And man, am I gonna look like an idiot if they lose today. Ah, well, if you can’t be an idiot over your sports team, what can you be idiotic about? But, of course, I think the Jets are toast – the hard part was always going to be in Indianapolis. Though, I think the Chargers will beat them, too.

Discuss this, the rest of the playoffs and everything else under the sun.

UPDATE: Well, that rather sucks….

Fascinating up in New York:

Former Tennessee Congressman Harold Ford is on a listening tour of New York, and he is not unhappy with what he’s hearing.

“I’m getting some encouragement from people across this state, and mainly across this city, who thinks that there could be a stronger, more independent voice in the U.S. Senate,” he said Friday.

Ford met with Manhattan Democratic Chairman Keith Wright in Harlem and Bronx State Senator Ruth Hassell-Thompson in Wakefield, Bronx. Neither official told Ford to stay out of the race either, unlike others higher in power.

“I’m just happy that he took the time and gave me the respect as one of the leaders here in the Bronx,” said Hassell-Thompson.

Ford is expected to participate in more photo-ops and an upcoming upstate swing, and will probably typecast Senator Kirsten Gillibrand as a virtual political puppet of Washington power-brokers.

“I didn’t take orders when I was in Congress other than the people in Memphis who elected me, and if I run here in New York and I’m blessed to win, I wouldn’t take orders other than from the people in New York,” said Ford.

While this would be a carpetbagger campaign, New Yorkers never seem to have a problem with such. So, that probably wouldn’t be an issue. Meanwhile, further in to the report, the Ford concept seems to be to run as an outsider against Gillibrand and the Democrat powers-that-be – and as a defender of one of New York’s biggest industries, the financial sector. This could get mighty interesting.

If Ford gets in the race, then it’ll become a complete toss up as to how it will all come out – both in terms of who winds up as the Democrat nominee and who winds up as the eventual winner in November. Gillibrand is pretty much just a tool of Reid’s and any reasonably competent GOPer should be able to knock her off…but a Democrat who isn’t a tool of Reid will have a good shot. Trouble is, Democrat leaders don’t like independent thinkers – slaves to their own passions they, in turn, prefer people will servile minds as subordinates.

2010 is going to be a very interesting year.

Just disgusting:

A mailing from the Democratic party in Massachusetts accuses Scott Brown of wanting hospitals in Massachusetts to turn away “all” rape victims.

Not only is it absolutely false — again, he sponsored an amendment that would exempt religious hospitals and religious medical personnel from a law mandating the distribution of emergency contraception in all hospital emergency rooms —it’s dumb. Why would you include the word “all”? Just because you can’t keep from going absolutely over the top while in the gutter? (Or because you are happy to win at any cost?)

The Brown camp is filing a complaint, as they should.

I wrote about this attack in “Rape, She Cried” earlier this week. But it’s apparently not just Coakley but the entire Democratic party there.

The word that I’ve heard is that Brown’s people are filing a criminal complaint – and if that means some Democrats go to jail over this, that would be a good thing. High time to put a stop to this sort of slander.

Brown is going to win this, and win pretty big, and that is the best means of sticking it to the Democrats. But, we also need to prepare ourselves for when we return to full power to really bring the hammer down on corruption in our politics…and not just the bribe-taking and such, but also the outright lies Democrats routinely use against Republican candidates.

UPDATE: Brown pulls ahead on Intrade.

Yeesh!

…The IMF says Japan’s gross public debt will reach 227pc of GDP this year. This is compounding at ever faster speeds towards 250pc by mid-decade.

The only reason why this has not yet blown up is because investors (mostly Japanese) have not yet had the leap in imagination required to understand their predicament, and act on it. That roughly is the argument of Dylan Grice from Societe Generale in his latest Popular Delusions note released today. “A global fiasco is brewing in Japan.”…

…We all know that Japan has been racking up debt for Two Lost Decades, yet the sky has refused to fall. Borrowing costs have slithered down to 1.36pc on 10-year JGBs and under 1pc on shorter debt, though they are not as low as they were .. nota bene. This seeming defiance of gravity has emboldened the Krugmanites and Keynesian prime-pumpers to call for a repeat in the US, UK, and Europe. There lies a great danger.

Mr Grice said Japan was able to pull off this feat only because its captive saving pool was large enough to cover the short-fall, and because the Japanese people continued to be reassured by the conjurer’s illusion that all was well. This cannot continue.

The country tipped into outright demographic decline in 2005. Households have already stopped adding to their stock of JGBs. As the aging crisis accelerates, the elderly are running down their assets. The savings rate will soon crash below zero.

Japan can turn to foreign investors to plug the gap, or course, but at what price? If yields reached UK or US levels of 4pc, debt costs would soak up nearly all the budget, leaving nothing for schools, roads, the police, or salaries for the Ministry of Finance. “I doubt there is any yield that international capital markets can find acceptable that will not bankrupt the Japanese state,” he said.

Note too that the Japanese will also have to run down their holdings of US Treasuries, currently $750bn or 10pc of the entire stock of US Treasury debt, as well as selling a lot of Gilts and Belgian bonds.

It is that last bit which ties us to the problem – if Japan has to start dumping US notes in order to pay interest on Japanese notes, then the bottom is really and finally out of the tub.

All of this is the result of fiat money and usury – nothing wrong with paper currency and nothing wrong with charging interest given the time value of money. The problem comes in when your currency is not backed by any hard asset – then investors start demanding 8, 10 and 15 percent returns on investments because they need to not only make a profit, but cover the loss in currency value as time goes on. If we had sound money – and, yes, I prefer we return to the gold standard…you kids out there, see if you can find a US coin minted 1964 or earlier…compare it to a coin minted afterwards…note that the older coin is actually made of silver, the newer coins are made of feces – then we wouldn’t have got in to this mess.

Oh, to be sure, we wouldn’t have been able to pile up the money as fast as we did – but where did all that money go? Well, a collection of financial sharks have gotten fabulously wealthy – but me and you? Well, we’re stuck with literal tens of trillions of dollars of debt and unfunded government mandates. We can’t build wealth fast enough to cover the debt, let alone increase our net wealth, unless we go back to a currency which holds its value over time.

Japan is the model – they have followed “Obamanomics” for the past 20 years. Having complete faith in the Keynsian model of “pump priming”, they have piled up massive debt in order to “inflate” themselves out of recession. And now all the money is gone up in smoke – and Japan sits on the cusp of complete economic meltdown. And this is where Obama and his liberals want to lead us.

We dare not go. As was famously said, some times being “progressive” means you realize you took a wrong turn waaay back there and so you head back to where you messed up, and start all over again.

As we’ve watched the tragic events unfolding in Haiti this past week we must not get trapped in to thinking that this was just an earthquake. That the terrible suffering we see there is the result of an “act of God”. In fact, to even start to think in such terms is to place the blame on God for things which are own fault.

To be sure, no one could have predicted the earthquake would happen when it did. But we can predict, with 100% accuracy, that an earthquake would eventually happen right where it did. We know the way our world works on that level – we have developed sufficient knowledge to simply know that at some time or another, the ground beneath us will shake violently.

Because we know this, we here in the United States – and especially in the more earthquake-prone areas – have continually refined our construction techniques to account for the inevitable shaking of the earth.

In 1994 the earthquake in Northridge, California was a bit less powerful than the Haiti quake but had one of the highest “ground acceleration” factors ever recorded – and that is what really does the damage. This was a devastating quake – about $20 billion in property damage was done. And 72 lives were lost. 72. Low estimates in Haiti are for 50,000 dead. Why the big difference?

Human failure.

The technology required to make a building withstand an earthquake is not cutting edge – and not terribly expensive, either. It does cost, but it costs far less than the cost of rebuilding once the place is leveled – and that is outside the human cost, in lives, once the building falls. Why aren’t buildings in Haiti so constructed? Because the contractors won’t build them so, and the government can be bribed to ignore the building codes, and the people of Haiti do not insist that their government work in the interests of the people.

So, its all Haiti’s fault? Not at all. For two centuries Haiti has been a grossly misgoverned nation. It is not possible to speak of any time in Haitian history that the Haitian government did credit to itself – nor is there a time in Haitian history where we can really point out selfless heroism in defense of the people on the part of the people of Haiti. And the rest of the world – knowing that this is the case – never stepped in. Never set about bringing justice to a blighted land.

After all, its a poor nation and it doesn’t have any natural wealth to speak of and, hey, out of sight and out of mind. Haiti is in sight, today, because so many people have died. But a week from now it will start to fade from view and as long as there is no new disaster, a year from now Haiti will be completely out of our minds. But they will still be our brothers and sisters living there and its almost a certainty that they’ll be just as badly misgoverned in January of 2011 as they were right now – meaning that if another earthquake, or a hurricane, were to strike, we’d be right back there, again, trying to rescue the people.

It is not possible for us to fix all the world’s problems. Only God can do that. But there is this to think about. When we speak of our sins in Church, we don’t just talk about what we did wrong, but also about what we failed to do right. It isn’t enough that I refrain from stealing – I must also help that poor beggar at my door. Can I feed all the beggars, all by myself? No, but if God presents a beggar to me, I have an obligation to help. Haiti has been presented to us.

Once I have given the beggar a sandwich, is my moral obligation complete? If all I have is a sandwich, it is. But if I have more, then my obligation continues. I don’t have an obligation to actually work for the beggar, but I do have an obligation to do as much as is in my power. By rushing to Haiti with food and medicine we are doing a wonderful thing – but if we think that once we’ve bandaged them up and given them a meal that we’re all done, then we are sadly mistaken. And we are, additionally, just set up to have to do it all over again, until we get it right.

We, the people of the United States of America, cannot solve all problems – but we can solve this problem. Haitians are not the particular problem – those who live in the United States are some of our hardest working citizens. But, some how, back in Haiti these same splendid people can’t seem to climb out of squalor. What gives? Simple – in the United States, defective as it is, there is a government which ensures that justice is done and malfeasance is punished. Anyone who puts up a building which pancakes in an earthquake is at least open to civil penalty, and maybe for criminal liability. There is no such thing in Haiti – and, two centuries on, we have to admit that it won’t spring up naturally in that country.

What they can’t do for themselves, at the moment, is precisely what we are morally required to do if we can. Can we turn Haiti in to a protectorate and provide that justice and honesty in government which will allow the people of Haiti to both flourish and learn the value of honest government? Certainly, we can – and it would be, in any case, less expensive than having to rush to the rescue every few years, as is now the case.

We have to let go of a false morality which says that a nation, as such, has a right to complete self-determination. Most nations do – but most nations can also ensure that buildings are constructed with at least minimal safety in mind. It is also false morality to state that we dare not judge the society of Haiti by our own standards – that is just a cowardly dodge by which we pretend we don’t have an obligation, when we actually do. We must embrace the truth – and the truth is that millions of our brothers and sisters in Haiti are suffering, quite needlessly, simply because of the failure of good people to act in time.

It is time to step in. It is time to really help the long suffering people of Haiti – to rescue them not only from their current distress, but from their societal inability to construct a responsible government. This can be done – and the Haitian people can take their rightful place in the world…free, prosperous and able to completely look after their own affairs. But it can’t happen by incantation – we can’t just talk about good government in Haiti; we’re going to have to impose it.

Or, be right back where we are, today, a few years from now.

UPDATE: The Clinton-Bush Haiti Fund is up and running

Cross Posted: Noonan for Nevada

Interesting:

…As we all know, during the housing boom, millions of Americans pulled cash out of their homes in the form of home equity loans and lines of credit. They also used “piggy back” loans in order to get even lower interest rates on their primary mortgages. Now, many of the borrowers in trouble, and many who are so far underwater on their loans that they don’t qualify for any refi or modification, are choosing short sales as a way out. (Short sales are when the lender allows the home to be sold for less than the value of the loan). About 12 percent of all home sales by the end of 2009 were short sales, according to the National Association of Realtors.

In order for a short sale with two loans to happen, the second lien holder has to drop the lien.

If they don’t, and there’s no short sale, the home goes to foreclosure and the first lien holder gets the house because second liens are subordinated debt to the primary loan.

In short, the second lien holder gets nothing. In order to get the second lien holder to drop the lien, the first lien holder generally negotiates some partial payment to the second lien holder. The second lien holder doesn’t have to agree, but more and more are doing so.

That’s all legal.

But here’s what’s not legal and what’s apparently happening quite often recently. Since many second lien holders are getting very little, they are now allegedly requesting money on the side from either real estate agents or the buyers in the short sale. When I say “on the side,” I mean in cash, off the HUD settlement statements, so the first lien holder doesn’t see it…

Banks hold about a trillion dollars in second liens on houses which are “underwater” – these loans are functionally irrecoverable. If they foreclose, the first lien holder will get nothing. If they agree to a short sale, they’ll get nothing. If they write off the loans, they’ve lost a trillion dollars in “assets” which are probably the difference between being open and being seized by the FDIC. Its quite a problem – and it would be no surprise if they were trying to pull a fast one on the side to get some money to offset what will eventually be a massive crash in bank assets.

There is no way out of our housing crisis except to “cram down” loan amounts to market value – and the first and second liens will have to take an equal percentage hit (it, if a home has lost 40% of its value, then the first and second mortgages will have to reduce their principle amounts by 40%). Its either do this, or face an ever rising wave of people who will just walk away from their homes. The credit hit will last, at worst, for three years – to be sure, it will remain on a credit bureau for 7-10 years (depending on the circumstances) but the actual effect of preventing major borrowing will last, at most, three years (and will probably last only a bit more than a year, in most cases). If the banks don’t see reason, then the people will simply do it on their own. And don’t anyone get high and mighty about this – the banks, themselves, are walking away from loans they took for properties which are massively underwater. Its just business, folks.

The houses were never worth the loan amounts. Yes, the consumers who borrowed were culpable, too. But they’ve already taken the hit. As a for-instance that I’ve mentioned before, I’m out – forever – about $130,000.00 on the house I bought in 2005. Never going to see that money ever again. Its ok – its just money. Think of it as rent for my home. But I am legion – there are about ten million people situated as I am, and the number is rapidly growing. Knock down the mortgage amounts to current home values and everyone just starts over again. With the advantage, for everyone, being that people will stay in their homes, thus helping the overall housing market to recover.

We can do it this way, or we can do it the hard way – but the “underwater” loans will not be repaid. Not now. Not ever.

Only Tuesday will tell – but:

A new poll taken Thursday evening for Pajamas Media by CrossTarget – an Alexandria VA survey research firm – shows Scott Brown, a Republican, leading Martha Coakley, a Democrat, by 15.4% in Tuesday’s special election for the open Massachusetts US Senate seat. The poll of 946 likely voters was conducted by telephone using interactive voice technology (IVR) and has a margin of error of +/- 3.19%.

This is the first poll to show Brown surging to such an extent. A poll from the Suffolk University Political Research Center – published Thursday morning by the Boston Herald, but taken earlier – had Brown moving ahead by 4%.

Rumors are spreading fast and furious around the web that the Democrats have written off Coakley – that Obama’s proposed trip is just window dressing designed to reassure other vulnerable Democrats that Obama will be there for them in the fall. Meanwhile, talking points are being ginned up to claim that a defeat in Massachusetts doesn’t mean that Obama’s agenda is unpopular.

Me? I say we take nothing for granted and work our selves hard to win.

UPDATE: Obama Personally Joins Massachusetts Quake Relief

Of course, the way they prepare is by going against America’s traditions and safeguards in government:

Even if Democrats lose the special election to pick a new Massachusetts senator Tuesday, Congress may still pass health-care overhaul through a process called reconciliation, a top House Democrat said.

That procedure requires 51 votes rather than the 60 needed to prevent Republicans from blocking votes on President Barack Obama’s top legislative priorities. That supermajority is at risk as the Massachusetts race has tightened.

Of course we’ve all heard of the Democrat plans to delay seating Brown, should he win. And then there’s Obama’s broken promise of transparency. Then all the bribes with taxpayer dollars to get votes in the Senate. Oh, and lets not forget that if you’re part of the grand, Democrat coalition you can be excused from Obamacare – and its taxes – altogether. And now they’ll just shove it through with 51 votes…because they can; because they don’t care about America. Because they’ve become a mafia-like organization.

Most of our liberals are ok with this – because they are slaves in mind and spirit.

UPDATE: And the contemptible Barbara Boxer (D-CA) is weakening in her re-election bid.

And in the middle of the night:

Big Labor got some big love from President Obama and congressional Democrats yesterday after they agreed to exempt union workers from the whopping “Cadillac tax” on high-cost health-care plans until 2018.

The sweetheart deal, hammered out behind closed doors, will save union employees at least $60 billion over the years involved, while others won’t be as lucky — they’ll have to cough up almost $90 billion.

The 40 percent excise tax on what have come to be called “Cadillac” health-care plans would exempt collective-bargaining contracts covering government employees and other union members until Jan. 1, 2018.

I hate to put it this way – but you f****** liberals! Just who the heck do you think you are? This is your signature plan. This is what you say we must have. It is you who say that health care is a right and that the government must be involved…but if doing it risks your campaign cash, you’ll let people out of it? What about the rest of us who don’t even want the dratted plan? Gonna let us out?

Heck, no. Can’t do that – need to shaft someone for the cost of what you darned well know is just a power grab. How much more corrupt can you liberals become? Whom else are you going to sell yourselves to? If you believe in this, then you should be lining up to pay for it – in fact, if its such a good thing, you should be willing to exempt the critics for 8 years…prove to us its better! Show us we’re wrong.

Well, you won’t do that – and you won’t do it because you know….oh, you know!…that the whole concept of socialized medicine is worthless and anti-human. But you liberals want it – oh, you want it so badly. Because it gives you control. Because it sticks it to the productive part of America – the part you hate; the part that is just too filled with religious believers, gun owners and people who insist upon liberty.

Utterly contemptible – and we’re going to make you pay for this.

And his name is John Dennis:

John Dennis, an accomplished businessman and entrepreneur, has been a pro-liberty Republican for a quarter century.

Born in Jersey City, the son of a longshoreman and a city hall clerk, he grew up in one of the city’s toughest public housing projects.

After graduating from Fordham University with a degree in business administration, John co-founded Humanscale, which became one of the world’s top 10 design firms, specializing in office ergonomics.

After a varied career in global development and marketing, John created Foundation Real Estate, a San Francisco-based investment company with domestic and international holdings.

He is the founder of the San Francisco chapter of the Republican Liberty Caucus and currently the head of the Campaign for Liberty San Francisco.

John is a board member of the Republican Liberty Caucus California, has served as an alternate on the San Francisco Republican Central Committee and is a member of the National Rifle Association.

This is certainly the man with the biggest uphill battle in 2010 – just getting the people of San Francisco to even consider a Republican is going to be hard…getting a majority of them to vote GOP…well, all things are possible. The important point: Pelosi will not go unchallenged.

It is up to us GOPers to do what we can for Mr. Dennis – though, of course, if there are other GOPers out there vying for Nancy’s seat, we’d like to hear from them. Any challenge we can mount in these bastions of liberalism means that the liberals will have to spend that much effort and money defending rather than attacking and that, in and of itself, is a good thing.

But, also, you never can tell. Who of us ever thought that Brown would even have a chance in Massachusetts? The people are furious with government – and its not just conservatives and Republicans…its independents and even that part of the left which is actually in favor of liberty (this is a small percentage of the whole – but it is there, and we should reach for it). These are revolutionary times and we should not lock ourselves in to the political boxes of the past.

I wish Mr. Dennis all the luck in the world and if anyone out there had ever thought of running – this is the year to do it. Pick your entrenched Democrat and have at him – it just might work.