Because the Culture of Death simply wants us to shut up:

Dr. Kevin Roberts, executive director of the Catholic grassroots advocacy group, Catholic Families for America (CFA), announced his organization’s sponsorship of a nationwide petition drive in support of CBS’ decision to air the pro-life advertisement featuring Tim Tebow during the Super Bowl.

“It doesn’t take long for the pro-abortion crowd to mobilize their members,” Roberts said, “so those of us on the pro-life, pro-family side need to be sure we do the same.” Roberts continued by describing how his organization would rally its members and those of similar groups to attract several thousand signatories.

The petition can be accessed at www.ipetitions.com/petition/prolifead.

Catholic Families for America is a nationwide grassroots organization run by lay Catholics, with offices in Austin, Texas, and Washington, D.C.

Medved had one of those pro-abortion fanatics on his radio show the other day – when he asked her “is life better than death”, she answered “I don’t think that’s the issue”. Just horrible that someone can think like that.

The thing about this is that the ad is not anything overtly anti-abortion – it just has the Heisman trophy winner and his mother pointing out that life is good. This, of course, gets the Culture of Death in a snit – they are worried that some young, frightened mother out there might take heart and decide to keep her child – something just too horrible to contemplate, for the pro-abortion people.

I just don’t get it – I don’t understand why anyone would defend a “choice” to kill an unborn child, or have any problem with a woman deciding to do the right thing. Shows how inhuman we’ve become after a century or two or liberal “humanism”.

Hammering Obama quite hard:

…He talked like a Washington “outsider,” but he runs Washington! He’s had everything any president could ask for – an overwhelming majority in Congress and a fawning press corps that feels tingles every time he speaks. There was nothing preventing him from pursuing “common sense” solutions all along. He didn’t pursue them because they weren’t his priorities, and he spent his speech blaming Republicans for the problems caused by his own policies.

He dared us to “let him know” if we have a better health care plan, but he refused to allow Republicans in on the negotiations or consider any ideas for real free market and patient-centered reforms. We’ve been “letting him know” our ideas for months from the town halls to the tea parties, but he isn’t interested in listening. Instead he keeps making the nonsensical claim that his massive trillion-dollar health care bill won’t increase the deficit…

Gotta be hard on Obama to understand that the better man to be President is a woman – and a conservative woman, at that..

Here I am, at home – getting ready for the procedure tomorrow, which requires me to remain close to the facilities, ya dig? So, anyways…got nothing much going on…but have plenty of time to surf:

Bernanke re-appointed:

The Senate voted 70-30 to reappoint Ben Bernanke for a second four-year term as chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Earlier, senators voted 77-23 to end debate, clearing the way for a final vote. During more than two hours of debate on the Senate floor, Bernanke backers warned that voting him down risked sparking turmoil in U.S. and foreign markets and thwarting a budding economic recovery. They said the Fed chairman deserved an opportunity to finish what he started.

Finish what he started? My house has already lost 58% of its value – are we going for zero? Or maybe we’re shooting for 20% unemployment? Shame on those Republicans fool enough to fall for the notion that re-confirming Bernanke will help the economy.

Global Warming Hoax Update: As we all expected, cold winters are now a sign of global warming.

RIP J. D. Salinger. Question: Has anyone ever actually read Catcher in the Rye? I tried but swiftly found it monumentally boring and never got past page 10 or so.

How do you forget someone is black?

Greece’s debt: will it be the trigger of a collapse in the Euro-zone?

A worrying development:

n a trend that will drive both the Fed and the administration crazy if it lasts too much longer, weekly unemployment claims are moving in the wrong direction.

Please consider the Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report.

In the week ending Jan. 23, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 470,000, a decrease of 8,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 478,000. The 4-week moving average was 456,250, an increase of 9,500 from the previous week’s revised average of 446,750.

It has been and remains my contention that all of the “stimulus” was just so much nonsense – you can’t print up a trillion dollars, have the Fed buy bonds with it and expect to have the growth in wealth required for their to be an actual increase in employment. We’re just spinning our wheels and the only people gaining right now are the very people who brought on the problem – corrupt bankers and their kept politicians.

Until we start creating wealth we won’t get anywhere – and the only way we can create wealth is to take the burden off wealth creation. We need massive tax and spending cuts and large amounts of regulatory easing in order to get the ball rolling. Obama won’t do this because he is incapable of understanding how wealth is created – we’ll be wallowing in this morass for some time to come.

This is getting really rather exciting:

One more Democratic senator who has long been regarded as a safe prospect for reelection may be facing a challenging year in 2010.

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely voters in Wisconsin finds Republican Tommy Thompson edging incumbent Russ Feingold 47% to 43% in a hypothetical U.S. Senate match-up. Five percent (5%) like some other candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided.

Any incumbent who attracts less than 50% support at this point in a campaign is considered potentially vulnerable.

We must take nothing for granted – and that means, in 2010, not thinking that any seat is impossible. I was talking it over with a friend the other day regarding the Republican challenger to Nancy Pelosi – of course there is no chance. Come on! Its San Francisco! But, then again…

Our job, as conservatives and Republicans, is to fight it out everywhere – spread the field and tap in to voter anger about the corruption and incompetence of government. We do that, and we can have an astounding year.

UPDATE: The growing rumors of a Hillary Clinton primary challenge in 2012. Me: I don’t think it will happen because the Democrat powers-that-be know that if by some chance Hillary did knock Obama out in the primary, the African-American vote would be greatly reduced in November, ensuring not only a Democrat White House loss, but a complete collapse in the Democrat House and State legislative seats. Still, the rumor is there…

Seems that Jonah Goldberg’s book – two years after publication – is gaining traction and, thus, starting to take a lot of flack. Read here for more.

My view: Goldberg gets it exactly right. This is especially true in light of my own assertion that all non-conservative views ultimately stem from the same, flawed source. Liberalism, as I’ve said, rests upon the falsehood that Man is perfectible by men. That our problems stem not from our fallen nature, but from the unjust systems and that if we can just change the system, we’ll change ourselves. Heaven on earth will result.

From that initial folly has stemmed all the rest – and thus liberalism, socialism, communism, fascism and Nazism are branches of the same, poisoned tree. Of course, to point any of this out – especially in a best-selling book – is to irk the liberals to no end. They insist that things like Nazism and fascism have nothing to do with liberalism – in spite of the obviousness of the relationship.

I think – for justice and for the sheer fun of it – that once we gain a commanding majority in the Senate, we should void the censure of Joe McCarthy (arguably liberal fascism’s most prominent American victim) and have him set up with a Presidential Medal of Freedom. It’ll get the dogs off Goldberg and provide us hours of entertainment.

Along comes proof that a liberal Democrat always has another step lower to go:

…When Elizabeth (Edwards) learned in March 2007 that her breast cancer had returned, it became part of the couple’s political calculations in his presidential run, according to Edwards’ former aide Andrew Young who has written a tell-all book “The Politician.” The book will be released Jan. 30.

“Once Elizabeth was diagnosed with cancer … within 12 hours they were openly talking about how her cancer prognosis was going to help them in the polls,” Young told ABC News’ Bob Woodruff in an exclusive interview.

In a statement to ABC News, Elizabeth denied the accusation, calling it “unconscionable, hurtful and patently false.”

Though the cancer had spread to her bones and was incurable, the couple made the dramatic decision to stay in the 2008 presidential campaign.

“The things that were most disturbing about the Edwards to me in these later years, was that nothing was sacred. They openly talked about [their son] Wade’s death as one of their motivators for running and why he ran… They used [their children] Jack and Emma openly as campaign props,” Young said.

Just as you can’t get blood out of a turnip, you can’t get integrity out of trial lawyers. This was the left’s hero until Obama came along – and let us now be a bit thankful for Obama. It would have been a very dark night for America if Edwards was President.

Which, for those of you who are not Catholic, is a recognition that Pelosi has excommunicated herself from the Church – and do note that: its not her being excommunicated, but an acknowledgment of her self-excommunication:

Speaking with LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) after the Vigil for Life Mass last week, Lexington Bishop Ronald Gainer said that the Church has been “patient enough” with outspokenly pro-abortion Catholic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

LSN questioned Bishop Gainer on whether Pelosi should be denied communion due to her public stance as a ‘pro-choice’ Catholic. While acknowledging that it was up to her local bishop, the Lexington prelate did say that “something should be done.”

Pelosi’s latest salvo claiming to support abortion and yet be a faithful Catholic came in a December Newsweek interview. “I am a practicing Catholic,” she said, while suggesting that this made the U.S. bishops uncomfortable. “I practically mourn this difference of opinion,” she said regarding her conflict with the Church over abortion, “because I feel what I was raised to believe is consistent with what I profess, and that is that we are all endowed with, a free will and a responsibility to answer for our actions.” She added: “And that women should have that opportunity to exercise their free will.”

Reacting to Pelosi’s stance, Bishop Gainer said, “to make these public statements is a betrayal of our Catholic faith and discipline.” The bishop noted that her position was a “contradiction” and stressed that “our Church is clear on what the teachings are regarding the sanctity of life, on the inviolability of human life.”

On the question of denying Pelosi communion for her betrayals, Bishop Gainer said he understood that such actions on the part of the Church are often spun to make a martyr of those denied communion, by falsely painting the Church as being heavy-handed.

Nevertheless, he said, “the bishops have an obligation to stand up for the Church’s teaching and when we have such a broad and public consistent denial of our Church’s moral position it would seem to indicate that we’ve been patient enough and something should be done.”

Everyone should also note that it is, indeed, up to Pelosi’s Bishop to make the call – it must be understood that in spite of what critics believe, the Catholic Church is neither monolithic nor dictatorial. The reason it is left up to the local Bishop in these matters is because it is felt – correctly – that the man on the ground (as it were) will have the best understanding of the totality of the issue. The weakness of the system, of course, is that we some times get Bishops who are unwilling to challenge people who persistently violate Church teaching and yet claim to be Catholic.

If Pelosi is ever denied communion by her Bishop it will, naturally, be spun as her being persecuted by a hidebound Church – but the reality is that just as one doesn’t really get damned by God, one doesn’t really get excommunicated by the Church. Its all in the personal choice – people decide to refuse salvation, people decide to reject the Church. All that anyone else does is recognize the choice having been made.

Pelosi is perfectly free to believe as she wishes – but to be a Catholic requires acceptance of certain, basic beliefs. Its not hard – we are pro-life. From conception until natural death, no one has just cause for taking an innocent life…and even a guilty life should only be taken at extreme need. Pelosi is flat wrong when she claims her views are consistent with Church teaching – and she’s either a bald faced liar, or a complete fool for making such a claim.

We all have our choices to make in life – Pelosi has made hers. We should recognize it.

UPDATE: Pro-lifers massively outnumber pro-abortion people in San Francisco demonstration. Come on, liberals, you can do this – you can reject abortion. I promise that if you do so you can still be in favor of massive spending and you may even continue to think of President Bush as Chimpy McSmirk BusHitler…you’ll only be giving up despair and death.

What will Obama say tonight? Shall we have a pool on just how many lies Obama will tell? How many times Democrats will pop up like robots to applaud his liberal lines?

Discuss this and anything else under the sun.

This will give liberals fits:

This really should have been released last week, which was of course the best news week evah, but we’ll take it.

Our newest survey looking at perceptions of ABC News, CBS News, CNN, Fox News, and NBC News finds Fox as the only one that more people say they trust than distrust. 49% say they trust it to 37% who do not.

CNN does next best at a 39/41 spread, followed by NBC at 35/44, CBS at 32/46, and ABC at 31/46.

The survey goes on to note how liberals, naturally, trust the old media more than they do Fox, and vice versa for conservatives. We’ve got two Americas, all right – and they are not even on speaking terms, at the moment.

This problem would be solved if the old media would just admit to their liberal bias and spice up the day with a few more conservative shows – Fox would probably follow suit with some more liberal-minded shows and we’d all benefit from having not only different points of view, but having those views available to us in a format we like.

Unfortunately, the old media is still wedded to the idea that they are unbiased (while the far left is still convinced that outside of Olberman, the entire media is right wing). The members of the old media like to think back to Murrow and they want to pretend that they are just tribunes of the truth – that Murrow, himself, was a liberal hack doesn’t seem to occur to them.

For now, this just means the old media will continue to weaken – eventually the stock holders will demand profits and we might see some changes.