Debbie Wasserman Shultz might be the best thing that Republicans have going for them right now. The more that this brainless twit flaps her gums, the more inane her comments seem to become. Hopefully her baseless hysteric ignorance will be a turnoff to the voters of this nation.
In some ways I feel for her … she does have a rather difficult job: defending the obAMATEUR and his failed policies. You need to know that many, if not most, Democrats don’t much like Obama either; but he’s theirs and they have to live with the ugly person they brought to the dance. But on the other hand, you get the feeling that this woman truly believes the things that she is saying. If so, she is one of the most ignorant people in public service in this country. But .. that goes hand-in-hand with being a Democrat. Remember that being called a “democrat” used to be an insult. It meant one who panders to the mindless whims of the masses. Ditzy Debbie is most assuredly a democrat. I guess that’s OK, though, if you believe that to be your road to power.
Just when you thought she had hit some sort of ignoranus peak, she comes out with this unbelievably partisan quote:
“We need to make sure that we tone things down, particularly in light of the Tucson tragedy from a year ago, where my very good friend, Gabby Giffords — who is doing really well, by the way, — [was shot]. The discourse in America, the discourse in Congress in particular . . . has really changed, I’ll tell you. I hesitate to place blame, but I have noticed it take a very precipitous turn towards edginess and lack of civility with the growth of the Tea Party movement.”
Yes! Those Tea Partiers are out of control with their riot like actions, squatting on public land, crapping on police cars, etc. etc. OH WAIT! Those are the actions of her and her party’s beloved Occupy Anywhere for Anything lunatics. You know the Occupy groups that her pResident and her party had orgasms over and try to paint them as a mainstream movement. Their uncivil behavior was beyond contempt but her regurgitation of dumbed down talking points against the Tea Party fits to the pandering to the ignorant masses, the drones. Occutards left their occupied sites full of trash .. and sometimes dead bodies. Tea Partiers always cleaned up. And I’m still waiting to see the a picture of a Tea Partier taking a crap on a police car. Edginess? Lack of Civility? That’s the occupiers, not the Tea Partiers.
That wasn’t all she had to say. She goes on to say, “when [the tea party] disagree with you on an issue, you’re not just wrong, you’re a liar.” Now I don’t use the word “liar” lightly. Someone is lying only if they know what they are saying is untrue at the time they say it. I’ve highlighted, the many occasions, her inaccurate statements about Barack Obama’s economy. Does she know that she is full of donkeysqueeze at the time she is spouting off or is she just ignorant?
As if that previous quote from Ditzy Debbie wasn’t enough, now she has something to say about our tax code. You’ll appreciate this.
“There is nothing wrong with doing well. It’s a goal we all inspire to. And we want everybody in America to do well. But we shouldn’t have our tax policy exclusively focused on helping people already doing well do better. In America we should target our tax policy towards people who want to be lifted up.”
First of all, half of Americans don’t even pay income taxes! For those who do, but find themselves at the bottom of the scale, it is not the job of the tax code to “lift people up.” Not to mention the fact that the earned income tax credit has become one of the federal government’s largest programs for lower-income taxpayers. Consider the following:
-
The EITC has grown in cost from $4.4 billion in 1990, to $26.1 billion in 2000, and to an estimated $44.9 billion in 2011.
-
The CTC was enacted in 1997, and then its cost rose from $0.8 billion in 2000 to an estimated $22.9 billion in 2011.
If anything, Debbie Wasserman Shultz should be outrage by the $4.2 billion in refundable tax credits given to illegal aliens just last year alone! Meanwhile, those who are doing well are carrying more of the burden than ever. The figure fluctuates between 37 and 40% — that is the percentage of income taxes paid by the top 1% of taxpayers. Meanwhile, they are earning around 20% of the income.
There is no doubt that our tax code is riddled with loopholes; clearly you know my opinion of our tax code. But to claim that our tax code “exclusively” helps those who are doing better and needs to target people to “lift them up” is such a misguided view of things. This is a prime example of how politicians view our tax code as another means of legislation and a way to buy votes. Is it any wonder why they will fight so vigorously to defend it when challenged with ideas like the FairTax or the 999 Plan?
While we are at it, here other moments, brought to you by Debbie Wasserman Shultz.
DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz Dodges Question About Obama’s Responsibility For Solyndra
DNC Chief Wasserman Schultz Stumped When Asked About Obama’s “One-Term Proposition” Promise…
Again this woman is either a complete ignoramus or a habitual liar. She spews the mindless talking points so well and the dumbed down lefty drones eat it all up. Some of them posted here and you can read their statements verbatim.
Blogs For Victory 
Wasserman Shultz is one of the new “stars” in the Democratic Party, following in the footsteps of Kennedy,Schumer, Durbin, Pelosi and the list goes on. She’s one of the reasons why the Democratic Party is shrinking, why less individuals describe themselves as liberal and why more individuals describe themselves as conservative than moderate and liberal.
It’s amusing that you think “Debbie Wasserman Shultz might be the best thing that Republicans have going for them right now.” Speaks volumes for the quality of Republican politicians themselves, doesn’t it?
Ya know, Watson, there’s an old saying: “when your adversary is engaged in self-immolation, the best course of action is to hide the fire extinguishers and get the hell out of the way.” I think that’s what Tired was referring to.
Is that like the circular firing squad that Neocondolences keeps talking about?
The Newt came out today and said he was too anti-capitalist when he complained about wall street firing people for the greater good! Even Newt has to toe the corporate line. Too bad for Huntsman, he still hasn’t got the memo. After SC Huntsman will drop out as penance for his sins.
After Huntsman comes in behind Stephen Colbert in SC, he’ll drop out. Pity the billionaires.
Wow watty, you, like Ditzy, regurgitate the dumbed down talking points just like I pointed out in the thread.
You follow the same theme “the Republican candidates are really unremarkable.”
Can you be any more of a mindless drone?
You too are the gift that keeps on giving.
If Debbie Shultz is the best thing Republicans have going for them right now they truly are in a pitiable state. You’re scraping the bottom of the barrel for subject matter in an amazingly rich environment of news and topical events. The blog lede has gone to hell since Mark left.
Again, the drones prove me correct and make my point. The poor content and the constant regurgitation of dumbed down talking points (like Ditzy Debbie) in your responses denny are always constant in this blog no matter who is the author of the thread.
Personally, I like Limbaugh’s pet name for her: Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz. And the flip side of Watson’s comment would be what it says about the Democratic Party that they would pick her to head the DNC.
Really pathetic that she couldn’t answer a simple question.
But that’s the way they are; libs always try to weasel themselves, and their fellow comrades in crime out of trouble.
Speaking of crime, one of my favorite Wasserman-Schultz quotes is: “Republicans Want to Make it a Crime to Be An ‘Undocumented Immigrant”.
““This past election was tough. We must do a better job of clearly articulating our accomplishments to the American people.”” Debbi Blabbermouth Shitzferbrains
Yeah, That’s the Problem! You’re not talking enough.
LOL! How many speeches has Obama given on Obamacare?
No, really!
Republicans are scared to death that this person will be covered by the Press!
Please, please don’t let her speak; she’s converting thousands of voters every time she opens her mouth.
Oh, the humanity! What are we to do?
(and please don’t throw me in the Briar Patch!)
Jeremiah, you mean a simple question, like “What do you read?”
First you ignore Deb. Then you belittle her. Then you fight her. Then she wins.
Keep obsessing on the presidential race. A year from now, it’ll all be ridiculed as a well-funded incumbent vs. a circular firing squad.
Watch the House and Senate. That’s what matters.
Haha, what is it that neocons always say to liberals when a comment is made on the silliness of one of their looney toons? Oh yeah,…if you are critical of what he/she says, well then, you must ‘fear’ them.
“You need to know that many, if not most, Democrats don’t much like Obama either”…tiredoflibbs. That sounds very much like what we are hearing from Conservatives about their pi** poor selection of Presidential candidates. How many times have we heard it said, ‘if so and so gets the nomination, I’ll just have to hold my nose and vote’, or ‘I don’t care for any of the Republican candidates, so I’m staying home on voting day’?
Face it, unless a GOP messiah shows up to rescue the day, President Obama will be serving another term.
Currently, we are being governed, and lectured to, by the minority. That dynamic will change soon:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/152021/Conservatives-Remain-Largest-Ideological-Group.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=syndication&utm_content=morelink&utm_term=All%20Gallup%20Headlines%20-%20Politics
“Oh yeah,…if you are critical of what he/she says, well then, you must ‘fear’ them.”
“How many times have we heard it said, ‘if so and so gets the nomination, I’ll just have to hold my nose and vote’, or ‘I don’t care for any of the Republican candidates, so I’m staying home on voting day’?”
More dumbed down talking points designed for the ignorant masses. Why do you fall for them so easily? You too are the gift that keeps on giving!
Then you fight her. Then she wins.
Now that’s funny! Apparently Wasserman-Schultz isn’t the only brain-dead looney-tunes on the left side of the aisle.
I also hope the DNC continues to parade DWS out in public. She is not only mindless, but awfully hard to look at too, so not much of an asset there but really what do the democrats have? They have no young talent on their bench like the GOP does. The GOP has Ryan, Rubio, Rand Paul, Allen West, Nikki Haley, and even Santorum, Christie, and Bachmann are all quite young as well. Who do the democrats have?? No one. Talk about the party of old white guys, the democrats always parade out Reid, Durbin, Schumer, Kerry, and Biden to defend their positions, and when Obama is gone, who picks up the slack? Hillary???
The democrats are soon to fade away from inanity and irrelevance.
TO see what a Democrat regularly DOES look at what they accuse others of. Its projection, the list of their accusations almost perfectly matches their behavior.
And when someone uses the term ‘Neocon” I can safely ignore the majority of their post. . because I’m pretty sure its a worthless post.
And when we see your posts “Ryan” we can safely ignore them.
Ryan
wellllll un less it is Meeeee LOL
Finally!! People have become outraged at the inhumane actions of Islamic extremists – the beheadings, the stonings, and the oppression …………..
Prior to the call, Karzai described the video as “completely inhumane and condemnable in the strongest possible terms.” His administration called on the U.S. military to “apply the most severe punishment to anyone found guilty in this crime.”
Oh wait, nevermind. Once again it’s the actions of our military that are deemed deplorable, and once again, like the politically correct children we are, we cower when faced with criticism. While I don’t condone the actions, I would tell the corrupt Karzai to go F**K himself. However, this does call into question what Obama knew, and when did he know it. Remember, according to democrats, this goes all the way to the top.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/us-military-karzai-strongly-condemn-apparent-marine-desecration-of-taliban-corpses/2012/01/12/gIQADTmDtP_blog.html
One of the truly funny aspects of this campaign so far is a number of our Libs telling us we’re just going to have to suck it up and accept Romney as our candidate. It looks like that is exactly what we’re doing. I had to hold my nose really tight to vote for McCain — no so with Romney.
Moderator: off topic
Canadian,
Is this a joke? Or are you that feminine?
Moderator: Deleted off topic again.
Well let’s actually think about this ok? – the dog was not injured or killed, right? And the dog was in an air tight kennel, safely secured, right? What’s the issue?
It’s ironic that you would be concerned about this, considering that I have never seen you express outrage at how human smugglers house the illegal immigrants they curry across the border, which is far worse and a direct result of policies that you support. Do you have any comment on that?
I see you bought Romney’s lie that Seamus was in an air tight kennel, Cluster. The poor frightened animal pooped all over the car windows; hard to do if the kennel were air tight.
I DO NOT support the smuggling of Illegal immigrants across the Mexican border, period. The deplorable conditions that they are willing to endure to ensure a better life just shows the level of their desperation. A very sad situation.
I see you bought Romney’s lie that Seamus was in an air tight kennel, Cluster.
No – that was from the article you linked to. This is the first I have heard of it. But I know my dog loves to stick his head out the window and nearly has half his body out the window most of the time, so I think you’re buying into some drama queen stuff here – not the first time.
Moderator: off topic again.
It may prove to be a problem only with insecure feminine worry warts. You, chief among them.
c0
awwwww BuB BuyaH
He’s conservative enough; Mitt Happens.
OT, but I got my name above the fold on MarketWatch’s home page this morning:
Friday the 13th on Wall St.
Euro-zone downgrade rumors spook investors.
Heh.
I always knew you would break into the big time!!
You’d think a Spook would want to avoid publicity; stay low and keep moving.
That’s my motto.
I just want to ask one question. If it was a air tight kennel, how the heck did the dog breath?
Make that two questions. Mitt is a conservative? Someone who signed into law, socialised medicine is a conservative?
I can just see the donkyrat 30 second sound bites right now.
He signed it into law because that is what the people of the state of Mass., via their democratic legislature wanted. Unless you think leaders ought to ignore their constituents.
Then why is it when Obama signed into law the Healthcare change in 2009, you said it was being forced on the American people when it was OUR congressmen and senators that voted for it in congress?
So when Mitt signs a law, its the will of the people, but when Obama does it, its forced on the american people!
Man, this election is going to be easier than I thought. 4 more years!
James,
Must I remind you that states have that authority, the feds don’t. States are completely within their right to enact state administered health care if they want. The federal government does not have that authority.
Man, liberals are dumber than I thought.
I have heard that argument a lot. What if the people of Mass wanted government purchased plasma tv’s or a government provided vehicle every three years. Make up your own little right if want, it doesn’t much matter.
What if Mitt decides when he gets into the oval office that the “people” don’t want romney/obama care overturned? You sure he would sign the legislation that would overturn it?
He could of vetoed that legislation and let the mass. legislature override the veto but he didn’t. That would have required him to take an actual possition.
Mitt, when he breaks your heart, you got what you voted for.
I will prefer to be an adult about the situation GMB, and if Mitt veers from my preferred positions, well then I will vote him out in 4 years, instead of whining and complaining as you incessantly do.
Cluster,
considering the matter is in front of the Supreme Court, you sure are the stupid one for proclaiming it as a fact!
seriously, lay off the conservative utopia drinks. This is a progressive world, get used to it.
Is that why the new gallup poll has 75% of Americans say they are moderate to conservative and only 20% stating that they are liberal?
You are good for comic relief James
Most neocons like Cluster are like that, they are like leeches and parasites on society. – James
Once again James demonstrates that virtue of liberal tolerance. Didn’t DWS just say that the tea party was to blame for civil discord? Evidently she doesn’t know James.
GMB,
He isn’t a conservative. He is a moderate from Boston. You should know that a real conservative he NO chance of being elected. Look at the other candidates…they can barely scrounge up more than 15% of the votes.
Just keep your mouth shut and vote for Romney.
LOLzer, me vote for Romney, MItt?? Only if I am drunk and I haevnt touched a drop of alcohol in over 12 years but thanks for the suggestion. Not.
GMB wont vote for Mitt, and neither will you, but fortunately the majority of voters will.
James,
What did Obama know and when did he know it?
about what?
about what? – James
Exactly. Personality is more your expertise James. Leave the adult issues to, well… the adults. Have a nice day
Let’s just say the policy is not your strong suit. You’re more familiar with perceived outrages of personality. A 5th grade quality to be sure.
Wishful thinking is an adualt trait? I was done with wishful thinking oh about the time my wife had our first child. Mitt has too many flip flops and too many skeletons for me to ever consider him a “conservatuve” He might qualify as a go along to get along repub but in the end the government under Mitt is only going to grow.
If Mitt thought it was proper for the government to get into your personal life as a state governor I don’t see why anyone would think he would not carry that over to federal government.
The media will rip Mitt to shreds if he gets the nomination. He will get wourse than Palin did because he is the immiediate threat.
That is the only upside to a Mitt nomination. Just to listen to the howls of how unfair the media is to Mitt .
Woof!! Said the dog on car roof.
GMB,
good point, I agree that Mitt is not a conservative. I just find it interesting that all these faux conservatives like Cluster and Count of can’t run to defend him as the “best” the GOP has to offer.
Cluster likes to vote for mistakes. Count just rationalizes whoever the establishment picks for him, and Neo…well neo can barely spell.
In the end, Obama will win reelection by a 52-48 margin.
and Neo…well neo can barely spell.
I do have trouble with jamestooge and Ochinpy…..oh well.
PS
care to compare w-2’s mr spelling bee?
I can spell LOSER and you fit that category.
I am very familiar with Mitt’s positions, and find him acceptable to vote for. I will leave the gnashing of teeth to you.
Gnashing my teeth? LOL Not at all. Just offering my opinions just like you.
Mountain, Boy Green whimpers: “If Mitt thought it was proper for the government to get into your personal life as a state governor I don’t see why anyone would think he would not carry that over to federal government.”
Well, the only reasons to make this statement are a belief that Romney is lying when he constantly refers to the 10th Amendment distinction between what is allowed to the federal government and what is OK for states to legislate, or complete ignorance of what the 10th Amendment says and means.
Or both.
“The Tenth Amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time the Constitution was adopted, that powers not granted to the United States were reserved to the States or to the people. It added nothing to the instrument as originally ratified.” – United States v. Sprague, 282 U.S. 716, 733 (1931).
The founding fathers had good reason to pen the Tenth Amendment.
The issue of power – and especially the great potential for a power struggle between the federal and the state governments – was extremely important to the America’s founders. They deeply distrusted government power, and their goal was to prevent the growth of the type of government that the British has exercised over the colonies.
Adoption of the Constitution of 1787 was opposed by a number of well-known patriots including Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and others. They passionately argued that the Constitution would eventually lead to a strong, centralized state power which would destroy the individual liberty of the People. Many in this movement were given the poorly-named tag “Anti-Federalists.”
The Tenth Amendment was added to the Constitution of 1787 largely because of the intellectual influence and personal persistence of the Anti-Federalists and their allies.
It’s quite clear that the Tenth Amendment was written to emphasize the limited nature of the powers delegated to the federal government. In delegating just specific powers to the federal government, the states and the people, with some small exceptions, were free to continue exercising their sovereign powers. ”
Nothing in the Constitution forbids states to vote to tax to create revenue to pay for health care for its citizens. Mitt Romney was elected governor of a state which voted to do this very thing. He swore an oath to uphold the laws of the state. He also understands the difference between state and federal government, and what is and is not allowed to each. Clearly Boy, Mountain Green does not.
Some of you may find this link interesting. It provides a scientific basis for the nature of the conflicts seen daily on this wonderful blog.
http://scienceprogressaction.org/intersection/2012/01/the-left-and-the-right-physiology-brain-structure-and-function-and-attentional-differences/
I found the first couple comments after the article interesting.
Good! Did you read any of the papers?
Good! Did you read any of the papers?
I did. They were so compelling that I’ve decided to become a Liberal Democrat and vote for Obama next November.
BTW, anyone know how to use the sarcasm font in a blog comment?
Spook,
Did you read them all? The one that proves that democrat Presidents have higher IQs then Republican ones? The study that proves that liberals love comedies and Republicans like reality shows. The one that proves that liberals are kind to puppies and conservatives eat babies seals. The study that proves African-Americans are mentally inferior and Japanese make good gardeners and are really clean.
All very scientific! Not agenda driven pop-psychology from questionable sources and intellectually dishonest slime merchants.
Now where did i put that sarcasm key?
This reminds me of the later-proved-to-be-fraudulent “study” that allegedly “proved” that even THINKING of eating meat was linked to antisocial behaviors.
“The study by three university professors to show that meat eaters are “selfish bastards” is based on fraud.
The professors suggested, based on a study, that meat eaters are more selfish than vegetarians and that they are less social to compensate their insecurity and loneliness.
The psychologists of the Radboud University Nijmegen and Tilburg University concluded from various studies on the psychological significance of meat.
They stated that thinking of meat makes people less socially (sic) and in many respects more “loutish”. It also appears that people are more likely to choose meat when they feel insecure, perhaps because it is a feeling of superiority or status displays, the researchers suggest.”
mitch seems quite gullible and eager to swallow any “research” that supports his bigotries.
The title of the author’s upcoming book, The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science and Reality is the tipoff to his agenda and belief system.
This is just another example of people having some belief about something and then working backward to create a supposed “science” to support it.
I notice that mitch doesn’t seem interested in the many proofs of denial of reality shown by Libs as they pursue an always-failed economic, social and political model in the starry-eyed conviction that it will turn out to be the opposite of what it always has been.
“Neo…well neo can barely spell.” Lets not start with the personal attacks shall James. I am more than willing to have civil discussions about my political views but once it starts in on personal attacks the mud gets deeper.
Besides my spelling is atrocious and I know it. I was kicked out of the local community college ebonics class for too many of them. 😛
Disagree. Having been throught this before with the jimmuhadmin it is very unlikely bams will winanother term. Except for deeply committed donks like yourself voter ethusiasm is lower than 1980 . Even Darth Mittens has a very good chance to win. My prediction is that if Mitt does win, he will not win the popular vote but will win the electoral vote.
Now that my friend would be interesting. No?
GMB if you look at voter turnout in primaries for the GOP so far, they are low and disappointing.
The dems at this point have more money, and better organization. They also have a better ground game.
Believe me, Carter was not remotely close to Obama in terms of foreign policy and domestic policy. You forget what the inflation and interest rates were under Carter?
This President can lose about 7 states and still win the election. Not to mention, states like Arizona which are in play due to the hispanic vote.
The election is in november. A lot can change. bams has given the repubs tons of ammo to use against him. As far as as the voter turnout in the primaries so far, both Iowa and New Hampshire were higher than they were in 2008 but I will check.
Obama has a foriegn policy? Thats a good one. Maybe you should ask the employees of Hawker-Beechcraft why a Brazilian company got the contract for a light attack aircraft and they didn’t. Not enough campaign cash to bams maybe?
Several states that bams won in 2008 are now up in the air. He will be lucky to hold any of them.
This year’s Iowa caucus also set a record for turnout, with 122,255 total votes cast. The previous record for the GOP caucus was 119,000 votes, set in 2008.
“Obama has a foriegn policy? Thats a good one”…GMB
———————————————————————-
A country’s foreign policy encompasses much more than military might; but I wonder, GMB, if a Republican President would have eliminated Bin Laden & Gaddafi in the efficient and low keyed manner that President Obama has done. This President certainly has cleaned up the country’s International image, an image soiled by GWB, quite well.
And Steven Harper has cleaned up plenty of those mistakes done to Canada by the likes of Jack Layton and his ilk.
BTW hows the work on Jacks statue coming along?
Green Mountain Boy January 13, 2012 at 2:53 pm #
And Steven Harper has cleaned up plenty of those mistakes done to Canada by the likes of Jack Layton and his ilk.
BTW hows the work on Jacks statue coming along?
———————————————————————————-
Prime Minister Harper is polling very well, GMB, his numbers have gone up substantially. I think the majority of Canadians are more or less happy with his performance and with the fact that we have not suffered as much as the U.S. with regard to the economy, unemployment & housing melt down. Luckily, for us, we were better regulated.
As for Mr. Layton’s statue; I think Jack would be appalled at the notion as he was a very humble & self-effacing man.
c0
see arguing with IDIOTS, pgs 13-69
“humble & self-effacing man.”
LOLzer x100 there CO. You definately need to get your nose out of the propaganda rags.
Copps or Rae? Six of none and a half dozen of less. Good luck there, you are going to need it.
Not to mention, states like Arizona which are in play due to the hispanic vote.
Do you mean the legal or illegal Hispanic vote?
You do know, don’t you, that a huge number of LEGAL Hispanics are quite outraged at the prospect of illegals getting, for free, what they worked so hard to attain. And that many are traditional in their religious views and upset about the sex-for-fun, kill-the-babies attitude of the increasingly Liberal Dems, particularly the kill-the-living-babies vote of Obama, as well as about the dilution of the concept of marriage so it includes pretty much anyone in any kind of relationship.
But nice demographic bigotry, just lumping all Latinos into one amorphous category.
Not to mention, states like Arizona which are in play due to the hispanic vote. Do you mean the legal or illegal Hispanic vote?…Amazona
——————————————————————————-
How many illegal Hispanics do you think will be casting a vote in this election, Amazona?
Tired: easier than you think. Illegals have been able to get driver’s licenses and thanks to motor-voter (a Democrat scheme) then can register to vote at the same time!
How many illegal Hispanics do you think will be casting a vote in this election, Amazona?
It’s hard to tell. With the push to allow same-day registrations and at the same time ban photo IDs to register or vote, voting appears to be open to anyone who wants to stroll in, claim to be someone, claim to be a legal voter, and pick up a ballot.
Do you Canucks take your voting so lightly?
Amazona, our electoral process, being significantly shorter in duration, less convolouted and better run, doesn’t seem to have the problem with voter fraud to the extent that you supposedly have in the U.S.
——————————————————————–
‘A recent paper from Columbia University political science professor Dr. Lorraine Minnite serves to debunk the myth—one echoed on this side of the border by the Harper Conservatives in their C-31 sales pitch—that voters in the U.S., under the instruction of shadowy operatives, regularly organize in attempt to manipulate the system.
From her findings, Minnite writes, “The claim that voter fraud threatens the integrity of American elections is itself a fraud. It is being used to persuade the public that deceitful and criminal voters are manipulating the electoral system. No available evidence suggests that voters are intentionally corrupting the electoral process, let alone in numbers that dilute and cancel out ‘the lawful votes of the vast majority of Americans.’”
In April, 2007, the New York Times reported that a Republican-dominated panel responsible for conducting election research played fast and loose with their researchers’ findings to inflate the perception about the prevalence of voter fraud in American elections.
Minnite continues in her paper, “The exaggerated fear of voter fraud has a long history of scuttling efforts to make voting easier and more inclusive, especially for marginalized groups in American society. With renewed partisan vigor, fantasies of fraud are being spun again to undo some of the progress America has made lowering barriers to the vote.” ‘
CO, I think Bin Laden was “eliminated” in such an “efficient and low-keyed manner” because it was necessary to downplay the fact that the entire operation had been stalled and put off by the administration until the military and the Secretary of State decided it had to be done, and done immediately, and they needed to keep Obama’s dithering and obstructionism under the radar.
They planned it, they executed it, and they invited him off the golf course for a photo op to make it look like he was part of it, while he slunk down in a corner, pouting, and Valerie Jarrett fumed at being ignored.
As for Gaddafi, I think his demise can be attributed to Obama only under the category of “even a blind pig finds an acorn—sometimes”. It is a nice effort to claim that when Gaddafi was taken and killed Barry’s position was “That’s exactly what we planned” but in fact he dithered, again, till others stepped in and took action.
Wouldn’t it have been a feather in GWB’s cap to have taken out the monster responsible for 9/11. Too bad he never got around to it. Oh well, even with all his ‘dithering’, President Obama was able to do the job Bush would not or could not do.
James writes, “GMB if you look at voter turnout in primaries for the GOP so far, they are low and disappointing.”
While the Secretary of State writes, “A GOP RECORD. Voter turnout Tuesday set a record for a Republican presidential primary …”
The Media will “rip Mitt to shreds” for being … what … too liberal? And that cause Conservatives to vote for … Obama?
Or, they’re going to convince the Moderates to vote against Romney for being … too moderate?
Or, is the “media” trying to accomplish voter suppression by discouraging conservatives who vote in much larger percentages than liberals, while moderates are discouraged because … they believe a moderate might just win?
Have either of you thought this through?
Meanwhile, Mitt Happens.
“Have either of you thought this through? ” Did you think this trough? Do you want me to post videos of Mitt’s flip flops? You want me to post the video of Romney when he said with a straight face his first name was Mitt?
Do you have any Idea what a competant spinmeister is going to do with videos if Mitt is the Nominee? He is going to be hammered in the media just like any other repub.
It is my opinion that he is the least likely repub able to handle the hammering. He is the most likely to “suspend” his campaign because of some made up crisis.
Which Mitt are you voting for? The capitalist Mitt or the anti-capitalist Mitt?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC1ZNyCpV-g&feature=player_embedded
A) I agree with that (heavily edited) clip I don’t subscribe to that Republican caricature either.
B) I have supported the fiscal conservative Romney for years now.
C) The “Media” won’t get any mileage by attacking Mitt from the right since their candidate is on Mitt’s Left.
D) Oh, you’re right; Mitt has been the favorite punching bag of the other Republicans in the primary race and the dimocrats and the Press since the 2008 presidential campaign so he’s obviously a quitter. /sarc
E) You’re not going to vote for the Republican candidate, you’re not going to vote for the democrat candidate, you’re not voting for anyone so your opinion matters …why?
Count. It is obvious that you read only what you want to agree with. I will not rehash again who or who I will vote for. I have said it many times. I would suggest you look through the archives.
It is only in your world where your opinion matters so much more than any anyone elses.
Why is that?
You’re right, I made up that whole “LOLzer, me vote for Romney, MItt?? Only if I am drunk and I haevnt touched a drop of alcohol in over 12 years but thanks for the suggestion. Not.” thing.
That statement of yours really means “I’ll support the Republican Candidate and vote for Mitt Romney or I’ll vote for the dimocrate candidate; Barack Obama.” or something
Your opinion of Mitt is so worthwhile; please tell us of his “anti-Capitalist” background. Since it’s only an opinion, I guess it doesn’t have to be true, so knock yourself out.
You are the king of putting words into mouths that never said any such thing. DWS is proud of you.
I invite to ignore me. I think i’ll post some more of Mitt’s flip flops. What would you like me start with?
Oh, put words in your mouth huh? That was the OTHER Green Mountain Boy that posted that … word for word … that I copied and pasted .. did I mention word-for-word? and I didn’t have to go to any archive to find it.
Remember this? Green Mountain Boy January 13, 2012 at 1:17 pm # ??
I can see why you’d wish for me to ignore you, that way you don’t have to be accurate since the libiots won’t correct you as you attempt to get Obama re-elected so you can feed your libertarian-purist martyr psychosis.
But, you claimed you can produce an anti-capitalist Romney so I’m looking forward to reading all about it because I’m not aware of this and like to be educated on facts and not unsubstantiated opinions based on nothing more than an unattainable ideal of pure conservatives that even Bill Buckley would find a misrepresentation or libertarian standard Barry Goldwater would find preposterous and likely laughable.
So, please, show me the anti-capitalist Mitt.
“that way you don’t have to be accurate since the libiots won’t correct you as you attempt to get Obama re-elected so you can feed your libertarian-purist martyr psychosis.”
Pure delusion. About as accurate as your opinion on the federal court systems.
“But, you claimed you can produce an anti-capitalist Romney”
Where did I claim this? You have Mitt’s own words and they are not enough?
Mitt Romney barky obama Six of one and a half dozen of the another. Two peas in a pod.
The rest of your post is pure drivel, gain putting word into my mouth that I never said.
I didn’t think you could.
Nice talking to you.
While you’re chewing on that Mr. I-never-said-what-I-said, try this; MORE LIES and More Mitt Romney clips taken out of context. ,
He is the most likely to “suspend” his campaign because of some made up crisis.
You mean like a dog pooping on his car?
Fist, this blog has really gone downhill since Mark left. Mark at least took the time to write interesting and intelligent blogs. Now, it is just thrown together most of the time. Very little thought or substance.
How many Americans even know who Debbie Wasserman Shultz is? Very few unless they closely follow politics. What a waste of time and space to write about her impact on anything at this time.
Meanwhile, there is a very active campaign going on between Mitt, Newt, Rick and Rick (and Ron) – but not much is addressed about that race here. Why not? The winner represents YOUR party. Has it just become too bizarre to talk about? It has been one of the more interesting races the Republicans have ever had – and yet one would hardly know it is even in progress from reading this blog.
How do you feel about corporate welfare, such as the Solandra mess? I am assuming almost everyone here finds it reprehensible that our government provided funds to this company – and then it failed. Well, here is a little more reading one might indulge in to get a better grasp of the full extent of corporate welfare:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-bain-subsidies-20120113,0,4573818,full.story
Now seriously, does it matter more to you who was in the White House when corporate welfare was dished out or the very fact it even exists?
Fist,(sic) this blog has really gone downhill since Mark left. Mark at least took the time to write interesting and intelligent blogs.
That is truly hysterical, Velma. I wish I had a subscription to LexisNexis. Any bets as to how many personal attacks on Mark from VanDregg/Sunny a global search of B4V’s archives would reveal.
Spook
the truth matters not to trolls.
scummy
Now seriously, does it matter more to you who was in the White House when corporate welfare was dished out or the very fact it even exists?
“corporate welfare” Marx 101………you mean the very Corporations that you are bitching about relocating overseas? those Eeeeevil corporations?
Lets talk about REAL welfare, the kind that has cost the US TRILLIONS of dollars with NOTHING to show but dumbed down innercity plantation donks screaming for OPM while contributing NOTHING ZERO, ZIP, ZILCH to our economy, civilization, country …well except for the season burning, looting, rioting, murdering, and blaming OTHERS for their station in life..
PATHETIC!!!
Velma: “How do you feel about corporate welfare, such as the Solandra mess?”
Of course, we are against it. But why are you not critical of your pResident, rather than defending him day after day? This was part of his FAILED policies to do everything in his power to keep from expanding on proven and efficient energy production – oil and gas. When the technology progresses enough for solar then it will happen. Government spending will not be the reason for success or failure for this. This shows that this man has no clue as to what he is doing just pandering to the ignorant masses – a Democrat.
This is by far the best post you have posted. But then you start in on the “corporate welfare” talking point. In this case, the government handing out cash (much like a venture capitalist) is truly welfare. Can we expect more from you against government spending to “Stimulate” the economy when it has been a proven failure versus unleashing the true capitalist nature of this country with the government getting out of the way (not completely mind you)?
As a Friedman fiscal conservative I don’t approve of any public-private enterprise that involves public funds to promote winners and losers in business. I approve of governments easing restrictions or regulatory encumbrances as an inducement, but not taxpayer money.
Sarah Palin alluded to this (Bain Capital receiving government “handouts”) on Hannity a few nights ago, I looked into it and believe it was a use of taxpayer money that I disapprove of; far less egregious than the Solendra-style of cash payout, or the Automakers sweetheart deal, or even the TARP taxpayer gift to mitigate risks in a risk driven investment scheme.
If any Keynesian methodology is applied to the Free Market, it is self-defeating, having said that a tax break is the least offensive Keynesian arrangement. I cringe but the reality is that it is an acceptable and legal method for localities to entice businesses and expand tax bases with very little risk to the taxpayers.
Iowa 2008 total votes in repub caucus 119,188
2012 122,255
New Hampshire repub primary 2008 239,793
2012 245273
It seems both states were higher than last time. So that argument holds no water at this time.
Fla 19 MILLION people, MORE registered GOP than all 3 other states together….
Cain was the fav., watch Santorum….
Means absolutely nothing. barky is going to win in a lanslide. /sarcoff
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/13/rnc-raises-27m-final-3-months-2011/
the US got along for the first 150 years without any income tax…it seems as if the Federal Government forgot the value of the dollar…because the piss so many of them away that its just stupid to allow it to continue…
bottom line…the issue is not income tax…its not about who pays less or more..or not at all…its about the federal government and the spin machine that keeps spending…and spending…and spending…its about the average government worker making 3 times what the average private market employee makes…its about greed and power and those who have spent a lifetime without accountability…
its about time to shut it down and repeal the income tax completely..and force the government to do the right thing…
Income taxes were in fact used before the passage of the 16th amendment.
Another one good old socialist Aberham Lincoln.
http://www.loc.gov/rr/business/hottopic/irs_history.html
REPEALED…seems as if they figured that once the war was ending it wasnt right to keep on raping the poor….
but that only left that rest of US History to demonstrate that the government could in fact operate WITHOUT an individual income tax…tarifs and whatever they had to do…but todays good ole’ boys dont care do they…if a guys got 3 kids on a minimum wage income…the SOB’s will still take money out of his check every week…
no excuse…only an idiot would endorse such a system
” and constantly threatening “civil war,” Since when have trumpka and van jones been posting on B4V?
Ahh. Disappearing post syndrome strikes again. Is there a detective in the house? We have a case for you. 🙂
Sorry, Wallace tried to sneak one through. Won’t happen again//Moderator
Don’t feed the troll.
Wasserman Shultz is one of the new “stars” in the Democratic Party, following in the footsteps of Kennedy,Schumer, Durbin, P
dont forget A, Weiner
GMB
or Hoffa Jr?
(hoffa sr is attending a Giants game)
Bwaaaaaaa ha ha ha
James January 13, 2012 at 1:29 pm #
I am tolerant of ALL people,
“grandpa”.
what a Moron
debbie wasperman shitz is dumber than a box of rocks and as ugly as the hilda beast and the Mooch.
paging janet rino!
Yeah forgot about hoffa and hiscalls for violent revolution. Added to the list. 🙂
GMB
and the SEIU communist thugs with andy stern…..Ochimpys bestist bud (except for GD America wright) oh and ayers, oh and calypso louie…..oh and blagovitich, oh and alinsky, oh and ………………………………………………………………………………………….
wallass
ROTFLMAO
a race war?
you bet, I take those donk racists calling for one at their word.
Insiders: GOP Nominating Contest Will Be Wrapped Up After Florida
By Taylor West and Peter Bell
http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2012/01/insiders-gop-no.php
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Fn Men!!!!
Allen West on the Marines Incident: ‘Shut Your Mouth, War Is Hell’
Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.), a former Army lieutenant colonel, sends THE WEEKLY STANDARD an email commenting on the Marines’ video, and has given us permission to publish it.
allenwest
“I have sat back and assessed the incident with the video of our Marines urinating on Taliban corpses.
I do not recall any self-righteous indignation when our Delta snipers Shugart and Gordon had their bodies dragged through Mogadishu. Neither do I recall media outrage and condemnation of our Blackwater security contractors being killed, their bodies burned, and hung from a bridge in Fallujah.
“All these over-emotional pundits and armchair quarterbacks need to chill. Does anyone remember the two Soldiers from the 101st Airborne Division who were beheaded and gutted in Iraq?
Give them a maximum punishment under field grade level Article 15 (non-judicial punishment), place a General Officer level letter of reprimand in their personnel file, and have them in full dress uniform stand before their Battalion, each personally apologize to God, Country, and Corps videotaped and conclude by singing the full US Marine Corps Hymn without a teleprompter.
“As for everyone else, unless you have been shot at by the Taliban, shut your mouth, war is hell.
Ooh Rah…Do or Die!!!!!!
Nick Berg ??????
Now now Neo, Neither you or LTC West are being proper dhimmis. Respect is only a one way street with the muzzies. I look at it this way the Marines are only guilty of killing those terrorists in the place they were planning to take a leak at.
They should have likked them somewhere else.
wow bad even for me. likked should have read killed. Oh well have at me. I don’t care. 🙂
GMB
I love it,
We can shoot them, blow them to hell, stab them to death, cut their throats, run them over with tanks, bomb them, kill their families.
but dont pee on them?
bwany fwank would pay them for that.
“bwany fwank would pay them for that.”
I no longer have a spare keyboard. You owe me. 😛
LOL LOL
Again this woman is either a complete ignoramus or a habitual liar. She spews the mindless talking points so well and the dumbed down lefty drones eat it all up.
All the above, communism, alinsky 101
More pure comedy (or insanity) from the leftards……….
Al Sharpton Guest: It’s Racially Insensitive to Have a GOP Debate on MLK Day
“We’re going backwards in this state and not forwards and that’s because of Nikki Haley and the tea party folks.”
gee it couldn’t be the NBPP, NOI, NAACP, SCLC, and ALL the race baiters and hustlers could it?
watch for this BS to ramp up to highs (lows) as the election draws closer.
ole debby wasperMan shitz will be the mouth piece along with al and mumbles (je$$e)
Whoops
it didnt take long….right on plan……
Michael Moore: Older Generation Who Didn‘t Vote for Obama Are ’Racist’
“Really, I mean, can I just throw out one statistic?”
Financially Ruined Greece Decides Pedophiles Qualify for Government Disability
Along with exhibitionists, sadomasochists, kleptomaniacs and pyromaniacs.
Hell HERE we make them POTUS, Senators and Congressman.
Rev. Lori Bruno, one of the witches casting a spell against Tebow
is that like the “rev”s al? je$$e? wriiight? louie? etc etc etc????
LOL X 10000
We are not morally superior to people who cuts the heads of live captives. People who will execute children of people they want to control?
Nice try bomber. Massive fail.
.
Bmitch
when the minimum standards for enlistment have been gutted to allow kids with criminal records and low IQ scores to be accepted,
THAT was what they said during the draft, dumbed down innercity kids with low IQ’s.
now a volunteer army is that?
Who Knew?
and all along we thought this Hi Tech army consisted of the smartest…..well I guess with affirmative action and gays this was bound to happen.
Bmitch
They might as well have recorded their skulls exploding,
been there done that kid,
aw it through my own peep sites….. 🙂
keep dreaming though…
aw = saw
Oh well BEER thirty…catch yall tomorrow…Lord willing!
Ah Rockefeller. A Republican. Gerald Ford’s VP. Not a “donk”.
If I remember correctly you aren’t you from Buffalo?
I’m reticent to admit it to you….and you alone, but I am from Binghamton.
Remember that famous photo of Rockefeller flipping off a group of students? The one with Bob Dole in the background. It was taken at the Bng airport and I have saved the local newspaper with the published picture for all of these years. At the time, I got a kick out of him being unshackled enough to express himself.
Now I remember him as a guy who came and went all at the same time!
bmitch
rocky a pubby?
yup…….my bad
a MUST read
Coil of Rage ….
When you’ve read to the end, come back and read this first paragraph again.
A Coil of Rage. The character of any man is defined by how he treats his mother as the years pass …. need I say more about this person below other than there is no character, no integrity but there is a ton of attitude and arrogance that defines his shallow past and hollow future ….. I rest my case..
I bought and read Obama’s book, Audacity of Hope. It was difficult to read considering his attitude toward us and everything American. Let me add a phrase he used to describe his attitude toward whites. He harbors a “COIL OF RAGE”. His words not mine.
THIS IS OUR PRESIDENT — HE’S RUNNING AGAIN, YOU KNOW! Is anyone out there awake?
Everyone of voting age should read these two books by him: Don’t buy them, just get them from the library.
From Dreams From My Father:
“I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.”
From Dreams From My Father :
“I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.”
From Dreams From My Father:
“There was something about her that made me wary, a little too sure of herself, maybe and white.”
From Dreams From My Father:
“It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.”
From Dreams From My Father:
“I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa , that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself: the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.”
And FINALLY ………….. and most scary:
From Audacity of Hope: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
If you have never forwarded an e-mail, now is the time to do so!!! We have someone with this mentality running our GREAT nation! Keep your eye on him and don’t blink.
I don’t care whether you are a Democrat, a Republican, a Conservative or a liberal,beware of the attitude and character of this sitting President.
Spread the word, his own words!
New Book Claims Obama Complained About Taking Pictures With Troops During Trip to Baghdad
Im sure they hated to have listen to your BS also you POS
Wow – you’re misquoting and taking out of context here neocon, but why am I surprised by that? You seem semi-literate at the best of times so your claim that you actually bought and read a book is suspect.
Your quote “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” is simply not found in the book.
The full and correct quote is:
He’s talking about standing by American citizens. But it’s far easier for you to misquote the book and spread mistruths isn’t it?
unpatriotdog
It was an E mail
talk about being an illiterate dumb ass.
unpatriotdog1
Larry sinclair wrote a book also can you quote me from that book also?
PS
I DID read in his book he is a racist and a doper…go polish the knee pads and get back.
mmmm mmmmmm mmmmmm
In Obama’s book, DREAMS OF MY FATHER..
* “I FOUND A SOLACE IN NURSING A PERVASIVE SENSE OF GRIEVANCE AND ANIMOSITY AGAINST MY MOTHER’S RACE”
* “I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites”
* “That hate hadn’t gone away,” he wrote, blaming “white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”
However, while campaigning in Kansas, Obama frequently emphasized that his mother was white, and that he had grown up in a predominantly white world.
* (Obama) vowed that he would “never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.”
* “I was trying to raise myself to be a black man in America, and beyond the given of my appearance, no one around me seemed to know exactly what that meant.” Honolulu’s paucity of African-Americans meant he had to learn to be black from the media: “TV, movies, the radio; those were places to start. Pop culture was color-coded, after all, an arcade of images from which you could cop a walk, a talk, a step, a style.”
* About student life and race at Occidental College Obama wrote “There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs,” he wrote. “It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.” He added: “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists.”
* While in college, Obama wrote(he) disapproved of what he called other “half-breeds” who gravitated toward whites instead of blacks.
Again, from Colonel Ray
“And after college, he once fell in love with a white woman, only to push her away when he concluded he would have to assimilate into her world, not the other way around. He later married a black woman.”
* After making his first visit to Kenya, Obama wrote of being disappointed to learn that his paternal grandfather had been a servant to rich whites. The revelation caused “ugly words to flash across my mind. Uncle Tom. Collaborator. House *igger.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix-AMYos0Js
paging hillary
Obama faces three local challenges to his eligibility for the Illinois primary ballot
WLS Radio has learned that President Barack Obama faces three local challenges to his eligibility for the Illinois primary ballot. At least one involves a group that believes the fight will be worse than the one Mayor Rahm Emanuel faced with his residency challenge.
Michelle Obama stresses service at BET awards
What?
she didnt attend the WHITE entertainment awards with all white entertainers only? OH WAIT!!
neo, just curious. You know wallace’s posts are always deleted, yet you keep their footprints on the blog by responding to them. Why do you want his presence to be known even when his actual posts are gone?
Not to mention that a post from you addressing something that is not there makes no sense at all. But you give wallace a presence here that the administrators seem to be trying to remove.
I wonder how Mitt would feel if someone strapped him to the roof of a car in a airtight box and left him there for 12 hours?
If caring about the welfare of your pets is a feminine trait then call me a girl.
Woof!!!
GMB
I wonder how Mitt would feel if someone strapped him to the roof of a car in a airtight box and left him there for 12 hours?
better than what chevy chase did in vacation…….
The dog is still alive right? But that shouldn’t stop GMB or any other liberal from dragging out the drama.
Gnash the teeth boys!!
Gnash the teeth? Are you stuck in a rut? Question for you Cluster. Well two questions. Are you familiar with Mormon theology at all? Especially early theology before Joseph Smith died?
Do you think Mitt see himself as the white horse?
I don’t care about early Mormon theology – I work with the here and now and what’s in front of me. I don’t care if Mitt sees himself as the “white horse” whatever in the hell that means. I leave that kind of bullshit to lesser minds. As I said, I am comfortable with Mitt as he is now, and if I am wrong, then I will help him be removed from office and will move on. My hunch is that he will make a good President and put us back on a sound fiscal path.
And that was three questions. If you’re counting.
And my hunch is it wont take a month after if he takes office that folks like you will be calling for his head.
Will be interesting to see who’s right but it is still not decided except in superior minds like yours that he is the nominee.
I bow to your self proclaimed greatness Sir, please carry on with the heavy lifting so us so called, what ever you want to call us, don’t have to do it.
Woof!
Exactly the type of a response I expect from someone who immerses himself in the weeds.
Weeds? Noot any more. All my acreage will be no till next year. You just can’t resist the personal attacks can you?
Keep firing though Cluster. It is folks like you that remind me why I am no longer a registered republican. You guys have swung so far left you are almost a carbon copy of the donky rats.
Couple of more Mitts, Castles, Snowes, Collins, Scazzafavas, Kirks, and the repub party in the United States will just as redundant as the Conservatives in Britain.
Compromise yourself right into the dog house.
Woof!
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/13/us-usa-taxes-payroll-republicans-idUSTRE80C0BY20120113
Looks like your speaker is stabbing the little tea party people in the back! atta boy Boehner! give’em hell!
I agree with you James. boehner is a sorry ass excuse for a republican. He belongs with the donkyrats. You are welcome to him.
Ok folks you are going to hate http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/11/mitt-romney-republican-washington-spending-flip-flop me or love me here. I have at least eighty (80) different issues Mr. Mitt Romney has flipped flopped on. I am going to post all of them. That will be at least one hundred sixty (160) posts because more than one link will get caught in the moderation.
So lets start off with Mitt on government spending.
Mitt for government spending.
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/11/mitt-romney-republican-washington-spending-flip-flop