Invoking the Home Rule Act, Trump has decided to take over law enforcement in Washington, DC. This will cause shrieks from the Democrats and probably a raft of lawsuits…but Trump is totally within his power to do this. Good to keep in mind that in DC, like in all major Blue cities, the reason crime is rampant stems from two things:
- The Leninist conviction that all crime is a result of social injustice (ie, the real criminals are those who sustain the system – that is, you and me).
- If you’re a Blue city mayor, DA or what have you, the last thing you want to do is arrest a lot of POC. They are who are doing most of the crime in the Blue cities, but there is no electoral upside here – and not just with POC voters, but with the upper class whites who tend to be the decisive vote in electing governments in Blue cities. Basically, you have to pretend the problem is anything but POC – and so you’ll come up with “alternatives to policing” and a host of other eyewash programs to pretend you’re doing something about it when you aren’t because you can’t.
But people don’t like that – they might not be able to totally articulate it, but nobody likes a lot of street crime. And not just out of concern for personal property and safety…nobody likes to see streets filled with litter and zombie-like drug addicts with criminals prowling around looking for the next victim. The people like to see clean, safe streets. Trump is going to try to give it to the people of DC.
Can’t emphasize enough how important it is that this work – because all of our crime-ridden cities are crime-ridden by choice. The leadership of the cities, like that in DC, made the political choice to allow crime to be rampant. If Trump can clean up DC then it’ll show that every city can be cleaned up…you just have to arrest the people committing crimes. It is like border security – Trump has shown that every President could have just done it. Closed it of. Stopped the flow. It just had be ordered done. It wasn’t – and for the same reason the government of DC doesn’t order the crime stopped…the political and social desires of those in charge are best served by business as usual.
The WNBA is going to install “anti foreign object netting” around the basketball court…if you don’t know why, then just Google … heck, don’t know how to write that on a family website! Anyways, just look around social media for the latest WNBA memes and you’ll quickly see which foreign object the WNBA is trying to stop. This is becoming ground zero in the culture war. The WNBA was created as a payoff, in my view: feminist groups were given this league by the NBA in order to take the heat of NBA players who were…not always total gentlemen with the ladies. Basically it is the #MeToo fine the NBA is paying. A whole infrastructure was built up to make it seem like it was an organic sport…something that people wanted. But it was mostly just ignored…and then Caitlin Clark became a thing and the WNBA had their first organic star…whom the other players proceeded to treat like garbage. It has all been so clearly mere jealousy…people who simply aren’t as good as Clark fouling her for being good. People saw this and now the previously-ignored WNBA is the currently-despised WNBA.
The league loses on average $10 million a year – chump change for an NBA with $10 billion in annual revenue. The pragmatic facts of life are that even someone as good as Clark probably isn’t good enough to sit on an NBA bench. As playing spreads among young girls there will grow an ever stronger group of female players and we will probably see some ladies being just good enough to in theory play for the NBA. But the play will never be NBA level – it can’t be because of those inherent physical differences between men and women (you know, that we’re supposed to pretend don’t exist). How much are people going to pay for something that doesn’t even work out to a AAA for the NBA? Not much. Sure, if you just love basketball as a thing and like to see a game, you’ll go watch WNBA…if nothing else is available. And in this it is sort of like AAA ball…which does get some people in the stands but, let’s face it, not that much…and certainly not a MLB prices.
I don’t care about the league at all – not a basketball fan. But the attempt to force it into a major league has been silly from the start. And now that people are really looking at it for the first time, they don’t see what they like. So, anti-foreign object netting…
Trump has apparently given the order to have our military go after the Cartels. The Mexican government objects. On the other hand, there really is no Mexican government. Sure, the go through the motions but the bottom line is that the Cartels totally control Mexico. You’d probably be better off thinking that the government is another Cartel…and probably the junior partner. Mexico has always been hopelessly corrupt…the only difference is how much corruption is going on at any given time. Keep in mind that there wasn’t a popular uprising to bring an end to Spanish rule in Mexico…it was upper class people who just wanted their own country to play with and they took advantage of a Spain gravely weakened by the Napoleonic Wars. Since that time, it has been one sort of oppression after another to keep the contraption together (lost in the records is the fact that as Zachary Taylor’s army moved deeper into Mexico during the Mexican-American War province after province asked him to get them into the American Union). The PRI for decades held it together via a mix of bribery and mild political repression…and the sort of political leader they developed was a coward merely looking for the next payoff. These people had no chance against the Cartels. The Mexican people might want to fight the Cartels but the Mexican government won’t arm the people…because they know that as soon as the Cartels are knocked off, those guns would be turned against the government.
This is still going to be a very tricky business. Make no mistake about it! Mexican’s do have a very prickly pride especially when we gringos are involved. But it has to be done – we can’t have Cartels dominating our southern neighbor. They have to go.
Blogs For Victory 
Now that the grownups are solving problems we can start to focus on the genesis of those problems. PJ Media has an article this morning about Rush Limbaugh’s prediction about homelessness being the next moral outrage. A couple of things popped up.
One is about the new word “unhoused” used instead of “homeless”. Author Scott Pinsker writes, about a Rolling Stone article using the new phrase, “I’m guessing the guys at Rolling Stone were less driven by their steadfast dedication to Webster’s denotative accuracy, and were more motivated to drop a word that conjured images of dangerous, dirty, unstable street-people.”
And he is right. “Homeless” people ARE dirty, often unstable, often even dangerous. But “unhoused” people are just like you and me, just without houses. And it’s a lot easier to stir up moral outrage about people we can relate to who are just being treated unfairly–which the Left tries to imply never happened before January 7.
This ties in with Rush’s observation so many years ago:
As Pinsker concludes; “The “unhoused” are a blunt instrument for bashing Trump, capitalism, and the GOP; nothing more, nothing less.
Same as it ever was.“
Without ever even understanding who Hitler was or why, exactly, he was bad. I’ll bet dollars to donuts that in college these days, the kids are taught that Hitler’s greatest sin was being anti-gay (even though Hitler was personally quite tolerant of homosexuality).
Well, it can’t be his attitude toward Jews that offends them, or the fact that he led the National Socialist Party. It could be that he was a fascist, though none of them know what the word even means, but I think there is a vague concept that (1) fascism is very bad, and (2) Hitler was, somehow, in some way, a fascist.
But that’s as far as they can go. Because they don’t understand that fascism is a left-wing construct and that literally nothing Trump has done or advocated is even remotely in line with Leftist political ideology, their “thinking” comes down to this: If Hitler was bad, and Trump is bad, then obviously Trump is just like Hitler, and if Hitler was a fascist then obviously Trump is a fascist, too.
Well, you have to admit, he checked off a lot of important boxes. He hated Jews and Catholics, he thought it was appropriate to put people he didn’t like in camps, he shacked up instead of getting married, he loved dogs, he was anti-gun, he was a vegetarian, and he thought it was just fine to impose his views on other people. He also liked to use the power of the government to control private enterprise, and was all about running his country from a massively powerful Central Authority.
If you’re on the radical Left, what’s not to like? When you think about it, it looks like their complaint about Trump is that he isn’t like Hitler.
He was also a Green – hated polluting industries and lauded the green spaces…of course, like modern liberals, he hadn’t the foggiest notion of how agriculture worked and he wouldn’t have survived a weekend alone in the woods.
All of this makes me think it is time to revisit this: