It does appear the Iran war played at least some role in our midterm defeat – it is hard to exactly quantify, but it is there, no doubt about it. In a lot of ways, Trump did it right – and it did have to be done, political consequences be damned. We didn’t go through the monkey show that is the UN, we didn’t bother consulting with our useless “allies”. We never planned on sending any significant ground force. We hit, from air and sea, very hard and essentially eliminated Iran’s military capacity along with vastly downgrading Iran’s nuclear program. But we didn’t get a surrender. It is still out there – and the Left and the Islamists (BIRM more and more these days) kept up a drumbeat about the economic costs while pretending that Iran has the capacity to control events.
We needed that surrender. And now we now perfectly what to do: we’re all peaceniks, now. No more war! All we are saying is give peace a chance!
But if peace really can’t be secured? Well, then it will have to be a really full exposition of the “war is hell” maxim. What we did in Iran was devastating but not quite devastating enough. In my opinion, this is how it should have gone.
- Jaw/Jaw – basically tell the Iranians (or any future insignificant power which thinks it can fight us) that we’ll come to a peace deal which leaves them alone provided no more nukes and no more Islamist proxies around the world. Fair deal. No more threat, Iran fully rejoins the global community and is able to spend its oil money on Iran rather than Islamist nuclear dreams – and we help them with financing and skills to build their economy.
- Given how very stupid and corrupt Iran’s leadership is, they would not have gone for this. We then say you have X number of days to agree to this deal. Failure to do so will unleash hell on Iran until unconditional surrender.
- Unleash hell. Sure, start it like we did – hitting Iran’s military and nuclear capability but without the slightest pause go right on to power plants, bridges, rail lines, telecommunications, industrial capacity…on and on and on until Iran’s entire capacity to survive is ruined. And here’s the key to really making this work: we explicitly tell them that if they don’t surrender, the last wave of attacks will be nuclear. And we don’t tell them which wave is to be last. But one of these days, Iran, that B-52 overhead will not drop conventional but a B61 nuclear bomb…and that we’ll keep dropping them until they’re all dead, or they surrender (essentially give them Japan’s choice in 1945).
Horrific, I know. But if we’re going to war, it is going to have to be the way we do it. And, thing is, it is the way we should have been doing it since the Japanese surrender delegation was escorted off the Missouri. This concept that we have to be nice and fair to weaker adversaries has led to an ocean of blood being spilled and a much worse world than it has to be. We fought in Korea and Vietnam against Third World barbarians who we could have defeated in a few weeks if we simply applied full force…and if we had to do it once, we wouldn’t have to do it twice. We nuked Japan. Had we nuked North Korea do you think China would have intervened? Heck no! But if they were really that thick headed…then so long, Shanghai. After that, you really think North Vietnam would have disregarded a US ultimatum to evacuate its forces from South Vietnam in, say, 1963? Zero chance. But if they really wanted to see what living on the surface of the Sun is like…
Wars happen because someone wants to steal something and they think they can get away with it. Everything the US has done since 1945 has convinced Third World barbarians that they can steal anything they want and even if the USA reacts, we’ll stop short of killing them all. This is why we have wars today – we have the power to impose peace and we refuse to use it because that would be mean or some really stupid nonsense the Left – which hates that we have this power – imposes on us, as if the Left has any moral code to begin with.
Once again, time to join the real world. A world in which law is just force reduced to habit and hiding its claws. You want international law? Then you have to impose it. Brutally. But the key here is that once you brutally impose law, as long as everyone is convinced you’re serious, you’ll keep it. We could usher in a century of peace for the world…if we want to. If we give peace and chance and make war really terrible.

You must be logged in to post a comment.