Tag Archives: Rick Santorum

Santorum Drops Out

Blogging from my phone here, so I can’t speak much yet, but please discuss the latest development in the primary.

UPDATE, by Mark Noonan:  CBS has the story.  Santorum was my guy from back when he was polling 0.005% in the Iowa polls.  I never thought he’d get as far as he did and he remains, in my view, the best possible person we could have picked in 2012.  But, such is not to be – congratulations to Mitt Romney for a superbly run primary campaign and I look forward to enthusiastically supporting Romney for the rest of the campaign.   Obama is doomed and America will be rescued.

The GOP Debate

I’m afraid I took the Mrs out to dinner, so I missed the majority – but Ann Althouse is live-blogging it and Stephen Green is drunk-blogging it.  So, we’re pretty well covered.

I have to say that I’m not terribly interested in these debates…mostly because the only sort of debates I like are those where the candidates ask each other questions.  With such a large number of candidates, I’d have them draw names at random out of a hat (after having drawn numbers out of a hat to decide who goes first).  It’d be a lot more interesting and a lot less scripted than the way debates are done now…and a lot more fun to watch.

The most important thing to remember is that any of the candidates would be a better President than Obama and any one of them can beat him.  I’m still leaning towards Bachmann (she’s right about vaccines in the sense that everyone should decide for themselves and their children on them…but wow wrong on falling for the old scam story that vaccination causes autism) but I’m not absolutely sold on any candidate.  Even Romney is rising in my estimation of late…seems that all the pressure being brought from the right is forcing him on to more conservative ground; that’s good.  My favorite of all favorites is still Sarah Palin and if she gets in, I’ll immediately be an enthusiastic and horribly biased backer of her candidacy…with the proviso, of course, that whomever gets the nomination will also wind up with my enthusiastic and horribly biased support (of course, my double-plus favorite of all favorites is Bobby Jindal…but he ain’t running…he’s holding off until 2016 if we lose next year, or 2020 if we win; and he’s very much young enough to wait).

Anyways, did any of you watch the debate?  What did you think?  Anyone land any punches?

GOP Debate

Stanley Kurtz over at NRO’s The Corner gives it to Perry:

This was a very successful debate debut for Rick Perry. It confirms his position as the leader of the field. As of now, this race is a Perry-Romney duel, but Perry’s the one to beat. Romney and Perry were well matched tonight, but Perry’s appeal to the base means he’s got a leg up over Romney just by fighting to a draw, which he did at least, if not better…

It seems to be the consensus that Perry did well – which means a Perry win because it was his first time out and he didn’t blow it.  As for me, I do believe that Perry’s entry in to the race immediately ensured that Romney would not be the nominee…even if Perry doesn’t end up making it, he’s sure to take a good portion of Romney’s support, thus causing Romney to come up short when the votes start to be counted. The big question is whether or not the second tier candidates can take advantage of the Romney/Perry dogfight…while the two big boys battle it out a clever Bachmann or Cain stealing their clothes and heading off to early primary wins?  We shall see.

 

Run, Sarah, Run!

Real Clear Politics has a link to the Palin speech today as well as several quotes – this is the most important part:

…On crony capitalism: “So many of them, they arrive in Washington, DC of modest means and then miraculously throughout the years they end up becoming very, very wealthy. Well, it’s because they derive power and their wealth from their access to our money, to taxpayer dollars.”

“They use it to bail out their friends on Wall Street. And their corporate cronies. And to reward contributors. And to buy votes via earmarks. There is so much waste. And there is a name for this. It’s called ‘corporate crony capitalism,’” she said.

“Like you, I’m not for sale. I believe in the free market and that is why I detest crony capitalism. And Barack Obama has shown us cronyism on steroids. It will lead to our downfall if we don’t stop it now.”…

She gets it – whether by insight or careful study, she understands the basis of what is wrong…we’ve got a self-perpetuating Ruling Class which has fastened itself upon American society.  They are like colonial overlords, or a visitation…they are not organically connected to us, but they rule us and bleed us dry so they and their hangers-on can prosper.  Unless and until we get rid of them, we won’t be able to restore America.

The people who run our system of government and economics will always stand in the way of reform for the simple reason that any reform will eject them from power.  There is no way that those who leech off the American people will voluntarily give up their place at the  trough.  They will have to be forced out – by peaceful, political revolution.  Sarah Palin understands this – so, to be sure, do Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain and Rick Santorum.  But Palin has the national name recognition and the instant ability to raise hundreds of millions of dollars as well as mobilize an army of volunteers.

In spite of all the excellent qualities in the current GOP primary field – and whomever gets the nomination will get my enthusiastic support against Obama – my view is that Sarah Palin is the best option for the GOP in 2012.  Palin is the embodiment of the true American spirit…the self-reliant, hard working, family-orientated, ardently Christian core of America.  She is the sort of person who crossed the oceans to found America, and who then tamed a continent, built a democratic republic and made America in to the most powerful and generous nation in human history. We can get that America back – but only by revolution.  Of all the candidates Palin is not only most likely to do this, but she has the ability to run that long, difficult race which will be necessary for a revolutionary to win the GOP nomination and beat Barack Obama.

So, run, Sarah, run.  Become the leader of the revolution and let’s restore America.

Santorum Claims Iowa Momentum

From the Santorum Campaign:

Former Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) far exceeded expectations in Ames and finished 4th in the Ames Straw Poll.

Today’s results were simply vindication for Senator Santorum’s belief that a clear, consistent and proven conservative record resonates with Americans. Outspent in Iowa by more than six to one in comparison to his nearest competitors, Senator Santorum showed that leadership trumps showmanship and that the American people deserve more than just television commercials, news conferences and empty promises…

Santorum has a point – he certainly wasn’t expected to do well in Iowa…a northeastern politician who was little known in Iowa managed to come in fourth (he certainly did better than Romney…another northeasterner who was beaten by Perry, who only announced on Saturday).

We’ll see if Santorum can build on this – he’d probably have to come in third, at least, in the Iowa caucuses to be taken seriously…and then he’d have to come in second in New Hampshire.  That is a high bar – he’ll have to outdo Paul’s legion of dedicated supporters while taking voters away from Pawlenty.  In New Hampshire, Romney is almost certain to win (and if he doesn’t, then he’s done), so the contest is for second place…if Santorum can do that, then he’s off to the races.  Not the nominee, by a long shot, but it would vault him in to the top tier of candidates.

It is still anyone race to win – Romney, Perry and Bachmann are the heavyweights; Santorum is one of the second tier candidates, all of which have their chances to break in to the top.  We have a very strong field of candidates, only two of which give me grave concerns should they be the nominee – Huntsman (was Obama’s ambassador, after all) and Paul (love him on economics, consider him completely wrong on foreign and defense policy).  Any one of them will get my vote and enthusiastic support against Obama because the safety of the United States requires that Obama leave office on January 20th, 2013.

UPDATE:  MN GOP wants Pawlenty to run for Senate.  That is an exceptionally good idea.  Doesn’t guarantee us a Senate seat from Minnesota, but ensures that the Democrats will have to fight tooth and nail to keep Klobuchar’s seat…and, of course, Pawlenty has already shown he can win State-wide in Minnesota.

Changing the GOP Gay Debate

I didn’t watch the GOP debate – took the wife out to dinner and looked over ultra-sound photos of one of two coming grand children (one coming in September, another in February).  This seemed to me a better use of my time – I tend not to like debates, at all, because they run to the absurd…and when you’ve got more than two candidates up there, just more absurd.  A debate should be between two candidates who ask each other questions.

I’ve read some of the after-action reports and it looks like no one hit it out of the park – which is to be expected, as its impossible to score big when you’ve got that many people up there.  Bottom line for the GOP is that any of the candidates are vastly superior to Obama, if on nothing else than they are all, to greater or lesser degree, in touch with reality while Obama is waaaay the heck out there in liberal fantasy-land.  But one thing did interest me as I read the after-action reports – a linked article from NBC:

Santorum continues anti-gay rhetoric, takes shot at Bachmann, rest of field

Rick Santorum today finally wrapped up his 50-city tour de Iowa.

He continued to press anti-gay views, saying that calling same-sex marriage a marriage would be like calling a cup of tea a basketball.

He repeatedly quoted a study that families do better in heterosexual marriages. Though that study actually uses the phrase “nuclear” family, which can include same-sex couples…

This is what passes for a news report – pure, unadulterated editorializing.  It would pass entirely un-noticed had it been a Daily Kos entry.  But since it is an MSM report – and thus a DNC press release, as it were – it tells us what the MSM/DNC wants…a big debate about social issues, with the GOP cast in the usual role of bigots.

What the report calls “anti-gay” views by Santorum are, or course, just bedrock, Catholic/Christian views on sexual and marriage matters.  Any sex outside marriage is inherently disordered, and as marriage is meant for the formation of integral families with the potential for naturally born children, same sex couples cannot licitly participate in it.  You can disagree with these views, but to call them “anti-gay” is to be a liar.  This, of course, is something no person of the left has a problem with…using situational ethics, it is ok to lie as long as it advances your cause.  By calling them “anti-gay” and thus implying a nasty bigotry to Santorum – and, by extension, all conservative GOPers – the MSM/DNC is showings its hand…cook up a case of bigotry against the GOP, set GOPer against GOPer on the issue and then allow Obama to portray himself as the voice of reason (and remember, Obama will not jettison his official opposition to gay marriage until after the election…until then, he’s still opposed but is “growing” and “studying” and being just one heck of a reasonable guy).

The key for the GOP in defusing this and turning it to our advantage is not to engage directly on the gay marriage issue – or, indeed, any of the contentious, social issues.  Our job is to point out the general moral collapse in our society and lay the blame for it squarely where it belongs – on liberal Big Government.  The riots in Britain give us the perfect opportunity to turn this debate firmly our way – we can point out that decades of welfare, moral relativism and general societal disintegration have led Britain to a place where welfare bums riot, the police are scared to act and anyone who tries to defend his life and property is at risk of arrest.  This is where the liberals are leading us – and if we want to avoid this trap then we need a firm, moral leadership which will insist that everyone pull their weight, that everyone live up to their moral responsibilities and that we start putting pressure on the purveyors of filth to stop it.

Think about how it is now – we rat bastards in the GOP have to stand athwart that nice, gay couple the MSM/DNC will highlight.  We have to tell Jack and Fred, who have been in a relationship for 20 years, that we won’t allow them to marry…and the narrative will be that it’s just because we’re nasty and cruel.  The truth of the matter is that gay marriage is a symptom, not the bedrock problem.  The real problem is that we’ve got moral decay which has led us to the point it seems reasonable that gays should marry…just as it seems reasonable that millions of able bodied should be on disability; just as it seems reasonable that illegitimacy is common; just as it seems reasonable pornography is easily available…one bit of social decay after another, but each individually something which is hard to combat.  Lump them all together and demonstrate where they are leading us, and it becomes a clear problem and an issue we can win on.

Leave aside the details, deal with the broader issue.  Take on what is overwhelmingly wrong rather than trying to attack each separate manifestation of societal decay.  Remember, we need a revolution to fix America – its gone way past bit by bit reform.  The whole socio-politico-economic system needs to be revamped from top to bottom.  Getting tangled up in small time details just plays in to the left’s hands…it allow them to attack us as bigots while the truth is that they need to be condemned as destroyers of America.