Polls is polls, of course; always grain of salt them. But this does reflect the reality of voter registration trends, which have almost all favored the GOP for years now. A few hiccups here and there but for the most part State after State – especially Battlegrounds and the light Blue States – are showing GOP voter registration increases. And even deep Blue like California are showing a GOP trend, though Democrat strength there is so dominant it’ll be years before it matters.
The Official Narrative remains that the GOP will certainly lose the House in 2026. Likely hold the Senate; though we’re already getting the “is Red State X about to turn Blue?” that we get all the time with some new Democrat hope being polished up for the MSM…and about to rake in untold millions for what will prove another futile campaign (though I wonder: with the cutoff of money to NGOs, maybe there won’t be $70 million for a useless Democrat Senate race in Texas next year? We’ll see; these things are done to get the GOP to spend money in Red States and thus have less resources for prospects…and you’ll note that the GOP still hasn’t figured out that its time to find some Great GOP Hope for deep Blue states, finance them out the wazoo and force Democrats to spend money). But the House is considered a goner for the GOP. And, normally, this would be so – the GOP majority is razor thin and just the normal mid-term snap back would propel Democrats to a majority. But voter registration trends and things like this recent poll are putting a fly in that ointment.
The Democrats are staking out the 20 in the 80/20 issues. They are doing this because they are convinced that they are on the popular side. They honestly believe – because they tell themselves endlessly – that the American people don’t want mass deportations, want boys in girls sports and are furious that we’re no longer providing funding for NGO’s. They believe that the federal judges issuing ridiculous rulings against Trump are in line with the people’s will. That rioting against ICE is the spontaneous expression of the people.
Could it be like this? I guess anything is possible. But my sense of the matter is that the Democrats are being simply insane and the American people perceive this. Given this, even if things aren’t perfect in 2026 and even if there are some serious complaints about Trump or GOP policies, they’re going to stick with Trump and the GOP. That the 2026 midterms will be akin to the 1934 midterms…in that election, the first for FDR, there should have been a snap back in favor of the GOP. There wasn’t because the GOP spent two years reminding everyone why they hated them.
The View announced they are going on hiatus. Can’t emphasize enough how important this is. It is part of the Democrat information ecosystem…even though they don’t have massive viewership, they reinforce the Democrat Narrative. Much like Colbert does with his show. Without this continual reinforcement of Democrat bigotry it will become increasingly difficult to sustain it. Can’t forget how propaganda works: it isn’t just the lie, it is the endlessly and universally repeated lie. A lie so pervasive that even skeptical people start to think there’s something to it…after all, it was on the daytime talk show, the evening news and the late night show! How can it not be true? They wouldn’t all lie…would they? Make no mistake about it, the people who run the MSM are still almost all Democrats…but they also are getting pounded in ratings as more and more people switch off while lying is becoming costly…Trump’s Presidential library will be gold plated if things keep going as they are! At the end of the day, the purpose is to make money – and shows like Colbert’s and The View aren’t money makers – or if they do squeeze out a profit, it isn’t worth the risk that a host of the show will go off on some anti-Trump rant, lie and cost the company 20 million dollars.
Lindsey Graham is asking that a Special Counsel be appointed to look into the Trump-Russia scandal – and that’s gonna be a hard No from all sensible people. This is a last, desperate attempt to cover up what Obama, et al did. To bury it under an investigation that will take at least two years…plenty for time to sandbag the whole thing and come out at the end with some lying report saying that while there were improprieties, no laws were broken. Laws were obviously broken: the only question here is can we sufficiently prove who broke them to get indictments and convictions? Indicting Obama is pretty much pie in the sky – one in a million shot – but the last thing we want is someone who starts out not wanting to indict. We want Bondi – someone who wants to indict because that’s what the records indicate should happen. The high hurdle here is the protections Presidents have in carrying out the duties of their office…this doesn’t protect actual criminal behavior, but it makes for murky legal ground that defense attorneys and judges will be happy to latch on to in order to protect Obama and their class. What I’m saying here is that we need to find out if there is such indisputable evidence that we really can indict…a special counsel will not get us there. Ever. And even if we can’t get Obama, there are probably a couple hundred people we can get…and we need an investigation which will make people want to turn State’s evidence, not work out a statement that obscures things in exchange for immunity.
The latest social media sensation is the Door Kick Challenge: it involves youngsters going up to random doors and kicking them very hard. Police are urging parents to talk to their kids and let them know this is foolish and dangerous. Most people are treating it as described – just a youthful (if rather dumb) lark. It ain’t that, guys.
It is gang recruitment.
It’s a test: will you do as you’re told? Will you, quite especially, do as you’re told when it is wrong and dangerous? The gangs are finding out who in the neighborhood will do something violently stupid. This is the perfect ground to develop young gang members you can use for hits and intimidation.
And right now the gangs need new blood – they are losing quite a lot of their foot soldiers via deportations. Enforcement via people brought in illegally is going to become increasingly difficult – but the gangs still need their enforcers to make sure the money keeps coming in. What better than to have a 16 year old true blue American citizen do it? Can’t be deported. If arrested, tried as a juvenile in most jurisdictions. At all events, totally expendable. You get that young man a nice car and some cool clothes for doing it, he’ll do any thing you ask him to. I do believe the gangs are going to hit back, hard. There are billions of dollars at stake here. They need an army to intimidate us into giving up the fight. This is the recruitment of that army. They essentially did this in all the Latin American countries they dominate…for relative peanuts, get a mass of ignorant but strong youth to do your bidding no matter how horrific it is…but you never start with having them chop someone to pieces. It is always the smaller, easier step that comes first…as part of the winnowing process to find the hard core.
Blogs For Victory 
If insurrection is defined as an effort to assume the powers of the government, aren’t we looking at a judicial insurrection?
(Asking for a friend)
We couldn’t actually remove them because we lack 67 votes in the Senate…but lets do some Process Is The Punishment here…impeach these judges. They are to hold their offices “on their good behavior”. Sure, the main thing we think of on that is as long as they’re not taking bribes or engaged in other traditional forms of corruption…but “their good behavior” is rather broad, isn’t it? I don’t think its good behavior if federal judges are openly defying the law…and even Supreme Court decisions. Impeach them. Put them on trial in the Senate. Force them into defending their actions in the open, with an audience, on camera…
I think the Founders would agree, although I doubt that they ever, in their wildest imagination, thought that Federal Judges would violate the law and the Constitution so blatantly.
It is both amazing and, in hindsight, totally expected. I mean, we’ve had essential Leninists teaching in our law schools for decades. At the same time the standards for getting a law degree have been lowered…so the product is often not very bright but very certain. You just know these clowns go home at night and say “I showed that Trump son of a bitch!”.
The more I think about it the more I warm to the idea of prosecuting them all for conspiracy to deny civil rights. I’m talking even those Blue State jurors who have gone along with prosecutions of MAGA.
You are right. Force them out into the open, out of their judicial robes, where they have to defend their rulings and try to maintain the illusion that they are not trying to advance political agendas.
Hard to believe, throughout the entire Epstein saga, that no one in Biden’s DOJ ever interviewed Ghislaine Maxwell.
Astonishing to hear and then immediately not when you think about it: they prosecuted her just enough to say they did something. They would have done less if they thought they could get away with it – just like they barely prosecuted Epstein the first time around. And it all begs the immediate question: why protect these people? Why go soft on them? This is the point I was meaning when I said, “BLM does have a point” some years back. Some unconnected black guy (or, white guy, to be fair) who did half of what Epstein did would have been locked up for life…this guy gets a slap on the wrist, and dinner with Katie Couric after he gets out.
At this point it doesn’t matter if there is or isn’t a cabal of pedos running the world – the result is the same no matter. People who purvey for the rich and famous get off easy and then everyone covers up the cover up. And I do believe that it just gets worse over time – over in the UK the Establishment is still trying to cover up the grooming gangs where immigrant communities – with the active cooperation of British law enforcement – routinely abused British girls. Some people thinking this will be enough to finally defeat the British Establishment but they just enacted a comprehensive – totalitarian – censorship protocol where anything you say which the Establishment deems unacceptable will get you sent to jail. Rely on it, those who keep talking about the groomers will soon be raked in and charged with terrorist speech.
We were on that same trajectory. Still are, to some extent. We pray that Trump and his team can get these guys and end it.
But…did he get a pass because he is rich and famous or because he was placed in his position of wealth and connections to advance a government agenda? If this is/was the case then the rest of it makes complete sense, unrelated to class, wealth or status. His role as someone acting as an agent of our government, if exposed, would simultaneously affect national security and condemn our own government for condoning if not actually participating in sex trafficking, pedophilia and corruption of minors. (And the same would be true if we were talking about Vernon Jordan instead of Jeffrey Epstein.)
The reason homosexuality was not allowed in government service was not due to puritanical government attitudes but because it was something so generally unacceptable in society that it made homosexuals vulnerable to blackmail to hide their secret. When same-sex attraction and its attendant lifestyle became so mainstream, it was necessary to find some other levers to force people into compliance so it was a natural move toward the kinds of things Epstein offered to those he targeted. Even openly gay people would have a hard time overcoming the stigma of underage sex or pedophilia or consorting with prostitutes forced into sex slavery or moving minors across state lines for sex or even plain old orgies.
If we are going to wonder why “the government” looked the other way regarding Epstein the first question we have to ask is what would be the downside TO THE GOVERNMENT in making his activities public and prosecuting him for them? And what secrets (shades of Hoover) did he have to force prominent government officials to give him free rein?
Yep – with the open question being whether the activities are the op, or if the cover up is just post-facto protection for the Club?
It seems pretty clear to me that Epstein was in the blackmail business…come to my island, have a little sex with a minor … enjoy! Oh, its all on film, BTW…and I’ll need you to deposit this amount here.
Freelance or working for someone? Hard to say. I think of Otto Skorzeny again: Hitler’s favorite commando. Dedicated Nazi. Played a key role in suppressing the July 20th plot. Captured at the end of the war he escaped and settled in Spain. With lots and lots of money; some of it pretty clearly the result of an SS bank heist at the Riechsbank in the closing days of the war but that doesn’t nearly cover how much money he had. Oh, and how did he escape? He claimed it was via fellow SS members dressed in American uniforms who sprung him from jail…which, if so, means almost certainly as least some Americans were in on it. Rumor has it that Mossad gave him an offer he couldn’t refuse and so he worked for them…while also helping the “ratlines” get ever more wanted Nazis out of harms way. When you start getting into things like this it all gets murky. You don’t know who is betraying whom and who everyone is really working for. So, too, I think it was for Epstein and others like him we’ve come across…the only common thing is that they are protected.
While a coverup could be the ex post facto protection of people in the Club his connection with Mossad from early on does point in the direction of setting up honey trap stings of the famous and powerful to create Hooveresque files on people who might need to be coerced at some time.
It’s certainly possible that he did this on his own, to have products he could then sell to the highest bidders, but that would not necessarily explain the determined refusal to dig deep and expose and prosecute.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has warned that unless change is instituted rapidly, Britain will soon succumb to complete societal collapse.
After describing some of the examples of this erosion of British society (carefully avoiding the third rails of immigration and foreign impacts on the nation)
Farage further suggested that Britain should leave the European Court of Human Rights in order to restore effective criminal deterrence.
Finally, it is starting to sink in, at least to some, that the New World Order, globalism, whatever you want to call it, it merely an invitation to put people who don’t like us in charge of our own countries.
Responses to Farage’s recommendations in the comments section on X are typical of radical Leftist outrage at the very prospect of slowing their determined destruction of nations:
One such Leftist comment: “Once again, we are faced with hollow promises from a minor politician who seems to aspire to create a police state reminiscent of Donald Trump’s era of summary justice. Rest assured, this individual will not be in a position of political power anytime soon.” Another brags about the “reduced” crime rate and swoons “thank you, Labour”—as if people are not aware that refusing to charge people with crimes automatically reduces the rate of reported crimes.
Because I no longer pay much attention to British politics, such as it is, as watching a country I love pick up velocity in its death spiral is very depressing, I haven’t followed Farage’s career, and some commenters claim he is for mass immigration. He certainly did not mention foreign gangs, efforts to replace British law with sharia, honor killings, grooming gangs, police refusal to help parents rescue their daughters from such gangs, or any of the other deep cultural problems in the UK, but his list of efforts to curb violence would certainly have a greater impact on those foreigners than on British nationals.
He carefully avoided mentioning sex crimes in his list of societal problems. Address illegal immigration, crimes by immigrants and all sex crimes associated with them and the problem is nearly solved.
BTW, comparing him to Donald Trump is not likely to turn most Brits against him, at least those fed up with the deterioration of their country and the fecklessness of their government. If there was ever a country ready to follow the American model of a populist revolution it is the UK, and if Farage can come across as the new Donald Trump or at least Mayor Giuliani he has a good shot at success. If he adds the immigration problems to his list of issues he will have a powerful message.
He’s as far right as you can get in the UK and be in any way politically viable – his Reform Party is polling better than any other Party right now, though the next election won’t take place for 4 years and that’s an eternity in politics (it could come earlier but Labour’s majority is so large that even with erosion – they’ve already lost 14 seats since the election last year – they can’t be forced to call an early election unless something catastrophic happens). He probably left off mentioning immigration specifically because Britain just enacted a new law for the totalitarian censorship of British social media…basically, you say anything critical about immigrants and you’ll likely get a visit by the police; keeping in mind that merely stating the truth about immigrants is considered critical. Farage probably just doesn’t want to wade into that and have the discussion become “Reform is a racist Party” rather than “dang everything sucks”. But that the Brits have to be careful shows how far they’ve fallen – I don’t think they can get back up. Even Farage is talking about Common Sense Knife Control to a totally disarmed British electorate who’s police are Establishment Enforcers.
The Protest-Industrial-Complex Isn’t Peaceful, It’s “Civil Terrorism”
What they DON’T address is tracking down and prosecuting those who fund these activities. Some entity or entities is behind the large sums of money it takes to buy plane and train and bus tickets, rent cars, pay for onsite housing and meals and buy riot materials to be delivered to obviously pre-planned riot sites. All of these leave money trails, and it is already against the law to incite riots, pay for riots, and engage in interstate commissions of these crimes.
It’s all well and good to go after the people on the street committing the physical crimes, but we need to cut of the heads of the snakes, and prosecute the money men behind it all and every organization that works with them. I don’t doubt that we would find a lot of foreign money flowing in, which would just add to the list of offenses and their severity. There would probably also be ties to the DNC, as we found when we looked into the actions of the Left against Trump and his associates starting back in 2016, and several NGOs currently enjoying tax-free status as they work to destroy the country.
One example:
China-Linked Tech Tycoon Neville Roy Singham’s Niece Backs NYC’s Next Marxist Mayor
Now the niece of this international financier of terrorism is openly supporting the Communist candidate for mayor of NYC.
Terminating money to the NGO’s will help in this area a lot but there is still plenty of foreign money available to subvert our country. They do it because it works and it is relative peanuts…you give some social media influencers just a couple hundred grand and they’ll parrot whatever Party Line you want…and the money doesn’t have to be a direct payment. The CCP – as well as other foreign actors – controls bot armies and they’ll repost and otherwise boost your social media clout if you say the approved things; you get paid for that, China gets their propaganda.
And I do believe that China is “all of the above” on subverting us – so, even though the CCP horribly oppresses China’s Muslim minority, they’ll pay people to push the pro-Hamas line…not because they care about Palestinians but because it just divides Americans into mutually hating camps. Anything and everything they can do to get us hating each other will be done.
Anything and everything they can do to get us hating each other will be done. says every Leftist everywhere, including those in the USA