The word at this moment is that the DOJ is going to charge Don Lemon and the rest of the Commies who invaded a Minnesota church yesterday under the Klan Act. The teeth of it:
…That any person who, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of any State, shall subject, or cause to be subjected any person within the jurisdiction of the United States to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution of the United States…
…That in all cases where insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combinations, or conspiracies in any State shall so obstruct or hinder the execution of the laws thereof, and of the United States, as to deprive any portion or class of the people of such State of any of the rights, privileges, or immunities, or protection, named in the Constitution and secured by this act, and the constituted authorities of such State shall either be unable to protect, or shall, from any cause, fail in or refuse protection of the people in such rights, such facts shall be deemed a denial by such State of the equal protection of the laws to which they are entitled under the Constitution of the United States; and in all such cases…it shall be lawful for the President, and it shall be his duty to take such measures, by the employment of the militia or the land and naval forces of the United States, or of either, or by other means, as he may deem necessary for the suppressions of such insurrection, domestic violence, or combinations…
Nutshell: if you do anything – even under the color of law or custom – which denies the rights of an American, you are in violation of the Act and if the local and State government wherein you reside refuse for any reason to secure your rights, then the President may use any means which come to hand to secure your rights, local law notwithstanding. Lemon’s assertion is that he was merely exercising his First Amendment rights to report on the incident…but the videos he’s posted show he had advance knowledge of and participated in the invasion of the Church, thus being part of a combination designed to deny the right of the people to free exercise of religion. Given that the government of Minnesota has done nothing – and has, indeed, encouraged such actions – it is now fully within the power of the President to see to it that the free exercise rights of the people of Minnesota are secured.
But, as they say, there’s more! 18 US Code 247:
Whoever, in any of the circumstances referred to in subsection (b) of this section…intentionally obstructs, by force or threat of force, including by threat of force against religious real property, any person in the enjoyment of that person’s free exercise of religious beliefs, or attempts to do so; shall be punished as provided in subsection (d).
Lemon and co are lucky nobody was physically harmed…but just for walking in there, they each face a year in jail. But the main thing to keep in mind here is that there are a host of laws on the books protecting civil rights, they are race and gender neutral, they have teeth…and they simply haven’t been applied to the Left, ever.
If we have just a small bit of guts, we’ll be able to destroy the Left…and they walked right up and asked us to. Keep in mind: the Klan doesn’t even exist any longer. Nobody will incorporate a Klan organization under the laws of the United States or the several States because doing so just makes you liable in court…so it can be with Antifa and all these Commie terror groups organizing protests and riots around the country.
Obstruct law enforcement. Block a road. Harass a citizen over beliefs. Any and all of these are massive federal law violations. And everyone involved in the organization doing it is completely liable both as to criminal and civil penalties.
Blogs For Victory 
I think it’s obvious to everyone that these protests are not lawful. No one has the right to harass, intimidate, incinerate, destroy, or hurl objects. That’s civil disobedience, bordering on incitement to war and they all should be arrested and face the maximum punishment. Why that’s not happening yet, I don’t know, but that is a big difference still between the right and the left. Biden and his DOJ didn’t hesitate to lock up J6’ers and aggressively track them down. We tend to be more patient, more forgiving, but that will be to our own peril if we don’t go after these law breakers.
Years and years ago, I was in golden gloves boxing and one thing I was told and always remembered was that if you knock the guy down, and he gets back up, you’re in a bigger fight. I boxed enough to know that that is true. We can not let the Democrats up off the mat, or else the fight will only get bigger and more dangerous.
And how about this?
18 USC Ch. 115: TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
From Title 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Clearly the mobs are engaging in rebellion against the authority of the United States as well as the federal laws regarding immigration.
And clearly government officials are providing aid and comfort to these criminal mobs and assisting in these rebellions. I don’t see how anyone participating in these “protests” can deny that this is what they are doing. There is literally no other way to explain or describe what they are doing. They are challenging the legitimacy not just of the laws regarding the apprehension and detainment of illegal aliens, they are challenging the underlying immigration law as well.
So arrest them, arrest all officials who assist them in any way (including refusing to step in and control violence against ICE officers) and let them sacrifice their official status (“shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.“) and arrest everyone in a mob that is doing more than verbally expressing personal angst of some sort (which is a 1st Amendment right). They can scream and howl some version of “this makes me sad” or even “people who break the law are my neighbors and people who enforce it are big poopy-heads” but once they try to interfere they are engaging in rebellion against the authority of the United States and its laws thereof.
On top of this are the Civil Rights violations. Lots of federal weight here, but 18 USC Ch. 115 doesn’t depend on Civil Rights legislation.
And BTW, in law the word “shall” is an imperative. It means “must”. Not “can” or “might” but locked-in “has to”. ” shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both“. And then there is that important word “and”. It also has weight in legal language. It means “in addition to”. (Yes, I know the trolls bleat and squeal in indignation when I talk about definitions, but they matter when we move out of the hysteria bubble into the real world.) Which takes us to this: “and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”
So anyone convicted of rebelling against the authority of the United States or its laws MUST be fined, possibly also imprisoned (“or both”) and in addition can no longer hold “any office under the United States”. I’m not sure how even the slimiest of the weasel judges of the Left could tap dance around this,
Yep – this is crucial in the Klan Act (Actually the Enforcement Act of 1871 – but it was enacted in response to Klan activity, so Klan Act):
This was to prevent a weak-willed President – or one controlled by the bad guys – from refusing to act. It isn’t a matter of choice – the President shall ensure our rights are secured. This is a bit of common sense – all Executive power being vested in the President and the President being required to see to it that the laws are faithfully enforced.
Oh, look. It’s one of those 80-20 issues Spook keeps talking about.
According to a new YouGov poll, 86% of Americans oppose using military force to acquire Greenland. 70% oppose even using federal funds to do so.
Americans are opposing Trump on virtually every issue.