Lots of stuff going on… Enjoy discussing it!
158 thoughts on “Wednesday Open Thread”
Comments are closed.
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Lots of stuff going on… Enjoy discussing it!
Comments are closed.
Blogs For Victory 
Interesting what happens when THE PEOPLE have a voice in deciding about raising taxes, even when it’s “for the children”.
So the MSM is still aghast over the “possible” inappropriate sexual advances towards a couple of women on behalf of Herman Cain, correct? They certainly do spend a lot of time on it, especially MSNBC and the rodeo clowns employed over there that operate under the guise of “political commentators”, who are convinced that these “alleged” lapses of judgement disqualify him for consideration for POTUS.
What’s ironic, is that they continue to worship at the alter of Bill Clinton, so just to refresh their memory – I submit the following:
The affair continued after Lewinsky became a paid White House employee and would last a total of 18 months. During their affair, the President and Ms. Lewinsky had ten sexual encounters in the Oval Office suite, including one instance in which the President, while engaged in sex, spoke to a Republican member of Congress on the telephone regarding sending U.S. troops to Bosnia.
And another not so flattering account of liberals favorite President:
But Broaddrick could not remember the date, even the month, of the alleged 1978 incident. And NBC’s Lisa Myers reported that Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton’s first gubernatorial campaign, attended a Clinton fund-raiser three weeks later. “I think I was still in denial,” Broaddrick said. “I still felt very guilty at that time, that it was my fault. By letting him come to the room, I had given him the wrong idea.”
Asked about Broaddrick’s allegation at a news conference earlier in the day, President Clinton said: “Well, my counsel has made a statement about the . . . issue, and I have nothing to add to it.” Attorney David E. Kendall’s statement called the charge “absolutely false.”
The nursing home operator, previously known as Jane Doe No. 5, told Myers that she felt “violated” but finally stopped resisting Clinton’s sexual advances because “it was a real panicky situation.” She said that “he was just a vicious, awful person.”
Pressed by Myers as to whether she was raped, Broaddrick said she had been. “It was not consensual,” she insisted. As for her feelings now toward the president, Broaddrick said: “My hatred for him is overwhelming.”
So the MSM is still aghast over the “possible” inappropriate sexual advances towards a couple of women on behalf of Herman Cain, correct?
There have been numerous news reports that Cain’s alleged physical gestures were not overtly sexual. Howie Carr at the Boston Herald has a humorous take on it.
If this is such a hot issue why did they wait until now to bring out this story instead of hauling it out when Mr. Cain first starting running for the oval office?
A week or two ago, one of our resident Lefties posted a link to a MarketWatch article that was very complimentary of OWS. How quickly things change.
The OWS fire just isn’t burning as bright as it did, despite of the SEIU funding – what a shame.
On another hypocrisy note – why isn’t rodeo clown Ed Schultz leading the charge against the draconian, anti union policies of Gov. Jerry Brown???
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/1027/Retirement-revised-Jerry-Brown-proposes-pension-reform-in-California
Because Jerry Brown’s proposal doesn’t include stripping significant collective bargaining rights, which was the main cause of mass hysteria in Wisconsin. When you disguise union busting as “pension reform,” then people tend to not like your pension reforms.
So you’re saying that eliminating collective bargaining rights on benefits only (they still have bargaining rights on wages), and generous benefits to boot, was the cause of the mayhem and drama queen moments? That’s a sad statement.
Incidentally, I support FDR’s position on public unions, the questions is, why don’t liberals?
The bill restricts wage negotiation as well. It just doesn’t eliminate it outright.
Saying that they don’t need bargaining rights because they already have good benefits is fallacious because without the bargaining rights the benefits can be reduced with far less pushback from workers.
Private sector employment in the U.S. grew by 110,000 in October, but if that trend continues, given present population growth, the number of unemployed will increase from the current 14 million to 27 million by 2020.
http://xkcd.com/605/
One of my favorites from xkcd.
http://xkcd.com/690/ is a good example of compromise
corky
fits your “logic” to a tee.
Oh, in case you didn’t get it from my previous response, your extrapolation is just plain stupid. Only roughly 50% of our population is actually part of the workforce, with the rest being stay at home parents, retirees, or children. If you compare job growth to expansion of the workforce and not the total population, you’ll find that at current rates, by 2020 the unemployment figure will be roughly… (wait for it) 14 million.
If you’d pay attention to any halfway real news source even occasionally, you’d have heard economists say the same thing. Quit getting your data from retarded political commentators.
corky
Quit getting your data from retarded liberal
political commentators.TROLLS.fixed
corky
US census states:
There are 38 million black people
11.4 million of them are on welfare, or 30%.
(11.4 million / 38 million = .3 or 30%)
There are 229 million white people, (hispanics counted as white)
11.6 million of them are on welfare, or 5%.
(11.6 / 229 = .05 or 5%)
i.e.
30% of black people are on welfare
5% of white people are on welfare
If you’d pay attention to any halfway real news source even occasionally, you’d have heard economists say the same thing.
Nah, Cory, just a little hyperbole, something you Libs know all too well.
the lies get round the world twice before the truth gets out…
HHS Buries numbers — HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius had report showing Obamacare would increase insurance costs a week before final votes
Now THIS I could go along with 100%
Is Newt Gingrich Set to Board the ‘Cain Train’ as VP?
“looking well”
Here’s the real 99% er’s
With 99 percent of the precincts counted early this morning, the Associated Press reported the split was 64 percent against the ballot measure, close to 612,000 votes, to 36 percent, about 350,000 votes, in favor.
How many MSM outlets will be reporting this?
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/state_edwatch/2011/11/colorado_tax_increase_for_schools_goes_down_to_defeat.html
cluster
TEA
Who do you think leaked the sexual harassment scandal to Politico? My guess is Karl Rove. He wants Mitt to be the nominee for the Republican party.
Nah, it was the Democrats.
They are SCARED TO DEATH of a strong conservative black candidate. Cain goes against all the narratives the Democrats have about the black population.
You can already see it in the news. You have the liberal media talking heads and the liberal politicians telling how “Herman Cain is a black person that knows his place.”, “Hermain Cain needs to put down the symbolic crack pipe.”, etc. etc. I even heard a caller on a local radio show complaining how “Herman Cain will dilute the black vote.”
They are scared to death of Cain and are trying to stop him at all costs.
Search the internet if you dare for more comments about Cain….
…we know you won’t.
I’m scared to death of Cain, but it has nothing to do with his skin color. The guy’s big platform is a tax plan that punishes the poor and rewards the rich so thoroughly that it doesn’t even meet current income levels. What is there not to be scared about?
Sorry cory, the liberal mantra is that if you are scared of the obAMATEUR, it is because he is black. This has been the theme since day one and has been regurgitated all over the leftist blogoshpere.
You can’t run away from liberal tactics.
BTW, I see bodie, jeffy, wally has chimed in with his usual poop flinging hoping something will stick. Sadly, for him his screed does not have the desired effect he wants.
Liberals hate it when their own tactics are used against them!
Pathetic.
“Nah, it was the Democrats”…Tiredoflibbs
—————————————————————
Cain’s own Chief of Staff disagrees with you, Tired.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/02/cain-camp-accuses-perry-campaign-leaking-sexual-harassment-claims/
Haha, I would think that the President & the Democratic Party would be overjoyed if Pizza Man were to win the nomination.
wow CO, he has a different opinion than I do….
….. who could have thought that was possible!
““the President & the Democratic Party would be overjoyed if Pizza Man were to win the nomination.””
Oh yeah, if that were true then the attacks by the left which have been all over the news as I stated would not be happening.
They are scared to death of an experienced, conservative black man, who would challenge the amateurish, liberal community organizer.
Your wishes and reality are not congruent.
So sad for you…..
“Oh yeah, if that were true then the attacks by the left which have been all over the news as I stated would not be happening.”…Tiredoflibbs
—————————————————————-
The attacks on Cain are coming from the Right as well, Tired. Are they scared to death of him, too?
Looking at the current crop of Republican clowns in the running, the President will have no problem at all in crushing whomever is unlucky enough to win the nomination. Surely, there must be someone of merit that the GOP can russell up to make it a fair contest.
“the President & the Democratic Party would be overjoyed if Pizza Man were to win the nomination.”
Oh, definitely. That’s one of the best-case scenarios for them.
“the President will have no problem at all in crushing whomever is unlucky enough to win the nomination.”
Romney’s the only one who’s got a chance, but the wingnut base hates Romney.
Sunny, you forgot to blame George W. Bush. Or Halliburton.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Juvenile, senile Rick Perry is the one to blame in the allegations leveled against soon-to-be-Pres. Herman Cain.
life is one wild ride…so much information…so little time to process it…and then we die…or do we?…certainly…malcolm X’s son would know…
Jeremiah-
Doesn’t Cain’s 100% pro-life but its a choice answer to abortion cause you any qualms?
It is the only legally correct answer that any President of the United States could make. I am 100% pro-life, however, I have no power under God to prevent individual people from murdering others. If there comes a time that God gives me foresight to know that someone is going to murder another and then asks of me to kill that potential murderer before they do, then I will have that power.
Even our Emperor Obama with all of his edicts does not have that power. He can order you to buy health insurance, but you don’t have to. If you don’t buy the health insurance He can order you to pay a fine to the IRS, but you can still refuse. If Obama knew ahead of time that you would refuse, He could send his goons to your house and kill you before you actually refuse, so that he could say he has the power to force you to do his will.
The hit on Cain has Mitts hoof prints all over it. That slime ball will do anything, say anything if he thinks it will help him. I seriously doubt if anyone in the Perrykrishna camp has the smarts to pull it off.
Onward establishment soldiers, ho!!!
6206j,
Of course not!
All Mr. Cain is saying is that – you have the choice to murder your child; but the government is not going to back your choice, or support your choice in the form of governmental funding. And there will be no such procedures procured within the confines of the United States of America.
You will have to go elsewhere to do so.
That is an interesting interpretation of his words.
I tend to agree with Mr. Davis.
typical left tactic, marx alinsky 101
Bork
Thomas
Gonzalez
Roberts
Cain
breaking
Report: Now Rahm Emanuel Allegedly Behind Cain Sexual Harassment Leak
surprise surprise.
Oh
and Palin on the list
Sarah P is on what list Neo? How did she get on this? Other than someone over at Hot Air trying to sound important again, I havent heard of or from Sarah P in awhile.
Still wish she would throw her hat in the ring though. There are plenty of folks still out who would work our tails off to get her elected.
GMB
palin added to
the donk hit/smear list I posted.
thanks to The democRAT smear machine of personal destruction against any constitutional conservative including minorities.
neocon1 November 3, 2011 at 12:20 am #
bmitch
Palin.barry & the mooch, A pathetic serial quitter malignant narcissist, AA, never ran a lemonade stand, racist, muslim, doper, lying POS, who grifts for a living.fixed
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
I realize this is probably beyond your mental comprehension, Wallace, but no spin is necessary. They should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Stupid Wallace – everyone knows that liberals love waffles.
Inspired by a novel, inspired by a manifesto, inspired by a sermon (“white men’s greed in a world in need..”)
To save the Constitution, to save the world, to “fundamentally transform” our nation while promoting racial hatreds…….
Keep reaching, Wally-Boy, for something to support your seething hatreds and bigotry. So far, you are just a failure, as always, under any name.
only mental midgets get talking points…that group is confined to liberal stooges…how else do you get this drivel…certainly you dont have the intelligence to present a screwed up liberal idea like this alone…
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Gee wally/bodie/monty/jeffy, only when you post drivel without sources to back them up are they considered talking points…
…You know, like you do every day.
Poor pathetic drone doesn’t know the definition of “talking points”. I hate to break it to you drone, but those posted responses have been sourced here time and again.
Your responses, however, the equivalent of rebuttal to them (your responses – just so you won’t get confused) are to scrape them off the bottom of our shoes.
Again, change your name and your tactics and you may not be exposed so easily.
Gee, wally/monty/bodie/jeffy, again you cannot comprehend simple sentences.
I was talking about your claim that the others posted talking points when those statements that they made were referenced here before and was not commenting your initial post. It is easy to copy and paste a news link. It is something else to do research in order to make a logical argument – something that is completely foreign to you.
Of course, posting a “source” ONCE every fifty responses does not negate the other times you regurgitate your self-proclaimed statements and try to pass them off as facts.
Wow, again you make a fool of yourself under this Wally alias – time to get a new one. Try elmo, or peter or barney or pick another and keep it. Well that would be a problem, eventually you would get banned because you will eventually resort to nothing but personal attacks (something you are close to doing now) since you cannot make sound, logical arguments or you would just not be able to stand the embarrassment of the poor reputation you would build up under it.
Again, you are the poster boy of government schooling.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
wally/bodie/monty/jeffy whines: “And where did I claim that?”
Here ya go. You have forgotten so soon?: “Won’t your old talking points for that situation suffice until you get some new ones?”
wow, don’t you even know what you write wally/monty/bodie/jeffy?
Oh that’s right, you have a library of your mental poop flinging. Each time your posts get deleted you can paste it up again and all of it is there – verbatim! I can count 5 or more times you keep pasting the same post over and over only for it to be deleted again and again!!
Why? Do you have trouble keeping track of your talking points? Or, is it that you believe if you keep posting the same thing over and over eventually it will become true?
You don’t want me to post examples — it will be too embarrassing even for you!
This is too easy……..
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Gee wally/bodie/monty/jeffy you claimed that they use talking points and then deny it!
‘Won’t your old talking points for that situation suffice until you get some new ones?”
Apparently, “talking points” means something different in wally’s land of make believe? Well with that many aliases……..
Your own post proves it. Of course, now you have pathetically tried to weasel out of it – only to result in more contradiction.
You must have taken the same lessons that cory did!!!
It took a while for you to respond, perhaps the mommy or grandma who read posts to you are not the ones to ask. I am sure they loath a trip to the basement to help you out.
This was fun for a while, now it is getting boring. You are incapable of discussing anything. You need some new tactics, your old ones have been figured out.
Speaking of flailing, what would you call this (repeating the same actions and expecting a different outcome?:
Wallace
Submitted on 2011/11/01 at 8:15 pm | In reply to watsonredux.
“But I think you find it better to play dumb.”
He admitted to this about a week ago.
Wallace
Submitted on 2011/11/01 at 11:01 am | In reply to watsonredux.
“But I think you find it better to play dumb.”
He admitted that to this about a week ago.
Wallace:
Submitted on 2011/10/31 at 10:14 pm | In reply to watsonredux.
“But I think you find it better to play dumb.”
He admitted to this a few days ago.
Wallace
Submitted on 2011/10/31 at 12:53 pm | In reply to watsonredux.
“But I think you find it better to play dumb.”
He definitively demonstrated this a few days ago.
Wallace
Submitted on 2011/10/31 at 3:49 am | In reply to watsonredux.
“But I think you find it better to play dumb.”
He made that abundantly clear a few days ago.
Wallace
Submitted on 2011/10/30 at 12:28 pm | In reply to watsonredux.
“But I think you find it better to play dumb.”
He proved this pretty conclusively a few days ago.
Wallace
Submitted on 2011/10/29 at 3:35 pm | In reply to watsonredux.
“But I think you find it better to play dumb.”
He illustrated that pretty clearly a few days ago, didn’t he?
———————-
wow………… scary. And that is just ONE of many examples.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
gee, jeffy, continuing to lie won’t dig you out of this one.
Again, I used your own words against you.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Wally, wally, wally, I have already proved that you are a liar and you contradict yourself.
This is just another one of those times and sadly you just can’t take it.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Keep digging wally.
Keep digging……
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
No wally, what is fascinating is that you continue to lie, distort and deflect after being caught!
No, it’s more like pathetic.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Wally/bodie/monty/jeffy continues to whine: “but you’re lying about it in a misguided and calamitous attempt to score a point. ”
Wow, I see that you cannot recognize the concept of irony, also.
Another pathetic attempt to distort, deflect and lie to save his sorry little butt from being caught in his usual pathetic little tactics.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Wally/bodie/monty/jeffy again you are talking in circles.
You old tactics will not change the fact that you lie about and contradict your posts.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
again, wally, since you cannot learn from previous failures…
You keep repeating the same thing over and over and expect a different result.
YOu have been caught in a lie again. No matter how many times you repeat yourself it won’t become true.
I have explained it before and it is not my fault that you cannot understand simple sentences with your own statements as proof. It is like you don’t understand what you even write (or copy and paste).
Pathetic.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
wally whines: “I will accuse you of lying in order to distract”
SO you finally admit to lying and using distraction as a tactic when you are caught at lying!
A break-through!!!
But then,again, you are set-back by posting a personal attack when you can’t spin your way out of your original lie.
Also notice, you repeat the same action expecting a different result.
Give it up, wally/bodie/monty/jeffy, you can’t escape from yourself.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Keep it up wally!!!
More deflection away from your being caught in a lie.
I will, though, humor you, but we will not let your ignorance get in the way of your question.
The sky has no color. It appears to be blue to the human eye due to light refraction and the separation of the light spectrum.
Just like water, it is clear though it appears to be blue in most circumstances depending upon its content.
Are you not finished embarrassing yourself yet?
You just keep digging yourself deeper and deeper and proving more of my points every time.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
To wally:
Are you not finished embarrassing yourself yet?
Again, he performs the same action with the same theme expecting different results.
Apparently he is not finished.
Pathetic.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Why do you keep rehashing the same crap with slightly different theme?
Are you trying to trip me up? Hoping I will type something wrong that you can grasp onto and yell to the world “SEEEEE….”?
It won’t work. You have been caught in your usual lies, distortions, deflections, projections, whining and the usual drone reactions.
You lost. Get over it and create your new alias.
And repeat your pathetic actions over and over again.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Gee wally, if you think I have tripped up, then why are you all over the place, deflecting from argument to argument, dodging and ducking, while I have been consistent each and every time?
You have massively failed! You have been caught in several lies.
Give it up. You lost. Get over it.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Poor wally, still projecting, distorting, deflecting and lacking the grasp of the concept of irony.
Keep digging wally. Keep digging.
Pathetic.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
wow, wally again, your lack of reading comprehension has nailed you in the a$$.
I have taken responsibility for my actions. You just don’t like the fact that you can shake them with your distortions and lies.
You need to get a life. This repeated effort by you expecting different results is getting pathetic.
… and boring.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Once again, wally, you have come full circle,acknowledging what you want and ignoring what makes you look foolish.
This tactic again proves you to be the liar that you are. I have no aversion to facts and you saying otherwise, again, make you the liar that I have proved you to be – using your responses to prove it so.
Don’t bother responding, it is going to be a repetition of more of your lies, distortions and deflections.
See Wallace November 7, 2011 at 2:10 am. // Moderator
Way to take the coward’s way out, tired. I knew you would. Can’t wait for your next colossal failure! It’s gonna be great!
wally continues the whine: “Way to take the coward’s way out, tired. I knew you would. Can’t wait for your next colossal failure! It’s gonna be great!”
It will be a long wait for you…. for my actual colossal failure.
Presently, you cannot recognize one since you are not aware of the frequent ones you have now.
Oh well, time to create another alias since you can’t help revealing yourself and revert to your pathetic ways.
Me….. I’ll stick with the original one I have had since coming here just after this blog was created. It is so easy to spot liberal bs.
“It will be a long wait for you”
It’ll be a week at the most. Your struggles with the English language, logic, and facts make each an every post a minefield for you. You flamed out spectacularly in this one, but thing you’ve demonstrated is that no matter how spectacular your last failure was, your next one will be even more spectacular.
Here’s a shocker.
Spook
she CANT, they have the records sealed and the amount is not disclosed after these “suits”
There fore they can strike again…several times, and usually do.
If she reveals the contents she is in violation of HER own court order and can open her self up to fraud.
I realize Newsmax isn’t necessarily a reliable news source, but their presidential poll does offer an interesting microcosm of public opinion.
http://www.newsmax.com/Surveys/Results/id/34
I wonder if Mr. Holder and the scoamf have any extra fast and furios machine guns left over for sale? I could use a couple.
No hables englise agui mi amigos!!
Green,
One can only hope that the criminal enterprise nature of this administration will become wide-spread knowledge over the next 12 months.
leonard
nah, they are marxist donks, that doesnt count, only for GOP.
I wonder if I could qualify for a Department of Energy loan. If I incorporated I could just call myself the Green Mountain Energy Company. I would only want a couple of million to start off.
Think they would fall for it?
Think they would fall for it?
If you’d agree to kick back 50% to BHOzo’s re-election campaign I can guarantee it.
A 50% kickback? Don’t you think that is kind of extreme Spook? After all its taxpayer money here. I think 10-15% is enough. Got to have some kind of golden parachute before I declare bankruptcy.
I think I’ll have MM and his non union production crew do my commercials.
Money talks ows suckers!!
GMB
we could celebrate it on piglowseys NON union vineyard.
For some reason, non union booze just tastes better. 😛
Loosing it?
Losing it? Nope lost it a long time ago….
The Useful Idiots, the ones obAMATEUR and many liberal looters have embraced have finally lost all patience for the system and revert to their predictable ways.
http://www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_19246904
I am sure bodie, jeffy, wally will paint these guys as conservative “plants” and somehow blame Bush, Cheney and the GOP.
Your GOP at work. Don’t want your taxes to be raised, don’t ask these guys to help.
http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/11/40_from_gop_urge_panel_to_cons.htm
Don’t go crying when future potus mitt goes along with stuff like this.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we got it, Romney=spawn of Satan, blah blah blah
I prefer spawn of Lucifer. It has a better ring to it. yada yada yada
What is this new rant about me supposedly supporting Romney? For a while, a while back, I thought he looked like a pretty good choice. I was influenced enough by GMB to recognize his weaknesses and it has been a long long time since I said anything even remotely supportive of him.
I was just commenting on the nonstop ranting and raving about him, the RDS we keep seeing here.
And when you guys “respond” to things that were never said, you just sound like the RRL trolls who infest this blog and do the same thing.
Mitt is not “my guy” and as for dolf’s silliness, well, it’s just dolf’s silliness. I guess that crystal ball of his is getting quite a workout, what with him having such insights into what does and does not matter to whom, and why. “I will blame the Amys and Clusters and Counts in the GOP who have real world experience, but ultimately just don’t care because their lives are only remotely impacted by the economy being a disaster.” is pretty funny, but nothing compared to “I won’t blame the Matts and Marks in the GOP, they don’t even have kids so their real world experience is practically nil.”
Perhaps the little college in the desert doesn’t have anything but the Leftist Compendium of Infinitely Variable Definitions for dolf to look to, to figure out the meaning of things like “real world experience”. His fantasy world seems to be quite extensive, but quite creepy.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we got it, Romney=spawn of Satan, blah blah blah
I was responding to that. You having a bad day on the Ranch or something. Politics got you down? Feel like you are spiraling out of control?
This is for you.
How does Spawn of Beelzebub sound to you Amazona? It just doesn’t have that ring to it in my opinion. We will keep it in reserve though in case I run out of ways to annoy you.
Many Happy returns to you and I look forward over the next year to point out all of mitts flaws. Mind you, now. I do believe that mitt will be the next potus. I think enough of the donkyrat base is going to stay at home to counter the SoCons like myself that will not vote for a progressive.
So the best of both worlds? Nicht wahr? You get your man mitt and i get to have some fun at Darth Flipflops expense.
🙂
Nah, I like alliteration.
When Romney gets the nod from the GOP establishment and loses to Obama despite 9% unemployment and a deficit the size of Colorado I will blame the Amys and Clusters and Counts in the GOP who have real world experience, but ultimately just don’t care because their lives are only remotely impacted by the economy being a disaster.
I won’t blame the Matts and Marks in the GOP, they don’t even have kids so their real world experience is practically nil.
Bardolf, I dont think bams can survive Darth Flipflop. It will be close in my opinion but bams still looses. I will go triple or nothing on that six pack. 🙂
An interesting scenario, bams wins the popular vote but looses the electoral vote. Civil war anyone?
No need to blame me, I would vote for Mittens. I think the only candidate I wont vote for is Paul – I would probably just stay home. In my opinion, Paul has some good ideas, but is one missed medication away from being bat shit insane. And I don’t like his foreign policy.
baldork
Dang – I feel left out……do I get blame? or a pass?
hell Im voting the the Neegro (not barry, the REAL one) 🙂
@Cluster
If you would vote for Mittens but not Paul you are to blame.
@GMB
Double or double= quadruple. A case of Sam Adams? It’s a bet. If mittens wins the primary I’m guessing he loses to Obama. Romneycare, pro-choice, big government lover. When there are 2 big spenders running, the people will take the big spender every time.
@Neo
You and Spook deep down are concerned about the future of the country. You can’t help you’re wrong 95% of the time. The public schools were never that good 😉
Bardolf, I’ll go that. If Darth Flipflop wins you get a case of Sam Adams. Its definately going to be interesting in 2012.
Mitt!!! 2012 Because you know you haven’t had enough of the establishment yet.
baldork
that is WHY YOU “teach” for them.
maybe mittens could run with bwany as VP
the best of both worlds.
one cult member and a gay
running against a cult/gay POtuS and a loon.
@Neo
You and Spook deep down are concerned about the future of the country. You can’t help you’re wrong 95% of the time. The public schools were never that good
Oh come on — Neo is wrong a lot more than I am.