Remember that “New Tone” BS?

From Politico:

Politicians recognize they give up a degree of privacy when they run for office.

But Democrats are testing the outer limits of that understanding with a practice that raises questions about when campaign tracking becomes something more like stalking.

While most serious campaigns on both sides use campaign trackers — staffers whose job is to record on video every public appearance and statement by an opponent — House Democrats are taking it to another level. They’re now recording video of the homes of GOP congressmen and candidates and posting the raw footage on the Internet for all to see…
This is just plain and simple intimidation – an attempt to scare Republicans.  By videotaping the homes (and, it seems, posting addresses on the internet) Democrats are inviting lunatics to do bad things.  Democrats complained mightily in the wake of the Giffords shooting that the mere use of targets on a map put people at risk…but now Democrats are actually giving the address, and a helpful picture of the place, to anyone on the left who takes seriously the notion that Republicans are evil and must be stopped at all costs.
If this – and the rest of the Democrat hate-mongering – doesn’t stop, then someone is going to get killed.  Depend on it.  Is there anyone on the Democrat side who has a shred of honor left and will try to stop this?
Advertisements

75 thoughts on “Remember that “New Tone” BS?

  1. GMB July 10, 2012 / 1:12 am

    The ends justify the means. With the communists it always has. Anything in the pursuit of power is permissible, as long as they are the ones doing it.

    Get used to it. Be ready for it. It is only going to get worse as the desperation increases.

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 6:37 am

      GMB

      BINGO……

      Is there anyone on the Democrat side who has a shred of honor left and will try to stop this?

      NO, they have become a soulless collection of communists, anarchists, revolutionaries, homosexuals, atheists, islamists.

      They are EXACTLY what a principled Christian would expect from such a collection.

  2. Rightlane July 10, 2012 / 2:15 am

    There was a good Interview in the National Review Online today: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/304964/getting-religion-back-our-economic-lives-interview, which I think speaks to your point. No or at least, there not enough honorable Democrats to make a material difference in behavior of the majority.
    We get the governance we deserve and we get the economy we deserve too. Morality is an indispensable element in either case and too many in our society have dispensed with any pretense of morality.

    Nowhere, I can think of, is lying just accepted as “business as usually” more readily than within the Democratic Party. Chief Justas Roberts pointed this out in his Obamacare decision, so many on the right are bemoaning. We all knew and argued the “penalty” was a regressive tax on the middle class, while Harry, Barry and Nancy were crooning, harmoniously at the top of their collective lungs, it’s a penalty not a tax! That was a lie and everyone knew it and everyone knew everyone knew it! Roberts understood this. Original intent demands, since the clear intent of the Democratic Congress was to lie to the American People about this being a penalty to pass the bill (the end justifying the means) and this lie being apparent to all players, Roberts contemporary decision upheld the Democratic Congresses’ original intent.

    The payoffs to the unions, green energy rip-offs, global warming, Keynesian economics, quantitative easing… are all the tools of the liberal trader as are the poor and dependent who vote for them.

    No, it is the operation of free markets within a moral society, which results in a solid economy. Honesty promotes confidence in business relationships. Another word for confidence is faith. If this is true, how can Obama’s administration improve our economy? Does anyone, after all the lies, still have reason to hope for change in anything other than our leadership or, more precisely, lack thereof?
    If the American people have decided to sell their birthright to freedom for political promises of free stuff for all, from habitual liars then we deserve the disappointment the inescapable bondage of the nanny state.

    • sue July 10, 2012 / 7:08 am

      I know everybody got really upset with Justice Roberts when the decision came out. However, I’m a glass half full kind of person and looked at it this way; He ruled that it was constitutional because it was a tax. If I remember correctly they even argued during the testimony that it was a tax not a penalty. Now they have to own that. The commercials can commence with Justice Roberts announcing that it’s a tax and find the footage of them arguing it’s a tax. Let’s face it the American people are not nearly as stupid as they think we are ( well most of us aren’t).
      There are many good people out there who haven’t been completely corrupted by the moral decay around them. It’s just we have been kept in the dark by a complicit media who haven’t really reported the news objectively in years and the fact that living our lives, taking care of our families and working to support ourselves takes most of our time.
      If we want those people we have to make our message not about the gloom and doom around us but that America isn’t done yet. We are still a great nation we just got on the wrong track for awhile. That it’s not to late to turn things around and become that beacon on the hill again. It’s how Reagon won. I’m old enough to remember Carter and how bad things were then but under the right leadership things changed for the better.

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:20 am

        sue

        I know everybody got really upset with Justice Roberts when the decision came out. However, I’m a glass half full kind of person and looked at it this way;

        guess you hold your nose and eat the s**t sandwich along with that half glass of milk the government feeds you?
        some of us dont.
        the man is either a liar, traitor, of doesnt know his ass from a hole in the ground and should be impeached for fraud(roberts)

        Ubama should be tarred and feathered and run back to kenya on a rail.

      • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] July 10, 2012 / 7:28 am

        After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:30 am

        sue

        we have been divided by racial and ethnic lines by race hustlers and cretins like the jack$ons, sharpstons, holder, van jones, the nbpp. noi, and Ubama himself.
        and too mant to list.
        Our government has been infiltrated by stupid know nothing, dumbed down partisans, communists,racists, homosexuals, and liars.

        47% of our population pays NO federal tax yet suck up TRILLIONS of OPM at the trough while screaming for more.
        Socialism has been rammed down our throats my leftist democrats and up held by RINO GOP.

        we have howling mobs putting hits on citizens while the state stands by and does nothing, then appoints a “special” prosecutor to FIND justice for a thug, thief, doper, who beat a man half to death got shot in self defense then prosecuted the victim.

        We are past the point of no return and only a war, revolution, or a sovereign act of God can save us.

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:32 am

        After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:43 am

        After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

  3. Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] July 10, 2012 / 7:23 am

    After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:31 am

      spoken by one of those cretins mentioned above.

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:36 am

      After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

  4. neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:36 am

    47% pay NO federal income tax…..donks protect these looters and takers…….NEXT?

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:39 am

      Our government continues to claim that the war on terror is bankrupting us. But what about these numbers? You do the math…

      $11 billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments.
      Illegal households only pay about one-third the amount of federal taxes that non-illegal households pay.
      Illegal households create a net fiscal deficit at the federal level of more than $10 billion a year. If given amnesty, this number could grow to more than $29 billion.
      $1.9 billion dollars a year is spent on food-assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC and free school lunches for illegal aliens.
      $1.6 billion is spent on the federal prison and court system for illegal aliens.
      $2.5 billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.
      About 21 percent of the population of U.S. prisons is classified as “noncitizens” from Mexico, Colombia, Cuba and the Dominican Republic. About 5 percent is listed as “unknown.”

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:49 am

      After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:53 am

      After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:48 am

      The federal government defines welfare as all entitlement programs funded through taxes.

      These programs, listed as “direct benefit payments for individuals” by the Office of Management and Budget, make up $730 billion or 43 percent of the $1.47 trillion the government will spend this fiscal year.

      yeah forkers lets hear about those GREEEEEDY rich (white) people who just have to be taxed MORE……..

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 7:55 am

      once again a simplistic answer with NO proof of either cost, or pending collapse (which is laughable) if the thieves were not here.

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 8:05 am

      After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 8:38 am

      After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

  5. sue July 10, 2012 / 8:01 am

    Where from my post did you ever get the idea that the government supplies anything for me? I put out an idea of how we can use the ruling to our advantage instead of just complaining about it and the government supplies my milk? Really? No where in my post did I ever indicate that I agreed with his ruling or even thought that it was a good one.
    We are on the same side of this debate. I have read Blogs for Victory since it was Blogs for Bush and have agreed with many of your comments Neocon1. I’m just as angry about many things that have happened in this country as you are but we have to convince others to join our ranks. I simply put out an idea as to how we do that.
    Yes Roberts does have a lot to answer for considering the information coming out is that he changed his vote at the last minute. It needs to be answered as to why and then the appropriate steps should be taken.
    I personally would love to see Obama and many others brought up on charges for the heinous things that have been done to this country and it’s people and have him taken from the White House to a nice cell in a maximum security prison somewhere.
    First the work of getting him and as many of the people who believe like him out of positions of power hence my post.

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 8:07 am

      sue

      I didnt mean to imply you personally,
      I just dont buy into your observation the glass is half full from the roberts decision. I think we have been screwed.

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 8:09 am

        sue
        my apology was not included in my above answer, sorry for the confusion……Im with you.. 🙂

      • sue July 10, 2012 / 8:20 am

        Neocon1,
        I do admit that being screwed is possible but I was raised to continue to fight until you achieve your goal or you have expended everything in the attempt. Let’s face it with all of the backdoor deals, lies and end runs around the constitution that this president and the democrat party has done we have lots to use in the fight. The trick is to get the information out to the American people. One poll I saw shortly after the ruling was that 30 something percent of the people polled didn’t even know there had been a ruling at all.

    • Cluster July 10, 2012 / 8:29 am

      I would say that passing a bill that impacts every person in this country, and takes control of 1/6 of the economy without ever reading it is probably the most heinous thing any administration has ever done to this country.

    • Cluster July 10, 2012 / 8:39 am

      Despite all evidence to the contrary, right? Every collectivist society in the history of this planet has devolved into mediocrity, misery, indebtedness, and malaise, and every political faction that led them into that malaise, promised bright horizons.

      Are you not old enough to understand that?

  6. Cluster July 10, 2012 / 8:02 am

    So according to one of our seriously misguided liberals, Frederick, the only thing holding up the US economy from total collapse is illegal immigrants. Does anyone still question the fact that liberals are dangerously stupid?

    Meanwhile:

    Eighty-three percent of American physicians have considered leaving their practices over President Barack Obama’s health care reform law, according to a survey released by the Doctor Patient Medical Association.

    So the bottom line is this – with Obamacare we will have more government bureaucrats and less health care providers. Still want four more years?

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/09/report-83-percent-of-doctors-have-considered-quitting-over-obamacare/#ixzz20Dihj4mT

    • Cluster July 10, 2012 / 8:22 am

      So really all you have is your demented “opinion” that illegal labor is propping up this economy, and that the 83% of doctors who said they may leave their practice are just bluffing, right?

      Frederick do you ever tire of rationalizing the irrational? What incentives do people now have to subject themselves to the costs and grueling work of medical school and internship? And how is the quality of healthcare suppose to improve when we pay our doctors less, and there are fewer of them? Let me see how you spin this one.

      • Cluster July 10, 2012 / 8:45 am

        That’s exactly correct Frederick. All people are motivated by success, both professionally and economically. Becoming a physican is incredibly hard work, and without the financial incentive, there will simply be fewer of them. That’s a simple fact.

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 9:01 am

        After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 8:33 am

        cluster

        oaths mean nothing to democrats……(see above for explanation of donks)

        neocon1 July 10, 2012 at 6:37 am #

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 8:31 am

      BS

    • Retired Spook July 10, 2012 / 9:37 am

      So the bottom line is this – with Obamacare we will have more government bureaucrats and less health care providers.

      Cluster, it has to be IMPLEMENTED first, and I’m not sure how Congress can implement something that the SC has ruled is only Constitutional as a tax without calling it a tax, particularly if it’s enforced by 16,000 new IRS agents. And, of course, implementation and funding will require a Democrat majority in both the House and the Senate, an iffy proposition at best. Plus, the SC decision lets states opt out of the Medicaid expansion portion of ObamaCare, something that over half the states have already announced they will do.

      • J. R. Babcock July 10, 2012 / 11:56 am

        RS,

        There’s another aspect that I’ve not seen anyone mention: will the taxes associated with ObamaCare be deductible on federal schedule A as state income and property taxes currently are. This could be a hidden reason Dems are reluctant to call it a tax, but ObamaCare contains at least 20 new and higher taxes in addition to the penalty being ruled a tax.

      • Retired Spook July 10, 2012 / 12:08 pm

        J.R.,

        In the second item on the list:

        $65 Billion: Individual Mandate Excise Tax and Employer Mandate Tax (Both taxes take effect Jan. 2014):

        Individual: Anyone not buying “qualifying” health insurance as defined by Obama-appointed HHS bureaucrats must pay an income surtax

        “qualifying” is the key word. Employer plans with high deductibles and health savings accounts will likely not qualify. So much for “if you like your health insurance plan, you can keep it” meme.

  7. Cluster July 10, 2012 / 8:34 am

    Meanwhile, the city that Obama hails from, and where he once was an influential community organizer and politician, is under siege and more dangerous than Afghanistan. On top of that, his former right hand man, Rahm Emmanuel, now runs the city and has no idea how to stop it. Keep in mind that Chicago has been a model liberal city for decades, so if you want to see what America will be under liberal leadership, look no further than Chicago.

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 8:40 am

      look no further than Chicago.

      wellllll maybe detroit also.

      • sue July 10, 2012 / 11:36 am

        or any other city that has been run by liberals for any amount of time. By the way apology accepted. 🙂

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 8:51 am

      After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

  8. Cluster July 10, 2012 / 8:43 am

    I think at the core of liberals objection to capitalism, is an inherent lack of self confidence and fear of failure. Frederick demonstrates that very well by ignoring all historical evidence and holding out hope that a collectivist model will protect him from failing. To liberals, it is preferable to bring others down with them, rather than risk seeing a few of them soar above them.

    • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 8:52 am

      After many warnings about posts of vicious racial and religious bigotry posts from Fredrick will no longer be allowed here and we encourage people to ignore them as responses to his posts will either be removed or will keep his comments alive on the blog. //Moderator

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 5:43 pm

        mod
        while I agree ole freddy the forker should be bounced. why were all of my responses removed and big bold letters replaced in them while several other responses to him from other posters allowed to stand?
        I mean ONE big bold proclamation to me with the others merely deleted would have sufficed would it not? especially since NONE of freddys were deleted before my responses were posted.

        just asking 😦

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 6:30 pm

        A LIE by the chief racist LIAR.

        Eric Holder revs up NAACP meeting

        ‘In our efforts to protect voting rights and to prevent voting fraud, we will be vigilant and strong,’ Holder says.

        In a rousing speech at the NAACP convention in Houston, Attorney General Eric Holder on Tuesday strongly defended his efforts to block controversial voter ID laws in some states – including Texas – saying the Justice Department “will not allow political pretexts to disenfranchise American citizens of their most precious right.”

        Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78352.html#ixzz20GGgbQyF

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 6:38 pm

        BARNEY FRANK: GOP mostly ignored my wedding…

        awwwww gee bwany, was the goat disappointed?

      • neocon1 July 10, 2012 / 6:44 pm

        this azzKlown should have been impeached, instead he is emboldened by the panty waist GOP and a dictator in the wh.

        Eric Holder to NAACP: ‘I Will Not Allow the Texas Voter ID Law to Happen’

        Time for the SOVEREIGN state of Texas and a few others to tell this regime to p**s off.

        WAKE UP America……..

        ‘We Have Never Seen Anything Like This Before’: Beck & the Military Weigh in on Army’s Public Training Exercises
        Government

        “With an exception of parades, have you ever seen military humvees driving through your streets?”

        http://www.theblaze.com/stories/we-have-never-seen-anything-like-this-before-beck-the-military-weigh-in-on-armys-public-training-exercises/

      • tiredoflibbs July 10, 2012 / 10:40 pm

        News flash, Holder, there is no Constitutional individual right to vote in a Presidential election.

    • bozo July 11, 2012 / 1:08 am

      Straw man. Liberals have no objections to capitalism – as a form of economics – especially when there are lots of little capitalists instead of just a few giant ones. It’s just a terrible form of governance. Progressives are much closer to Mark’s preferred form of governance – distributism – than you capitalist flamers. Distributism doesn’t redistribute cash, it redistributes property and tools, things men need to be self-sufficient. Distributists are big on busting up monopolies. They’re anti-war and anti-outsourcing. They prefer credit unions to Wall Street banks. There are a few big core differences, but all in all… three acres and a cow – is that too much to ask (not for me, I’m doing fine thanks)?

      • tiredoflibbs July 11, 2012 / 2:29 pm

        “Liberals have no objections to capitalism”

        What about proggies? – Liberals in the classical true sense are the antithesis of the “modern liberals”. Modern liberal is a progressive, which was code for “socialist” during the progressive era.

        I guess you discount that notion of objection when obAMATEUR said he was “working behind enemy lines” when he held a brief job in the private sector.

      • Count d'Haricots July 11, 2012 / 5:44 pm

        Distributism? BRILLIANT!

        Just one question; from whom do you i>take the land and the cows?

      • Mark Edward Noonan July 11, 2012 / 9:37 pm

        Count,

        That was the ideal when Distributism was first developed – but, back then, more the half the population were still farmers and the rest were only a generation or two away from the farm. Bit late for that, now. But Bozo does have the basics of it down, though I don’t know if he fully realizes where it all leads.

        Distributism is close in touch with Catholic social teaching – which has as its basis in politics and economics a demand for Subsidiarity: that all decisions, as far as possible, be made at the lowest level possible. So while Distributism would break up the biggest capitalist enterprises it would also break up Big Government. Additionally, the primary means of breaking up the big corporations would not be by government decree (that, though, is how Big Government would have to be broken up) but the setting up an economic system where smaller firms would not be prevented from competing by an alliance between Big Government and Big Corporation (which happens all too often these days with corporations essentially bribing politicians to legislate their competition out of existence). A genuine free market would have killed GM forty years ago and by now there would be a dozen American auto makers…all relatively small, agile and responsive to changing market conditions (which would mean that, over time, some would fail while new ones arose to take their place but the overall number would probably become fairly stable over time).

        What a Distributist wants is for you and 20 of your friends, if you’ve a mind, to pool your money and labor to start doing things which are already done by others – either because you have figured out a better way to do it or because you’re just annoyed at providing profits to other people. You would require no government permission to do this – as long as your enterprise did not take or damage the property of others, you’re free as a bird and entirely on your own.

        A good way to think of it is like this: the problem with capitalism is not that there are too many capitalists, but too few. And this is far superior to our liberal friends who would progressively make fewer capitalists until they’ve concentrated it all in One Big Capitalist – the State.

      • Count d'Haricots July 12, 2012 / 1:27 pm

        Like the subsistence farmer and the candle-maker; this will come in handy since technology would likely revert to 19th Century levels.

        It is however quaint that someone still believes that everyone can run a business; that everyone is capable, intellectually and temperamentally, however naïve that belief may be.

  9. Cluster July 10, 2012 / 9:16 am

    I have no idea when that unemployment rate will drop Frederick, but I do know that you just continue to deny reality in favor of hope and change despite all historical evidence to the contrary. Competition and innovation via the economic platform of capitalism has resulted in the highest standard of living, and the most powerful economic country in the world in just 200+ years, and because of some trepidation and fear of failure on behalf of a few, liberals have set on a course to systematically dismantle that.

    I also see that you have denied the collectivist aspect of Obama’s policies which is strange, considering that you champion that model. So why the denial? I can tall you this – taking over 1/6 of the economy, is employing a collectivist model. 47% of households currently receiving government assistance is collectivism. 1 in 7 people receiving food stamps is collectivism. Why don’t you stay true to your convictions and stand up proudly and say that America does need to be a collectivist society and that we are well on our way?

  10. Retired Spook July 10, 2012 / 12:26 pm

    Another gem from the you-can’t-make-this-stuff-up” file.

    CNSNews.com) – If Chicago’s street thugs are going to attack each other, they should take their fight away from innocent children, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel told the CBS Evening News on Monday.

    “We’ve got two gangbangers, one standing next to a kid. Get away from that kid. Take your stuff away to the alley. Don’t touch the children of the city of Chicago. Don’t get near them,” Emanuel — President Obama’s former chief of staff — told anchor Scott Pelley.

    “And it is about values. As I said then [when a 7-year-old girl was shot and killed last month], who raised you? How were you raised? And I don’t buy this case where people say they don’t have values. They do have values. They have the wrong values. Don’t come near the kids — don’t touch them.”

    Pleading to gangbangers about values? Why didn’t someone think of that before?

    • Cluster July 10, 2012 / 1:05 pm

      What a pathetic little man Rahm is.

  11. Cluster July 10, 2012 / 3:58 pm

    Courtesy of Bernie Goldberg – 5 specific promises Obama made in 2008:

    Fact No. 1, as a candidate, Barack Obama promised to create five million new energy jobs alone. Just 5 million energy jobs.

    Fact No. 2, he claimed that, by the end of the first term, his healthcare plan, would quote, “bring down premiums by $2,500 for the typical family.”

    Fact No. 3, he guaranteed that his financial rescue plan would help stop foreclosures.

    Fact No. 4, in the first year of his presidency, he pledged, quote, “to cut the deficit we inherited in the half by the end of my first term in office.”

    Fact No. 5, he said he would, quote, “lift two million Americans from poverty” and, quote, “jolt our economy back to life.”

    He hasn’t lived up to a single one. Make sure he is held to account.

    • tiredoflibbs July 10, 2012 / 4:45 pm

      Cluster, let’s not forget the “most transparent administration”, “ban earmarks”, “pass the stimulus and unemployment won’t go over 8%”, “not raise taxes on the middle class” and “let constituents review legislation for 72 hours before voting takes place”.

      Fact 1: Energy jobs – not even close.
      Fact 2: Premiums up 9% in one year.
      Fact 3: Yeah right.
      Fact 4: Half? – What of his promise to be only a one term president if failing in that promise (we knew it was BS at the time).
      Fact 5: Sure, if they readjust the poverty level.Jolt our economy? I’d say he did that, but in the wrong direction.

      Let’s see, will the drones and dems hold him to his promises like they did for “read my lips no new taxes”???? The media blitz was astounding……

      NOPE.

    • Retired Spook July 10, 2012 / 5:45 pm

      Fact No. 5, he said he would, quote, “lift two million Americans from poverty” and, quote, “jolt our economy back to life.”

      Well that one’s a big oopsie.

  12. bozo July 11, 2012 / 1:25 am

    Where do these Democrats get these ideas?

    BTW, did Drudge forget to refill the color cartridge? Just askin…

    • Cluster July 11, 2012 / 8:03 am

      That’s great bozo, thanks for the article. I think a little civil disobedience is exactly the right thing to do. We’ll just follow the lead of OWS, because know how much liberals liked OWS.

    • neocon1 July 11, 2012 / 5:53 pm

      conservatives fighting back with the SAME tactics used by the union thugs and CPUSA say it aint soooooo

      • Count d'Haricots July 11, 2012 / 6:01 pm

        It was a hoax, neo, dim-bulb libtards broke their own windows to gin up anger at the TEA Party. It didn’t work, no one believed that a vast army of blue-haired ladies were rampaging through Wichata.

  13. GMB July 11, 2012 / 9:57 am

    http://dmvanswers.com/questions/419/How-much-do-state-ID-cards-cost

    No mention of a raced based pricing system in any state I can find. Every race pays the same price. You can correct me here if I am wrong but I do believe that every state that has passed a voter ID law makes provisions to provide a free ID if you cannot afford to pay for it. Again with no race based requirements.

    Your 15th Amendment argument is bogus at best.

    • GMB July 11, 2012 / 9:59 am

      Beg pardon, 😛 I would not have replied to ykw if I had know the zapper was going to strike again.

      Lol

      Racist commentary by Brimstone posters has most of them off the blog for a while to see if they can learn to post without vicious bigotry. Fredrick is off permanently because when his racist and religious bigotry was edited he increased it till it became necessary to remove him for good. Anyone whose posts contain bigoted commentary on age, race, religion will find their posts deleted. //Moderator

      • sue July 11, 2012 / 10:09 am

        Oops goes for me too. It got zapped while I was typing response.

      • neocon1 July 11, 2012 / 3:22 pm

        GMB………..

        mod
        while I agree ole freddy the forker should be bounced. why were all of my responses removed and big bold letters replaced in them while several other responses to him from other posters allowed to stand?
        I mean ONE big bold proclamation to me with the others merely deleted would have sufficed would it not? especially since NONE of freddys were deleted before my responses were posted.

        just asking 😦

      • GMB July 11, 2012 / 5:26 pm

        Neo, ykw…short for “you know who” Better than naming for those best not named.

        🙂

      • neocon1 July 11, 2012 / 3:27 pm

        GMB

        Hey ykw! Eat these apples.

        commies don needs nooo steeenking reeeson for hypocrisy…….after all what they do is fo da chillen, we are the raaaacists who do it for hate…….dontcha know
        …..

        PS…..ykw????

  14. sue July 11, 2012 / 10:07 am

    Please explain how having to produce a valid driver’s license or id card is discriminating? Especially when many states will provide the id’s for free. You have to have one to open a checking account or any banking transaction, buy any adult beverage, get a card from blockbuster, apply for any benefits from the federal government. I even had to produce an id to register my child for school and until the office personnel knew me after her first year had to produce it to check her out. I even have to produce a valid id to dump trash at our local dump site.
    And using your reasoning who was AG Holder discriminating against when the media had to produce an id and their credentials just to get into his event against Texas for wanting id’s to vote?
    Or is what you are saying is that you think minorities are just to stupid or lazy to go to their local DMV to get one?
    And who really hates minorities most? The group that thinks that they can succeed just fine without the federal government holding their hands or the group that for decades now has worked really hard to convince them that they need the government to give them everything because they just can’t make it on their own.

  15. Chrissy Ann July 11, 2012 / 2:38 pm

    Using the terms Democrat and honor in the same sentence is laughable at best. And to answer your question: the answer is NO

  16. Amazona July 11, 2012 / 6:10 pm

    When the Progressive movement hijacked the lovely-sounding word “liberal” and it became Liberal, representing the Leftist political system, it no longer had its old meaning of open, tolerant, looking for new ways to solve problems, and became just another word for the same old Leftist collectivist intolerant oppressive system that has also flown the flags of Communism, Socialism, Fascism, and Progressivism.

    Yes, there is a difference between Communist and Socialist, etc. But both, as well as Fascism, Progressivism and Liberalism, are on the Leftist spectrum and represent power and authority and control vested in a large powerful central government, with little or no authority at the local level or with the individual. There are degrees of size and power of the central authority but all of these movements represent a rejection of the American Constitutional model of small central government severely restricted as to size, scope and power, with great power left to state and local government.

    Once there is movement away from the restrictions of the Constitution on the federal government, once it is expanded to include things not laid out in its enumerated duties and therefore forbidden to it by the 10th Amendment, the line has been crossed from Constitutional Conservative government to larger and more powerful central government, and from one of the basic forms of government to the other.

  17. GMB July 11, 2012 / 10:33 pm

    testing

  18. tiredoflibbs July 12, 2012 / 12:23 pm

    The left get more and more funny with each passing day or is it DESPERATION?!?

    The leftist looters, drones and propagandists are saying that Romney getting booed at the NAACP was racist!…..

    …..on ROMENEY’s PART!!!!!!

    They are saying that the booing will enrage the white racists! Does that include people like obAMATEUR’S “typical white” grandmother?

    The last Presidency to criticize and disagree was , according to the left “Patriotic”! America has a duty to question, criticize and disagree!!!!

    Now, according tot he same LEFT, to question, criticize and disagree with this pResident, “IT IS RACIST!”

    Again, more funny or more DESPERATE?!?

    If you look at the polls, more DESPERATE!

    Pathetic

Comments are closed.