I noticed that Thunberg and her merry band of morons were picked up by the IDF and ordered deported by Israel. But as I rolled around in my head the whole situation, I realized that it is people like her who keep the killing going. Those who pull the trigger are not even primarily guilty. It is people like Thunberg.
Political terrorism has no definite start date – that is, we can’t say “on such a such date, the first act of political terrorism occurred”. This is because there can’t be a 100% definition of it and arguments about what it is can spin out endlessly. But I was thinking recently of the Carbonari – a shadowy Italian organization which grew out of Napoleonic-era Freemasonry. The group was dedicated to the creation of a unified and Liberal Italy (they loathed the Catholic Church and traditional Italy) – the country at the time being divided into a series of small States, most of which were directly ruled or deeply under the influence of the Hapsburg Monarchy. They managed to start a few unsuccessful rebellions (Italian unification eventually being accomplished by Cavour who used a combination of military force and diplomatic skullduggery to achieve his aim), but they also turned to terrorism to try to obtain their goals – including the unsuccessful assassination of French Emperor Napoleon III (who, in his youthful days of exile, was rumored to have been a member of the Carbonari). And that attempt done in order to push Napoleon into assisting in Italian unification. Whether or not Napoleon made his decision based on this is unknown…but in the event, he provided the decisive support for Italian unification. It is possible to say, “this is where it began: this is where the world started to fall under the influence of terror”.
We are told in history books that the Carbonari were the good guys. As we’re also informed that Garibaldi (another key person in the unification of Italy) was the hero. So, too, those who tried to strike at the Czar’s government in Russia. And the Hapsburg government in Vienna. And the British government in the UK. If you read the books you won’t find absolute condemnation of either Czolgosz (who murdered McKinley) nor of Lucheni (who murdered the Empress Elizabeth of Austria). We’re somehow supposed to feel a bit sorry for the murderers, with an unspoken subtext of “their victims got what was coming to them”. But let us circle back to Garibaldi for a moment – what did he want? A semi-socialist, anti-Catholic Republic governing Italy but with a mind towards “liberating” the whole world…that is, his fight for Italian independence and unity was a means, not an end…a stepping stone. And while he could rouse a rabble very effectively, nothing he ever said or did was aimed at helping Italians be Italian.
You know, like Lenin’s efforts in Russia.
Good to point out here that I think it was Kerensky – overthrown by Lenin’s Bolsheviks – who noted that the only way Lenin could have done what he did to Russia was via a total hatred for Russians. A complete desire to destroy everything the Russian’s were. And that, I think, is a very important point. What is Thunberg up to? The ostensible purpose of her trip was to bring aid to Gaza (totally unneeded as Gaza has more food and other supplies than it knows what to do with)…but always remember that “globalize the Intifada”. That gives the game away – it isn’t about Gaza. Just as Thunberg’s earlier efforts on “global warming” weren’t about saving the world from a hot day…it is always about something else, and that something is always the total destruction of what is…the memory and traditions of the varied peoples of the world and their replacement by a universal ideology.
It must be kept in mind that to be a political terrorist doesn’t require you kill anyone. Of course, those who set the bombs have their own guilt, but the worst actor is the person who justifies it (some times these are one in the same person – but mostly they are very distinct people). And who is the most guilty? Sure, a evil person who does the deed…but why does he do it? Because he’s a weak minded person who has been told that it is both necessary and good. You think about the men who did 10/7 – they are men like any others. They were born like all the rest of us and they are prey to all the same weaknesses…and are called to the same morality. But they went into defenseless towns and raped and murdered completely helpless human beings. To get from the innocent babe to the savage murderer is a lengthy process. Takes a lot of steps…and the most important step is those who keep telling the perpetrator that he is good and honorable in what he does.
And Thunberg is one of those saying, “it is honorable to murder”. She will never utter those exact words. She will claim endlessly she’s against violence. But she will also say in various ways that those who did 10/7 are the good guys…just as one miserable, hate filled son of a b*tch after another has been saying it about all the hideous political murderers of the past two centuries. It is very pervasive. As I said, even we normal people fall for it…in our unwillingness, most of the time, to vigorously condemn it. But, still, the guilt still lies most heavily upon those who find ways to justify it all…to some how excuse and explain it all way and lay all blame on the victims. You know, like the Left has been trying to lay the blame for Charlie Kirk’s death on Charlie Kirk…which efforts, of course, encourage even more people to kill.
We have a choice to make in our society – and while most of us won’t want to make it, we will – very likely – be forced to make it. That choice will be: just how much of this are we going to put up with? How long will we let these people foment violence, justify it and use it as an excuse to go after us? Eventually we have to call a stop to it – because if we don’t, we end up jailed or killed. So, the time is coming – and perhaps quite soon.
In my view, we are under no obligation to be gentle with people who justify murder – no matter what words they use to try to mask it, no matter how well they spin a tale…killing someone who isn’t directly threatening your life is wrong. It is murder. There is never even the slightest justification for it…and while we must take care to punish the actual perpetrators, we’re going to have to start punishing those who say its ok to kill. We’re going to have to stop treating someone like Thunberg as a mere idiot – she is incredibly stupid – and start treating her like as accessories after the fact.
Blogs For Victory 
“ … they are men like any others. They were born like all the rest of us and they are prey to all the same weaknesses…and are called to the same morality.”
NO. They are NOT men like any others, and they do not have the same morality. Huge mistake here Mark. Muslim men are barbaric to the core. We are not like them and we should never share a common society. Multiculturalism is a complete and utter failure. It is time to restore American culture and those who don’t want to be part of it … can go. Our freedoms don’t allow people to import their own culture.
In terms of evil … I think you can include 90% of the current Democrat Party. Democrats have become enemy combatants and need to be treated that way. In Chicago right now, the Leftists are tactically equipped to take the fight to ICE and they are doing so. Who is paying for this??? Someone is funding a leftist insurrection and we had better find out who. This is war folks, which is aided and abetted by Pritzker, Johnson, etc. Remember, Democrats have been calling us fascists and encouraging their base to “fight” ….. THEY WANT WAR.
Let’s give it to them
Homan has referred to 8 U.S. Code § 1324 – Bringing in and harboring certain aliens. I have cited it many times. Yet so far no one has been charged under it. Why not?
(A)Any person who—
(iii) knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
(iv)encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or
(v)
(I)engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts, or
(II)aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).
(B)A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—
(i)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;
(ii)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(iii)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) during and in relation to which the person causes serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
We’ve got the law. We’ve got the penalty. It is a mandatory penalty–in law, “shall” is an imperative. We’ve got the people openly and blatantly violating the law. So why aren’t these people being lined up, cuffed, arrested, arraigned, charged and prosecuted?
Does anyone doubt that a sudden change in how we treat these “protesters” by just rounding them up, cuffing them and publicly arresting them, with someone on a bullhorn explaining to the rest of the mob what is happening, and then hauling them off, would have a chilling effect on the recreational rioters? Yeah, folks, no misdemeanors here, no equivalent of traffic tickets, no in-and-out at your friendly sanctuary city’s jail, but FEDERAL charges. The penalty is a fine, or jail—for each person in custody being shielded by this mob—and we are asking for jail.
And don’t go whining to your DA, your mayor, your governor, because they have just been busted and perp-walked for conspiracy to commit the same crimes.
There is a leftist cancer in our judicial system that needs to be rooted out as well, and that is the reason the chaos continues. It would be great if we could simply, arrest, prosecute, and imprison but that’s not what happens. These insurrectionist judges, elected by defense anttorneys, allow them to walk, and then any opposition to these judges is then framed as Unconstitutional.
Laws are for decent and honest people. Current Democrats are neither, so more brutal tactics may be required. I suggest eliminating George Soros and his son as a start. Cut off the head.
I’m waiting for that, too – though I do consider that if we indicted someone in a deep blue city on such charges, the jury would let them off no matter the facts of the case…what I’m hoping is that they’re working up conspiracy…so that the main indictment can be in our territory. Like this: Blue City Official A helps illegals escape detection…but the illegal was brought across the border in Texas. To be indicted as part of a conspiracy, you don’t have to even know the other players in it. The Blue City Official might have no idea who helped the illegal cross…but by helping the illegal stay, that Official is now part of the trafficking conspiracy.
I know it would be severely frowned upon, but I’d still like to do the experiment of swooping in and plucking newborn baby boys from their Muslim mothers and rearing them as normal human beings, to see how much of the brutality we see in Muslims is genetic and how much is purely cultural.
THEY WANT WAR.
Let’s give it to them
We can do that without a shot being fired, except symbolic shots as shown by simply arresting them all for violation of federal laws already on the books.
18 U.S. Code § 111 – Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees
In General.—Whoever—
(1)forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in section 1114 of this title while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties; or
(2)forcibly assaults or intimidates any person who formerly served as a person designated in section 1114 on account of the performance of official duties during such person’s term of service,
shall, where the acts in violation of this section constitute only simple assault, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, and where such acts involve physical contact with the victim of that assault or the intent to commit another felony, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
“where such acts involve physical contact with the victim of that assault or the intent to commit another felony, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both” would presumably apply to someone who assaults a law enforcement officer, with physical contact, and the intent to commit another felony—that is, to violate 8 U.S. Code § 1324 – Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
I’ve been wondering for years why we have never followed the money trail that would have led back to those financing the riots across the country. I even looked up the law against inciting (and, presumably, paying for) riots.
18 U.S. Code § 2101 – Riots
Whoever travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, including, but not limited to, the mail, telegraph, telephone, radio, or television, with intent—
(1)to incite a riot; or
(2)to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or
(3)to commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or
(4)to aid or abet any person in inciting or participating in or carrying on a riot or committing any act of violence in furtherance of a riot;
and who either during the course of any such travel or use or thereafter performs or attempts to perform any other overt act for any purpose specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) of this paragraph— [1]
Shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
This applies to interstate incitement of riots, but I’ll bet states have their own laws as well.
But that is just it – out of the womb, they are men just like you and me. You and I would never in a million years enter the home of defenseless people to rape and murder. And you don’t just get men who do that sort of thing – even the serial killer is made. But to have hundreds or thousands who do that? What is the 1, 2 and 3 steps to get that? What I’m saying is that the originator isn’t the actual killer…nor even the person who trained the killer: it is the person who says the killing is justified. That there’s a good and honorable reason to enter the home of a family out of the blue, rape the mother in front of the father and then brutally murder the whole family.That is what the “activists” do…and I hold them guiltier than the perpetrators.
Here’s some “mainstream” rhetoric from a Democrat. No big deal anymore, Democrats openly advocate violence and death …
Jay Jones, the Democratic nominee for attorney general of Virginia, faced condemnation from Republicans and Democrats on Friday after text messages from 2022 resurfaced in which he said he would “piss on graves” of GOP opponents and mused about hypothetically shooting then-Republican Speaker of the House of Delegates Todd Gilbert.
In a text message exchange with Republican Delegate Carrie Coyner, Jones used violent and inflammatory language, writing that if he were presented with a hypothetical situation in which he had only two bullets and was faced with the choice of shooting Gilbert, former Nazi leader Adolf Hitler or former Cambodia dictator Pol Pot, he’d shoot Gilbert “every time,” prompting pushback from his former colleague.
“Gilbert gets two bullets to the head,” Jones wrote. “Spoiler: put Gilbert in the crew with the two worst people you know and he receives both bullets every time.”
I see she stopped short of sending him a strongly worded letter.
Bill Maher seems to have figured out how to be funny again.
You gotta love anyone who comes right out and describes Democrats as “human-adjacent life forms”. Evidently his audience laughed and applauded at each of his jibes, so there might be hope after all.
I love the smell of a good meme in the morning.
What is Thunberg up to? The ostensible purpose of her trip was to bring aid to Gaza (totally unneeded as Gaza has more food and other supplies than it knows what to do with)
And now we learn that (doing Gomer Pyle imitation) surprise, surprise—no “aid” supplies were found in the flotilla.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1974693848246112383?s=61
I like my idea better—-just make the oath of office binding. So if a judge swears to uphold the law and then rules differently he faces a hearing upon the first complaint filed, and has to defend his ruling and might lose his position and all associated benefits. If he swears to uphold and defend the Constitution and rules in a way that defies it, ditto. Would this be a perfect solution? No. Would it be subject to abuse? Possibly, just like every other law. But it would be a speed bump.
Now judges don’t have to defend their rulings. So make them defend them. Make them explain them and face being fired if they went too far. But lower the bar from impeachment levels to just violation of the oath.
BTW this would also apply to every official, elected or appointed. That would make short shrift of this “sanctuary” nonsense, as well as DAs and sheriffs and chiefs of police picking and choosing which laws to enforce and prosecute.
Kurt Schlichter’s been a little off his game lately. Oh, he’s still been pithy and on-target, skewering the always-skewerable Dems, but his posts haven’t had that gleeful Schlichterist zing we’ve all come to know and love.
But fear not, for Kurt is back, and in fine form, with Is Being Insanely Stupid Actually a Cunning Democrat Strategy?
Referring to Sam Stein, “who is some sort of poobah at one of the Dispatchwark Project outlets” tweeting with “Margaret Dumont** levels of fussy outrage” that Hegseth fat-shamed the generals, he went on.
I think it is safe to say yes, we ARE having fun yet.
** This may call for a little research into the cast of so many of the old (REAL) Three Stooges films.
We all had our suspicions … nothing felt right about 2020 and the plandemic. Now the results are in …
A large-scale population study out of South Korea has now found a 27% overall increase in cancer linked to the COVID-19 injections that were marketed as “safe and effective.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/devastating-covid-19-vaccine-side-effect-confirmed-new/
We are also learning today that Biden targeted and spied on 9 Republican Senators.
Democrats ARE the enemy within
At this point they’ll be lucky if all they do is lose power.