An Instapundit reader asks:
Notice how there was no “antiwar” movement during the ‘90’s, even though we were at war the entire time in Iraq, Haiti, Kosovo, a dab here and there in Afghanistan and Sudan. Then, after 9/11, it was the “Next Vietnam” with a passionate “antiwar” movement with the NYT’s full treasonous participation, just like the good old days. And now, even though the daily death count has matched the highest daily rate we ever saw in Iraq, there is no “antiwar” movement or daily casualty count in all the newspapers. It’s like the “antiwar” movement can be turned off and on like a switch, depending on which party is in the White House.
Well, where are you guys? Where the “no blood for oil” demonstrations? The attempts to put Obama up on war crimes charges? The “Obama lied, people died” posters? Come now – or is being “anti-war” really just a matter of being “anti-GOP”?
Blogs For Victory 