The prisoners control our prisons – likely with the aid of bribed guards. An extreme example of this from NBC Los Angeles:

Charles Manson on Line One.

The murderous cult leader was one of thousands of California inmates busted with a cell phone last year, which he used to call unidentified people in California, New Jersey, Florida and British Columbia, according to the Los Angeles Times.

“It’s troubling that he had a cellphone since he’s a person who got other people to murder on his behalf,” said Terry Thornton, a spokeswoman for the California Department of Corrections. She added that it is not known if the one-time cult leader, now 76, used the phone to order up any crimes…

A prison should be thus: no television, no radio, wooden barracks for most inmates, concrete cell blocks for trouble makers, no phone communication, all areas of the prison under audio and visual monitoring from off-site locations 24/7, backbreaking physical labor 6 days a week 52 weeks a year from all inmates. Prison guards should be regularly transferred to prevent corruption networks from developing; prisoners should be known to guards only by their numbers.

Under such a regime, Manson wouldn’t be able to get a cell phone – and we wouldn’t have rape, drug abuse, murder and mayhem in our prisons…nor gang lords being able to run their criminal empires from behind bars. Prison is not supposed to be a nice place – it is supposed to be a place where a prisoner has time for really only one thing: thinking about what got him in to prison. The ultimate hope is that the prisoner will finally admit culpability and begin the process of personal redemption – but that is up to the prisoner. Our main concern is that the prisoner be kept away from the public, safe from harm and incapable of doing anything other than thinking about what he did.

We have become a very un-serious society. Creeping barbarism coupled with moral cowardice has led us to a bizarre, Alice in Wonderland world in which welfare recipients and convicted murderers can obtain cell phones while hard working Americans wonder if they’ll keep their job for another month. Revolutionary change is necessary to fix this – and, trust me on this, November 2nd was only the tiniest first step in the journey of a thousand miles. We’ve got a long way to go – and only a limited time to save our nation.

We’d better get ready to put our backs in to it.

How would you like to be found guilty for acts by another person, committed decades ago? Well, all you have to do is become Catholic – and then you’ll find that even if you never did anything wrong (and weren’t even around at the time) you are guilty:

From Delaware Online: Jury faults Delaware parish in sex abuse

In a ruling that likely will have far-reaching implications for about 150 priest sex abuse cases pending or tied up in bankruptcy court, a jury found that St. Elizabeth Roman Catholic parish was grossly negligent in its failure to properly supervise then-priest Francis DeLuca and is responsible for at least $3 million of $30 million in damages awarded to John M. Vai, who repeatedly was molested as a teenager in the 1960s.

Yes, you read that right. A jury has found an entire parish to be at fault for a case of sexual abuse by a priest. According to this ruling, hypothetically speaking, if you are a member of a parish that has ever had a priest convicted of sexual abuse, you are at fault for it…

Do keep in mind that a child is far more likely to be abused by a public school teacher than a priest – and then consider that if someone abuses a child in your local school, you are responsible for it, at least as far as this ruling goes. Additionally, am I the only person who wonders how valid a judgment can be made about events alleged to have occurred decades ago?

What started out as a terrible scandal where the leaders of the Church made egregious errors in dealing with sexual abuse has now become a mere implement to persecute the church and enrich trial lawyers. Enough is quite enough on this – looting the Church has been a common past-time among some for four hundred years and it is time to call a halt to this. Even if you’re not Catholic, do remember that they’ll be coming after you, next. If such a ruling stands, then any group which can be connected with anyone who did a crime will become deep pockets for anyone who wishes to steal some money via the courts.

Justice requires that anyone who broke the law go to jail – though, in most of these cases, the priests in question are long retired, or even deceased. There can be a case made that anyone who suffered abuse should have their psychological and spiritual counseling over the matter to be paid for. Beyond that, its either looting or persecution, and there should be no place for that in the United States of America.

(Note to liberals: The issue to be discussed here is this issue. Any attempt to re-hash the whole Scandal in the Church or drag in absurd accusations won’t fly, so don’t bother.)

Heard this version of the song for the first time today, and thought it so good that I wanted to share it:

There is no other way to describe this – from NRO’s The Corner:

…U.S. Civil Rights Commissioner and Corner regular Peter Kirsanow calls it “the worst piece of proposed legislation ever reviewed by the Commission.” The purpose of the bill is to shore up the Hawaiian government’s ability to discriminate in favor of — and confer special benefits on — those it considers to be “ethnic” Hawaiians. Of course, this would all be to the detriment of Hawaiians of African, Asian, European, or other descent. (How many drops of ethnic blood must one have to be considered an eligible “Native”? The bill doesn’t stipulate, but I am sure there are some old laws from the time of the Confederacy that the “Native” Hawaiian government could use to help make that determination.)

The bill is intended to do an end-run around court decisions and preserve Hawaii’s current practice of conferring government benefits on “Native” Hawaiians, including special home loans and business loans, as well as housing and educational programs…

Hawaii’s Senators – both Democrats – are pressing to have this bill passed in the lame duck session by attaching it to a “must pass” bill. What they are essentially trying to do is pass a law which will judge people entirely by their ethnic background – if you are of the “correct” ancestry, you’ll get benefits no one else gets. This was the basis of the Jim Crow laws of the South – laws designed to ensure that a favored group got preferential treatment by government.

It is disgusting that this would be considered – but entirely in the nature of our modern Democrats who don’t care how lousy a thing is. The only concern here is that Hawaii Democrats maintain their control – and the price of their continued power is to kowtow to the racist ideology of some (but by no means all) people of Hawaiian ancestry. There is no bit of feces Democrats won’t smear all over themselves in order to maintain and expand their power.

And this is just a foretaste of what they want for all of America – they want us all carved up in to groups where if you are in the right group, you’ll get goodies out of the treasury. By playing group off against group and dangling promises of special treatment in front of them, Democrats hope to divide and rule – never caring for a moment if America dies, but only that they remain in charge as long as she lives.

This from Phillip Klein over at the American Spectator:

On Thursday, the California High Speed Rail Authority board unanimously approved the 65-mile “train to nowhere” that would link two tiny towns at a cost of $4.15 billion, all because the state didn’t want to lose $2 billion in federal stimulus funds.

The rail line would connect two central California towns, Borden and Corcoran, with a combined population of 25,000…

…to sum up, a state that’s broke is spending billions of dollars on a project that benefits a tiny percentage of people, so that it doesn’t lose billions of dollars in payments from a country that’s broke…

I’m a fan of high speed rail. I’d like to have us re-work our entire rail system for high speed. I think the speed up of the movement of goods would be a long-term net economic benefit to the whole economy – and I think that high speed rail would be able to capture at least a portion of travel which currently goes by air. But you don’t do it this way.

You don’t do it with government subsidy, other than whatever government action is needed to clear the right of way for the rail lines, themselves. When you do it with government, you get absurd things like starting the project by connecting a couple tiny towns. How about a high speed rail from Los Angeles to Las Vegas, instead? That would make too much sense, I guess. It is just additionally stupid when you realize that the government – State and federal – will really be spending money ultimately borrowed from China and such places in order to fund a project which will do nothing to get us out of our current mess.

An asinine government ruled by a corrupt Ruling Class continues to head for the cliff. And its getting really, really close, now.

So, how’s that economic recovery thing working out for you, Americans?

The U.S. economy added fewer jobs than expected in November and the unemployment rate rose, dashing hopes that the recovery is gaining momentum…

…The jobless rate, obtained from a separate household survey, unexpectedly rose to 9.8%, the highest level since April.

Economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires had forecast payrolls would rise by 144,000 and that the unemployment rate would remain unchanged at 9.6%…

That is because most economists – trained to believe that Keynesian theory is correct – are functionally idiots when it comes to economics. You don’t get economic growth by printing and borrowing money and then spending it like mad. You get growth when people work hard, save their money and carefully invest it for the long term. Any economic theory which does other than encourage hard work, savings and careful investment is someone trying to run a con – trying, that is, to steal things from those who have real wealth.

We can get out of this – but not until those in charge change their ways, or are replaced by people with common sense.

We’ve become rather barbaric of late – and I think we can fix it.

Limbaugh on the RINOs/Ruling Class types against Palin.

Proving it takes all kinds to make a world, someone is willing to speak up for printing money as an economic cure. I disagree in the comments.

Will the British cops arrest Assange? I doubt it – I figure he’s going to skate.

Well, we were warned: “You will be hated by all because of my name, but whoever endures to the end will be saved.” – Matthew 10:22. Seems that Christians are the most persecuted religion on the world.

Adm. Mullen: Don’t want to serve with openly gay service members? Then you can get out. Some how, I don’t think that we should replaced “don’t ask, don’t tell” with “pound sand, if you don’t like it”. I think the Admiral has made an error here – essentially insulting those in the armed forces who are apprehensive about this proposed policy change. I’m sympathetic to the idea of allowing openly gay people to serve (with reservations long noted) – but this isn’t the way to do it, Admiral.

Iowahawk strikes back at Assange.

Legal Insurrection notes:

…Without the enthusiasm of Palin supporters the Republican Party is nothing moving into 2012.

The campaign troops who will be in the field, on the telephones and at the fundraisers in 2012 will be the same troops who fought the 2010 campaign war. And those troops weren’t carrying Mitt Romney, or Mike Huckabee, or Newt Gingrich signs.

That doesn’t mean Palin gets the nomination just because she wants it, or that she is presumptive, or that her supporters constitute a majority of the Party.

It does mean that the Republican nominee cannot win against Barack Obama without the enthusiasm and support of Palin supporters…

This is where Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment kicks in – what is really meant by “thou shall not speak ill of your fellow Republican”. If someone wants to attack Palin, they’d better do it on policy and/or resume’ issues. Don’t do it by saying “she’s not ready” or “she can’t win”, that is.

It is, of course, hard to attack Palin on policy – for the most part, she’s entirely in line with the majority of the GOP on matters of taxation, spending, Constitutional issues, etc. You can attack her on policy only by going more liberal, which will kill you with GOP primary voters, or by going more conservative, which may kill you with moderates in November. To really get past Palin, a GOPer will have to demonstrate how he can better implement what Palin supporters want – but that is hard to do unless you, yourself, have been a governor for some time longer than Palin was, and can point to a solid record of accomplishment without any skeletons in the closet.

But if you want to be the Republican nominee for President and you aren’t Sarah Palin, you’d better figure it out – because if you don’t have Sarah Palin’s enthusiastic backing (and thus the backing of her legion of supporters), you can’t beat Obama. Trying to knock her out by saying she’s a dunce or just not ready for prime time will only turn off Palin supporters.

This is why I figure that only Christie or Daniels can defeat Palin – and Christie has already made some Palin supporters mad with his sly dig at Palin’s credibility as a candidate (though, of course, Christie still asserts he won’t run – so, no harm, no foul). Jindal also has an outside chance, if he decides to go for it in 2012 (though I think he’ll wait until 2016 – if we lose in 2012 – or 2020; he goes for re-election next year, will probably be thumpingly re-elected and that carries him through to 2015). Only a successful governor can bring to the table more than Palin does – and if that governor can both argue against Palin while also showing respect for Palin and her supporters, he’ll have a good shot at it.

Main thing – don’t cross the Mama Grizzly. Don’t fall for the MSM narrative. Don’t let the Ruling Class types – who are scared spitless of Palin – convince you to denigrate her abilities or her impact. Meet her as the awesome, elemental political force she is and argue your case – that is the only way to do it.

From Reuters:

A bipartisan deal to vote on dueling tax packages fell apart late on Thursday and the Democratic Senate leader will instead set votes on his party’s plans to extend only some Bush-era tax cuts, an aide said…

The MSM report, naturally, goes on to blame Republicans for the impasse. But over at NRO’s The Corner there’s Sen. Harkin (D-IA) asserting that if Obama caves on taxes for those making over $250,000, he’ll be in trouble in 2012. In other words, Democrats might be in an internal impasse – not wanting to be responsible for a big tax hike, but also not willing to challenge their own left wing base on the issue.

We’ll see how this plays out.