Is Senator DeMint a Blogs for Victory Reader?

Posted by Mark Noonan in Republicans, Senate on April 29th, 2009 at 11:13pm with 10 responses.
Tags: , .
Click here to get Caucus of Corruption: The Truth About The New Democratic Majority by Matt Margolis and Mark Noonan.

We report, you decide:

First, quoting myself:

I’d rather have 30 Senators I can rely on than 60 Senators who are in it for themselves…

Now, Senator DeMint (R-SC):

I would rather have 30 Republicans in the Senate who really believe in principles of limited government, free markets, free people, than to have 60 that don’t have a set of beliefs.

Or is it that great minds think alike? Or perhaps that there’s room for one more rock solid conservative Republican in the Senate? For now, I’ll just congratulate Senator DeMint on the sheer brilliance of his remark.

Thank you for visiting Blogs For Victory. If you enjoy our content, please consider making a donation to help us cover the costs of our servers.



Mark Noonan is co-author (with Matt Margolis) of Caucus of Corruption: The Truth About The New Democratic Majority. He also blogs at Nevada News and Views. Follow Mark on Twitter.

10 Responses to “Is Senator DeMint a Blogs for Victory Reader?”

  1. lucas says:
    April 29, 2009 at 11:33 pm

    I’ve always thought that people in the media and on the big scene have been monitoring this Blog. There’s a lot that goes on down here.

    So no surprise really. And yes, I think Mr. DeMint may have been reading and this quote came to the fore-front from his subconscious. He picked a good line to pick up on in any case. It’s a good statement, hands down.

  2. guyincognito says:
    April 29, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    Mark,

    I’m amazed at your capacity to the extract the wrong conclusions from unfolding events.

    Here’s hoping that you and Senator DeMint get what you want.

  3. Mark Noonan says:
    April 30, 2009 at 1:57 am

    guy,

    You forget that we are Christians – we win, in the End.

    What we are here to do is the right thing and allow the ultimate fate to be decided by God…we’re not here to get along because the editorial page of the New York Times says we must…

  4. Mark Noonan says:
    April 30, 2009 at 1:58 am

    lucas,

    It isn’t the first time I’ve seen one of my points hit the Congress or the MSM 24-48 hours after I made it…could all be coincidence, of course, but this one was too close to pass up.

  5. fmrmarine says:
    April 30, 2009 at 9:19 am

    Mark

    i have heard a few conservative talk radio shows say things along the same lines that are posted on BFV and thought Hmmmmm>

    The amount of trolls that post on this relatively small blog is telling.
    Also they ALL ignore certain threads entirely, while swarming others with multiple posts all in lockstep, and spouting nothing but donkRAT speaking points………coincidence? I think NOT!!

  6. fartotheright says:
    April 30, 2009 at 12:13 pm

    guy, I am at your capacity for making asinine statements. If I where you I’d not even waste my time posting if I thought what you thought. I am just venting my irritation with asinine trolls like you, that’s why I am posting. OK now I’ve vented, I am good now.

  7. casper says:
    April 30, 2009 at 12:23 pm

    I guess this proves it, Senator DeMint is really js02.

  8. fartotheright says:
    April 30, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    casper, LOL, are your trying to be funny?

  9. joeboston says:
    April 30, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    casper, LOL, are your trying to be funny?
    ———–

    C’mon… that was pretty humorous. I got a chuckle.

    Mark, congrats, you’ve been (almost) quoted. Good for you.

    From the comments on this blog on who you guys want to “purge” from the GOP, 30 senators would be a stretch. It would be more of about 12-15.

  10. cluster says:
    April 30, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    This reminds me of Buckley’s statement:

    “I’d rather be governed by the first 2000 people in the Boston phone directory, then by the 2000 people on the Harvard faculty.”