From Gallup
Republicans’ support for Herman Cain has surged to 18%, their support for Rick Perry has sagged to 15%, and their support for Mitt Romney remains relatively stable at 20%. However, Romney’s support is matched by the 20% of Republicans who are unsure which candidate they will back for the Republican nomination in 2012.
So, what do you think? Is Cain just the flavor of the month, or is he on the way to winning the nomination? What about Perry? Is he yesterday’s news?
Blogs For Victory 
Of course it will last. He’s got God on his side!
Someone’s got a sense of humor.
Hmmm…Cain is not the first GOP candidate from the current crop of hopefuls who have received the Almighty’s blessing to enter the fray, patriotdad1. It does appear as if the big fella upstairs is having a bit of fun with them all.
cO
see arguing with idiots pg 13-69
Another snickery and supercilious tee-hee from the “there is no greater authority in the universe than I” crowd.
Those who believe in a Higher Power tend to see their lives directed, while those who see themselves as the center of the universe tend to see all as random and meaningless.
Which explains the random and meaningless tone of their posts, as well.
A half-smiling arrogant chuckle from the “I am a god” crowd. Those who believe in God see purpose in their lives, the rest see no purpose. Which explains their purposeless posts.
Cain’s recent climb is likely a result of more and more people coming to the realization that he can win. There are lots more like them, that quietly have said they like him but didn’t think he had a chance so wouldn’t vote for him in polls….now that it looks like he does have that chance, his support can soar another 15 to 20 points just in people that already like him but just wanted him to prove himself.
That is a far better situation than Perry, who was the great Texan hope. All the loose voters clung to him when he entered and would start falling off as they began to hear of him and from him.
Cain’s position is better than Romney, who’s support is only steady and would be everybody’s third or fourth choice. He has no one to add to his support, though he doesn’t have to worry about losing more than a few percentage points.
Newt will continue to rise but only very slowly, his only hope is to be one of only three left by super tuesday and if that were to happen he would get all the cast offs of the other two, they would all gravitate towards the intellectual genius.
It would take someone like Jeb Bush to enter the race to instantly take the support away from Cain the way Perry did to the others, I don’t think anyone else could do it.
Interesting, when you wrote “He has no one to add to his support” of whom were you speaking; Cain or Romney?
Because if it’s Romney, I disagree; as the one holding the center-right position he can gain from almost every stumble the other candidates make (except Ron Paul as he has no real support other than the small cabal of Ronulans that follow him about like pubescent girls at a Justin Bieber concert, but I digress) by playing the “safe-haven” candidate.
If it’s Cain, I think we both agree that he’s already cut into the other candidates support (except Ron Paul whose “support” is about as solid as a fart in the wind, but I digress further).
It is Romney whom I speak. Romney should already have 45 to 50% of the support, he doesn’t though. That is because most of those who did not vote for him last time are seeking for someone viable other than Mitt. That is a bad position in that it doesn’t matter where he is on the political spectrum, his garnering additional support depends on whether nobody else is viable. The people who aren’t counted in his 20-25% don’t want TO HAVE TO vote for Mitt. They will if they must, but if there is any way they don’t have to, THEY WON’T.
It is completely opposite of where Cain stands. His standing is such that (minus the staunch Romney supporters and Paulbots) his universe of potential votes are those that are willing to vote for him IF he can be shown to be viable. Romney’s universe of potential primary votes consists of those who will not find anyone else who is viable.
doug,
Nice to see you’re getting use out of the Word of the Day calendar. I think when they say you should work it into a sentence, they meant once, or perhaps twice.
I’m jus’ messen with ya’ man.
I agree, many conservatives and disaffected Republicans see Mitt as the establishment’s “Next-in-Line” and fear another shellacking like Dole and McCain with prettier hair.
This is also the reason that when polls match up Obama with specific Republican candidates, respondents will choose “none of the above” or even Obama should their candidate not be on the list. Ronulans would pick Obama over Romney, and Romney supporters refuse to believe any other candidate is worth a vote.
When Bush, Cheney and the oil cartel took over the country, the price per barrel of oil quadrupled during their tenure – that was not a coincidence.
If Cain gets it, will the same thing happen to pizza?
The horror…
I miss the good ol days when the oil cartels ran the country.
I am liking Cain more and more everyday. His private sector experience, and his non political correctness when speaking of Occupy Wall Street is exactly what we need. Obama is right, we have become a soft country and it’s because of liberalism. If those protestors really wanted a job, they’d pick their ass up and move up to North Dakota, where unemployment is around 3%, and jobs are available.
There is also an irresistible charm to putting Cain up against Obama.
cluster
There is also an irresistible charm to putting Cain up against Obama.
maybe in oleje$$e jackass’s words he would “cut the ni***rs balls off” ?
LOL
Cain – ?
West?
Rubio?
Santorim?
My pick would be West balance the business with the military experience.
If those protestors really wanted a job, they’d pick their ass up and move up to North
Dakota,KOREA where unemployment is around 3%, and jobs are available, food is a plenty, a true anti capitalist workers paradise.fixed 🙂
Rubio is my pick for VP but he says he wont do it. So I would like to see either Paul Ryan or Newt. And Newt may be the better choice, he could help Herman navigate Washington
It’s absolutely hilarious that in your fanboy fantasies, Newt actually wants to be in elected office, cluster.
Wallace – is that you?
blowz0
yeah we see how the oil prices dropped when the muslim community agitator’s regime usurped their way in….Oh wait!
Cluster
I love newt but he like Palin is a lightning rod so I count him out as VP.
Cain will need someone who will add votes not controversy
.
The left is already saying Rubio is ineligible, not a natural born citizen….I KID you not..what pathetic loons they are.
Wouldn’t it be fun to watch Newt shred Biden in the debates though? But you are not wrong about Newt being a lightning rod.
meanwhile back at the RAUNCH, Ochimpys army of flying monkeys march
(Reuters) – Thousands of people including “teachers”,
religious leaderscommunity agitators with no church (wright -jacka$$) and unionworkersthugs and drones. marched in downtown Chicago on Monday to voice mounting anger over GOVERNMENT joblessness and income inequality (welfare and OPM in protests that snarled rush-hour traffic.Chanting “We are the 99 percent” and “Tax, tax, tax the rich,”
Written by an Anarchist, Anti-Capitalism Group ‘Occupy Wall Street Journal’ Full Color, Free Newspaper is Funded By George Soros, The Tides Foundation, Code Pink and Michael Moore.
=====================================================
Did a Chicago Protester Admit He’s Being Paid To Occupy Chicago?
“I am a volunteer . . . I’m a full-time volunteer.”
====================================================
DELICIOUS……..
Did Cornel West Really Tell Herman Cain to ‘Get Off the Symbolic Crack Pipe’?
First “Oreo” now, “crack pipe..
yo yo yo …co-nel
fix dems teeths and the hair??? grease and cock roaches come to mind.
More looooove from O’s “army”
Wild Subway Video: Young Girls Attack NYC Cops Trying to Arrest Them
It shows several NYPD officers in Harlem attempting to arrest four girls who had tried to board the subway without paying the fare. The girls resist arrest — but that might be an understatement.
wait until O loses in 2012
So, what do you think? Is Cain just the flavor of the month, or is he on the way to winning the nomination?
What about Perry? Is he yesterday’s news?
1. cain winning yes
2. perry yesterday yes
I think it is Cains to lose.
another islam / painted rock will kill him off.
If he stays focused on the economy, world, commie protestors, and O he will win.
the radical, racist left is already melting down, POPCORN please.
neo, are you sure the “Left” is making this comment about Rubio? Because the entire argument came about from some who would probably be categorized as being on the Right, but in any case those who looked at old law and rulings and felt that OBAMA was disqualified on these grounds.
I thought you were one of these, who constantly posted links to articles and old rulings about this very issue. Am I wrong? Didn’t you repeatedly make the claim that Obama is not a “natural born citizen” and post link after link to support this claim? If it was true of Obama, why isn’t it true of Rubio? Of Jindal? Is this a flexible, constantly moving definition, depending on who it might apply to?
For “the Left” to be saying this would mean the same is true of The One We Have All Been Waiting For, and I doubt that they would do this.
I, personally, have heard nothing about Rubio’s possible eligibility. I have, however, brought it up myself, not because I personally question it but because once the definition of “natural born citizen” has been brought up, so often, so stridently, so vociferously, it is sheer hypocrisy to suddenly pretend that the issue simply does not exist because now it might apply to someone we like.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. Live by the accusation, suffer when the accusation might reflect back on you.
I originally found the shrill claims of Obama’s failure to qualify as a “natural born citizen” to be, well, stupid. But when I finally looked into the basis for the claim, I found the arguments compelling, if not conclusive. Compelling enough to require further investigation and probably adjudication, to resolve the matter once and for all.
I hate the idea of taking bright stars like Rubio and Jindal out of presidential contention. But I am not a hypocrite. I realize that if a definition applies to a Democrat it has to apply to a Republican, and I contend that once the matter has been raised it can’t just be stuffed back into the bag now that it is inconvenient.
I also contend that the rising political status of Jindal and Rubio offers the Right a brilliant opportunity to accomplish a necessary feat and establish a valuable perception, that of unbiased fairness. Prior challenges to Obama’s eligibility have often been thrown out on the basis of “standing”—-the court’s ruling that the plaintiff had no legal standing to bring the case. Now we have two people with unqualified standing, with the best and most challenge-free standing possible, who could demand that a formal and definitive ruling be made. Let Jindal and Rubio demand that a court, or Congress, or whatever the appropriate ruling body might be, hold a public hearing, and rule on all the applicable law and evidence.
It should have been done before Obama got the Dem nomination. Let it be done now. In today’s world, with so much immigration, this is an issue that is bound to arise again and again, and every time it is swept under the rug because one side or another has a vested interest in pretending it doesn’t exist. Now we have a sitting President, duly elected and sworn in, who has signed bills and treaties—what if, at a later date, a more courageous court agrees to examine his eligibility and rules that he was never eligible for the office? What a can of worms that would create!
Multiply that by other candidates, other Presidents, and think of the mess that could have and should have been avoided if we had merely stood up for clarity and not been blinded by selfish bias.
Ama
I am for the constitution, however it seems the eligibility issue is legally moot per, Stare decisis.
So from now on Lasse can run if her mom ran across the rio grande 1 second before birth.
However my point was watch how the left will flip and become “birthers” if Rubio or Jindal were to run…kind of like they did to mcLame.
Well,, it’s hard to see how one can be “… for the Constitution….” and in the same sentence declare that one of the most important clauses in it is now “moot”. Or are we also now going with “consensus” instead of law?
Great approach to the rule of law. If enough people ignore a law, it just becomes “moot”?
The fact is, some brought up an issue, and argued it vehemently, and those same hypocrites are now saying oh, well, just let it ride, now that it might have an impact on what WE want.
If we are who we say we are, we respect the Constitution, we respect the rule of law, and we apply the same standards to all.
neo, check your dictionary.
“Stare Decicis” does NOT mean “Ignored by the courts because addressing it would create a big mess that they really don’t want to deal with”.
It means “to stand by that which is decided.”
It is the principal that the precedent decisions are to be followed by the courts.
Find us a precedent decision on the citizenship issue that supports what you just said. On the contrary, the established law you yourself often cited has been the opposite.
And, to continue: To abide or adhere to decided cases. It is a general maxim that when a point has been settled by decision, it forms a precedent which is not afterwards to be departed from. The doctrine of stare decisis is not always to be relied upon, for the courts find it necessary to overrule cases which have been hastily decided, or contrary to principle. Many hundreds of such overruled cases may be found in the American and English books of reports.
Ama
It has been
IGNORED by the courts
IGNORED by the supreme court
IGNORED by both houses of congress
IGNORED by the election commission
IGNORED by every politician.
so now along comes Rubio and all of a sudden he has to meet the standard?
do not get after me, get after the so called GOP and our so called government of, by and for the “people” who have shoved this POS down our throat.
AMA
laws are ruled moot every day.
There are still sodomy laws on state books which are ignored thus rendering them moot.
Do I like it? (ignoring laws on books) NO
can I do anything about it ? NO
Neostupid,
If you consider Americans who voted for the person you opposed in 2008 and still oppose shoving something down your throat, then have at it big boy.
The FACT is, he won, fair and square. Only a deranged kook like yourself would think he isn’t eligible.
For the record, I believe both natural born simply means born in the US. As the SC has stated before.
Neo,
Amazona and I have discussed this many times and I share the frustration with the lack of action taken.
Remember that the courts system is set up in such a way that only issues which are not self-apparent are run through the courts, in theory. We all know the courts are clogged with nonsense that should be adjudicated by common sense by a fist meeting a nose. That’s a joke in case the weak minded are offended.
The status of the term “natural born citizen” will not be decided until the right case with the right elements makes its way through the system. As complicated and often convoluted as it is, it prevents the courts from writing laws one day and striking them down the next, in theory.
In order for Rubio or Jindal to have the matter before a court, there must first be an action that causes harm or a tort (since there is no way this ends up in criminal court.) Neither of them can ask a court to decide a question of law unless there is a case brought to the court. Right now, neither has a case since neither has been harmed or benefited in any demonstrable way.
The Supreme Court does not take questions of law or Constitutionality simply to settle a bet.
They could have a case that would fast track if either were denied a place on a ballot because the elections board in any jurisdiction decided they did not meet the qualifications of “natural born citizen. they could sue in court to have their names added to a ballot and ask the court to decide the meaning and application of the term.
Don’t be Nelly Negative about this; we can get this before the Court, bigger brains than yours or mine are working on it as I write this.
Oh, and ignore Sasan, he’s an idiot.
ama
neo, are you sure the “Left” is making this comment about Rubio? Because the entire argument came about from some who would probably be categorized as being on the Right,
Hillary was not on the right……
=================================================
A Hint of New Life to a McCain Birth Issue
By ADAM LIPTAK
Published: July 11, 2008
In the most detailed examination yet of Senator John McCain’s eligibility to be president, a law professor at the University of Arizona has concluded that neither Mr. McCain’s birth in 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone nor the fact that his parents were American citizens is enough to satisfy the constitutional requirement that the president must be a “natural-born citizen.”
Enlarge This Image
McCain Presidential Campaign, via Associated Press
A 1936 picture shows the future presidential candidate John McCain in the arms of his grandfather John Sidney McCain in the Canal Zone. His father, John Sidney McCain Jr., is at left.
Related
Times Topics: John McCain
Blog
The Caucus
The CaucusThe latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.
Election Guide
More Politics News
The analysis, by Prof. Gabriel J. Chin, focused on a 1937 law that has been largely overlooked in the debate over Mr. McCain’s eligibility to be president. The law conferred citizenship on children of American parents born in the Canal Zone after 1904, and it made John McCain a citizen just before his first birthday. But the law came too late, Professor Chin argued, to make Mr. McCain a natural-born citizen.
“It’s preposterous that a technicality like this can make a difference in an advanced democracy,” Professor Chin said. “But this is the constitutional text that we have.”
Several legal experts said that Professor Chin’s analysis was careful and plausible. But they added that nothing was very likely to follow from it.
“No court will get close to it, and everyone else is on board, so there’s a constitutional consensus, the merits of arguments such as this one aside,” said Peter J. Spiro, an authority on the law of citizenship at Temple University.
Mr. McCain has dismissed any suggestion that he does not meet the citizenship test.
In April, the Senate approved a nonbinding resolution declaring that Mr. McCain is eligible to be president. Its sponsors said the nation’s founders would have never intended to deny the presidency to the offspring of military personnel stationed out of the country.
A lawsuit challenging Mr. McCain’s qualifications is pending in the Federal District Court in Concord, N.H.
There are, Professor Chin argued in his analysis, only two ways to become a natural-born citizen. One, specified in the Constitution, is to be born in the United States. The other way is to be covered by a law enacted by Congress at the time of one’s birth.
Professor Chin wrote that simply being born in the Canal Zone did not satisfy the 14th Amendment, which says that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
A series of early-20th-century decisions known as the Insular Cases, he wrote, ruled that unincorporated territories acquired by the United States were not part of the nation for constitutional purposes. The Insular Cases did not directly address the Canal Zone. But the zone was generally considered an unincorporated territory before it was returned to Panama in 1999, and some people born in the Canal Zone when it was under American jurisdiction have been deported from the United States or convicted of being here illegally.
If there IS a standard, then yes, Rubio should have to meet it. So should Jindal.
And, in fact, there IS a standard. It is stated in the Constitution of the United States of America. It is the definition of the standard that is in question, and when there are conflicting definitions of a standard then that standard should be defined.
Ignoring is not the same as adjudicating.
Sasan seems to think that getting a lot of votes means the laws should not apply. He also claims that the Supreme Court has ruled on the definition of “natural born citizen”. Where? When? What ruling? If the ruling is there, why hasn’t it been cited?
If the issue had not been raised, and fought for so stridently by so many, including you, neo, I would say it might not rise to the level of demanding attention. But when any person, or group, demands that a certain standard be met when it applies to an opponent and becomes silent when it might apply to their own side, I see nothing but hypocrisy. And, in this case, an effort to excuse it with a variation on the old “But everyone ELSE has been doing it” whine.
If it’s right it’s right. If it’s wrong it’s wrong. No matter what the “consensus” may be.
I bow to the Count’s obviously greater knowledge in the area of law, and accept that Jindal and Rubio might not have a case for a court. I see his point about this being similar to asking the court to settle a bet. But surely somewhere there is a body of authority which can make a definitive ruling on this.
And BTW, Hillary did not challenge McCain on the grounds of his being a “natural born citizen” as the citizenship of his parents was never in question. This would be the issue regarding both Jindal and Rubio, just as it was the issue with Obama every time you brought it up.
neo,
I don’t know what Hillary has to do with that, but McCain was born on a military instillation and according to Statement of Forces Agreement (actually it was the Base Rights Agreement in 1932), persons born on the installation to American citizens are under the jurisdiction of the United States and are citizens. The “people born in the Canal Zone” that were deported were not born in the instillation or were not born to citizen parents.
Goldwater was born in the Arizona Territory prior to statehood so the issue of the Insular cases doesn’t apply to citizenship.
amazona,
I’ve asked my legal authority friends about this many times; after the usual “I donno” I get dozens of scenarios in which the courts can be brought into the issue.
Each time they tell me, “… that assumes “Mr. Mrs. Ms. X” has standing.”
Even if Rubio or Jindal is on a presidential ballot, a third party would have difficulty challenging it in court because the third party has no cause of action; they haven’t been harmed and they likely have no standing because of the lack of harm.
If it were easy everyone would be doing it.
Any pictures of Ruby yet?
Neo brought up Hillary.
Ruby is in Colorado, and may be up for adoption. Something about a really REALLY crappy repaint job that was somehow not admitted to in discussions about her qualities. Think one step above Krylon. That, and a bad drag link and tie rods. Not exactly the stuff of full disclosure.
Another way to put it before the courts is to pass a law … interesting possibilities, that.
However, Ruby II, with a trunk full of Concours de’Elegance trophies, is angling for a trip out West.
Wait … what?
You’re going to make Bonny Blue feel like a Yugo at Pickles Auction.
I have heard that the OWS mob now plan to take their protests to the homes of the “rich”. I wonder how Michael Moore, Sean Penn, Nancy Pelosi, etc. will react to protestors on their properties.
Cluster
I have long said this will spill over into the suburbs.
at first it will be benign, but it will lead to destruction-looting then a shooting war.
It is the plan of the regime for the destruction of America.
Does any one politician matter any more? If Mr. Cain wins the presidency will he get any cooperation from a replican controlled congress? Will people like boener, cantor, and mcconnell cooperate in the reduction of thier power? We are far past the point where politics are the cure.
Will those three men vote for what needs to be done or will they vote to get reelected?
Until people of power are ready to willingly give that power up by making needed but unpopular decisions, politics will continue to be the disease.
Neo, It will not take much. The rich people that can afford to hire armed guards will. One hot head, one bad decision, and one pull of the trigger.
The OPM is almost gone. We are not even pretending to find solutions anymore.
Green Mountain Eeyore,
WOW!
What a shaft of sunshine.
Please, give up, spread the misery, keep the hopelessness going, you’re sure to rally people to your cause. I only hope they all, in turn give up and above all, don’t vote.
Meanwhile, you’re as depressing as an Obama speech and just as predictable.
Caveat, glad you liked my post Sir. FYI. I am not trying to rally anyone to my cause. Choose your own path. In my view the reality of the situation is far beyond the fixing by one man or woman.
The truth is often depressing.
You could tell me how any one politician could make things better. That would require a little bit of effort though. You up to it?
Of course “no one politician” can change the course of an entire nation. Don’t be so relentlessly silly.
You just hunker down in the Gloom Bunker and let people with ideas and energy and a touch of optimism try to SOLVE problems, while you just whimper that they are toooooooo big!
Clearly, the election of a conservative will signal a nationwide interest in changing the current course of the nation. Drop a conservative into office from a space ship and it would be meaningless. Elect him with millions of votes and it says something about the will of the people.
Even given the surly definition of all politicians as self-interested greed machines with no interest at all in doing what is best for the country, reelection in a nation that just elected a conservative and sent a message that it has had enough of big spending, big government, and bypassing of the Constitution ought to signal to even the densest and most selfish of politicians that keeping the D.C. job will mean following the trend of moving toward a more Constitutional form of government.
Who cares if they do it out of self-interest or altruism or patriotism? All that matters is that they do it. And if the will of the people is made known clearly and loudly enough, they will, as will many Dems who also can read the handwriting on the wall.
“Clearly, the election of a conservative will signal a nationwide interest in changing the current course of the nation.”
So then you believe that the election of somebody you (hilariously and wrongly) claim is a “Marxist” in 2008 signaled a nationwide interest in changing the course of the nation toward (what is actually not but what you hilariously and wrongly claim is) “Marxism,” right?
In egypt right now, Coptic Christians are being murdered and thier homes are being torched. All because they are christian. What will any of the republican presidential candidates do or even say about it.
What can they do? What could they do even if they were president? People are losing thier lives and homes because they are christians. How soon will events like this start taking place in the United States?
Go ahead, put your faith in politics and politicians. I am willing to be convinced. How are politics and politicians going to fix anything? What is your agenda for utopia and how will it be accomplished?
Ok lets boil this down. If a conservative is elected, everything will be peachy keen after the next presidential elections? Is this all the optimism anyone needs? What are your ideas to get us back to a constitutional form of government?
I am willing to be convinced. Please show me how a electing a man like Mitt Romney is going to help? Just because he has that magical (R) after his last name?
Well, starting with your contention that Romney is a political whore who will sell himself to whoever puts him in office, we have already established that if conservatives control his political destiny he will whore himself out to the conservative cause. That’s a start.
But he would be elected President, not King. If we the people demand that his authority be limited to that imparted by the Constitution, and we the people stop looking at Washington as the source and seat of all power and start electing strong local-government conservatives at home, the combination will move us back in the direction of a more Constitutional government.
It took more than one election and one Liberal to get us where we are now, and it would be foolish to claim that it can possibly take only one election and one conservative to fix it.
Please do not employ the mathematicians’ and Liberals’ ploy of using reductio ad absurdum, or reducing an argument to its most ridiculous level, to try to make a point. No one has ever said “….if a conservative is elected, everything will be peachy keen after the next presidential election…” Of course it will not and it would be a stupid assertion if anyone did.
ROMNEY = 4 more years of Ochimpy
MILLIONS will stay home.
Mitt Romney has a history of doing what is best for Mitt Romney. I have the proof in video and in print. Expecting him to do anything other than to start campainging for reelection the minute he is sworn in is foolish.
The OPM is almost gone. The barbarians are crying out for more and more and more OPM. How many election cycles will they wait?
How many election cycles will it take before the barbarians crash down the gates?
In your opinion, how many election cycles will it take to accomplish your goals?
Green,
Keep up the resistance! I want you to stay home on election day! only vote for your perfect candidate, whoever that may be. otherwise, please stay home!
GMB
Vote or don’t vote, do what you think is best. You’re correct that Romney is a whore on par with Obama. The other comments are people who live in IDEAL world where if we all just get along things will be swell. Abortion, pshaw what’s the problem, nation building exercises in hellistan, what’s the problem and on and on and on.
Vote for Romney or Cain or Paul or Obama if you think that’s what will serve your family best in the future. If you’d rather spend the day in your garden do that. You’ve got your reward, don’t pay attention to fear mongers. You’ve given more than enough service to the country that you don’t need to justify your opinions to anyone.
GMB
let em die in Egypt BFD (sarcasm)
painted over rocks and the dreaded n word are so much more relevant and Eeeeeeevil.
Neo,
what can you possible suggest we do in Egypt?
Are you like mark? save the christians all over the world! Yay for world christian police!
Neo, I agree. That upside down painted rock is of supreme importance. Also that Rick Perry has good hair. That is almost enough to make me vote for him. 😛
You are invited to come share the safety of my bunker when the shtf. 🙂
tommyturban
Nuke mecca
neutrons for the rest of the muzzies
GMB
I heard today that Christie will endorse mitt either before or after the staged Q&A = aka “debate”
surprise surprise surprise!!!!
neostupid,
yes, let’s nuke a city, for no other reason than simply your hate and fear of another religion.
I am sure that would save a lot of christians! keep up with the detailed foreign policy directives!
tommyTurban
hate of a murderous satanic CULT?
YUP
Fear? ha ha ha ha !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 🙂 🙂 🙂
till the barrels melt down
Neo, nuking mecca wouldn’t work. One of the very few creatures to survive the blasts at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were cockroaches…….
Green,
Please stay on your farm and don’t vote ok!
Romney just got Christie’s backing and it’s just about over for the GOP “race”.
What do you think? Doesn’t Mitt give you goosebumps?
Didn’t take Mr. Christie long did it? Wonder how much money Mitt donated to Mr. Christie’s reelection fund?
Can you say Secretary Christie? Pick any spot in Romney’s dream administration.
I think Romney against Obama will be a good race.
But you assure us that you won’t vote for Romney correct?
tommyturban
assure you?
I assure yo,u if you were ever to ……….fill in the blanks Moron.
GMB
you are right muzzies,& commies = cockroachs including the infestation in the white painted house.
GMB
RINOS tend to flock together.
or is that herd….LOL
Neo, rinos run in herds most definately . As regards to Mitt, I am in complete agreement with Neo. If Mitt is the ruplican nominee, millions of social conservatives will skip the presidential ballot. Mitt still might win though. Doesn’t look good for the person occupying the oval office right now.
Green,
If social conservatives stay home like you say they are, Romney has no chance. Actually, he doesn’t have a chance either way, but if those social conservatives stay home, he might as well quit after the convention.
GMB
as one Rush caller said today, mitt = Obama light.
Rush had some good points though. this time last election cycle juiliani had a wide lead,and mcLame was THIRD and expected to drop.
Things can change, There are rumors hillary is up to her ba**s in gun walker.
One impeachment, one indictment could be a game changer.
president biden? please stand up!!!!!!
Hell Id vote for ole gaff joe just for the comedy and inevitable Hindenburg type crash and burn of the donk party.
Maybe we should go for true bipartisan ticket. Biden and Paul. They could switch off every three months. The gaffe machine and the nutcase. What a combination that would be. 😛
Cain leads in South Carolina.
http://americanresearchgroup.com/
Cain won a straw poll in Fla
there is talk of a Jan primary in Fla. If so, mittens will be hanging on the fence to dry out AGAIN with his “cult”
The real problem is mitt has $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and a huge organization.
Cain does not.
GMB
what is that noise and smell?
it sounds like a fa*t and smells like a troll. sasan is dat U ?
Sounds a lot like Romney and Huckabee from 2008, and which had the most delegates? Romney has a ceiling even with his dollars, you just can’t be a flipflopping slick willie of a candidate and win the republican nomination. He needs lots of help in the form of too many other candidates performing well in order to split the remaining votes.
Cain tied with romney in Virginia
http://p.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2011/oct/11/cain-rises-va-poll/
Tea Partiers ‘Invade’ Occupy D.C. Protest…And This is the Video
What happens when the Tea Party invades the seemingly never-ending “Occupy” protest movement? Until now, this question has been left to the whims of the imagination. But over the weekend, Accuracy in Media, Let Freedom Ring and Young America’s Foundation joined forces to infiltrate ”Occupy D.C.”
As you can imagine, the results are quite hilarious, as the Tea Party counter-protesters state their love for capitalism, holding signs that read, “Taxed Enough Already” and “Unions Destroy Jobs,” among others. The patriotic young men, who are predictably met with anger, hand out Constitutions to the “Occupiers,” while defending capitalism (Meredith Jessup covered this on the blog as well).
In the video, you’ll hear an Occupy D.C. protester call one of the Tea Partiers an “idiot.“ Another man calls one of the supporters of capitalism a ”candy a**.” And yet another individual who is visibly agitated says, “I‘m gonna turn away because I don’t turn the other cheek. You push me and you’re gonna have a problem.”
Some of the other responses, though, are even more bizarre: “Our troops are the terrorists” and “You and your corporate cronies…get the f**k out of my country” are two odd statements to look out for.
Accuracy in Media described the mission as follows: “To see what happens when three peaceful fans of capitalism, guns and our military take to the streets.”
Watch the insanity unfold, below (caution: language):
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/tea-partiers-invade-occupy-d-c-protest-and-this-is-the-video/
Ahh, the tolerance and understanding of the left on full display. How ia anyone going to break this depency on OPM?