Posts with the tag 'YouTube'

The Sad State Of The Conservative Blogosphere

This blog post was a long time coming. With the disastrous election behind us, the conservative blogosphere has an opportunity to play a role in delivering the Republican Party out of the wilderness… if we’re up to the challenge. Right now, however, I don’t think we are.

2004 was a good year for us, but it has been downhill ever since. The conservative blogosphere has become a series of self-serving cliques rather than a movement-serving community.

Back in 2004, we were all united because we had the same goal, and we worked together to achieve it. But now conservative bloggers, unable to duplicate the fundraising prowess of the left-wing blogosphere, have made their objective to try to recreate the party in their own image from the top down rather than by true grassroots buildng from the bottom up..

Conservative blogging used to be about building community. But it has become something that is elitist, DC-centric, and contrary to grassroots empowerment.

Look at some of the top blogs we have on the right… they’re run by people who are in the business of politics… I know and like many of them, but so far I haven’t seen huge successes from their work. I do applaud their efforts to help the party, and admire their dedication… I am just not convinced the current approach will help the cause. For instance, there are weekly “Conservative Blogger Briefings” and conference calls that I and many other bloggers are invited to, but if you live outside of the Washington DC area or have a full time job, you can’t take part in them. Even if you could, I have failed to see how they’ve helped the movement.

As the founder of Blogs For Bush, one of the most successful blogs during the 2004 presidential campaign, I have been effectively shutout because I don’t live in Washington DC and don’t blog full time for a living. Other successful blogs and bloggers have moved down the path of conglomeration… not so much to serve the movement but to serve their own ambitions and egos. Blogging for them is a business venture.

We were destined as a community to fail our party’s nominee when we made the primary season the quest to find the next Ronald Reagan. While the Democrats were pretty much united around one of two candidates, we were divided amongst all all of ours. And look at the result. Turnout this year was virtually the same as 2004 despite the huge operation Obama had. This means that given the huge deficit McCain had in the popular vote compared to Bush in 2004, too many decided that since McCain didn’t score high enough on the “Ronald Reagan Scale” that they weren’t going to help him win. There is more unity in the conservative blogosphere when we want to punish Republicans for not being conservative enough.

Whether it was blog posts about protest votes for a third party candidate or not wanting to make calls for GOTV, the conservative blogosphere just kept demonstrating that the impossibly high standard they set for McCain was enough reason to use their power to prop themselves up as arbiters of conservatism, rather than to encourage their audience to vote for the one man who could stop the Orwellian nightmare that Obama has promised to create.

And from the look of things they still don’t get it.

Perhaps my clout in the conservative blogosphere isn’t what it used to be, and none of the people who should read this will take my critique seriously because I am not a former campaign worker or some other blogger never bought me out to write for their own blog, but I did create something that worked back in the day, and while blogging has changed over the years, the formula for success has not changed so much.

Here is what I think the conservative blogosphere needs to do to get back on track:

Get Local

This is an example of what the right should be doing more of, and this is an example of what the right should be doing less of. All politics is local and it doesn’t matter what I, a blogger in New York, says about about a congressional race in California or a gubernatorial race in Washington…

I run two local politics blogs, Hub Politics for Massachusetts (though my brother really runs it now), and The Buffalo Bean for Western New York, and I can tell you that it is much easier and more effective to engage your own community and cover races that impact you than it is to proselytize from a nationally oriented blog about a race with local issues that you can’t fully grasp since you don’t live there. By getting local you can establish connections with your local party leaders and even local media. We got to get our heads out of Washington and back into our states and congressional districts. The bloggers/activists trying to reorganize the party now have things upside down because they think they can rally a movement around a single site with a top-down approach.

High-traffic nationally oriented blogs can’t keep on assuming they will have the same impact as a local citizen journalist who builds up a following in their district, region, or state. They have a role to play, tey just got to understand what it is.

Promote Candidates, Not Your Own Agenda

Again, more of this and less of this. I am sick and tired of conservative bloggers wasting time and effort on the wrong things. Trying to influence who is chosen for leadership positions in the Senate or who becomes chairman of the party are the wrong battles. We can be far more effective uniting behind good conservative candidates than we can in pretending that leaders already in Washington give a damn that a few bloggers with big egos signed a statement telling them what they should do. We don’t need to waste time telling them they need to better harness the internet, either. No one cares about what is on GOP.com (or their sad excuse for a blog) and the party isn’t going to revolutionize itself by using Twitter. How many of you have done your part to make one of the NRSC’s YouTube videos go viral, or visited and linked to one of the NRCC’s microsites?  The party will either figure out how to do things rght or thoy won’t… but we are on the frontlines of iternet based campaigns… so let’s get our act together before we tell them how they should do things.

As, bloggers, we’re not even using the internet as effectively, so we shouldn’t pretend like we have the magical answer for the party. Recent attempts to create conservative alternatives to ActBlue have been failures. RightRoots.com died (rightfully so) and Slate Card raises only a fraction of what left-wing counterparts do. If we can’t beat them by copying them, we need to try a different approach.

Focus On Rebranding and Redefining Our Image

Our ideas haven’t been rejected, we just allowed ourselves to be falsely defined by the Democrats. During this presidential campaign, Obama hid a radical agenda behind empty rhetoric and slogans. So, we need to realize that Obama’s presidential campaign didn’t win, his marketing campaign did. If we can’t effectively communicate our message then it doesn’t matter that our ideas are better. We need to redefine our image and bring back those voters who have been duped into thinking that Democrats actually give a damn about helping them. We need to be creative in our presentation and realize we are a selling a product. And for a product to outsell the competition it first needs a good marketing campaign. Superior products that don’t get exposure eventually don’t get off the ground… We, as conservatives have the superior product, we just aren’t marketing it right. So, let’s put our egos aside and help rebrand the party instead of wasting our time remaking it with pointless lists and mission statements.

Unite Ourselves

The conservative blogosphere is not united. We’re motivated more by self-promotion than by advancing conservatism. Get over it. Let’s help each other win back this country. No one blog is the answer. A bottom-up grassroots network is what we need. We can do it if we are committed to the cause.

 

There, I have said my piece. I don’t know what other conservative bloggers will say. They may not notice or acknowledge what I’ve said. They may think I am totally wrong. Maybe I am. But I don’t think so. Maybe I will be welcomed into the dialogue, maybe I will be blacklisted. Who knows?  I guess we’ll find out soon enough.

UPDATE: Future assessments of conservative blogging to be posted here.

24 comments November 10th, 2008

Democrats On John McCain

18 comments August 9th, 2008

Ron Paul Fumbles on Glenn Beck

I didn’t see all of the interview, but I did catch the part where Ron Paul advocated abolishing the IRS. And wasn’t impressed with Ron Paul’s response.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ohglJS3ltM 350 350]

Hey, the idea sounds great to me. But, as I was watching, I was struck by the fact that when Beck asked Ron Paul what would replace the IRS — a flat tax, a national sales tax, or something else — Ron Paul really had no answer. He basically said he didn’t want it replaced with something else or with more spending. Here’s the video:

His response to “What is your proposal?” was weak. Paul basically said he had no proposal. “Anything would be better.” Well, that’s great, but that doesn’t solve the problem, or answer the question about how the federal government would get tax revenues to pay for the things it’s suppose to.

Michael Illions over at Polipundit noted that Ron Paul looked uncomfortable at this point, and I have to agree, but I’m not sure whether it was because Glenn Beck was fawning over his desire to abolish the IRS, or if it was because he had no plan to explain what he believes the federal government should do to generate revenue to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States.

16 comments December 19th, 2007

More Post-Debate Fallout For CNN

CNN continues to get more flak for their screening practices… and even more obviously Democrats/liberal questioners have been discovered

Also interesting is that the Republican CNN/YouTube debate was the most-watched debate yet.

106 comments November 30th, 2007

CNN/YouTube Debate

Watching? Feel free to discuss.

UPDATE: Well, that was a rather disappointing debate. Not because of the answers (though some were better than others) but many of the questions selected were awful. So many were loaded questions or presumptuous. I got the impression that there were some that weren’t even submitted by Republican voters (the target audience) and that was annoying. Still, the Republican candidates certainly demonstrated once again that they can handle a debate in unfriendly territory, with some lousy questions, and a crappy moderator. Meanwhile, Democrats are still too chicken to participate in a debate on FOX News.

I didn’t see the Democrats’ CNN/YouTube debate, so I can’t compare the two. So, if anyone here did watch both, I’d like to hear about the differences.

The most ridiculous moment of the debate was when the openly gay retired Army Colonel asked his question about the Republicans’ positions on gays in the military and lo and behold, after the candidate gave their answers, we learned the guy was actually in the audience, were he was given the chance to say whether or not he was satisfied with the answers. Of course he wasn’t. And we know why…

Apparently he is connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

It turns out that Keith Kerr, retired Colonel., U.S. Army; retired Brigadier General, California National Reserve, who submitted a YouTube question about gays in the military, is actually a member of Hillary Clinton’s Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transexual Americans For Hillary Steering Committee. He’s also part of a film production crew trying overturn the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy.

I’m not sure what the rules of the debate were, and if only Republican voters were supposed to submit questions, but having someone involved in the Hillary campaign not only ask a question, but be granted a unique chance to explain whether or not he was satisfied with the responses, was either the result of severe sloppiness or bias on CNN’s part.

The exchange on waterboarding and torture was interesting. McCain’s personal experience with torture made it impossible for anyone to assertively disagree with him on the issue of waterboarding. Romney could have handled it better though. While his point about not laying out what forms of interrogation will and will not be used on captured terrorists, what was really missing was the point that waterboarding is not torture.

The Cheney cartoon? Give me a break.

I can’t really say who I felt won or lost, since I did miss some parts of the debate. Each had their good moments and bad moments. I don’t know how many undecided Republicans made their decisions tonight, but I will close by saying that I was never really impressed by the whole YouTube debate concept, and I’m still unimpressed.

101 comments November 28th, 2007


Prime Sponsor

Advertisements

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Meta

Tags

Advertisements

Buttons For Your Blog

Disclaimer

Blogs For Victory is privately owned and maintained. All contributors are volunteers unaffiliated with any campaign or political party.

Material published and opinions expressed herein are solely the responsibility of the individual authors of this site.