The Trump documents case has been put on hold indefinitely – from what I can understand, the judge is rather concerned about the whole premise of the case and will essentially engage in what amounts to a trial of the prosecutor. This is not a surprise – the case is ridiculous and any decent judge would see right through the scam.
On the other hand, today we saw in the hush money trial in New York the testimony of Stormy Daniels – a proved liar who’s whole monetary existence depends upon getting attention. Gee, no chance she’d be playing an angle here, right? Don’t get too upset about it – the case is also ridiculous but as its in New York, it will proceed to the jury, where conviction is 50/50. But the conviction will be thrown out – you can’t actually do what the judge is doing: that is, allow salacious, uncorroborated testimony designed only to provoke an emotional response from the jury. That Democrats are going ape over the delay in the documents trial is all we need to know about the New York trial: that dog won’t hunt. Convicting Trump in New York will just burnish Trump’s credentials as an outsider. Democrats know this. They wish they could just make it go away. It was all supposed to prevent Trump from getting the nomination. Now “backfire” doesn’t begin to cover it.
The Israelis are restarting their Gaza offensive. They are still taking way too long here. Absolute brutal use of force to finish this quickly is still what they need to do. The longer this drags out, the worse it gets for them. Naturally, the world is screaming bloody murder – the world wants Hamas to survive. They want it to survive because their Arab money bags have ordered them to secure Hamas’ survival. It is really no more than that – the kids out protesting in the colleges have no idea what is going on. They’re just doing what the organizers – who are not students – tell them to do. The whole thing is disgusting – but it all stems from an unwillingness on the part of the Israelis to drive the sword all the way in. I realize that Israel feels a need to stroke the American government – but there comes a time when you choose your nation over your benefactor.
Israel has time and time again had their Arab enemies on their knees, only to hold off from dealing the fatal blow. People forget that for all the early Arab success during the Yom Kippur War, less than three weeks after the Arabs started it, the Israelis were poised to force both the Egyptian and Syrian armies to surrender in the field. They could easily have taken Damascus and Cairo and dictated peace. We told them not to. They went along with it. They have to stop doing that. Kill them. Finish this. Dictate the terms of settlement.
Aside: Kirby was out there announcing that you can’t crush an idea with weapons. As if World War Two never happened. Guys: force works. In fact, it is ultimately the only thing that does work in human affairs. Being law-abiding is a learned habit. Sure, you can find saints. Lots of them, in fact, if you just poke around a bit, and sometimes in the oddest areas. But for most people, most of the time, what keeps them in line is the learned behavior of civilization. Learned so deeply that most people don’t even realize it isn’t something that comes naturally. And what taught the child to share wasn’t a reasoned argument; it was a rap on the knuckles. The adult doesn’t even remember being taught to share. To say “please”. It happened so young that our memories don’t stretch back to it. So, too, with societies – especially when they’ve gone terribly wrong. What burned the cancer of Nazism out of the Germans was 1,000 bombers unloading on their cities night after night. So it will have to be with the Palestinians. A lot of them will have to die so that the shell-shocked survivors understand that it was all a lie, and never fall for it again.
The Boy Scouts will now be Scouting America – for diversity. Bottom line: if you have a son, do not send him there. They will be groomed by perverts. The leadership of the scouts has absolutely no idea what the Boy Scouts are about – and after bankruptcy brought on by sex scandals, they are trying to DEI their way back into relevancy. What the Right has to do is create an entirely new organization – I favor calling it the Rangers, as that has a distinctly American ancestry going back to pre-Revolutionary times and brought forward into modern times by the Army Rangers in World War Two. I’m not particularly concerned with sex segregation; certainly not for members under 12. As long as proper segregation is maintained in the most crucial areas, there can be groups that have both boys and girls. But they can also be segregated. I’d allow local chapters to decide. The program would mostly be just scouting: that whole camping, hiking, doing good works in the community thing. Kids need that – kids today especially need something that will get them away from video screens. But I’d have it emphasize self reliance, hard work and honesty. They idea is to help parents craft their youngsters into sober, hard working citizens of the Republic. And I think it would experience rapid growth.
Blogs For Victory 
Here’s a weird story … she has just disappeared. I guess she doesn’t feel she needs to answer to the people, which has become a hallmark of DEI Democrats, hasn’t it? Once their incompetence is exposed, they scream racism, it’s really gotten to be old, tired, and exhausting to live around these people.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/report-st-louis-authorities-cant-find-soros-backed/
It’s hard to believe how toxic the Democrat Party has become.
Things will get worse before they get better, but I believe America has grown very tired of the whining, complaining, and extremely incompetent Democrat Party. I sincerely believe Trump will win in a landslide.
Fani is claiming that the only reason people are paying attention to her misdeeds is because she’s black. What a surprise.
Hopefully Kim Gardner will act as a role model for other incompetent DEI officials because we’d be a lot better off if they all disappeared. Sadly, there don’t seem to be any black leaders who are willing to talk to their people and point out that when they support people just because of the color of their skin they damage their entire race because everyone gets judged on the quality of the people who are in office.
What I’m starting to sense is an undercurrent of belief that the last 10 years has proved that we really should not have black people in office. That’s what you get when you put people in office based only on their race and not on merit or qualifications. But then that’s also what you get when you think of merit as a “white thing”.
… we’d be a lot better off if they all disappeared.
LOL, truth.
With DEI being everywhere and all the time, we here in Vegas naturally had to honor the black people who were instrumental in developing Vegas…I mean, other than Sammy Davis Jr, of course (too Republican; almost white-adjacent). So they put up these signs around D Street lauding this or that black person…one of them was this guy I had never heard of and it described him as “Publisher and Visionary”. That second word is the key: because every black person the Ruling Class puts forward has to be some sort of unique genius. I mean, seriously: it was good enough that the guy published a paper which was built for the black community. Good job. Glad he had success. But “Visionary”? Come on; it was a paper. And when they put up the sign, that was the first I’d ever heard of him…so, not that massive an impact, guys.
I’m sure the missing DA was also lauded as some sort of super genius finally able to put whitey in his place – you know, she was one of those people who were sick and tired of being sick and tired and no justice no peace hands up don’t shoot on her way to get some skittles. Then they decided on an audit and she skipped because the super genius lady had her hand in the till and there wasn’t a friendly judge in sight. Because she only got in there to begin with via skin color and gender.
I just read a little bit about the Stormy Daniels testimony and it reminded me a little bit of Christine “Blowsy” Ford in that a sexually experienced and promiscuous woman is posturing as someone who was confused, baffled and intimidated by an alleged sexual encounter.
This is a woman who publicly has sex for money. She doesn’t just go to a private room and have sex for money like a normal call girl or prostitute—-she does it in movies that can be seen over and over again for years and years. Her entire career Is based on her willingness to expose her body and engage in sexual activity in public and now she is getting all fluttery and talking about how she had a hard time handling the advances of Donald Trump. Her story seems to be that as a publicly known participant in movies where she had sexual intercourse with many men, she agreed to go to a hotel room with a stranger who was aware of her career in pornography and then was baffled and bewildered and confused and unsure how to handle his expectation that she would have sex with him.
All of this testimony by the way is totally irrelevant to the accusations made against Donald Trump. He was not indicted for having sex with a woman whose career is in pornography. This was grandstanding. It was an effort to influence and prejudice the jury against Trump, which is especially interesting as the same week another judge had his trial overturned because he allowed testimony that it was not related to the charges made against the defendant.
BUT—– I’m waiting to hear if Trump’s attorney asks her if she asked for money in exchange for not talking about this alleged encounter. In other words did she try to blackmail or extort him? Putting her on the stand seems so foolish when it exposes her to the possibility of criminal charges against her—- unless maybe in her case they would actually pay attention to the statute of limitations. The only reason I can think of for putting her on the stand other than introducing a lot of smut and drama into the trial and trying to prejudice the jury is to possibly get her to say that yes, she did threaten Trump with exposure of this event, and demand money to remain silent, with the assurance that she would never be prosecuted for this. Even that seems stupid. There’s basically been an acknowledgment that she was paid to shut up. That’s never been denied. Trump says he never had sex with her. She said he never had sex with her after she said he did, and now she’s changing her story again. But there’s still no point to it. She made the claim, Cohen gave her the money in exchange for an NDA (which she violated) and the only thing that matters now is how many people are going to accept the crystal ball reading that supposedly gives special insight into what Trump was thinking.
In other words when we get past the smut and the melodrama and the distortion of the law and the election interference and the abuse of power, what we’re looking at is a typical Leftist Thought Crime. That is, not what Trump did but what the State claims he was thinking when he did it.
As Stephen Kruiser of PJ Media commented, regarding the Stormy Daniels exhibition in a great article, We’re one donkey away from this trial being moved to Tijuana.
Just saw this comment on X … LMAO
JUST IN: Stormy Daniels will no longer be allowed in the court room after she allegedly asked the Judge to gag her as well.
ROFL!
I think you nailed it: mostly just an attempt to prejudice the jury. But, will they be? I’m not sure; that’s why I rate conviction 50/50. Hung jury is very much on the table. I read her testimony and it just does seem false – both as you pointed out that she couldn’t possibly be confused on what a man expects from her in his hotel room but additionally on the thought that Trump wouldn’t need to get a porn star. Word is that he’s a bit of a germaphobe; likes things very clean. A porn star is not the definition of “clean”. A man with his wealth and public prestige could get a heck of a lot better than Stormy – even among porn stars. She also doesn’t seem his physical type – you look at her and at Melania and its a huge difference in looks and style. My bet: she’s just flat out lying, sure in the knowledge that they’ve already told her there’s no chance of a perjury charge.
My bet: she’s just flat out lying, sure in the knowledge that they’ve already told her there’s no chance of a perjury charge.
Still, if Trumps lawyer didn’t read her previous statements and then ask, “on which occasion were you lying, he should have.
I doubt the judge will allow that – but he should still try.
I’d like to know if she told Trump or someone on his team that he had to pay her to keep her from telling her story, because that sounds a lot like extortion to me. I doubt that Cohen just came up with an amount and volunteered to send it to her without a demand for payment. This question in one form or another should be asked of her, of Cohen, of Trump’s accountants and so on.
Outrageous: Chicago Teachers Union Demands $50 Billion in Pay Hikes Among Other Perks
According to internal documents obtained by local news sources, CTU has upped the ante considerably by requesting 9 percent annual raises for all teachers; $2,500 retirement bonuses; fully paid abortions for all members; a bevy of mandated positions at all schools, such as “Climate Champion,” “restorative justice coordinator,” and “gender support coordinator;” housing subsidies for CTU staff and CPS families; creation of 180 new “sustainable community schools;” total teacher autonomy over the curriculum; the implementation of a 100 percent electric bus fleet; a district-wide carbon neutral mandate by 2035; environmental, social, and governance (ESG) pension investments; weight-loss drug coverage for all members; and $2,000 for each undocumented student.
Sure, why not. Perhaps we could add free coffee and donuts for teachers, along with personal chauffeurs. But why stop there. Let’s give them early retirement too, say after 10 years along with lifetime health benefits. After all, the Chicago schools are performing at the top the charts (turned upside down). Then, when property taxes triple and sales tax doubles, anyone who’s not getting government assistance will probably have already left. Not sure anyone wants to take those people in if they continue hiring these wonderful “teachers” and voting in politicians that magically transform your city into a sight to behold (for what not to do). And I thought we already won the war against slavery. Guess some people don’t want freedom. Not sure who’ll pay for all of these wonderful benefits no one else gets with such
stellaratrocious job performance.Over the past few years, CPS test scores have plummeted. According to U.S. News & World Report, “In Chicago Public Schools, 16% of elementary students tested at or above the proficient level for reading, and 12% tested at or above that level for math. Also, 16% of middle school students tested at or above the proficient level for reading, and 12% tested at or above that level for math. And 14% of high school students tested at or above the proficient level for reading, and 14% tested at or above that level for math.”
https://townhall.com/columnists/christalgo/2024/05/08/outrageous-chicago-teachers-union-demands-50-billion-in-pay-hikes-among-other-perks-n2638742?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=52ce413f6fb58c7873c6b911b92d704d389047e1deec5d09abd903754eeb0b1f&recip=26664402
Meanwhile, all of their students are in the lowest percentiles in STEM curriculum. They all need to be fired and replaced.
In new dictionaries the word “hubris” will be Illustrated with demands like these.
I have a feeling that “total teacher autonomy ” is really the goal, buried in all of these other insane demands. For the Left to completely control education they have to have complete control.
It’s all coming out … the 2020 election WAS STOLEN
https://x.com/citizenfreepres/status/1788269632668696583?s=61
This is coming out of Georgia where Joe Biden and Fani Willis are currently trying to prosecute Trump for questioning this. Hard to believe. All of Trumps indictments, are falling apart. Folks, we are winning.
Also, Biden is now withhlding aid from Israel to win an election … THE EXACT SAME THING, they accused Trump of, and impeached him over.
Now is the time to be bold about Trump. Wear your gear, tell your neighbors. They stole this election from him. Don’t let them lie about that anymore.
“Baseless claims” blah blah blah blah blah
We watched ballots being repeatedly scanned, and were scolded and told us not to believe our lying eyes.
When illegal ballots were accepted in spite of lacking postmarks or signatures and then folded into the vote count we were told that if they kept repeating repeatedly running those illegal votes through the machines over and over that was proof that a recount was meaningful, ignoring the fact that the issue was many of these votes should never have been accepted as legitimate because they were improperly submitted.
We also watched ballots being counted that were cast under new illegal election laws passed in violation of the Constitution of the State of Pennsylvania and were told that we were supposed to ignore that too.
FINALLY some of the shenanigans of the 2020 election are coming to light. I think the next question should be who will be held legally accountable for these violations of the law. Of course right now courts are busy trying non- violations of non-existing laws
Fruit of the poisonous tree is a legal metaphor used to describe evidence that is obtained illegally. The logic of the terminology is that if the source (the “tree”) of the evidence or evidence itself is tainted, then anything gained (the “fruit”) from it is tainted as well.
Yet this concept has never been applied to the handling of ballots that have been accepted in violation of election law or rules. Theoretically, if a ballot fails to meet the criteria of an acceptable ballot —-that is, if it is not mailed in a timely manner, if it has no postmark, if it has no identification to indicate when it was mailed, if it was received after a certain deadline, and especially if it lacks a signature the legal concept of the fruit of the poisonous tree should apply and that ballot and its contents should be discarded.
Ditto for ballots that were sent in based on an illegal change to election laws, such as those that took place in, Pennsylvania.
If all technically illegitimate ballots had been excluded instead of being folded into the legitimate vote tally the outcome of the 2020 election would have been vastly different. This is the dirty little secret the Left frantically tries to hide with its constant bleating of phrases like “widespread vote fraud”. With with linguistic qualifiers like “widespread” and “fraud” they can throw up enough of a smokescreen to hide the fact that millions of votes were counted that, if election laws had been strictly followed, would never have been accepted.
Yeah your side is definitely winning. You have a candidate who is in obvious cognitive decline, who is still out on bail in four jurisdictions. He is sitting in court listening to witnesses (many who worked for him), testifying as to how he broke the law. That is when he isn’t sleeping. keep winning that way and Biden will win by twelve million votes.
Casper’s always been confused but I think it’s really odd that he’s now unable to tell the difference between Trump and Biden. “Cognitive decline”?
But since you’ve made your declarative statement that there has been testimony about how Trump “broke the law” perhaps you, unlike real lawyers, can tell us which laws he broke.
I’m thinking that the term “cognitive decline” comes to mind when you look into a mirror.
“the point of the case (is) an accounting argument made up specifically for this case, based on an alleged violation of another law the prosecutor won’t name You can’t make this up, but if you did it would be more coherent than this crap.”
But Casper slurps up this slop from the Leftist trough, licks his lips and begs for more. That’s okay. It’s a free country and people can decide if they want to believe the truth or if they want to be led by their blind Identity Politics. It’s just that he then flaunts his delusions on sites like this. But then after watching the insane comments that Casper’s been making for the last 2 or 3 decades we’re fully aware of the fact that he’s completely lacking in self-awareness.
You can have a guy who proclaims himself to be a “devout” Catholic who seems to desperately love abortions and mutilating the genitals of children while passively embracing the hatred of Jews, or you can have a guy who may or may not have had sex with a woman who was attractive at the time and be able to afford groceries, gas and your rent or mortgage.
That’s what Democrats will not allow themselves to understand. Which do you think will win that argument?
Biden is old and stutters. That said, his speeches of late show a man still on top of is game. Trump is in a down hill spiral. He can’t stay awake in court, and has about a third grade vocabulary. He is have fewer and fewer rallies even though he is free three days a week. His handlers are keeping his appearances limited to short periods where he repeats the same stuff over and over.
Oh, Casper, you poor silly bunny. Biden is not stuttering. There’s actually a clinical definition for stuttering and it does not cover the incomprehensible way that he mangles words. Stuttering is the inadvertent repetition of the first letter or syllable of a word, such as “I tried to s-s-s-stop”. That is not how Biden flails in his efforts to speak. Over the years you’ve said a lot of completely indefensible things, but to claim that Joe Biden is “at the top of his game has” to stand out as one of the goofiest things in a long litany of goofy things that you have come up with here.
The man is barely functional. He is incapable of expressing a coherent thought unless it is written out for him on a teleprompter or on cheat cards that he can read while he’s sitting with other world leaders and even then he’s so clueless that he has to read the instructions given to him. He’s either so senile that he really does not know when his son died or where or how or he is simply lying but because he keeps repeating his story I’m inclined to think that it’s senility because surely his wife or aides have pointed out to him after he’s made these statements that they are incorrect.
Donald Trump is in the middle of one lengthy trial and preparing for others. He has 3 days a week where he is not in court and you actually are complaining that “He is have (sic) fewer and fewer rallies”. Have you compared the number of Trump rallies to the number of Biden rallies? If you have the courage to do so, then you might compare the length of time Trump spends speaking to people at his rallies without notes or teleprompters to how long Joe Biden is capable of speaking to the handful of people who show up to allegedly support him. ( And no, a canned speech made to a captive audience at a factory, for example, is not the same as holding a rally where you ask people to come to show their support for you.) Biden’s handlers keep his public appearances to a minimum, keep them extremely short, feed him every word that he is supposed to to say and have to give him detailed instructions on complex things like how to walk onto a stage and how to walk off. When he goes off script he meanders through the weeds of his former lies repeating them over and over again, though to give him credit he has started adding some new ones, like an uncle eaten by cannibals. We’ve all noticed that even with the extensive vacation days that Biden has taken he has not used them to try to have big rallies. Of course, we’ve also noticed that when he tries to have a rally only handfuls of people show up.
Donald Trump does not have “handlers”. And campaign speeches always repeat the same appeals to voters over and over again. You’re really scrambling here for something to try to make a point but failing miserably. Lately, you seem quite preoccupied by your claim that Donald Trump has “the vocabulary of a third grader” yet he can pronounce the words he uses, and people can understand what he’s saying—-and he doesn’t describe fantasy events that never happened. You snipe about your claim that he “can’t stay awake in court” but this trial is a sham in which a lot of phonies just drone on and on about a lot of nonsense, posturing for the Complicit Agenda Media that only handful of babbling sycophants take seriously. Trump may have been dozing, or he may have been merely illustrating how insignificant and boring this whole farce is. Pretending to doze off is a pretty blatant way of illustrating contempt for the proceedings.
On the other hand, I didn’t see you coming here fretting when the president of the United States was falling asleep in official government functions, as Joe Biden did, and of course you’ve managed to turn a blind eye to his embarrassing “digestive issues”.
Trump and Biden are basically the same age but Biden is a doddering incoherent incontinent idiot while Trump is still energetic and to use your words “on top of his game”. Trump uses the big boy stairs. He doesn’t poop his pants. He doesn’t make up elaborate fictions. And when he is making a speech he knows how to get off the stage without asking for directions or having to have somebody hold his hand and lead him away.
The Stormy Daniels testimony is turning out to be the gift that keeps on giving, from giving us phrases such as “mattress actress” to the question “(W)as she a T and A CPA on the side all this time without us knowing?” to the shift from “porn star” to “adult movie copulator” It’s an embarrassment of riches to those of us who love watching the prosecution step all over itself as it vividly illustrates the defects in its so-called case as the foundations for appeals and requests for a mistrial keep piling up.
One of the stars of the Donald Trump humiliation ritual in a New York City courtroom has come to add a little T and A to a bookkeeping trial. What is the former adult movie copulator doing in this Manhattan courtroom? Was she a T and A CPA on the side all this time without us knowing and came to provide expert testimony? Was she the campaign finance expert whom the judge has allowed as an expert after disemboweling Trump’s choice? The answer is clear.
After letting trial out early on Monday after prosecutors assured the judge they needed to stretch out their case at least another two weeks because they had so much evidence to present in this bookkeeping case, their next move was to start Tuesday’s testimony with Stormy Daniels, the former porn performer.
Daniels is the woman who signed a nondisclosure agreement with then-Trump attorney Michael Cohen to stay quiet about her allegations of a tryst with Donald Trump. She said that she’d never had a relationship with Trump and was doing appearances when she met him.
She later broke the agreement but has never been brought up on extortion or contractual charges, for when you are helpful in humiliating Orange Man Bad, you are considered an asset to the left.
Former District of Columbia U.S. Attorney, Joe diGenova, put it this way.
This isn’t really a trial, what’s going on in New York. It has all the accoutrements of a trial…it has a fake jury, it has a fake judge. It has a real prosecutor, it has a real defendant. What it doesn’t have is real law and a real case. This is an embarrassment to the judicial process in New York, but that seems to bother no one in New York—neither the New York Times, the New York State Bar, nor the New York judicial system.
He told WMAL that if observers were unclear before this that this wasn’t a serious case then testimony this week should settle the questions once and for all. “This is a smear job,” he says .”
About this: “Was she the campaign finance expert whom the judge has allowed as an expert after disemboweling Trump’s choice? ”
(I)f you’re Trump’s attorneys, you might say “Hey, let’s get that attorney guy, the former Federal Elections Commission Chairman, who wrote that op-ed back in 2018 about how these payments aren’t federal elections violations.”
“Great idea,” they agreed. But then at pretrial motion in limine, which is Latin for Orange Man Bad, the judge said, well, he can testify, kinda sorta.
The People’s motion is granted to the extent that Smith may not testify as a lay (fact) witness; offer opinion testimony regarding the interpretation and application of federal campaign finance laws and how they relate to the facts in the instant matter, nor may Smith testify or offer an opinion as to whether the alleged conduct in this case does or does not constitute a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act.” (He can testify generally about what the law does.)
Yes, the former Federal Elections Commission Chairman is not allowed to testify as an expert witness on federal election law. ” Why not?” inquiring minds might want to know. And the answer is simple: When he was still the Federal Elections Commission Chairman he wrote an opinion piece stating that the payment made by Trump’s attorney was not a violation of election law. In other words when he was legitimately and officially considered an expert witness he expressed an expert opinion that the court does not want to be entered into testimony.
From an article appropriately titled We’re Now in Full Goat Rodeo Mode in the NYC Trump Trial we see the argument that Trump tried to steal the 2016 election with attorneys payments in 2017. (That man is WILY!)
Well, Trump can read a teleprompter, though he seldom needs to, being able to speak contemporaneously for an hour or more in unrehearsed speeches at rallies, and understands if it gives him directions such as “pause” or “don’t jump” instead of reading those directions as if they are part of the speech. (Not that Trump needs to be told to refrain from odd physical gyrations like jumping and skipping.)
And in a Trump speech we don’t run into undecipherable gibberish such as “Liz Shuler” who was the “president of ayeeffffellseeyuhh!”
You really have to turn off MSNBC. Geesh! You’re 180 from reality here.
Biden can’t even walk properly! He’s reading editorial notes off the teleprompter; he’s President Ron Burgundy.
As for the trials – the only one left is the Stormy Daniels trial…where you’re hope is in a whore. We’re only certain about two things on her: she’s a liar and she’ll do anything for money. Trump’s attorney got her to admit that she knew nothing of any hush money payments. In any jurisdiction but New York, as soon as that came out the case would have been dismissed (assuming a judge even allowed it to go to trial in the first place). There is no case – there is nothing Trump did.
The documents trial? Turns out the prosecutor brought the “classified” folders with him so he could insert the documents and then take the pictures.
Fanni’s little fiasco? An appeal on her removal has been allowed to proceed.
Trump is off screen as Biden implodes.
Remember the derision and the scoffing when Trump said that he didn’t even pack those documents, but they were packed for him and delivered to him? And gee, what have we learned? That the Biden Administration decided what went in those boxes and delivered them to Mar-A-Lago. I don’t think there’s ever been any testimony that Trump ever examined the documents or knew what was in those boxes.
Then the FBI started rummaging through the documents without any concern about the security clearances of those FBI agents, and then they rearranged them and completely destroyed any chain of evidence in their effort to falsify evidence. So the whole documents case against Trump is falling apart, While the documents case against Biden is simply being ignored.
Yep – just completely unjust what they are doing.
And that is why if Trump does get back in, punishment must be on the table. The federal agents involved in the Trump cases are conspiring to deny Trump his civil rights. They did the same with the J6 defendants. And with those who have been charged as terrorists for praying outside abortion clinics. As well those who pressured social media companies to censor posts. The law seems pretty clear – no lawyer, but when I read “if two or more persons conspire to deny rights or privileges enjoyed under law”…that is pretty all-encompassing. Everyone has the right to not have bogus legal cases ginned up for political purposes. On and on…and each offense carries a max sentence of ten years in federal prison.
We need to send a lot of people to prison for a very long time – or this just gets worse no matter who we elect.
Civil rights violations are federal in nature, and I think the treatment of the j6 defendants definitely falls into the category of violation of civil rights, as do a lot of the other punitive actions of the government. I’ve posted here the federal laws regarding the protection of illegal aliens and I think every government official who has participated in encouraging people to come to this country illegally, and /or who has contributed to them remaining here should be prosecuted.
The very idea that an American citizen is being threatened with accusations of violation of laws that the government refuses to reveal to her attorneys, to the point where she has to flee to Russia and ask for political asylum, is one of the most insane indictments of the disgusting level to which this country has fallen that I can think of. This is how the American Stasi treats people who have the temerity to make accusations against their Leader—-the face of newly Stalinist America.
Casper, you are the most politically gullible person I’ve ever known. You simply parrot what the “cool kids” say and think that passes as an informed opinion. I’m embarrassed for you. I could go on and on about your defense of Biden but it’s pointless. I just don’t give a fuck what any Democrat thinks anymore.