Hal Lewis’ resignation from the American Physical Society:
From: Hal Lewis, University of California, Santa Barbara
To: Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society
6 October 2010…
…It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist…
Do read the entire linked letter – a stunning rebuke to the politicization of science over the past few decades. And just in case you liberals out there think this guy hasn’t got any credentials:
Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chmn of Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President’s Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW II; books: Technological Risk (about, surprise, technological risk) and Why Flip a Coin (about decision making).
Certainly a man who knows what science is. This issue of science being subordinated to politics is very alarming – aside from global warming, what other issues are being skewed because the scientists we rely upon for facts are being twisted by desires for grants, or worries about reputations if they dissent from reigning orthodoxy?
In my view, all of this ultimately stems from the way we allowed the hard left to infect our institutions of higher education. For a long while, the hard sciences were immune from the lies – after all, science is science and you can either prove your theory, or you can’t. But as time went on, the leftwing worldview gained hold, and anyone who wanted to advance in an academic career, regardless of their particular discipline, had to toe the liberal line. In large measure, we can’t rely upon anything coming out of a major university…it may or may not be true, and we can’t rely upon it until we’re sure that a genuinely independent group of scientists had a look at it.
The truth shall set you free – and so truth is not popular on the left. One of the tasks we’ll have to set ourselves it to revive the standards of truth in higher education. Science must be something which goes where ever facts and human reason lead – not something subordinated to whatever political fads are agitating the left at the moment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.