Much has been said over the past week that the prospects in Egypt and the larger Moslem world are pretty bleak. Anyone who takes the time to consider things realizes that whatever the average man or woman in Cairo might hope for out of the revolt, what they are likely to get will fall far short of desires. At best, we might get regimes which are only moderately Islamist in character; at worst, we get a series of Iranian-style regimes. There has been an interesting debate over at NRO’s The Corner to the effect that the only way to get to a liberal Islam is to go through some sort of Islamist Islam – and there is much to be said for that, though there is also a rather grating error in the line of thinking.
Taking their cue from a bit by Reuel Gerecht, the conception is that we have to go through Martin Luther before we can get to Thomas Jefferson. That, in fact, enlightenment can only come once the people have travailed through religious obscuritanism. After that, once that has failed, the people will suddenly start reading Voltaire, I guess. All of that is a load of nonsense.
First of all, it presupposes that until the Enlightenment – until we get to Jefferson – no one has a clue of a properly governed society of free men. The Enlightenment, though, wasn’t all it was cracked up to be. During that time, what happened was a group of shallow, half-educated and self absorbed people starting attacking what they didn’t understand – Christianity and the past. As things weren’t perfect, all that existed up to the moment of judgment was condemned out of hand and a whole, new future was envisioned where people who were properly up to the job would organize everything for everyone. In the long run, this got us the French Revolution with its Terror…and then the successors to the French in Lenin’s Russia, Mussolini’s Italy, Hitler’s Germany and Mao’s China. And, indeed, the Islamists who think they are advancing Islam, but actually advancing a socio-cultural bit of nonsense which is only possible for people who don’t know about the past. Islamism has cooked up a story of a glorious Caliphate which can be restored once the right people are in charge and able to organize everything for everyone. This is no more or less stupid than the pathetic imaginings of a Karl Marx.
From the 11th to the 14th century the Christian west was very well governed. This is the time of St. Francis; of St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Bernard, Dante, Albertus Magnus, Boccaccio, St. Louis IX, Abelard, Petrarch, the Gothic flowering, universities for higher education, the invention of the compass, eye glasses, the blast furnace, windmills…hardly the Dark Ages of mankind. We didn’t need an Enlightenment to allow justice to be established – and, indeed, in a very real way the establishment of the United States (a federal system where government is strictly limited in nature) is a means of recapturing what was strongly developing until the disasters of Black Death and what amounted to a civil war in Christendom when the Reformation took place.
What does Islam need in order to have a just social order? It needs to desire it. Will the people on the streets of Cairo desire this so strongly that they’ll get it? That remains to be seen. But no one should fear these events – they are working themselves out. They may prove a cure or a poison for Moslem society. Our job is not to wring our hands in worry; our job is not to try and plaster on to current events a false template of what happened in our own past; our job is simply to do what is right – and at this moment that means giving our blessing to anyone who will fight for justice and liberty. Cut our ties with the tyrants, completely and stand ready to assist anyone who is actually fighting for justice, and to smite anyone who would seek to create and export injustice.
Such has really been the actual tasks of men from the beginning of time. To do what is right, as far as our abilities allow. We won’t get it right in all respects. We will make terrible errors. But if our desire is to help the good and defy the bad, then we won’t go altogether wrong, nor instigate complete disaster. Of course, it would be helpful to us if we’d strip away a lot of the nonsense we’ve been fed upon for a couple centuries now about how the world developed. The truth does set you free, and thus the truth is obscured as much as possible – because a select part of our population doesn’t want the rest of us to be free.
But, stand firm for what is right; condemn what is wrong – in the end, that is all anyone can do. And if we do that, then no matter what comes now and in the future, we will be able to meet it with a clear eye and a clean conscience.
You must be logged in to post a comment.