Comments on: National “Keep Your Kid at Home Day”

By: ricorun

ricorun — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:23:13 +0000

Dasein: I think we’re all in debt to Gabby Johnson for stating what needed to be said.

Who could argue with that? Lol! H/T neocon1.

By: declinetosate

declinetosate — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:15:33 +0000

So, the controversial speech was today. Which parts could be considered as harmful for our kids to have heard?

By: jeremiah06

jeremiah06 — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:49:06 +0000

Children have been exposed to leftist indoctrination for years, and years and years …. no secret!! And that’s how we got a Communist President today.

Obama hopes the children will go home and try to change Mommy and Daddy’s mind, because he is der “leader.”

Well, it’s really not necessary for him to change minds, as most of their mommies and daddies are atheist liberals anyway … so it comes natural to them, because the majority of them came from the same school-of-thought that he and his czars did also.

So most of he damage has been done … but we don’t need anymore Democrats or Barack Obama adding to it.

By: Count d'Haricots

Count d'Haricots — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:35:59 +0000

Cracker-croaker,

Rahverit!

By: neocon1

neocon1 — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:32:45 +0000

rico

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke5Mr5eCF2U

By: ricorun

ricorun — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:07:21 +0000

Perhaps I am remiss, but does anyone know what Dasein (aka Count) is talking about?

By: Count d'Haricots

Count d'Haricots — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:00:27 +0000

Now who can argue with that? I think we’re all in debt to Gabby Johnson for stating what needed to be said. I am particularly glad that these lovely children are here today to hear that speech. Not only was it authentic frontier gibberish, it expressed the courage little seen in this day and age.

By: ricorun

ricorun — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:49:00 +0000

This sophomoric sarcasm from the committed leftist that claims the very sight of a weapon will inspire someone to kill the president. What a poltroon.

The fact that it was knowledgeably stated doesn’t exactly make the inductive “logic” involved any less sophomoric.

Be that as it may, then there’s this from notalwaysright (what an apt nic) … I guess since Chairman Mao had his “Little Red Book” it is reasonable for Obama to have his “Little Red School house”. I wonder if Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Tojo, Nero (you get the picture) ever delivered a rant to such a large targeted segment of their populations.

I suppose if you consider it carefully enough, one could argue that there is a fine line between induction and projection. But I don’t see any fine lines here.

By: neocon1

neocon1 — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 18:15:21 +0000

notal

No but they would if they could have.
It is the first step og big bro’s indoctrination, get them hooked young keep them locked up forever.

By: notalwaysright

notalwaysright — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:33:00 +0000

I guess since Chairman Mao had his “Little Red Book” it is reasonable for Obama to have his “Little Red School house”. I wonder if Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Tojo, Nero (you get the picture) ever delivered a rant to such a large targeted segment of their populations.