a&gt;.

Interesting question:  What would the conservatives on this site advocate if the Iraqis asked us to leave by 2010 (regardless of the situation on the ground)?

Neocon, if there was anything that Ron Paul taught us, it's that internet polls are essentially worthless, because some people have nothing better to do than spam polls with votes for their candidate.  For example, I voted once, cleared my cookies, and voted again...  In fact, any self-respecting statistician (I assume they exist) would laugh if you tried to use that poll as evidence for an argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsweek-blogitics/21211/what-mccain-gets-wrong-about-the-surge-and-iraq/" rel="nofollow">You should read this with an open mind</a>; I know you won&#8217;t but it was worth a try&#8230;  The main crux of the article is that saying that the surge was entirely (or even mostly) responsible for the current situation is a gross simplification, considering the sheer vastness of variables involved.  In fact, Nouri Al-Maliki <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzNhYTJmMmUyOTViM2FmNWFkYTJkOTQ5MjIzZmYzYTU" rel="nofollow">doesn&#8217;t give the surge any credit for the reduction in violence</a>.</p>
<p>Interesting question:  What would the conservatives on this site advocate if the Iraqis asked us to leave by 2010 (regardless of the situation on the ground)?</p>
<p>Neocon, if there was anything that Ron Paul taught us, it&#8217;s that internet polls are essentially worthless, because some people have nothing better to do than spam polls with votes for their candidate.  For example, I voted once, cleared my cookies, and voted again&#8230;  In fact, any self-respecting statistician (I assume they exist) would laugh if you tried to use that poll as evidence for an argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neocon</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68638</link>
		<dc:creator>neocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68638</guid>
		<description>Dennis,

I like McCains chances really well.

Posted on Sunday, July 13, 2008 3:29:41 PM by jveritas

In the ongoing AOL straw poll McCain is winning 50 states and 64% of the popular vote. Almost 200,000 people have voted so far. 

Here is the link: 

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/07/07/aol-straw-poll-july-7-14


In addition I will say only that your opinion is duly noted, but it is just that, an opinion. And you know what they say about opinions. 

And current events just don't support your worldview. Granted, the post war startegy was woefully deficient, but the surge and diplomacy have turned things around rather nicely. So for you to continue to trump a 4 year old liberal meme is just irrelevant and quite frankly embarrasing. 

have a nice day
peace, neocon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>I like McCains chances really well.</p>
<p>Posted on Sunday, July 13, 2008 3:29:41 PM by jveritas</p>
<p>In the ongoing AOL straw poll McCain is winning 50 states and 64% of the popular vote. Almost 200,000 people have voted so far. </p>
<p>Here is the link: </p>
<p><a href="http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/07/07/aol-straw-poll-july-7-14" rel="nofollow">http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/07/07/aol-straw-poll-july-7-14</a></p>
<p>In addition I will say only that your opinion is duly noted, but it is just that, an opinion. And you know what they say about opinions. </p>
<p>And current events just don&#8217;t support your worldview. Granted, the post war startegy was woefully deficient, but the surge and diplomacy have turned things around rather nicely. So for you to continue to trump a 4 year old liberal meme is just irrelevant and quite frankly embarrasing. </p>
<p>have a nice day<br />
peace, neocon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68637</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogsforvictory.com/2008/07/22/new-york-times-helps-obama-hide/#comment-68637</guid>
		<description>Neocon, as someone with connections to the Middle East going back decades I had heard more about Saddam's atrocities in the 70s than most Americans had just before the present Iraq war. His genocide against the marsh Arabs was as heinous as his more well-known atrocities. The list really is quite long. Having spent time in Afghanistan I was also editorializing against the Taliban well before most people had heard their name, back when the world was fixated on Bosnia. 

I and others advocated concerted and forceful international action to bring these extremists under control long before you or Noonan ever cared about them. Those with a background in Middle Eastern affairs knew it would take international action.

Bush came along with neither a clue about the enemies of civilization or the limitations of his own ignorance, and even less the limitations of military power disconnected from diplomacy. After 9/11 he had a chance to outdo his daddy in war. He got Saddam and good riddance - but in so doing unleashed forces he was completely unprepared to deal with. He opened Pandora's box and every other damnable thing flew out. Some of us saw these things coming - we wanted the actions taken to be mindful and effective, not wantonly destructive, as they have been.

The Bush administration has epitomized the concept of moral relativism to a degree unprecedented by any other American presidency. As for the chest thumping right-wing chauvinists here, I don't think they even understand the definition of the term. 

As for Fareed Zakaria of Newsweek, he was an advocate of the Iraq war from the start. I have taken his opinions with a chunk of salt ever since. However much all the opponents of Bush's war have been proven correct it is consistently the original supporters of it whose stars have risen, and Zakaria is no exception. So I fail to see why you should have a problem with his credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neocon, as someone with connections to the Middle East going back decades I had heard more about Saddam&#8217;s atrocities in the 70s than most Americans had just before the present Iraq war. His genocide against the marsh Arabs was as heinous as his more well-known atrocities. The list really is quite long. Having spent time in Afghanistan I was also editorializing against the Taliban well before most people had heard their name, back when the world was fixated on Bosnia. </p>
<p>I and others advocated concerted and forceful international action to bring these extremists under control long before you or Noonan ever cared about them. Those with a background in Middle Eastern affairs knew it would take international action.</p>
<p>Bush came along with neither a clue about the enemies of civilization or the limitations of his own ignorance, and even less the limitations of military power disconnected from diplomacy. After 9/11 he had a chance to outdo his daddy in war. He got Saddam and good riddance - but in so doing unleashed forces he was completely unprepared to deal with. He opened Pandora&#8217;s box and every other damnable thing flew out. Some of us saw these things coming - we wanted the actions taken to be mindful and effective, not wantonly destructive, as they have been.</p>
<p>The Bush administration has epitomized the concept of moral relativism to a degree unprecedented by any other American presidency. As for the chest thumping right-wing chauvinists here, I don&#8217;t think they even understand the definition of the term. </p>
<p>As for Fareed Zakaria of Newsweek, he was an advocate of the Iraq war from the start. I have taken his opinions with a chunk of salt ever since. However much all the opponents of Bush&#8217;s war have been proven correct it is consistently the original supporters of it whose stars have risen, and Zakaria is no exception. So I fail to see why you should have a problem with his credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
