It’s In The Bill: Taxpayer-Funded Abortions


Click here to get Caucus of Corruption: The Truth About The New Democratic Majority by Matt Margolis and Mark Noonan.

If you were to ask a pro-abortion rights Democrat during an election year what their position on the controversial issue was, they’d probably say “I believe in a woman’s right to choose, but I think the number of abortions should be reduced,” or some variation of that. That little caveat at the end is meant to hide their true, radical abortion views.

The problem is, they do everything in their power to increase the numbers of abortions by making abortions easier to get (even for minors) and easier to pay for.

I’m always reminded of the pro-abortion rights slogan “Keep your laws off my body,” “Keep the government out of my bedroom,” or something stupid like that. So, it amuses me to no end that these pseudo-libertarian baby killers have no problem with the government’s involvement with abortion when it comes to paying for them.

Health care reform should not be used as an opportunity to use federal funds to pay for elective abortions. Health reform should be an opportunity to protect human life – not end it.

Unfortunately, Speaker Pelosi’s 2,032-page government takeover of health care does just that.  On line 17, p. 110, section 222 under “Abortions for which Public Funding is Allowed” the Health and Human Services Secretary is given the authority to determine when abortion is allowed under the government-run plan.  The Speaker’s plan also requires that at least one insurance plan offered in the Exchange covers abortions.

What is even more alarming is that a monthly abortion premium will be charged of all enrollees in the government-run plan.  It’s right there on line 16, page 96, section 213, under “Insurance Rating Rules.”  The premium will be paid into a U.S. Treasury account – and these federal funds will be used to pay for the abortion services.

So, not only does the House version of Obamacare include taxpayer-funded abortions, the government has the power to determine “when abortion is allowed.” So, you’ve got the government back in the bedroom, and you got the laws ”controlling” your body, etc. etc.

I think even the most ardent pro-abortion rights individual ought to be able to see that the government (read: taxpayers) should not be funding abortions. All it does is put the government in control of the very things the pro-abortion crowd claims to be against.

Thank you for visiting Blogs For Victory. If you enjoy our content, please consider making a donation to help us cover the costs of our servers.




Matt Margolis is co-author (with Mark Noonan) of Caucus of Corruption: The Truth About The New Democratic Majority. He also blogs at The Buffalo Bean. Follow Matt on Twitter.


37 Responses to “It’s In The Bill: Taxpayer-Funded Abortions”

  1. ohioorrin says:

    as an indie, I support a woman’s right to chose…w/in limits.

    but I do NOT support taxpayer funded abortions excepting for the health of the mother.

  2. aztec says:

    Much to your chagrin, abortions are a legal medical option and should be included in any health care system. Don’t try to use the government to shove your religious beliefs down our throats.

  3. kmg1 says:

    The way it is set up, if an individual wants coverage for abortion, they pay an extra, separate premium. That is why the money is set aside in a separate account. It keeps it segregated from all other funding, so that service is paid entirely be premiums. Also, from what I’ve read while at least one plan in the exchange must offer abortion coverage for those willing to pay extra, there must also be at least one plan that does not offer any abortion coverage.

  4. neocon1 says:

    aztec

    Don’t try to use the government to shove your religious beliefs down our throats.

    Back at ya…..

    Dont try to shove YOUR atheistic pro murder, and sodomy down ours through the government.

  5. cluster says:

    No worries,
    This bill isn’t going anywhere thanks to one courageous Democrat:

    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/56677

  6. aztec says:

    Neo, Abortion is not murder, never was. I’m certainly not a sodomite and you know nothing of my religious beliefs. Do you always assume you know so much based on so little?

  7. neocon1 says:

    aztec

    by GODS law abortion IS murder, if you do not believe that you are NO Christian, but a person deceived by the spirit of the age.

  8. kjstrouble1 says:

    Neo, get off of it. Your belief is that abortion is murder, but that is not the law of the land. While I believe in choice, I also believe that restrictions on choice should be left to the states. I look at abortion law as a state’s right area, not something the federal government should decide on.

    As for government funding – no way. If you are making the choice to have an abortion, it should not be funded by tax dollars because so many disagree with this choice.

    BTW – I have a problem with ANY MAN having a say in this choice – until you guys are the ones going thru the pregnancy, you don’t get to make the decision!!!!!!!!

  9. aztec says:

    Neo, That’s your interpretation of God’s law. When did he put you in charge?

  10. ufgators says:

    if you do not believe that you are NO Christian

    Yes, they still pay taxes even if they are not Christian. I support their spiritual decisions.

  11. neocon1 says:

    kjstrouble1 says:
    November 5th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    Neo, get off of it. Your belief is that abortion is murder, but that is not the law of the land. While I believe in choice,

    There are many things that are legal and yet an affront to God.

    1 Corinthians 6:9-10 “Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.”

    Galatians 5:19-21 “Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.”

  12. jeremiah06 says:

    Exodus 20:13 – “You shall not murder.”

  13. js02 says:

    kjstrouble1 says: November 5th, 2009 at 6:01 pm “Neo, get off of it. Your belief is that abortion is murder, but that is not the law of the land”

    who put you on a throne of BS…abortion IS murder…ask ANY DOCTOR…ANY NURSE…and MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL…if abortion kills a living human being…

    the only thing you prove is that you are about the dumbest libtard around about…

  14. js02 says:

    aztec says: November 5th, 2009 at 6:02 pm Neo, “That’s your interpretation of God’s law. When did he put you in charge”

    there’s another mental midget playing cowboy…you ever heard of nature?taking a life, any life, means you kill it…even yours…just laws exist to protect the innocent…the law of nature tells us to protect our children…this is the way of life…been that way for ever libtard…

    men cannot change Gods law…and they CAN NOT CHANGE NATURE…

    not even people like you…no matter how many libtard lies you repeat…you can NOT change the truth…and no man can be compelled to follow an unjust law…this was what the declaration of independence was all about you idiot…so that mental mdigets like you dont destroy the world

  15. js02 says:

    aztec says: November 5th, 2009 at 1:47 pm “Much to your chagrin, abortions are a legal medical option and should be included in any health care system. Don’t try to use the government to shove your religious beliefs down our throats.”

    dont pull that libtard BS here…THERE IS NO US CODE GUARANTEEING THE RIGHT TO KILL YOUR OWN CHILDREN…period…its NOT a legal medical option…because the LAWS DUTY is to protect the INNOCENT…not the WHORES WHO CANNOT CONTROL THIER LIBIDO…and its not a religious topic…the RIGHT TO LIVE, and the RIGHT TO LIFE…is GURANTEED UNDER OUR CONSTITUTION

    so go suck on your libtard rhetoric where other libtards will wail over your libtard lies…because it just doesnt work in real life…

  16. tiredoflibbs says:

    ““Neo, get off of it. Your belief is that abortion is murder, but that is not the law of the land””

    Really? It seems the courts will say otherwise.

    Then why are many people serving life sentences or are on death row convicted FOR TWO COUNTS OF MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE when they murdered a mother and HER UNBORN CHILD.

    Mark Peterson comes to mind. Look them up, they are all over the country. If you are too lazy to do so, then you are an ignorant fool who chooses to stay that way.

  17. neocon1 says:

    kjstrouble

    - until you guys are the ones going thru the pregnancy, you don’t get to make the decision!!!!!!!!

    REALLY??
    It takes two to tango, seems you “girls” have NO problem making a guy PAY child support for 18-21 years, but have no say with KILLING the CHILD.

    KEEP YOUR legs closed and end the problem.
    liberalism is a mental disorder.

  18. neocon1 says:

    tired

    when they murdered a mother and HER UNBORN CHILD.

    BINGO,
    funny little fact to get into the way eh?

    (scott peterson)

  19. tiredoflibbs says:

    hey neo,

    thanks for the correction scott not mark peterson.

    notice the moochers’ response……

    what?

    I can’t hear anything but deathly silence.

  20. cam1 says:

    Mark,
    I assume you have private health care insurance now. Do you hold back a portion of that to display your displeasure with insurance companies that pay for abortion?

    Can I get a big refund for cost of the Iraq War to which I was opposed?

  21. js02 says:

    the only thing you get is ignored cam1…gee…such is the life of a stooge eh?

  22. cam1 says:

    js,
    I went to Mass last week and heard people talking about this very thing. It made me wonder why the Catholic Church would take such a position on this topic but ignore those other government policies with which it disagrees.

  23. Mark Noonan says:

    cam,

    I’m unaware of any private insurer who pays for elective abortion.

  24. cam1 says:

    So Mark,
    Sounds like you are paying for it now?

  25. Mark Noonan says:

    kmg,

    Guttmacher is a fanatic, pro-abortion group and if you actually read their wording, you can see how utterly bogus their assertion is.

  26. kmg1 says:

    Do you mean this wording?

    •The Guttmacher Institute’s federally supported study, assessing levels of insurance coverage for a wide range of reproductive health services, found that 87% of typical employer-based insurance policies in 2002 covered medically necessary or appropriate abortions; the data can be found in Table 1 here.

    ◦Importantly, the 87% of plans that covered abortions did not include plans that offered abortion coverage only in very limited circumstances (such as rape and incest, or to protect the woman’s life). Only a very small number of respondents offered such limited coverage, and they were not included in the study’s findings.

    ◦The study queried all large insurers (with at least 100,000 enrollees) and a random, nationally representative sample of small insurers.

    ◦Importantly, the 87% of plans that covered abortions did not include plans that offered abortion coverage only in very limited circumstances (such as rape and incest, or to protect the woman’s life). Only a very small number of respondents offered such limited coverage, and they were not included in the study’s findings.

    ◦The study queried all large insurers (with at least 100,000 enrollees) and a random, nationally representative sample of small insurers.

  27. kmg1 says:

    For some reason part of it pasted twice.

  28. kmg1 says:

    Whether it is 48% or 87%, it is clear that it is a common practice for health insurers to cover offer coverage for abortion. In fact, I believe Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Nevada offers coeverage for RU-486.

    Do you even know what your provider covers, Mark?

  29. js02 says:

    The reality is this stooge…if health care providers were required to insure that the recipients were fully aware that they supported abortions by putting that information in plain language…the heath care horizen would be substantially affected…

    but as far as BCBS goes, im sure you will find the following exclusion listed in every one of thier policies”

    “Services, drugs, or supplies related to abortions, except when the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term, or when the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest;”

    so no, your pro-death stance isnt covered there…

  30. kmg1 says:

    So you are in favor of RU-486. Good to know.

  31. js02 says:

    nice try stooge