Blogs For Victory

Which is the title of a really good song by the Moody Blues – but also a good time for an open thread.

First, some poetry:

Let those who are in favour with their stars

Of public honour and proud titles boast,

Whilst I, whom fortune of such triumph bars

Unlook’d for joy in that I honour most.

Great princes’ favourites their fair leaves spread

But as the marigold at the sun’s eye,

And in themselves their pride lies buried,

For at a frown they in their glory die.

The painful warrior famoused for fight,

After a thousand victories once foiled,

Is from the book of honour razed quite,

And all the rest forgot for which he toiled:

Then happy I, that love and am beloved,

Where I may not remove nor be removed.

– Wm. Shakespeare

Then a joke:

Why Beer Is Better Than Obama

Beer is better than Obama because soldiers like beer.

Beer is better than Obama because beer doesn’t mind if you cling to your beer.

Beer is better than Obama because sailors like beer.

Beer is better than Obama because beer doesn’t mind if you own an SUV.

Beer is better than Obama because marines like beer.

Beer is better than Obama because beer isn’t a lawyer.

Beer is better than Obama because beer and whine don’t mix.

Now, have at it.

From the paper which essentially says Obama can do no wrong:

When President Obama nominated former Senator Tom Daschle to be his secretary of health and human services, it seemed to be a good choice. Mr. Daschle, as the co-author of a book on health care reform, knew a lot about one of the president’s signature issues. As a former Senate majority leader, he also knew a lot about guiding controversial bills through Congress, where he remains liked and respected by former colleagues.

Unfortunately, new facts have come to light — involving his failure to pay substantial taxes that were owed and his sizable income from health-related companies while he worked in the private sector — that call into question his suitability for the job. We believe that Mr. Daschle ought to step aside and let the president choose a less-blemished successor.

Of course, if you read the entire editorial you won’t find the Times condemning Obama for being fool enough to appoint someone like Daschle…to do that would also call into question Obama’s judgement on a bunch of his other nominees with, as they say, “ethical lapses” (what we say is they’re crooks, but such phraseology is banned when describing Democrats). The MSM is still in full-blown worship mode as it relates to Obama, but the plain fact of the matter is that Obama has assembled a which is going to be the major stumbling block to enacting Obama’s plans. A collection of has-beens, crooks and hacks with only one or two adults in the whole mix (hard to believe that we’re relying upon Hillary and Panetta to keep Obama’s Administration more or less up on the rails).

This is what we get when we elect to the Presidency a man who, point blank, is not fitted by knowledge or experience to be President. We can only hope he has the stomach for the job and that he’s a really quick learner.

Meanwhile, Daschle has to go – and Obama should figure out the best way of getting rid of a couple other albatrosses ’round his neck (Holder immediately springs to mind) as soon as he can ease them out without too much of a fuss.

Has been handsomely won, and while we go forward backing our Commander in Chief in his efforts to win in Afghanistan, settle the Israeli/Palestinian conflict and put a lid on Iran, we must keep in mind that in his first real foray into foreign and military affairs, he goofed up really, really bad:

Iraq held provincial elections in an environment of calm that would have been unimaginable two years ago. That the elections came off in such an orderly, peaceful manner is further testament to the success of the surge and suggests that the change American efforts have achieved in Iraq’s security environment may be sustainable over the long run.

We won’t know the final results of the elections for weeks, but early reports are that Sunni and Shiite secular parties have fared relatively better than their religious counterparts. If this is the case, it will be a step toward empowering Iraqis locked out of the current power structure and making Iraqi politics more truly representative.

You on the left need to take a lesson here – first off, realize how very wrong you were to call for withdrawal timetables; you were also wrong to call the campaign in Iraq lost; you were further wrong when you said that we can’t implant democracy into the Moslem world. A bit of humility is your best medicine right now – that and start learning a bit about war and foreign affairs, and chuck all your books by Noam Chomsky in the garbage, as they aren’t even worth recycling. Right now, it is your guy Obama who has the ball – and you can help him help America, or you can fail him and fail America. The war isn’t over, and there is some hard fighting left to do and we might be called upon to do the very same things President Bush had to do…but this time, it’d be nice if you’d get behind our military and act like patriots, for once.

Shows that when Obama starts appointing leftwing fanatics to the courts, we can work up a popular opposition to it:

Nearly two-thirds of U.S. voters (64%) say U.S. Supreme Court decisions should be based on what is written in the Constitution, but only 35% think President Obama agrees with them.

Twenty-seven percent (27%) say high court rulings should be guided by fairness and justice, and nine percent (9%) are not sure which is more important, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.

A slight plurality of voters (38%) say Obama thinks the Supreme Court should base its decisions on fairness and justice. Twenty-seven percent (27%) are not sure.

The courts are a vital thing, because that is really where liberals hope to make the running – knowing that they can’t really get their programs through the legislature, they seek to use the courts as a judicial legislature to impose their views by judicial fiat. But, wonder of wonders, a majority – at least according to this survey – believe that the Courts should just rule on the law and leave legislating to the legislature, or to the people, presumptively.

There is a core of conservatism at the center of the American population – and it is why our democratic republic has endured so long. In the end, a republic can be conservative, or it won’t long be a republic. The self-discipline necessary for a functioning republic only comes from an adherence to a strict code of morals – without this, a republic will disintegrate into a mobocracy as prelude to a dictatorship. The fact that after decades of relentless leftwing attempts to undermine the constitution and convince people that nebulous concepts such as “fairness” should guide our courts, the American people appear to want the law to be the guidance of the courts.

Working in tune with this basic American conservatism, we can thwart the worst aspects of Obama’s liberalism and eventually regain power.

For which act I give him credit for thinking clearly on this tricky matter:

Obama preserves renditions as counter-terrorism tool

The role of the CIA’s controversial prisoner-transfer program may expand, intelligence experts say.

The CIA’s secret prisons are being shuttered. Harsh interrogation techniques are off-limits. And Guantanamo Bay will eventually go back to being a wind-swept naval base on the southeastern corner of Cuba.

But even while dismantling these programs, President Obama left intact an equally controversial counter-terrorism tool.

Under executive orders issued by Obama recently, the CIA still has authority to carry out what are known as renditions, secret abductions and transfers of prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States.

Current and former U.S. intelligence officials said that the rendition program might be poised to play an expanded role going forward because it was the main remaining mechanism — aside from Predator missile strikes — for taking suspected terrorists off the street.

As I’ve said before, I don’t think that Obama will close Gitmo, at least not before January of 2013…when he’s either safely re-elected or equally safely defeated for re-election, and thus a released Gitmo terrorist no longer poses a political threat to Obama and his Democrats (hey, they are Democrats – and that means that everything takes a back seat to political power). After all is said and done, unless Obama proves to be the biggest fool in history (which I don’t think he is) he’ll end up retaining most, if not all, President Bush’s anti-terrorism policies…even if some of them are disguised by new terminology and/or are revived under different guise shortly after being “ended” by Obama.

While the left was shrieking in complete absurdity about threats to American liberty and violations of human rights under President Bush, the fact remains that no liberties were threatened and no one’s rights were violated. All we did, under President Bush, was work out the best means available for dealing with terrorists once captured – the alternatives to doing what Bush did were to either shoot them out of hand, or turn them loose, neither action being in our best interests. It really is a difficult situation – we’re dealing with men who are very wicked and who’s home countries often don’t want them back, except perhaps to kill them.

President Obama, to his shame, joined in with the leftwing slanders about what we were doing – but now that he’s President he’s probably having his eyes opened to just what sort of people we’re dealing with and just how narrow our margin of error is when dealing with people who believe that slaughtering innocent people is a good thing.

And now, lefties, where is your outrage? Of was there ever really anything to it outside of a hatred of all things Bush?

At least to some degree:

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said Sunday the massive stimulus bill backed by President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats could go down to defeat if it’s not stripped of unnecessary spending and focused more on housing issues and tax cut.

The Senate version of the bill, which topped out at nearly $900 billion, is headed to the floor for debate. The House bill totaled about $819 billion and earned no Republican votes, even though it easily passed the Democratic-controlled House. At some point lawmakers will need to compromise on the competing versions.

McConnell and other Republicans suggested that the bill needed an overhaul because it doesn’t pump enough into the private sector through tax cuts and allows Democrats to go on a spending spree unlikely to jolt the economy. The Republican leader also complained that Democrats had not been as bipartisan in writing the bill as Obama had said he wanted.

“I think it may be time … for the president to kind of get a hold of these Democrats in the Senate and the House, who have rather significant majorities, and shake them a little bit and say, ‘Look, let’s do this the right way,'” McConnell said. “I can’t believe that the president isn’t embarrassed about the products that have been produced so far.”

Anything the Congressional GOP can do to cut out the wasteful and worthless spending and add a bit of actual stimulus and/or tax cuts will just make it that more likely we’ll start to get out of this recession some time in the second half of 2010 or, perhaps, the first half of 2011…pass it as is, and we’re doomed to an economic depression which will last until a year or two after Obama and his Democrats are either booted out of office or, at least, are forced to apply supply-side economics to the problem. Of course, my preferred course of action is one which won’t happen, but which would put us on the best long-term course – admit we screwed up for the past 75 years or so and go back to a genuinely free market economic system. But we won’t do that – because we’re stupid (and I mean that in a nice way).

In the end, the election of Obama – the most overtly leftwing President America has ever had – might prove beneficial to conservatism in the long run. By showing how entirely out of touch the left is, Obama and his Democrats are just handing the GOP issue after issue to clobber them on in 2010 and beyond. But first we must try to save the economic life of the United States – even if by helping to kill the worst aspects of the bill we end up helping Obama.

Given the recent Iranian tirade against the United States and President Obama, this should disturb us:

US President Barack Obama has already used experts within the last few months to hold high-level but discreet talks with both Iran and Syria, organizers of the meetings told AFP.

Officially, Obama’s overtures toward both Tehran and Damascus have remained limited.

In an interview broadcast Monday, Obama said the United States would offer arch-foe Iran an extended hand of diplomacy if the Islamic Republic’s leaders “unclenched their fist.”

If the response to “months” of high level, but discreet, contacts between Obama and Iran is hate-filled rant by the “President” of Iran directed against the United States and President Obama, then we’re seeing the Iranians having a perception of weakness on the part of the new US Administration. I hope President Obama is paying close attention here – be nice and show that you are willing to meet the Iranians on the level, and the response is to pour sh** all over the United States and demand we truckle to them. What the tyrants who run Iran are waiting for, now, is to see whether or not President Obama will show patience (which they’ll perceive as weakness, and thus become more outrageous in their behavior as they test to see how far they can go), or whether he’ll show some teeth to the Iranians.

Iran is in an extraordinarily difficult situation – oil prices in the tank, economy in shambles, surrounded by American power, under threat of severe attack by Israeli forces – and Obama can easily let the Iranians know that we won’t tolerate any nonsense from them. Or, Obama can try to be “big” about it and, like a string of liberals past, ignore the Iranian provocation…thus ensuring there will be more, and worse, to come…

I’d like to see the number higher, but at least there’s more smart than dumb in American views of global warming:

Forty-four percent (44%) of U.S. voters now say long-term planetary trends are the cause of global warming, compared to 41% who blame it on human activity.

Seven percent (7%) attribute global warming to some other reason, and nine percent (9%) are unsure in a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.

Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Democrats blame global warming on human activity, compared to 21% percent of Republicans. Two-thirds of GOP voters (67%) see long-term planetary trends as the cause versus 23% of Democrats. Voters not affiliated with either party by eight points put the blame on planetary trends.

What I’m surprised about is that it seems something like four in ten Democrats are smarter than Al Gore…this bodes well for our new RNC chairman to reach out to Democrats…if we get all smart Republicans and all smart Democrats on our side, then we’ll have an unbeatable majority…plus a minority which will be so dumb that our entertainment will come from playing transparent practical jokes on them…

On the Obama-Pelosi-Reid Where-Do-You-Republicans-Get-Off-Questioning-Us? “stimulus” bill:

Yet perhaps the clincher is the answer to a bigger question: how did the Great Depression end? It didn’t stop with the conservative suggestion: slashed spending, slashed debt and slashed government activity. It ended with precisely the opposite: the vast fiscal stimulus of the Second World War. The government sent debt soaring to its highest levels in US history (until today) in order to spend more than ever before. It set up the longest boom in US history.

Uh, no. It wasn’t the massive spending of WWII which got us out of the Depression, it was the fact that of the major industrial nations of the world (USA, USSR, Germany, Japan, UK and to a lesser extent France and Italy) only the United States emerged unscathed from WWII in a world in which there was massive war damage to be repaired. In 1945, if you wanted a manufactured item, the United States and Britain were the only fully operational economies, and Britain was flat broke. Couple this with the entirely unforeseen population boom resultant upon increased food supplies and vastly improved public health efforts and, voila!, you’ve got a post-WWII American economic boom. But it was a boom which was, from the start, living on borrowed time.

Absent a massive restructuring of the post-WWII American economy to return it to its pre-Depression free market model, it was only a matter of time before the rebuilt industrial nations – joined by other nations rapidly industrializing – began to eat into America’s market share. The pinch started in the 1960’s but only really began to be felt when the bill came due for Vietnam and the Great Society at the same time the Arabs pulled their first oil embargo, sending energy costs in America soaring. From then on until Reagan, the American economy sputtered along unable to cope … the high tax, high spend, high regulation economy built by FDR simply could not provide growth when this started to require rapid innovation – we were heading back into the Great Depression when we fortunately elected Reagan who lowered taxes and cut regulations…unfortunately, he was unable to bring spending under control, so the seeds of FDR were still there, waiting for the perfect liberal storm to have another go at wrecking the economy.

Here we now stand, poised at the same position we were at the start of the Great Depression with a choice to make – follow the myth of FDR, or understand that you cannot spend your way into wealth? Upon our decision here much depends. Obama and his Democrats are incapable of the decision because they are unaware that the FDR model even has an alternative, let alone a more successful one. Only we Republicans have the knowledge necessary to steer America out of our economic morass, and we are completely shut out of power until at least after the 2010 mid-terms. Rather a tricky situation.

Anyone who still claims that Obama is bringing a new way to doing business to DC is a fool:

“If a Bush appointee got rich off of Wall Street in this climate, had a chauffeur from one of his fat cat cronies, had unpaid taxes that amounted to more than what most people make in a year, and then the administration tried to fix it behind closed doors. Democrats would call for his head and would demand ‘accountability,’” said a top Senate GOP aide.

The person referred to is, of course, former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, Obama’s choice for HHS. This is what Democrats do – they cover for their corrupt members. Only the risk of electoral defeat makes Democrats move to punish a miscreant member of their party. Blagojevich is out because he risks not only the Governorship, but a Senate seat as well, in the 2010 elections. Daschle doesn’t risk any particular seat, so its ok and he gets a pass…now, if we GOPers could just figure a way to have Daschle put a Democrat seat at risk somewhere, Democrats would give him the boot in a heartbeat.

All of you liberals out there who were shouting for blood over the alleged crimes of the Bush Administration – where are you now? Demand Daschle withdraw or be known forever as hypocrites.