Got into a little debate about the Ukraine War on X – it ended up with me, apparently, being placed on someone’s list of Stupid People. Meh. Not the first time. Won’t be the last. But the crux of the debate is this:
I suggest that it is time for Ukraine to seek a peace deal with Russia, even at the price of lost territory.
The other side suggests I’m an idiot and that this would be to reward a cruel and evil aggressor.
Now, to be fair, I agree that a peace deal which leaves Russia in possession of the Donbas would be to reward the aggressor – this whether or not Putin is cruel and evil (that’s a debate for some other time). But that wasn’t exactly what got me on the Stupid List. We went on and my opponents are quite certain that such an abomination cannot be tolerated – that Ukraine must continue the fight! On and on. Fight! Fight! FIGHT!
To which I responded: well, yeah, they can fight on but to what purpose? The Ukrainians simply lack the physical power to expel the Russians. At this point, all further bloodshed is pointless because it cannot alter the result. Everyone on both sides is now dying for nothing. Presto: I’m on the Stupid List.
After it was over it occurred to me that what is really lacking in the modern world is any knowledge of history, especially of military history. I mean, seriously: the normal course of war throughout human history has been an aggressor attacking and the defender either prevailing or not against this aggression. I will use the closest example to what we have in the Russia-Ukraine War – the War of the Austrian Succession/Seven Years war.
This two part war started because Prussia in 1740, perceiving a weak Hapsburg government under a newly enthroned female Monarch (Maria Theresa) would be easy pickings…so they occupied the Hapsburg province of Silesia. Turns out, Prussia (under Frederick the very-much-so-called Great) got a lot more than they bargained for. Maria Theresa was made of much sterner stuff than expected. She didn’t just roll over – she fought. First round went on until 1748 when mutual exhaustion compelled peace – but a peace where Maria Theresa ceded Silesia to Prussia. She wasn’t about to lie down for that for long and so as soon as peace was concluded she started reforming her realm, rebuilding her armies and forging new alliances for a second round, which started in 1756 – called The Seven Years War in Europe, in America it is our French and Indian War (which, of course, led very directly to our Revolutionary War twenty years later). Unfortunately for the cause of the Just, Maria Theresa was not able to prevail – after seven years of fighting and pushing Frederick and his Prussia to the verge of destruction, luck went against her and she was forced to once again make peace with Prussia still in possession of Silesia. Why did she quit? Because she found that she simply lacked the physical power to compel Prussian withdrawal. She could have kept fighting. She still had soldiers. She could have kept going on and on and on…but it was done. She couldn’t win. It was time to quit. And so she did.
That is what I’m talking about. As long as you have a hope of prevailing, fight. But as soon as you see the end beyond reasonable doubt, it is time to call it quits.
To be sure, history is also filled with wars that went on long after the decision was reached. Most famously was, of course, Hitler’s war where he was ordering his shattered armies to attack when the Russians were a hundred yards away from his bunker. That war was definitely over the moment the Allies got ashore at Normandy – which is why von Rundstedt, asked what to do about it, said, “make peace, you fools”. World War One – the Germans got their peace with Russia in March of 1918. At that point, no longer burdened by an Eastern Front (and having access to Russia’s vast raw materials) their choice was simple – sue for peace with the western Allies. They had no chance – the British/French/American armies and economies were vastly superior to anything the Germans could bring to the field. It was time to quit. Instead, they attacked. Had they quit in April of 1918 they would have got vastly better terms than they got in November 1918. Also, the Confederacy. The Civil War was effectively over with the surrender of Vicksburg and Lee’s defeat at Gettysburg…but it was absolutely finished when Sherman took Atlanta. At that point, it was time to throw in the towel…no possible outcome later would be better than running up the white flag in July of 1864. The loss of lives and property resulting from these wars going on past their decisive moments is astonishing…and the world is a worse and poorer place today because of stubborn pride keeping up a lost fight.
And that is what I’m on about regarding Ukraine. The only ghost of a chance Ukraine has is if an American and/or European army comes to redress the balance. That is simply not possible as the European and American populations don’t want to fight. Ukraine had her chance for victory – had she built up a mobile strike force to attack the lumbering and incompetent Russian army of 2022. She had a second chance once that first Russian invasion was checked – before Russia got her act together. But now it is too late…Russia’s power just grows and grows while Ukraine’s fades away. The Russians don’t even have to be in any way clever…they so vastly outnumber the Ukrainians that they can fix the Ukrainian army in place and just grind it down with artillery. If Ukraine throws up the sponge right now then they’ll get far better terms than if they fight pointlessly until total collapse, at which time Russia gets to dictate terms. And this is without considering the loss to Ukraine’s future in the number of brave, fit young men who are dying day by day. It is just time for peace. There’s been a war. Ukraine has lost this war. End it. Pay the price of defeat. Maybe Ukraine can try again later – that would be up to Ukraine. But for this moment, it is over. Pay the price for peace.
But I think we, being a very sinful people these days, just can’t grasp that concept. Our pride is involved – that is, those who have been boosters of Ukraine just can’t contemplate a future where Ukraine isn’t triumphant. Pride combined with a callous disregard for human life is what has brought us here – and it is very sad, especially as it is expressed by people who not only have never seen death in war, but who don’t even really think about it. That is, the young man who is on the front line…he’s got all the same hopes and dreams that any young man may have and then in an instant, all gone. Never to come back. Lost forever. The people pushing for war don’t seem to think about that – can’t even comprehend it. How precious the blood expended is…how irretrievable the loss. I am starting to think they are very much monsters…and no less monsters than Hitler raving about massive counterattacks from the bunker.
We had that quite moving anti-war song of the 1960’s, Where Have All the Flowers Gone? but I think we need an update to it…the flowers have all turned into stone faced freaks who think of human beings as so many blocks of wood. Not themselves, of course. Oh, no: you’ll won’t find the war boosters in the trenches – but for everyone not them, off you go…grind away. Die. Just don’t make me confront my own failure…
Blogs For Victory 
Let’s be very clear about this … Biden allowed Russia to take the Donbas region, aided by Kamala, and Ukraine will never get that land back. Period. This is just basic follow-the-dots logic. And here’s why, in 2014 Putin rolled into Crimea, took complete control, and Obama did nothing. Not even a strongly worded press conference. Putin then sets his sights on the Donbas and begins amassing troops along the border shortly after Biden’s victory (knowing he had success under Obama). Kamala then goes to Ukraine and publicly announces that Ukraine is soon the be a NATO country, something of which Putin vehemently opposes, and then our boy Biden mumbles that maybe “a small incursion would be acceptable”. That right there was an invitation to Putin to proceed … and he did, and now he owns the Donbas region which is all he wants and Ukraine will never get it back, just as they will never get Crimea back. We can thank Democrats for all of that.
On another note, I guess Casper thinks that forced vaccines, censored speech, punitive taxation, indefinite imprisonment, selective prosecutions, and fealty to less than 1% of the population are the freedoms our founders wanted. Who knew?
Well said, but you left out one important factor: all the companies, many if not most of which are American, who are making billions of dollars producing weapons used in the Ukraine/Russia war.
And that’s what it’s all about. Follow the money. I read that early on in this conflict, the President of Poland had an agreement with Zelensky and Putin for a cease fire and talks. Biden stopped it. Or let’s say, the Military Industrial Complex stopped it. At this point, this is a war of choice.
There is a special place in hell for those who play at war. And that its all coming these days from our supposed anti-war Left just makes it more disgusting.
Make no mistake about it: in a just war fighting for what is right, I’ll agree that we should pour out whatever amount of blood it takes…but to win; not to stalemate. Certainly not to lose. And that is where we’ve entered complete insanity – there is no measure in these people. They are coddled, wealthy cowards who get their jollies off talking tough. If Russia breaks through and crushes Ukraine entirely the war boosters won’t lose any sleep over it. Won’t even really think about it. But the dead will still be dead.
I notice that pro-abort casper is just ignoring my observation that abortion depends on slavery.
I’ve been developing along those lines, myself.
The purpose of abortion is to enslave women not just to men, but to the worst sort of men.
Used to be a guy had to “do the right thing”…now he can just say, “hey, get an abortion”…the old way wasn’t in any way perfect, but I think that there being at least a call to do the right thing is superior to a blanket go ahead and do the wrong thing.
Not only that, it’s that the women OWN their babies. It’s that the human dignity of these very tiny people, their very right to life, can be determined by the people who declare ownership of them—and as casper pointed out, that is the definition of slavery.
So if a 12 year old is forced to give birth after being raped, wouldn’t that be a form of slavery? She would be forced to house a group of cells inserted into her body against her will for the next nine months. Isn’t she a slave to the embryo?
BTW, I’m not proaborition. I would never force anyone to have an abortion. I am for women to to be able to make their own choices.
casper, you come up with the goofiest crap I have ever heard. The sad/scary part is that makes sense to you.
Whenever I hear that a twelve year old girl should be taken in to have her baby killed I remember driving one night with my ten year old niece, and hitting a rabbit on the highway. She grieved for that bunny the rest of the night. So do not tell me that a young girl forced to kill a baby because some adults made her do it will not suffer guilt and grief, more than if she were to carry that child to term. A young girl will not, thankfully, have the same twisted concepts that “adults” like you have. A young girl will be thinking of babies, not “cells inserted into her body”. (What kind of mind even THINKS that way?)
A young girl facing pregnancy is always a tragedy. It cannot be erased by adding another tragedy to it. Women who have had abortions often suffer horrible grief and guilt, and people like you would impose this on a child. And what is even more grotesque, you would claim it would be for her own good.
A twelve year old girl who is pregnant has probably been raped, probably by a father or brother, and that is something far more damaging to her than having to undergo a perfectly normal physical process that millions of young girls have gone through, throughout history. Without ghouls like you hovering over her telling her that she is being permanently damaged by this, with loving and intelligent guidance, she can get through this and end up sad at giving up her baby for adoption but proud of herself for having the courage to deal with a difficult situation. Just, for her sake, keep her away from freaks like you howling at her that she is “a slave to her embryo”.
Your creep factor just keeps increasing, along with evidence that your IQ, never impressive, keeps eroding. So now the person who can make the life or death decision about another human being is not the slave owner, but the slave? I suppose on Planet Casper that makes sense, but then on Planet Casper making sense has clearly never been a priority.
And then you fall back on the same garbage argument people like you always make, as you piously intone—“for women to to be able to make their own choices”. And no one will argue that a woman should be able to make her own choices. For her own body. It’s when women make lethal choices about someone else’s body that this pathetic argument falls apart. I know you’re about as smart as a box of hair, but even you should be able to grasp that abortion is about choices made for human beings not given a chance to make their own. This seems to be well beyond your limited comprehension, though.
To make it easier to understand: Two living human beings, with separate DNA, separate personalities, maybe even separate genders, go into a room in the abattoir. Only one leaves alive. One has assumed ownership of the other and passed a death sentence on it, while claiming to the world that she was really only making a decision about her own body. Do the math. She made a decision about a second body, a lethal decision. So do not keep mouthing that disgusting mantra because it is inherently false and inherently dishonest.
And you have reached a new low, even for you, with this truly vile post. I’m surprised that you are willing to give people a peek into the kind of sick mind that even thinks this way. Of course, self awareness has never been a strong point with you.
And quit the lie that supporting abortion is not “pro abortion”. You wouldn’t feel the need to try to defend yourself by pretending that you are really just driven by the noble concept of personal autonomy, without actually being FOR abortion itself, if you didn’t know, deep down, that it is a vile and inhumane and pathologically selfish self indulgence that kills human beings. This is one of the slimiest evasions made, and it is made by slimy people.
You either think that this form of slavery is OK, that it’s fine for women to declare ownership of the babies they helped create and then pass death sentences on them, or you don’t. There is no middle ground. There is no squishy place between where you find the practice abhorrent and despicable and where you think it’s fine that you can stake out with some pious muttering about “a woman’s right to choose”.
No one has the right to choose death for a completely innocent person who has committed no crime, done no harm, but merely had the misfortune to be conceived by a pathologically selfish female. Abortion is choosing death for another human being. And you’re fine with that. You defend it. You support it. So don’t try to weasel out of it with some sleazy platitude.
Here’s the thing, Casper – most 12 year olds who avail themselves of abortion weren’t made pregnant by a, say, 14 year old…they were mostly raped by an adult and the person paying for the abortion – the disposal of the evidence – is the rapist or someone connected to same. You’re not actually helping here.
And, also, you wouldn’t go for a rape exception…nor a first trimester exception. Your party is committed to federally funded abortion on demand until birth. There is no retreat from it – and anyone saying they take even a slightly moderate view on it is lying because when the rubber meets the road, all Democrats back abortion to birth regardless of what they campaigned on.
Frankly Amazona i find it pretty creepy that you would force a twelve year old to give birth to her rapist’s child. And frankly most Americans agree with me. Do you have any idea what pregnancy can do to a twelve year old body/. Did you know that pregnancy is the leading cause of death among teenage girls worldwide? Did you know that a twelve year old is much more likely to give birth to babies with birth defects than a woman over twenty?
I’m 100% for women having babies, but only if they want the babies. I have a friend who was raped and chose to have the baby. She is 100% happy with her decision. I also have friends who were raped and chose not to have the baby. I support all of them.
You people always focus on the rapist, never on the human life you want to destroy and throw in the garbage. You always act like killing the innocent child of the rapist will somehow help the raped girl or woman heal, when in fact you are adding a second tragedy and crime against humanity to the first.
“Did you know that pregnancy is the leading cause of death among teenage girls worldwide?” No, and neither do you. And ‘worldwide” covers third world nations where teenage girls are usually small and malnourished and have no prenatal care. A healthy American girl who has been well cared for and well fed is in better shape than many if not most women in many third world countries. Don’t drag in that “worldwide” crap.
“Did you know that a twelve year old is much more likely to give birth to babies with birth defects than a woman over twenty?” No, and neither do you. And again, apples to apples—healthy teenagers or third world malnourished teenagers? Cite your sources here because I call BS on both of them.
Young girls have always had babies. It used to be the norm. It is a natural physical process, and when the girl or woman starts out with good health and a history of being well nourished, and has good prenatal care, there is no reason for a pregnancy to be a serious health issue. Is it ideal? No. But neither is forcing a girl to do something that is likely to haunt her for the rest of her life.
You always manage to come up with “friends” who have gone through whatever we are talking about—-as if women just confide things like this to men like you. Now you know all these women who have confided in you that they have been raped, and even that they have aborted the resulting babies. I don’t believe you.
How many “friends” do you know who have been pregnant and had the courage and dignity and respect for life to carry that child to term and then find a loving home for it? I went to school with three girls who got pregnant. One, who was 15 and never wanted anything but to be a mother, got permission to marry her slightly older boyfriend and had a perfectly normal pregnancy and childbirth. The others gave up their babies for adoption. While you sit there like a toad smug in your lies and the propaganda fed to you by the Death Cult, inventing stories to shore up your indifference to basic human decency, I have experience. I used to visit one of those friends in the Florence Crittendon Home for Unwed Mothers, and spend time with her and other girls there. I had a car, and would take a carload of young pregnant girls out for a few hours away from the home. We talked, and laughed, and went to drive-ins for Cokes or shakes. They were not tragic figures crushed under the burden of pregnancy.
None of them LIKED being pregnant. They knew they would be sad to give up their babies. But they were proud of what they were doing.
Over the next several years I met three women who, when we got to be friends, confided in me that they had gone through the same thing. Another friend, in her 30s, had her marriage fall apart when her husband got into a cult and though she tried to be responsible she got pregnant by the first man she dated as she was recovering from her unwanted divorce. She found a lawyer who specialized in private adoptions, screened families, chose the one she thought would be the best one for her child, took good care of herself, gave birth, and handed that beloved and fortunate little boy to excited new parents.
So, unlike you, I actually have experience with women who have gone through unwanted pregnancies and given up those children to loving homes. And the thread that winds through every one of their stories is that of dignity and respect for life, of pride in doing the right thing, pride in knowing that they had the courage to care for and nourish those tiny dependent human beings and care for them the best way they could, and joy in knowing that those children were out there, alive because of them. Their experiences did not end with a bloody corpse in a garbage can.
I also know, from family experience, being from a poor family where a new pregnancy was usually met with a feeling of dismay, that once the first shock passed these women—every one of them—quickly came to love those formerly unwanted babies. This is nature’s way. That original shock dissipates—-if ghouls like you give it a chance—–and morphs into the natural maternal love of a real woman for her child. That is why the abortionists push so hard for abortions NOW, IMMEDIATELY. That is why they fight so hard against any effort to provide true choice to newly pregnant women, by giving them ultrasounds and consults with doctors so they have actual information about their babies, their bodies, and what to expect. That is why the pro-death ghouls refuse to provide any information at all about options to killing those babies. They callously take advantage of that early panic, and then send these damaged women on their way, indifferent to the grief and guilt so many of them feel for the rest of their lives. (I also had a friend who counseled women who were suffering tremendous guilt and grief for killing their own babies. This is the secret the pro-death cult—-and yes, that includes you even though you try to weasel out of it—doesn’t want people to know. Abortion destroys not just the lives of the unborn victims but of untold women who were convinced that abortion was the only answer to their situation—-a permanent solution to a temporary problem.
So, casper, you are now preening in the conviction that you have successfully diverted the conversation away from the inconvenient discussion of slavery—that is, of the moral and ethical elements of one person owning another and having total control over that other human being, to the extent of passing a death sentence on it. This is not a complete surprise, given your dedication to the only political party in the history of this country that has defended slavery and your antipathy to the party created to fight it.
Your efforts to evade the topic with your truly vile example (and your absolutely disgusting description of a human child in utero) did not distract from it, merely supporting the observation that you can’t come out against slavery while at the same time defending the concept that one big person can own another small person. You just chose to try to dodge the question by revealing a particularly ugly aspect of what you are.
Weird waking up to the notion that Casper seems to know a lot of women who have had to struggle through the abortion decision, who knew? I’m 63 and I can’t think of one instance that I knew of a woman struggling with that decision. I guess the old adage of show me who your friends are, and I’ll show you who are … is true. But that’s exactly what the abortion decision is … a struggle. It is nothing to be celebrated as the Left so often does in the most vile manner possible. Abortion is the taking of life, period. Abortion is not healthcare. And Casper is simply using the most extreme example of abortion to malign the pro life position, which is what all Democrats do.
The abortion issue to Democrats is a lot like the student loan issue, the illegal immigration issue, and of course DEI, these are simply top down driven agendas designed to hold their constituents harmless of any personal responsibility, and then blame the other side for being extreme. The only position on abortion which is extreme, is the democrats position, which is why they use 12 year olds as cover.
“You people always focus on the rapist, never on the human life you want to destroy and throw in the garbage.”
And you people always focus on the embryo and not the girl who has to carry it for nine months.
“You always manage to come up with “friends” who have gone through whatever we are talking about—-as if women just confide things like this to men like you. Now you know all these women who have confided in you that they have been raped, and even that they have aborted the resulting babies. I don’t believe you.”
People confide in me because I’m a good listener. And in seventy years, I’ve listened to lot of people. I don’t care if you don’t believe me.
You are so impressed with the dumbest comebacks, such as “And you people always focus on the embryo and not the girl who has to carry it for nine months.”.
You do echo your idol, though, when you think of a baby as “punishment” and act like carrying a child to term is unbearably cruel and difficult. You are one of those people who actually thinks of an unborn human being as merely an “embryo”—when it isn’t just a “a group of cells”. And yes, I DO focus on that innocent human being whose very life hangs in the balance. And yes, I DO focus on the girl, too, knowing how fragile and delicate the feelings of young girls are, worrying that because of allegiance to some abstract delusion some people will force her into an action that means that for the rest of her life when she sees a tiny baby she will think “I killed one of those” and when she sees a toddler she will think “that’s what my baby would have looked like, if I had not killed it.” (Because those are the thoughts and regrets of millions of women who have been told that abortion is merely getting rid of “a group of cells” and no big deal.)
Your way, a bunch of bossy old people arrogant enough to claim to know what is best for a young girl impose their will upon her and force her to kill her unborn child. In five years, she will be at least a senior in high school, with a dead baby behind her and a lifetime of guilt and grief ahead of her, but with the lesson that the way to handle adversity is to run away from it, and always take what looks like the easy way out, even if innocent people have to pay a heavy price. Death is final. It leaves no options, no future. It is a dead end, and there is no second chance.
My way, compassionate and caring people surround the frightened girl with love and support, educate her about what to expect in the next few months, and give her the mental and emotional tools to deal with it. One of the things she may learn from this is that running away from challenges and taking the easy way out is not always the best way to live, and that she has the strength to deal with whatever life throws at her. By the time she graduates she will be years ahead of her peers, having met a major challenge head-on and handled it with courage and dignity even when it was hard. At the very worst, she will feel that she paid a very high price for a few months, but the chances are she will not think “I wish I had killed that baby”. Because Option Two is about second chances, about life, about options.
There is physical rape, and then there is emotional rape, and I believe that forcing a young girl to kill her unborn baby is the same as emotionally raping her, leaving her scarred for life. Not that people like you care about such niceties, being all involved in the whole rape culture. No twelve year old girl is capable of the kind of “choice” you people babble on about. No, this would be forced upon her, indifferent to the damage it might impose. That kind of emotional damage is a lot worse than the physical demands of pregnancy and childbirth.
And you are still clinging to the tired old “12-year-old-rape-victim” fantasy, because it is familiar to you, comfortable to you, a lot more comfortable than dealing with the ugly reality that what you are really championing is a particularly ugly form of slavery, one in which the slave always dies.
The reason I don’t believe you is because you are a liar. No one has ever even hinted at “forcing women to carry a dead fetus to term”. That is not only a vicious lie, it is a contradiction in terms as a dead fetus would result in a terminated pregnancy. Surely not even you are so bone-deep stupid you think a dead fetus would just hang around in a uterus till the end of the ninth month. It’s almost as if you’re afraid someone might think you have an iota of intelligence, and want to put that delusion to rest.
Mission accomplished.
You also lie when you claim that the Republican Party is “also pushing to get rid of birth control and IVF,” lies so blatant that no one can possibly believe them. Well, evidently YOU can. Of course you forget that when Trump was president the Republicans, with his support, wanted to make birth control available without a prescription, and the Dems fought that and blocked it. Pills to kill babies, of course. Pills to prevent conception? No way. And the party is not involved in an effort to ban IVF. You simply lie. You’ve simply abandoned all pretense of decency and honor and honesty and just pull one lie after another out of your rear end. No wonder you support Biden—neither one of you cares a whit about honesty.
But you cling to that 12-year-old-girl theme. It seems to resonate with you, the idea that you could be one of those telling a young girl that she had no option but to kill her baby. It kind of sounds like you would like that. Nice power trip, a chance to put your death cult ideology into practice. Just be sure you’re not around when she is a little older and realizes what you people did to her.
For all your posturing as a Christian and a decent man you really are a horrible person, wallowing in lies because they just make you so happy.
Mark,
“And, also, you wouldn’t go for a rape exception…nor a first trimester exception. “
Actually, I would along with exceptions for rape. I would also want exceptions if it impacted the mother’s health. You guys are the ones forcing 12 year olds to have babies and forcing women to carry a dead fetus to term. Your party is also pushing to get rid of birth control and IVF.
Still running away from that slavery issue, I see. I used your own definition of slavery and you still aren’t man enough to stand by it now that it has been pointed out to you that you, yourself, accurately described the attitude of female gestators who assume ownership of the human beings entrusted to their care, to the point of imposing an arbitrary death sentence upon them.
All you can do is blubber “12-year-old-girls-forced-birth-12-year-old-girls-forced-birth-12-year-old-girls-forced-birth” like some beached walrus caught in a net.
So you can’t admit that slavery is never justified, because that would mean that pregnant women don’t own their unborn children as chattel, to be disposed of at will by any means desired, and that would mean being a heretic to the secular religion of Leftism. Abortion is a sacrament of this church and is sacred to its teachings and its relationship to slavery is not a problem.
And to quote our last real president, you should also have to defend the other sacraments of this profane religion: policies of Open Borders (where millions of people, including record numbers of Terrorists, are allowed to enter our Country, from prisons and mental institutions, totally unchecked and unvetted!), to Ending Social Security, Men playing in Women’s sports, High Taxes, High Interest Rates, encouraging a Woke Military, Uncontrollable Inflation, Record Setting Crime, Only Electric Vehicles, Subservience to China and other Countries, Endless Wars, putting America Last, losing our Dollar Based Standard, and so much more.
And evidently this religion, much like Islam, teaches that lying to support and defend it is OK.
George Orwell had it right:
Off topic, but hysterically funny:
If only he would stop the infantile name calling he would be so much more impressive. It’s time to see Trump the Statesman, not Trump the Schoolyard Bully.
And now the nation has seen Joe and his physical and mental condition. I think continuing to pile on will eventually have a negative impact. Yes, having a president with those obvious mental and physical issues is a major problem, but constantly ridiculing and attacking a feeble old man suffering from dementia is going to look cruel. We don’t make fun of people who are not normal, whether they are kids on the short bus or people with dementia. It’s time to move on. The issues Trump brought up are legitimate and important, and he needs to stick to them and move away from the ugly persona of personal attacks and name calling.
He’s baiting Biden.
You might recall Trump denigrating Biden’s golf game during the debate – today Biden went on Morning Joe and part of his slurred rant was about golf!
Biden stays in – which looks likely – it’ll be like this al the way until November.
So much fun!
Of course he is baiting Biden, much like I am baiting casper. Anyone can imagine my wink and implied “Let’s see how far he will go this time” as I lay another trap to lure him into yet another revelation of his lack of both an IQ and a moral compass.
They are both mentally and morally defective, both addicted to lying, and both reprehensible human beings. However, only one of them has ever been the first black woman vice president to a black president, or driven a big rig, or almost been a football star or taken a chain to a gang member out behind the dumpsters. .
I’d just like to see Trump concentrate on all the things that Biden is predicting that he (Trump) will do if he’s re-elected that Biden and/or Democrats have done or are doing. Also keep reminding people what common grocery items cost when he was President, what the price of gas was, what interest rates were, which president used the justice system to target his political opponent, how he (Trump) was winding down (not ramping up) our military involvement around the globe. That’s just for starters. If I were running Trump’s campaign, I make extensive use of billboards.