Liberal Fascism and the Culture of Death
Tags: Culture of Life, liberal lies.
Click here to get Caucus of Corruption: The Truth About The New Democratic Majority by Matt Margolis and Mark Noonan.
Come together in this amazingly anti-human article:
The “inconvenient truth” overhanging the UN’s Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world.
A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days…
…The fix is simple. It’s dramatic. And yet the world’s leaders don’t even have this on their agenda in Copenhagen. Instead there will be photo ops, posturing, optics, blah-blah-blah about climate science and climate fraud, announcements of giant wind farms, then cap-and-trade subsidies.
None will work unless a China one-child policy is imposed…
What is the “one child” policy? It is a policy which mandates forced abortions and sterilization once you’ve had one child per couple. It would “work”; there would be a lot less people around. But are there really too many of us?
The author notes that we’ll reach 9 billion people by 2050 – and “unsustainable” number, in her view. Left out – because it doesn’t fit with a hate-filled, anti-human screed – is the fact that population growth rates, currently about 1.22%, are expected to fall to 0.33% by 2050. Also left out is the fact that some estimates have global population at 7.4 billion in 2050…this if the reduction in the birth rate continues on as current (and there’s no indication of a change in this pattern). Further left out is the projection that population could be 500 million less in 2100 than it was in 2000.
The truth about human population is that the Culture of Death has already seized hold of us – birth rates are dropping like a rock all around the world and most of Europe already has a birth rate lower than replacement. But voluntary suicide isn’t enough – when you really, really hate yourself and the human race, you want more positive measures. So, a one-child policy naturally commends itself.
All of this is, of course, utter nonsense. We’re not overpopulated now. We won’t be overpopulated in 2050. We can never actually overpopulate the world. Breed like mad and without any sense at all and we’ll still not be able to overcome the amount of land and resources available. Current global population density for the land area of the world is about 118 per mile. Japan’s is 874; and Japan is not exactly and environmental basket case. Put 42 billion people on earth and we still won’t have the population density of Japan. Anyone out there think that we’re ever going to reach 42 billion? 20 billion? Heck, even 10 billion? My bet is on the low end of population projections, given that even a here to for fertile nation like Mexico is only an ace away from being below replacement in fertility.
Some of the nations which are already below replacement level include Tunisia (just in case you think all Moslem nations breed like rabbits), China, Germany, Brazil, Japan, Poland (just in case you think Catholic countries are immune), New Zealand and Puerto Rico. Among the nations which will probably shortly fall in to the negative are Iran, United States, Vietnam, Turkey and Indonesia. The most fertile nation on earth is Niger – one of the three nations which have a birth rate of 7 or more per child. My great-grandparents had 14, and that wasn’t unusual a century ago; so, 7 really isn’t all that much in the grand scheme of things. Keep in mind that each nation which falls below 2.1 children per couple can only maintain its current population by immigration – but even the nations which supply the immigrants are drying up.
Our problem is no longer how to deal with growing population, but how to prepare ourselves for a world which will have a declining population. Don’t tell this to the Culture of Death people, however, because it would upset them – if they can’t promulgate new ways to murder the innocent, their whole day is wrecked.
Thank you for visiting Blogs For Victory. If you enjoy our content, please consider making a donation to help us cover the costs of our servers.Mark Noonan is co-author (with Matt Margolis) of Caucus of Corruption: The Truth About The New Democratic Majority. He also blogs at Nevada News and Views. Follow Mark on Twitter.
15 Responses to “Liberal Fascism and the Culture of Death”
Caucus of Corruption
This population control falls right in line with them being able to control that the “right” people are being born as well.
It won’t stop there either. Once you get total control of birth you can then move on to take over how LONG a person should be allowed to live.
Insanity! It’s insane to believe CO2 is raising the temperature of the planet to catastrophic levels. It’s insane to believe science, that can’t accurately predict the temperature next week, can predict global climatic conditions fifty years from now. It’s insane to suggest we dramatically lower global lifestyles based on the musing of those who, in their arrogance and greed, claim to know the unknowable. There are simply too many variables.
It’s insane to believe we can insure 30 million uninsured American without increasing costs let alone bend the cost curve downward. It’s insane to believe we can cut 50 million from Medicare without diminishing the quantity and quality of care provided to the elderly. It’s insane to believe a government who’s given us Social Security, Medicare, earmarks, the Post Office, and our current school system, just to name a few, can find efficiencies to make up a fifty cent cut let alone fifty billion.
It’s insane to award the Noble Peace Prize to man whose greatest achievement to date is getting himself elected. It’s insane to award the Noble Peace Prize, the Oscar and a Grammy to Al Gore. However, we expect like this from Hollywood and we’re increasing less surprised when they come from Norway these days too.
In short, those on the left are pie-in-the-sky insane!
Isn’t one of Barry’s czars notorious for promoting mandatory sterilizatio, even for finding a way to to it secrectly so people would not realize they were being sterilized?
It’s all part of that elitist “The proles aren’t smart enough to make the big decisions so we need to make them for them” mentality.
re: the ignoble peace prize: It was bad enough that it was awarded, after The One had been president for only 11 days. It was worse when he actually flew to Norway to ACCEPT it—he didn’t even have the decency to say what we all are thinking, that it was a travest. And then while there he dissed the King of Norway by turning down an invitation.
I thought this guy was the secret to rebuilding failed American status around the world. I don’t think Michele did much to further that, pawing the Queen of England, or Barry by giving Her Majesty his Greatest Hits iPod, and Sarcozy is already disenchanted, as is Merkel.
That cowboy’s looking better all the time…..
right
it is insane to say there is No God.
It is insane to follow the murderous cult of islam.
it is insane to elect a man who had zer0 experience, was a known marxist, cult following racist.
Too many people on the planet, according to the commies. Okay. Let them put their money where their mouths are; anyone who agrees with this needs to kill themselves, for the sake of Mother Gaia. Seems pretty reasonable to me.
Amazona, in post #3 you are referring to John Holdren, the Science Czar. Holdren also pushed the Global Cooling nonsense back about 20 years ago, and was of the firm belief that we would have completely run out of natural resources by now, would be living stacked like cordwood, and would have resorted to cannibalism by now.
Holdren is also a contributor to the Climategate e-mails, advocates the same kind of forced abortions mentioned in the article, and was previously a science advisor to Bill Clinton.
It’s clear now, as if it wasn’t already, that these lunatic czars, the arguments regarding vetting…are all pointless. The problem isn’t with the lunatics, it’s with the lunatic giving them power: Obama himself. Vetting process? Ridiculous. Does anyone truly believe that a schmuck like me, in the privacy of my own home, can find all these things out about ANY of Obama’s cadre, and yet he, with the FBI, CIA, and all the rest of the alphabets under his command, has no idea or the means to find out what his buddies have done?
Horse pucky. He knows damn well what these people are about. HE AGREES WITH THEM. Firing Van Jones, or Holdren, or Jennings, or Dunn isn’t going to make a damn bit of difference; it’s just treating a symptom or two while the disease itself runs rampant. Hopefully 2010 will prove to be the first round of Chemo; let’s hope the patient survives that long.
tfmo, I could not agree with you more. Any feeble effort to pretend that Obama simply missed the ‘quirks’ of his appointees is tramsparently false. These people were chosen because they reflect Obama’s vision for his “transformation” of the nation.
The speed and thoroughness with which Obama has increased the power (and funding) of the Executive Branch is amazing. Congress is impotent, the Complicit Agenda Media will not report it, the nation at large is ignorant, the critics are savaged in coordinated efforts to silence them through ridicule, intimidation, and other Lefty tactics—-this is a socialist revolution, and just because it is, so far, bloodless doesn’t make it any less a hostile takeover.
The Left-wing faction of America is not changing anything much, abortion became legal under man’s ruling in 1973 in America despite God’s ruling which states emphatically ‘no.’ The left is just merely building on the change that had already taken place in the 60’s to early 70’s. Some might remember the infamous names of Herbert Marcuse, Margaret Sanger, Madeline Murray O’Hair. Mr. Marcuse is one, btw, that taught in some of our major colleges and universities, during which time the student revolution broke out. Madeline Murray O’Hair, was akin to the terrorists whom are gaining access to our judicial system. Margaret Sanger a Malthusianist was akin to Satan himself going hither and yonder deceiving people constantly without ever letting up
Those three had profound and very evil influence on our country. How Americans did not see the danger of them and stop them is beyond my understanding. Now we have to stop all their recruits, but I don’t if that’s going to be an easy task, every school in the country has adopted their way of thinking, and there are millions who have been brainwashed by them. So, it’s malthusian eugenics, elminate the human race, full speed ahead, and off the cliff we go into the deep dark valley below. I think liberals should adopt this philosophy for their own families instead of forcing everybody else to abide by it.
Some folks, those that are searching for light in this dark world of liberalism, would be happy…it would seem… to hear something new and different than the evil that communist liberals have spread far and wide in almost every country.
That one child policy is a threat to to the Right far greater than nuclear weapons. Maybe you guys out to try “breeding camps.”
sadie,
actually that one child policy will do wonders for those on the government dole.
One child on welfare rather than 2-8 is a plus.
But please, continue to post your irrelevant BS. It is amusing to see you make a fool of yourself, yet again.
most people exercise their own population control.
sadieforker
Maybe you guys out to try “breeding camps.”
I think tijuana has a few we could send you to, to train the mules.
I wonder if the author of that article will give up one of the TWO children she has.
That is the other part of liberals, they want things done by others, just don’t hold them up to the same rules.
sadie is so determinedly ignorant, s/he/it does sometimes provide some humor.
In fact, demographicially speaking, the Left has to import people and then find ways to give them the vote, even illegally, as they are not reproducing enough to sustain their numbers.
It is the Left that kills off its own young out of pathological selfishness and ego, and it the Left which tends to have one child, if any. The Right, with its inherent value of human life, reproduces more than the Left.
So the one child attitude would mean the eventual disappearance of the Left, if they can’t figure out how to continue allowing a flood of illegals into the country and then giving them citizenship, or ways around that requirement, along with government goodies, to assure their support at election time.
This is also another reason the Left is so passionate about substituting political indoctrination for education—-they must find recruits when they are too young to realize the utter stupidity of the movement.