If you’re going to be a fanatic, I guess you might as well go all the way:

…He doesn’t even want his ruling — which ignores Supreme Court precedent and imposes gay marriage against the expressed wishes of the electorate — appealed to the Ninth Circuit. Walker feels that only the state politicians who were against Proposition 8 have standing to appeal, while the over 7 million California voters who supported Proposition 8 shouldn’t be able to even present their position to a higher court. It’s outrageous. The people are supposed to be sovereign, not the politicians. This stay order will be appealed to the Ninth Circuit and if necessary to Justice Anthony Kennedy, and I think it is a tactical mistake on Judge Walker’s part to display his injudicious zeal — once again — before Kennedy’s eyes.

It seems that Walker prefers to be the hero of the gay rights movement to being a judge – it is the only way to read this: he wants gay marriage and is determined to impose it on his own hook. He doesn’t care about the risk of over-turn on appeal – he’s got his fame among his ideological friends, and that is what he values more than anything else.

While the 9th circuit will probably flub its task – staying Walker’s ruling is the only rational course of action – it does seem that the Supreme Court, even if it wants to impose gay marriage, will not be pleased at the way Walker is going about his business.

UPDATE: How Glenn Beck gets it wrong on gay marriage.

UPDATE II: From Time, of all places – Walker might have sabotaged his own agenda:

And to add another twist, at least one constitutional-law scholar in California is suggesting that by trumpeting the issue of standing, Walker has opened a hornet’s nest he may have been better off leaving undisturbed. “If the proponents don’t have standing to appeal, then it’s entirely plausible that the courts will rule that they did not properly have standing to go to trial,” Vikram Amar, a law professor at the University of California at Davis, told TIME Thursday evening. “This is an issue he glossed over when he allowed them to intervene in the trial.”

Amar says that if the Ninth Circuit agrees with Walker that the proponents don’t have standing to appeal, the judges may well decide they shouldn’t have been allowed to intervene in the case at all. If they do, he says, they could decide to vacate the trial entirely, sending it back to Walker to start over. The governor and attorney general would be unlikely to intervene — but on the other hand, come November, voters will choose new candidates for both of those offices…

It was flat out wrong for CA AG Brown to not go in to the case – for that, alone, he should have been removed from office in California (if you’re AG, you defend the laws – even if you don’t like them. Period.). Walker wanted a “legal” ruling so he allowed standing to a group of people, and then said they didn’t have standing because he knows darned well his ruling will be over turned on appeal…but if they don’t have standing now, then they didn’t have standing then. Can’t have it both ways, “judge”.

This just points out even more strongly the nature of this trial and ruling – what was wanted was a certain ruling, and Walker was determined to get it. Impeachment is a necessity – simply to defend the judicial system of the United States.

From the AP:

The $700 billion U.S. bailout program launched in response to the global economic meltdown had a far greater impact overseas than other countries’ financial rescue plans did on the U.S., according to a new report from a congressional watchdog.

Billions of dollars in U.S. rescue funds wound up in big banks in France, Germany and other nations. That was probably inevitable because of the structure of the Treasury Department’s program, the Congressional Oversight Panel says in a new report issued Thursday…

Bail outs are never a good idea – and this is just a strong bit of proof of that. They never work as intended and will always benefit groups and institutions no one in their right mind would intend to benefit.

It was bad enough that we even did the bail outs, but if we had a government run by people with any sense at all – even if not enough sense to understand that bail outs are stupid – then we would have at least ensured that every penny went to Americans, alone. But that wasn’t the point – what was intended was a vast sum of money to be expended by Democrats to secure power and wealth for themselves – and that is precisely what we got – all that we got, and all we ever would get, while they are in charge.

November is coming!

Rep. Paul Ryan, on the scene of the melt down, reports:

Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.), the ranking member of the House Budget Committee, tells National Review Online that Democrats are entering a “panic mode” as November approaches. “They are beginning to get a little unhinged,” Ryan says.

“The Left sees their agenda being rebuked by the voters this fall,” Ryan tells us. As their electoral worries mount, he says, Democrats are scurrying to “nullify any notion that there is an alternative path for America. They want to delegitimize an alternative plan and win the argument by default, making the case that there is no other path for America than what progressives have mapped out for the country, and that any other talk, of any other idea, is just fanciful.”

“That’s what’s troubling,” Ryan says. “They are trying to deny the debate that must happen if we are going to get out of the mess that we’re in.”…

The dream of decades is dying – they thought that McGovern would do it; but he lost. They thought that Carter might pull it off; but he was defeated for re-election. They thought that Clinton would ram it on through; but he betrayed them and tacked to the center to ensure his own political survival. Now comes Obama – and the left was sure they had it in the bag.

And to a certain extent, they did – a hard left ideologue was elected along with a Congress led by the furthest left part of the Democrat party. And President and Congress did start to work – but then something happened the left never expected: the people immediately reacted against it. And then it just got worse and worse – the people started to spontaneously organize and began to exert populist pressure on the GOP to shift towards the people. Capping it all off, the liberal prescription for the economy – which all liberals were convinced would work – crashed and burned.

Now they are facing a complete rejection – not just the normal mid-term losses, but the risk of the sort of losses you spend 20 years recovering from. 20 years in which, of course, the other side can repeal and replace everything you’ve done. Faced with this stark fact, they are getting in a panic – not knowing what to do, they are running around trying one expedient after another to survive.

It won’t work – its too late in the game…

Matching his worst poll result to date:

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 24% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-six percent (46%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -22…

And an overall total of 56% disapprove of the President’s job performance – small wonder Obama is going to be scarce on the campaign trail this fall.

Not what anyone wants to hear, but it is the case:

Pimco, the world’s biggest bond fund manager, has warned the US faces a prolonged period of stagnant growth and a real risk of outright deflation, similar to what Japan experienced in 1990s.

head-in-hands

Echoing a warning by M&G’s bond team on Monday, Pimco portfolio manager Scott Mather says if a Japan-like deflationary scenario becomes the baseline for the US, it would have “profound implications for asset prices”…

Yeah, no kidding. Others – such as Mish – have been warning about this for some time. I believe we are in a deflationary spiral – and debt is the ultimate culprit as it prevents us from building wealth.

All the government spending done over the past two years – here and around the world – was intended to spark inflation (which, by the way, is the financial system and government picking your pocket, but that’s an issue for another day) and thus get the easy money, get-richer-quick (for some) economy rolling again. It didn’t work – and as noted in the article, Japan has already tried this for 20 years and it never worked – in fact, the effort exacerbates the problem because when government “stimulates”, it builds more debt.

To get out of this there are a whole list of things which must be done – but first and foremost is balancing the budget. Until government stops spending more than it takes in, there sinews of economic growth simply won’t exist in sufficient force. We also need a host of regulatory and tax changes – but even cutting taxes won’t be sufficient if government spending is not balanced.

The debt is the problem, my friends – until we fix that, we fix nothing.

Check out this headline:

Only Government Bloodsuckers Made More Money Last Year

This, specifically, is in response to the news that while the rest of us are losing our jobs, suffering pay cuts or are just fearful of future job losses, government employment has shot up by about 250,000 since Obama took office and, of course, that government pay is increasingly lavish (heard on Rush today that the union bosses claims this is because of the high level of skill and education needed to run government…riiiiight…).

It will be hard for the historian 50 years from now to determine which particular government straw broke the back – and the patience – of the American people. But, no doubt about it, people are mad as heck and aren’t going to take it any more. I started writing up what I saw as a Second American Revolution about 16 months ago – when the evidence for it was still thin. By this point you’ve got to be willfully blind to not see the political tsunami brewing.

Turns out that “willfully blind” is an apt description of 90% of the elected Democrat party, and probably a good 40% of the elected GOP. The Ruling Class seems oblivious to the change in public attitude – the Democrats seem to think that if they can just smear the GOP a bit and remind everyone how much they disliked President Bush in 2008, all will be well. A stupid illusion – but I hope it holds until November 2nd; or, at least, until early October when it will really be far too late to change things.

Genuinely clueless idiots:

Federal Reserve officials decided to reinvest principal payments on mortgage holdings into long-term Treasury securities, making their first attempt to bolster growth since March 2009 to keep the slowing U.S. economy from relapsing into recession…

Because the first effort worked so well, right?

This is, of course, entirely expected – and one really can’t get too angry with Bernanke. He’s a product and defender of the system – it has brought him and his friends and family wealth and power, and he’s not about to chuck it all and build a new system where hard work, savings and careful investment would lead to the largest rewards – such a system would exclude him and the rest of the Ruling Class. Anger directed at the likes of Bernanke really isn’t going to get anywhere – and as long as he’s sitting on his pile of wealth, he simply won’t care what we say.

But this is, ultimately, a disastrous move. At best it will just delay the inevitable crash. We’re just moving part of th disaster from one set of books to another – though do keep in mind that he’s moving the disaster to the taxpayer’s books. The Fed might be considered some sort of independent agency of the United States government, but the fact remains that its full faith and credit is actually backed by the American people. Look in the mirror and you’ll see where Bernanke is getting the money to buy the bad debts.

A stupid, worthless economic model is dying and it is going to take down a corrupt ruling class with it. It will be painful to go through, but the good news is that we’ll be done with the Bernankes of the world once we’re finished.

How do you think the story would have been covered in the MSM? Now, what happened when a black man killed 8 white Americans?

…The New York Times’s August 3 headline read: “Troubles Preceded Connecticut Workplace Killing,” and in the second paragraph, the Times reported: “He might also have had cause to be angry: he had complained to his girlfriend of being racially harassed at work, the woman’s mother said, and lamented that his grievances had gone unaddressed.”

On August 7, the Washington Post’s headline read, “Beer warehouse shooter long complained of racism.”…

And on it went – I read all that sort of thing, too. For some reason, the 8 victims – their stories – were lost as the MSM endlessly repeated the absurd and irrelevant claim of racism on the part of murderer! Once again – it was bad America which caused this to happen. For Pete’s sake, they have him on video stealing the beer he was being fired for – that he wanted to call and say racism made him mad is just the act of a lunatic.

But lunacy and the left – especially in the MSM – go well together, and they won’t drop this meme of racist AmeriKKKa until they are all forced out of business.

From Reuters:

Non-farm productivity fell for the first time in 1-1/2 years during the second quarter and labor costs barely edged up, according to a Labor Department report on Tuesday that underlined a slowing pace of economic recovery.

Productivity declined by an annual rate of 0.9 percent after rising at a revised 3.9 percent rate in the first quarter, the first time since the fourth quarter of 2008 that output per worker fell…

Just another indicator that the recovery has faltered – the only question now for most people is, will we slip back in to full blown recession? For people like me, the answer to that is, “no”. That is because people like me figure we never really left the recession to begin with.

Meanwhile, for people like Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Barack Obama, the answer is, “cripes! Spend another trillion! Bound to be a different result, eventually, if we just keep doing the same thing!”.

Sharron Angle reminds us that once upon a time, Reid had a different opinion:

This is just the way Democrat leaders are, boys and girls. You genuinely anti-war liberals out there should pay close attention – realize that Democrat support for your position was only valid as long as a Republican was in office. If you want to be anti-war, that’s just fine – but remember that Democrats were just using you to make a narrow, partisan political point.