Keep in mind that a year ago the American people very solidly rejected the Left – but the Narrative being pushed now is that everyone regrets that and yearns for Kamala.
That simply isn’t true. Also keep in mind that at no time in 2024 did Harris’ own pollster show her with a lead – they knew they were cooked from the get-go. To be sure, they might not have told Harris (and her actions on election night indicate they didn’t) but they knew they never had a chance. And if you watch carefully the MSM coverage of Election Night 2024, after a brief burst of optimism early on, by 8 PM Eastern, they all knew it was over. I’ll never forget watching at about 6:30 PM here in the Pacific time zone irritated that they hadn’t called Georgia (they would call it just about half an hour later) when it had been clear since 5:00 that Trump had won it…and my stepson walks past, asking idly what I was watching: “the election.”
“Election? That was over two hours ago.”
I don’t know what particular cyber-nerd-fu he had used, but he told me that the numbers just weren’t there for her and was shocked that everyone hadn’t called it for Trump. So, too, with everyone else in the know. The latest they should have called it for Trump was 11 PM Eastern when California closed. But, they dragged it out until 1 or 2 PM Eastern. Why? Because the Democrats hadn’t given the MSM permission to call it. The Narrative was still be held up, likely to make sure they got all the votes they could downballot. That is how totally owned the MSM is – they could show the raw numbers. They could show that the outstanding votes weren’t there for Harris to catch up…but they couldn’t call it.
So, whatever you see in the MSM is whatever Narrative the Democrats have ordered the MSM to present. It is worse than useless to watch it – because even hate-watching it gives ratings and thus money to them.
Trump rope a doped them again and is now saying he’ll approve releasing the Epstein files. He knows he’s not in them. We know he’s not in them. Those who are saying he’s in them, know he’s not in them. We know by the simple fact that if he was in them, that would have come out years ago. We also note, with great care, that we’re not supposed to question any of the victims…to merely accept their assertions as Gospel. That tells you right there that the victims standing forth are in on a new con – a con designed to make people think that Trump is involved. After all, an NDA does not cover criminal acts…you can talk them up with out violating an NDA. There is nothing, really, to stop any of them from talking…unless they’re being paid not to talk. And I don’t mean by some rich idiot fifteen years ago, I mean today. Something is very dirty in all of this – and Trump has called their bluff.
Blogs For Victory 
Out of the entire Senate and the entire House, only one person opposed releasing the Epstein files. Would that there was that much agreement on the important aspects of governing our nation.
The Democrats are knee deep in shit from what we already know about the Epstein filed and I suspect it will get worse. Stacy Plkaskett texting with Epstein while questioning Cohen during a hearing??? Un fucking believable how that is just over looked. And then there is Hakeem begging for money, and Lawrence Summers now exiting public life because of his involvement. This is called poetic justice. Release the files!! Bury the Democrats!!
Time to dismantle Obamacare too. Get Big Insurance and government subsidiaries out of healthcare.
Democrats are dying, MAGA is thriving. God Bless America
From ABC News:
“Communicating,” yeah, that’s what he was doing.
It will only get worse for Democrats … pass the popcorn
Have you also noticed that Democrats are now encouraging the military, law enforcement, etc. to violate Trumps orders? This is openly advocating treason. We have 3 more years to destroy the new socialist/furry Democrats. All gas. No brakes.
It’s especially satisfying that the Donkeys are the instruments of their own destruction. Ain’t karma a bitch?
Thankfully, this current political opposition of ours are so fucking stupid, beating them almost feels like abuse. Here’s Jazzy Crockett, the intellectual leader of the party, incorrectly blaming Republicans from taking money from Jeffrey Epstein. Problem was …. It wasn’t the real Jeffrey Epstein. Just someone with the same name and Jazzy never took the time to verify ….
https://x.com/Acyn/status/1990889556774903965?s=20
In his monologue this morning Jeff Childers covered a topic that has occupied the news cycle for the last few days, with trolls gleefully shoving it in our faces. I don’t believe anyone here bit, and I don’t believe the number of true Conservatives nationwide who are burning MAGA hats make up any significant numbers.
How many MAGA hats have supposedly been burned? Whoever burned them at least had to buy them first, so they earned MAGA revenue and added to the list of MAGA supporters, so burn away. (I’ll bet they still had price tags on them.) The thing is, this kind of performative emoting is just not what conservatives DO. It’s so blatantly Leftist, I’m surprised that anyone bought into it—if anyone did. That’s like claiming that a bunch of Trump-supporting conservatives are suddenly blocking traffic to express their angst and squirting ketchup on priceless paintings in ‘protest”. Hint to Leftist false-flaggers: If you want people to think an action reflects the Right try to avoid an action that screams LEFTIST! at the top of its lungs.
And OF COURSE the bots and trolls are being sent out! Because that’s all the Left has! They shook Jazzy Crockett out of her hairspray-induced stupor to bark about an alleged link to Epstein, and the daft broad couldn’t even find the right Epstein, and all this desperate ploy to find something—ANYTHING—to link any Republican to Epstein accomplished was dredging up an old Temu Obama plea to the already-convicted criminal begging for his support, telegraphing perhaps the belief that having a convicted pedophile as a supporter would broaden his appeal.
The Word Of The Day on the Left is “pedophile”—and no, that’s not part of a campaign promise. They wore the word ‘felon’ out and nobody cared, because the charges were so blatantly bogus and the judge such an asslicking simp that it was all just a joke, and as usual the butt of the joke didn’t get it. The problem with the Left is that every word they want to use in smear efforts against the Right is so closely linked to them that there is the very real chance those big bad scary words might just snap back on them. Like “fascist”—-hard to carry that off with a straight face with significant numbers of their base being the only demographic still in existence calling for extermination of Jews. Ditto for “worse than Hitler” as Hitler’s big claim to fame was his determination to exterminate Jews. They tried “king” for a while, but that so obviously only sucked in the dumbest at the bottom of the Stupid Barrel it didn’t really go anywhere.
If they really wanted to go after a pedophile they had to look no further than their own back yard for the last 4 years as Biden’s daughter said publicly that he did inappropriate things with here in the shower when she was a child. Bottom line, they really aren’t against pedophiles unless they can tie the word to Trump, and, as Mark pointed out the other day, Trump just isn’t into little girls.
I don’t know if C-Span still has the videos in its archives, but back in 2019-2020 when Biden was running against Trump I saw, and linked here, many videos taken of Biden when he was Vice President doing staged photo ops with new members of Congress and cabinet members. There are many videos of him molesting young girls.
The routine was that the giddy, starry-eyed excited new people would be brought in and lined up for photos with the VP. He would zero in on any young girls and insist that the girl stand next to him, on the opposite side from her parent, and during the photos would put his arm around her and place his hand on her breast, or where she would be developing a breast. The girls looked concerned, but were not going to say or do anything to spoil the day. The most egregious of these was with the daughter of incoming senator Michael Bennett of Colorado. He actively massaged her breast, to her embarrassment, and then when he was turning away from her actually gave it a little tweak.
With shorter girls, too short for him to put his arm around, he would place them in front of him and then pull them back into his crotch. The reaction of Elaine Cho’s daughter to this was so obvious that her sister noticed and leaned over to ask what was wrong and they had a little talk about it.
All this talk about “pedophilia” could be shut down very quickly with a montage of VP Biden molesting young girls, within a couple of feet of their parents who were distracted by the photo op.
The Narrative is ubiquitous…they never stop. Its like a Cyber-Terminator. And it is important to simply stop listening to them. On X I joined a No Dooming group and my advice to everyone was to be very careful in attacking the Doomers. Even attacking them gives them oxygen. Far more important is to simply keep highlighting the positive and only engaging in critics who have something interesting to say.
Far more important is to simply keep highlighting the positive and only engaging in critics who have something interesting to say.
Amen! And there is much positive to highlight. The glass is 7/8 full.
I’d say to not just highlight the positive but keep asking the protestors to provide examples of what Trump has done that bothers them. During the silly performative “No Kings” marches I saw several marchers interviewed who had to admit they had absolutely no example of anything Trump had done that was “kingish”.
When they bleat “we want our rights back” we need to immediately ask them what rights they have lost—and when. And highlighting the positive should include things like supporting their rights to participate in their government by limiting that participation to citizens–that their rights and powers are taken from them when their votes are diluted by cheating or allowing non-citizens to vote or affect establishment of districts. A positive is the protection of a vote, preventing it from being stolen by a bogus vote that cancels it out.
Those of us who understand politics and the Constitution understand the value of stripping legislative powers from agencies and returning authority back to the legislature and to the people, but this is boring school stuff compared to the visceral appeal of the Next Shiny Thing—that is, the next catchy phrase that the feeble-minded can chant while waving their pre-printed signs and stomping around in unfocused fury in a shallow pretense of being politically involved. But that doesn’t mean we should stop trying to explain it.
You’re right Rock’s, I couldn’t give a fuck what you or the protestors say anymore. You all have been nothing but violent pain in the asses for 10 years now and have become real life examples of the “boy who cried wolf”. No one listens or cares anymore. And your emotionally stunted example of Trump calling for the “deaths of Congress people” is just the latest example of why normal people can’t stand people like you.
I see you are still compelled to chase after every string the trolls drag in front of you. This particular troll’s pathology is deeply invested in victimhood so calling him names just gives him gratification. Insults feed his sickness and by participating in his pathology you become complicit and a partner in it. He will continue to make outrageous comments to suck you into attacking him because he gets off on this and I would think by now you would understand the creep factor of being part of his fantasies and stimulating his desired response.
I’ll respond to whomever I choose.
Of course you can. You have always had a special relationship with Rocks and his cronies and aliases and have always wanted to bring him into the blog so you can play with him even though no one else has agreed or wants him here. I was just commenting on my observation that your participation seems to make you a part of pleasuring of a very personal nature and wondered if you had considered this aspect of your relationship.
So when you respond to Rocks … and you do, is that “pleasuring a personal nature” of yours?? For the love of God, stop the pearl clutching. Any one can comment here, and should feel free to do so. In fact this little blog only has about 4 or 5 commentators so the more the merry. Have a nice day.
Every now and then Rocks sets up a home run for our side, setting up a perfect scenario for making a point or illustrating something important. And when he does, I tee it up and hit it out of the park. No pearl clutching—–I do not think the term means what you think it does—-just thinking of Kurt Schlichter’s recent suggestion to not feed the trolls.
You always wanted the trolls here, so much that you actually set up a separate blog just for you and them, a private little clubhouse where you could play with them all you wanted. For some reason that did not work out and now you want at least one of them back here. The conviction that I am in charge of who can post here had to come from someone and you were the only one in that little private circle ____ who could have, but you evidently did not tell him that several people have had moderator status of different levels, including you. That was a trust thing, supposedly private, but we all see how that turned out.
That is why Rocks is convinced that I am The Boss Of Everything—that and his personal issues with strong women in roles of authority. He’s a whiny little bitch who needs to blame someone else for the fact that he is reviled and I am the target du jour. It’s a victim thing, given energy by you. But not everyone wants to be part of a Bickerson relationship of back-and-forth name-calling.
I think it’s actually kind of cool that we have our own little pet troll who is so devoted to us that he has graced this blog for possibly up to a couple of decades, under a myriad of screen names, knowing that 99% of his posts are going to be deleted. That’s dedication – or possible a mental disorder.
I’ve always gone with “mental disorder” and unless a post has set up an opportunity to make a point I have chosen to avoid becoming part of his pathology.
Rocks, what is your obsession with Amazona?? It’s on a level with your Trump delusion. I suggest you worry only about yourself, you have a lot to work on right there.
Once he became convinced (somehow…I wonder HOW?) I run the blog I became the natural focus for his fixation. It is so much easier to have a single Big Meanie to blame than admit that no one can stand him, no one respects him, no one cares what he is blathering on about, no one is interested in his sources of goofball insanity. No, he needs to cling to the fantasy that he is admired, or would be, if not for ME.
It’s that odd juxtaposition of victimhood and narcissism—the conviction of being smart and wonderful and accomplished and valuable, EXCEPT for the person who is responsible for no one else realizing this.
Calling for the execution of Democrat congressmen who openly and publicly called for a subversion of the Constitutional separation of powers and a politicization of the military was over the top, but Trump says a lot of things that are over the top. I’ll worry (OK, maybe worry isn’t exactly the right word) when he actually starts executing Democrat congress critters. Virginia just elected a new Democrat AG who openly advocated the murder of his opponent and his wife and kids, and all they were was the opposition.
I need to go back and re-read the comments, but I thought they were basically that these Dems should be arrested, which of course would put them in the legal system, and then that the legal system could call for the death penalty after due process, based on the law.
I didn’t read them as saying we should round up and hang Dems who advocate for seditious comments, advocate for violation of our law, etc. He did use the word “arrest” after which he offered his opinion that the death sentence would be appropriate for treason.
He made the same mistake so many do, in applying a broad brush to define “treason” but in fact it is narrowly defined in the Constitution.
Let’s be adults here. Trump DID NOT call for the execution of those Democrats. He simply said sedition was punishable by death. The question is, are Democrats seditious. Those who think he did call for the deaths, obviously think they committed sedition and I wouldn’t disagree.
Is sedition punishable by death? I seem to remember a big legal battle about the legality of even criminalizing what is seditious commentary because of the 1st Amendment, and I don’t remember a death penalty for anything but actual treason. Things get messy when terms are so loosely defined.
Rocks, I have no clue who deletes your comments and furthermore I don’t give a shit. It’s not as if you say anything interesting or intelligent. And just a tip here, you should resolve one conspiracy before embarking on another. Any final comments on the Epstein delusion now that we all know it’s only Democrats who are guilty of that.
Rocks, I have no clue who deletes your comments and furthermore I don’t give a shit.
You sure as hell used to know.
It’s not as if you say anything interesting or intelligent.
Then why do you waste your time responding to me.
And just a tip here, you should resolve one conspiracy before embarking on another. Any final comments on the Epstein delusion now that we all know it’s only Democrats who are guilty of that.
Um, no. I’m respond to whomever I choose however I choose.
You and your friends here are apologists of pedophiles. You make up rationalizations, like claiming that grown men trafficking 13, 14 and 15 year old girls isn’t technically pedophilia. I mean, listen to you all. Every single person involved should face justice. I don’t care what political party they are affiliated with. And that includes Epstein’s besty Donald Trump.
Rocks, your hatred of Trump has led you down some weird paths. Now you;’re accusing us here of claiming 14 year olds don’t qualify, or something like that? That has never happened sweetie. None of us have ever defended pedophilia. You would do yourself well by just stop lying and chasing media narratives. Trump is not a pedophile, is not a Russian asset, is not a fascist, nor is he a white supremacist. He has been in public life for over 40 years, has raised a beautiful family, built an incredibly successful business, and use to be a Democrat and use to be good friends with all of those people who now hate him. Democrats, like you, are suffering from mass psychiosis due to the most effective Leftist propaganda campaign ever waged in America. Your grandkids will thank people like us here at B4V for not falling for all the shit you have.
Now if you wanted to see if anyone was a pedophile, you should look into Bill Clinton, Lawrence Summers, and Joe Biden (who reportedly took showers with his young daughter). Good luck.
I feel like the roommate complaining about another roommate constantly bringing a very offensive person into the home, someone no one else in the house wants around. We say “he is flatulent with disgusting personal hygiene, he is belligerent and hostile, he never flushes the toilet, and we don’t like the way he looks at your little brother” but your response boils down to “Yeah, I hate him too, but I think it is fun to call him names and make fun of him and to do that I have to let him in first”.
To which I, for one, reply that I would much prefer for you to go to HIS playground to make fun of him instead of letting him stink up the place here. Contrary to some beliefs, I am not The Boss Of Everything so I don’t make the rules, but I do have an opinion.
Grow up. I don’t let him in and that assertion is laughable. Here’s a thought …. Don’t read his comments and stop with the lectures.
You do realize that we all know he is here to a great extent because *someone* violated a trust and gave him what was supposed to be confidential information, right? Seems to justify a little “lecturing”. And his loyalty to you is equal to yours, as he constantly makes it clear that he was clued in by *someone* and throws you under the bus. What a well-matched pair. You guys need to get a room.
Interesting story here and a clear example of just dangerously stupid bleeding heart Democrats are. They are a danger to this country
Our investigation shows what happens when a tribal mindset meets a bleeding-heart bureaucracy, when imported clan loyalties collide with a political class too timid to offend, and when accusations of racism are cynically deployed to shield criminal behavior. The predictable result is graft, with taxpayers left to foot the bill.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/minnesota-welfare-fraud-somalia-al-shabaab
Naturally they steal – we essentially encourage them to. I’m very confident that organized crime plays a huge role here – bringing them in, getting them on welfare and then skimming off of every program. They’d be idiots not to.
Isn’t it interesting that since USAID closed down, Democrats now need to borrow money. Coincidence?
One would almost think that they had lost their lucrative little, taxpayer- funded slush fund.
It was rather clever of them – create government programs to pay themselves and use part of the money to buy influence to get even more government funding.
Half of it is graft. At least. Trillions of dollars are simply being stolen every year.
That’s actually not much of an exaggeration.
“The war’s over” 😂
that was hilarious
This a YUGE problem in this country and many doctors and big pharma need to be held accountable. I read the SSRI prescriptions are up over 400%. That’s just evil
https://archive.is/Wjq2P
Trump needs to be more like Lincoln on this issue.
“Must I shoot a simple-minded soldier boy who deserts, while I must not touch a hair of a wiley agitator who induces him to desert?” – Abraham Lincoln – June 12, 1863, on efforts by Democrat politicians to incite rebellion and sedition among Union soldiers.
Bismarck was a lot of thing but he was most of all a clear thinker.
1848 was a year of rebellion all around Europe and one of the most intense was the Hungarian revolt against Hapsburg rule which was suppressed with great intensity. Bismarck got into a discussion about it with most of the people deploring the Austrian action as cruel but he pointed out that there is blame all around. Sure, things weren’t great in Hungary but they also weren’t hideous and reform was possible within the system. But starting a revolt – which did not have universal support – the rebels bet they could shoot their way into power. That is, they were partly responsible for the result.
That is the thing everyone tries to dodge around – the assignment of responsibility. We are all human beings with agency. What we do matters – both in the here and now and the hereafter. Some fool in the Army might take those Democrat statements to heart and disobey an order…maybe even try an act of violence. And when that happens, we’re supposed to only do something to the soldier. Nope. I’d do less to the soldier than I would to the people who incited it.
One down:
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., announced Friday night that she will be resigning her seat in Congress come Jan. 5, 2026.
Conveniently, MTG is retiring 2 days after her pension is fully vested. She’s a woman of principle LOL
She’s either got a gig lined up or there’s a criminal charge coming ’round the bend at her.
As someone known for her constant nagging about precise use of words, this article impressed me as the best writing I have seen on the subject. It makes so many important points the whole article would have to be quoted to include even the most significant.
This is such a great explanation for the focus by the Left on the word “fascist”. Logically, they are protesting against a political system that is part of their own political allegiance, but logic has nothing to do with it. Reality has nothing to do with it They learned “fascist” as a feeling, not a doctrine — a linguistic siren, not a political ideology.
In progressive speech, words aren’t vessels for meaning. They’re vessels for emotion: disgust, fear, boundary-marking, tribal alert.
Once you realize this, the entire pattern snaps into place. Their conflict style isn’t adult debate. It’s the adolescent female model of social aggression:”
In modern progressive moral logic, “fascist” functions as a moral alert, not an ideological label.
As I have so often said (and this is not an original understanding) whoever controls the narrative controls the country. This article shows how controlling the narrative starts with controlling the definitions and shifting them from objective descriptions of the actual meaning of words to mere symbols of emotions.
In a similar vein, the word “pedophilia” is getting a lot of press lately, and as usual with the Left this has little or nothing to do with the actual literal meaning of the word (“The American Psychological Association (APA) Dictionary of Psychology defines pedophilia as “a paraphilia in which sexual acts or fantasies involving pre-pubertal children“) instead being mere virtue signaling of feigned outrage about alleged acts by conservatives.
We’ve seen this before, in the hysterical emoting over “Catholic pedophile priests” when, while it is true there was a scandal in the Church involving sexual abuse by some priests, it was not “pedophilia” but was homosexual priests preying on post-pubescent boys. The reality, of this being homosexual predation, was unacceptable to the Left and its promotion of gay priests, so the word simply had to be lifted from reality and placed in a different (false) context to try to indict the entire Catholic Church with the lie that adult priests were molesting children.
In the current iteration, the word has been dragged out again, stripped of its true meaning, and applied almost randomly to any sexual act, real or imagined, involving any conservative and any young person. Now when a mature-appearing 17-year-old girl (clearly well past puberty) with a fake ID, who hangs out in bars, agrees to a sexual relationship with an older man after convincing him she is 18 and providing an ID to “prove” it the Left pounces on this as proof of his “pedophilia”.
(The C-Span videos of Joe Biden sexually molesting young girls does appear to be true pedophilia, as he chose girls who appeared to be pre-pubescent to stand next to him or in front of him during his photo ops as Vice President, where he could then grope their breast areas or pull them back into his crotch.)
Certainly no 14-year-old girl is legally qualified to consent to sexual conduct, and certainly sexual conduct with girls of this age is immoral and illegal. But it is NOT pedophilia, and it is clear that this powerful and negative word has been chosen by the Left to imply a deeper and more serious moral and legal meaning than the actual act. California, notorious for its casual approach to crime, has this in its statutes: ” California Penal Code § 288 states that “any person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or lascivious act, upon or with the body, or any part or member thereof, of a child who is under the age of 14 years, with the intent of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or sexual desires of that person or the child, is guilty of a felony..” California also addresses the crime of sex with a minor: “Under California Penal Code 261.5 PC, a “statutory rape” takes place when any person engages in sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 18” and reserves the right to classify this as either a felony or a misdemeanor, thereby acknowledging that circumstances may alter the severity of the crime.
So any time some radical Lib starts howling about “pedophiles” remember that unless he is outraged about Joe Biden he is simply lying about politicians engaging in pedophilia. And demanding accuracy and clarity in language is far from “defending pedophiles”. It is merely a determination to insert honesty into a Liberal narrative.