Picture this:
Two studies… the conclusion of the first is supportive of the war in Iraq while the conclusion of the second is the opposite. When the first study comes out, liberals topple over each other looking to see who funded the study, tell us we need to “consider the source” in order to determine any biases. But when the second study comes out, they treat it as gospel and find ways to argue that where the money comes from is irrelevant. In other words, liberals don’t want you to “consider the source” if the study supports their position.
That pretty much sums up what is happening with the latest Soros-funded study that claims to document all the so-called “lies” that we were told leading up to the war in Iraq.
It doesn’t take long to find the flaws in the study, and there’s the whole other argument about all the information that contradicts their assertion that statements were lies. But, that doesn’t matter to morons like Keith Olbermann, who I saw on MSNBC moments ago practically in ecstasies over this bogus study.
UPDATE, by Mark Noonan: Thanks to Matt, I was able to take a look at the “study”. Its just a rehash of the usual litany of liberal/left lies about what happened 2001-2003. Future generations will marvel at all this – how millions of people believed a series of lies which accused an honest man – President Bush – of lying.
Blogs For Victory 