There is a video out there where a black woman in Los Angeles is asked why she’s voting for Bass. The answer: because she’s black. We’re at that level of third world tribal idiocy. Nothing in that city is functional…the whole thing is dying. “But I’m voting black because I’m black”…even though, if successful, it’ll mean a worse life for that voter. She doesn’t care. She doesn’t think. She’s a barbarian…a barbarian carefully curated by our Ruling Class to do just that: vote for the tribe no matter what.
Isn’t the first time this has happened in the modern world – Lenin did it in Russia and Hitler did it in Germany. Get people to become savages and then tell them that the only thing that matters is the tribe…for Lenin is was class. For Hitler, it was race. Here in America it is the upper class fostering the barbarism so it is all about race (or gender, yadda, yadda, yadda). We’ve got upper class white people rioting in front of ICE facilities in favor of foreign criminals because the Ruling Class says the criminals are part of the tribe. It was sad, now it is simply disgusting.
We still have to tread a little carefully here. We are winning, but we have not won and a misstep could convince the mushy middle to opt for the barbarians. Those rioters at ICE should be hit with a water cannon, clubbed senseless and then put on trial…resulting in ten years for each of them. But the power for that isn’t there – it isn’t that we’re worried about what they’ll call us (we don’t care what they call us) but that to get what we want will take time…Trump Time. Vance Time. A MAGA Congress. The ability to pass laws and ensure they are enforced…a termination of the ability of federal district judges to interfere in the Executive Branch (they have no such power – there is nothing in the Constitution which says a district judge can enter an injunction against the Executive Branch). But once we do win, then we really have to set to work.
We’re dealing with idiots – and we’ll have to treat them like the idiots they are. They’re right now boosting Talarico as some sort of moderate candidate…the man is insane. But no more insane than anyone else on the Left. He’s better at hiding in than some, but his worldview is built upon a series of very stupid and obvious lies – and if he, and they, get their way then civilization dies…in a horror of barbarism combined with twisted application of science. Once we do win, we have to start thinking in terms of breaking up the Blue States, disenfranchising the Blue voters and setting guardrails in place which will make it essentially illegal to enact Leftist policy. No more getting lunatic policy by calling it the Everyone Gets a Puppy Act. Policies which are insane and based upon lies must be banned.
In the end, it is a question of whether we’ll protect the normal, human elements of life…family, faith, property. Cleanliness. Manliness. Femininity. Order. Peace and quiet. The Left wants all of that gone – they want us living in filth, fighting each other over the scraps accompanied by a cacophony of simian shrieks. No loyalty. No honor. Nothing beautiful or true. A truly Orwellian nightmare.
We can’t win this by being nice. In fact, we’re going to have to get mean – pitiless, in fact. Watch their tears flow and still take things away from them, and then punish them for crying. For weeping over the fact that they are no longer allowed to destroy. We have to turn insane barbarians into sane citizens and this won’t come easy. Or quick. It’ll take a couple generations of get rid of the Leftist poison…to get to a point where nobody would dream of voting for someone based on their skin color or gender. People who wouldn’t dream of getting paid for not working. Who won’t tolerate dirty streets. Who abhor wastrels. Sane people. Civilized people – that is what we have to make.
Blogs For Victory 
The ability to pass laws and ensure they are enforced…a termination of the ability of federal district judges to interfere in the Executive Branch (they have no such power – there is nothing in the Constitution which says a district judge can enter an injunction against the Executive Branch).
If necessary, pass a constitutional amendment that says any federal judge who assumes authority not described in the Constitution or specifically prohibited by the Constitution is automatically removed from the bench, and forfeits all pay and benefits including retirement. Since all courts but the Supreme Court are created by Congress, it might be possible to have Congress simply pass a law creating such a structure.
This sounds very much like the law I have been advocating for years (since having to deal with a corrupt judge)—that a violation of the oath of office (which includes ruling according to the Constitution) by any government official would result in immediate loss of the position and all its related benefits.
This would apply to DAs who flout the Constitution in establishing and promoting “sanctuary cities” plus any officials who obstruct the ability of law enforcement officers to enforce the law. It would apply to judges, governors, mayors, sheriffs, police chiefs, all law enforcement officers–anyone taking an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution and all its laws thereof as well as local laws.
This would not require a Constitutional amendment, just a new law passed by Congress.
I think the main reason your ideas were not enshrined in the Constitution by the Founders is that they never dreamed public service would be such a magnet for dishonorable people, both those committing illegal acts and those tolerating it.
I was at Mass today and it really got crystalized out for me during the Homily and prayers – I do wonder, at times, if I am right – that is, am I in any manner in conformity with God’s will? Naturally, I can’t be perfectly conformed but we are supposed to try, right? The Homily was, of course, about the Trinity as this is Trinity Sunday but the prayers were the usual stuff…for peace and understanding, for those suffering. And it came in a sort of flash for me: the Church is, indeed, right. As I’ve said before, I will never dispute Catholic dogma. That isn’t my office – I lack any ability to act as judge in such matters. I am to conform myself to those dogmas as far as possible. But the Church in practical application isn’t living up to the dogmas. To be fair, none of us ever do – but it was staggering for me to understand this fully.
When the Church says we must feed the poor that is of course what we must do. God commands it. But I recalled those times I’ve been on the serving line at Catholic Charities and the humanity passing by collecting the free food…some are clearly just poor people, others are just as clearly drug-addled bums and yet others are people obviously capable of earning their daily bread but just grabbing a free handout (I’ve seriously seen people with I-phones in those lines). We must feed the poor. Nobody should go hungry, ever.
But by just handing out the food, we are not feeding the poor – we’re sustaining indolence. In my mind’s eye came the picture of the neighborhood around Catholic Charities: filthy. Littered. Graffiti. If we have 300 people coming in for food and 200 are adults without small children to mind…then right there we have 200 person-hours of labor! Lunch is at 12. Get here at 11 and you’ll be handed a broom and trash bag – after an hour of cleaning up your own neighborhood you’ll get all the food you can handle. Do this daily and that neighborhood would positively gleam with cleanliness! It would become a place people wanted to go rather than avoid.
The kicker: we wouldn’t get nearly those 200 person-hours…almost everyone in that line the day before this was implemented would not be present the next day. They’re bums – layabouts. People feeding off the productive society…content to wallow in filth and ignorance as long as no effort is demanded. My bet: we’d get 20 or 25 hours of labor…of decent people just down on their luck. The whole scene shifts when you realize that it is uncharitable to offer aid without effort. It degrades a human when you do that – and this is just as true if the person is perfectly willing to be degraded.
And therein lies the real problem of modern times: people are willing to be degraded. Physically, intellectually, emotionally, morally. People line up to become bums and bastards. And the whole system is built to do this and allow the really depraved to live well off it…from NGO bosses making huge pay to the Learing Center stealing taxpayer money. Trump opined the other day that we might find so much fraud that we can balance the budget if we eliminate it. I think he’s right – or so close to right as makes no matter. We’ve been told by the Left that a balanced budget requires massive tax increases. The Right tells us we have to take benefit cuts – especially to Social Security. I’d like you to imagine a whole string of really vile obscenities here…because that is how I now view those who tell us this. They’re turning human beings into beasts and stealing the wealth of normal people to do it, just so a clique of amoral creeps can live well.
The corrupt judges – and other officials – are just part of the depraved. They don’t care about law. Just as, for instance, no Cato Institute Libertarian cares about human life…none of the people running the show care. They just want themselves to be well off…and as they can’t produce anything useful, they are determined to live well off of us, the normal people…and they do this by deliberately ignoring law – and basic morality – to impose lunacy upon us. Raising up hosts of savages demanding to be supported and ruining our society as they do so. Indeed, we must hold them accountable for their oaths…but also for their humanity. For the fact that they are so self-centered as to become inhuman monsters.
Funny !!
I think MAGA should jump the shark, so to speak, and threaten to pack the court themselves. I want Trump to nominate 5 more SC Justices and force Democrats to oppose it. And if we have to nuke the filibuster to pass the SAVE act, then let’s do it.
If we had a GOP Senate – rather than a RINO one, as now – then they’d do precisely that: submit a bill to increase the Court by two Justices and just see how the Democrats react.
In fact, if we had a MAGA Congress, we’d be passing law after law popular with the American people and see how the Democrats react…it can be as simple as increasing the penalties for misappropriation of taxpayer funds…Democrats would come out against it right now. They feel they have to – because they believe it is working. That is, they believe their “resistance” to every aspect of Trump is popular. Keep in mind, they still believe the MSM…so, when the MSM reports a poll showing Trump at 35% approval, they believe it…and so believe they should “resist” even harder…the American people, in their minds, are in favor of illegal immigration…
The Democrats have convinced themselves of a lot of stupid things and that is the reason we will win the mid terms. Trump is batting 1000 in political endorsements so far which speaks loudly to his continued strong support amongst the vast majority of normal Americans. I also read not long ago that the RNC has amassed over $130 million to the DNC’s paltry $15 million. And then of course there is the quality of candidates …. Talarico is the creepiest and least American man that I have ever seen. I would have a hard time not punching him in the face.
And let’s stop messing around with Iran. Let’s finish them. We should wipe out every electrical plant in the country along with the remaining military targets including Kharg Island. Iranians are not serious people who we can negotiate with, they are 5th century barbarians and the population are largely uneducated cowards or worse … barbarians themselves.
Iran has ended the peace talks???
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charles/2026/06/02/marco-rubio-just-threw-down-the-gauntlet-with-iran-n2677087
Time for bridge and power plant day. Wipe out there entire national power grid. If they want to act like 5th century barbarians, send them into the 5th century.
Don’t read too much into such things – Iran doesn’t have an actual government; various factions are trying this and that. Trump feels confident he’s talking to those who will come out on top.
Speaking of insane barbarians:
Looking at the cost of dealing with the homeless (though the money doesn’t really “deal with” the homeless at all) and the appalling living conditions of those on the street, I have come to the conclusion that we should just buy up buildings and convert them into large dormitories and put addicts into custodial care.
Would they like it? No. But then they are addicts and/or homeless because they reject civilized living and choose to live in a constant state of opposition to any kind of structure. But then they demand that we take care of them. Social media are full of self-congratulatory accounts of people scurrying around to find clothes, food, sleeping bags, etc for the people who basically place their orders for what they want, knowing that someone will accommodate them. But these acts are not compassionate, they are merely enabling, giving the enablers a nice warm fuzzy sense of moral superiority.
“Compassionate” would be recognizing the fact that the mental illnesses of these people condemn them to lives of misery. They would be surly and resentful at being forced to live in a heated room, with a bed and a bathroom, and getting three good meals a day—but my response to that is “tough”.
What we subsidize just grows, and we subsidize living on the streets—along with the animal abuse, drug use, malnutrition, filth, disease, alcoholism, harsh weather conditions, etc. I believe that if a city were to implement this kind of mandatory custodial care for the chronically homeless (saving true intercession for those dealing with situational homelessness, like loss of a job or a house by people who genuinely want to get back on their feet) that city would not only cease to be a magnet for the bums and addicts it would be on a list of cities to avoid.
Yep – that was the flash of understanding I had: we’re paying people to be bums. And then paying those who pay the bums…huge sums are earned by people who provide services, so they have a vested interest in keeping the problem going and, indeed, making it worse (so the programs to actually help druggies get high).
Labor camps – but I do like the idea you have of essentially reusing old buildings…this is a two-fer in that such use as labor camps would also help alleviate urban blight.
We know that incarcerated people tend to sort themselves out, with some choosing to accept some jobs and responsibilities. Given the stability of life in a facility, some will settle down and choose to become “trustees”, assuming responsibility for cleaning, etc. and developing a sense of personal dignity. These people could evolve into some kind of job training, for building maintenance, etc. and move upward through tiers of responsibility and benefits.
The flying monkeys of the Left would, of course, have a new source of outrage, howling that it is not a crime to be homeless and therefore homelessness should not be punished.
Revisit the old “poor house” concept. For basic needs met—a bed, blankets, nutritious food—-open to anyone in need. TV limited to the History Channel and high school level classes.
Then do what society does, and demand more for getting more. A private room, or better food, or more channels on the TV, would call for a certain number of hours of basic custodial work, done well, or working in the laundry and making beds once a week, or kitchen duty.
Every job that requires an additional skill set would gain more privileges, up to a certain amount of pay, as well as more responsibility. But anyone who refuses to participate in the maintenance of the facility gets only basic subsitence.
My mother was an alcoholic, and I spend many years dealing with her mental illness, including spending time visiting her in various custodial situations and getting to know her fellow patients. And I learned that they are, basically, much the same.
They are oppositional personalities, steeped in victimhood and nurturing grievances. They tend to be very manipulative, playing on peoples’ emotions, and this is a source of great pleasure and power for them.
The ongoing desperate effort to stir up racial division and conflict keeps reaching new lows. The latest is the phrase “chimp out”.
Now, we have seen enough video clips of white and Hispanic people, usually women, going absolutely apeshit to understand that this is not a racially-specific term. But the Left, in its frantic need to generate conflict, and lacking the self-awareness to realize that when they claim that any reference to any ape is really a reference to black people they are really telegraphing their OWN prejudice and perception of black people, and have jumped on the use of a phrase that describes only a behavior and claims it is really just a description of a race.
From msn: “Chimp out” has become a rhetorical device that portrays Black people as more violent than other groups and, thus, less human”
Every now and then Facebook dumps a load of video clips of women reacting to traffic stops, and nearly all of them are white women—and they are “chimping out”, throwing themselves on the ground, screaming incoherently, kicking and trying to bite officers, etc. Ditto for arrest videos of shoplifting. That doesn’t even include the white women and their animalistic behavior toward ICE agents and law enforcement.
I’d be inclined to edit the MSN comment to read: ““Chimp out” has become a rhetorical device that portrays women as more violent than other groups and, thus, less human”.
One of the socially negative effects of us being so afraid of being called racists is that it has allowed room for actual (or created) racists to take on the mantle of Defenders of the West. It is a strong part of the appeal for youngsters, I believe: someone who is willing to take a stand, even if a rather stupid stand…and even if the stand is actually paid for by the Left to divide the Right. The more we fight back against it, the better – and we can’t do better than take a page out of the Trump playbook.
Old ways:
“You’re a racist!”
“I am not; and more Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act than Democrats!”
New ways:
“You’re a racist!”
“You’re a f*cking liar for calling me that.”
Crude. Effective. Doesn’t give them an inch. I’m not going to argue with Leftists – I’m going to shout back. And, sure, this will turn off Low-T “Conservative”…but I kinda want them turned off and out of my movement.
New ways:
“You’re a racist!”
Only a truly stupid and hateful person could say that.
Yep – the reality is that racism requires a person to specifically believe that one grouping of people is inherently superior to another based upon skin color…absent that, whatever else it might be, racism isn’t it. But as you note, now just using the phrase “chimp out”, which has no racial context at all, is being called racist…mostly because they actually don’t want us posting videos of people chimping out…doesn’t matter their color, the fact that people are starting brawls at Waffle House and the airport is a sign of civilizational collapse and the more people see it, the more they are willing to get stern in stopping it…and our Ruling Class needs us to wallow in ever deeper filth, not get clean.
“they actually don’t want us posting videos of people chimping out…doesn’t matter their color, the fact that people are starting brawls at Waffle House and the airport is a sign of civilizational collapse”. Destabilization of our culture and society is the goal of the Left, but the increasing media attention to this is starting to make more people react to these antics with disgust. Suddenly showing clip after clip of people acting like savages is really drawing a line between Us and Them, and that line is less and less related to skin color. It’s actually becoming more gender-related.
Pushback is interesting. Evidently an Apple “update” got my never-used Facebook account locked into an unending serious of video reels sent to my phone, ranging from ads to improbable stories to recipes, and there has been a flood of clips from black women deriding “that racist BS” and even black men talking about skin color not making a difference in who they can count as friends. One clip of a beautiful young black woman said (trying to remember the exact wording): “I was a perfect Liberal: Two parts compassion, one part moral superiority and one part claiming anyone who didn’t agree with me was a racist”.
Whoever is handling the media response is genius, which I have to say because it is what I have been advocating for a couple of decades now—that is, to diminish the virulence and hatred and violence by making fun of it or just kind of ignoring it. What social media are doing is thinning the herd. Now it’s not just “black people” but a specific and narrowing category of black people exhibiting racial animosity, and even that category is having trouble keeping its focus on other races. In the meantime, outside this bubble, black and white and brown people are just getting on getting on—going to school together, working together, dating each other, marrying each other, merging multicolored families, living next to each other, etc.
The new category for social unrest is teenagers, with the sudden rise of supposedly spontaneous “takeovers” by young people of certain parts of town and, in Florida, of beaches. And in Florida they ain’t having no part of that. They are raiding these riots, throwing people in jail and charging them with everything they can think of. After a recent shooting in Clearwater I expect enforcement to be even more Draconian.
And, of course, the Democrat Party is self-destructing, which is a thing of beauty to behold. Their favorite pejoratives for others have all turned out to be self-identifying. “Nazi” is less powerful if you, yourself, are advocating for the genocide of Jews. “Fascist” has been such a handy-dandy multipurpose epithet, useful in pretty much any context—until it starts to sink in that it has been the Dems acting like textbook fascists, from relationships with industry to silencing opposition voices. Climate change has suddenly just disappeared, the Green Energy banners (solar, wind, electric cars as saviors of the planet) are trampled in the mud, more people are turning back to God and even the more rigidly organized religions like Catholicism, the howls about “pedophilia” are now more like whimpers as the child abuses of “trans” procedures are becoming better-known, etc.
Watch the Rubio Congressional hearing to see Democrats verbally “chimping out”—-being loud, rude, crass, strident, and smug in their conviction that they are perfectly entitled to throw temper tantrums in Congress and use their time to merely hurl accusations and epithets in the form of rapid-fire questions without giving even a moment to respond to any of them. It was like a demonstration of an answer to “Just how rude ARE Democrats, anyway?”
More “chimping out”. Take a look at the potty-mouthed aggressors and see if you can find a way to link this to blackness. I see ratty-haired white women and a pasty guy.
I think the only time I’ve ever been called a racist was on this blog a number of years ago. I don’t even remember what the subject was, but it rolled off me like water off a duck’s back. Racist, Nazi, Fascist, it really doesn’t matter; when that’s all they’ve got, it’s really ALL THEY”VE GOT!
My previous comment got me to thinking about the long-ago post where I was called a racist, so I used the search function (which, in all fairness, Forty/Rocks/Cody/etc. taught me how to use) and typed in “Spook racist” The first two posts were truly a trip down memory lane. We had some interesting discussions back then.
https://blogsforvictory.com/?s=Spook+racist
https://blogsforvictory.com/2013/04/11/ideology-thread-cont/
Once upon a time, you all were willing to engage in discussion with people you don’t agree with. Not any more.
I could explain the difference between then and now to you, but since I can’t understand it for you, it would be a waste of time.
There has always been the attitude of the blog trolls that they have some kind of special entitlement that should allow them to clutter the blog with lies, personal attacks, blatantly false propaganda and examples of mental illness–and that the decision of all the moderators to end this and simply clear away the detritus is somehow an admission of being bested in discourse. (The moderators know how I happened to become the figurehead of moderation, but there’s no reason to go into that again. Write it off to a hopefully temporary spasm of extremely bad judgment and violation of trust and let it go. Suffice it to say it seems to have permanently established me as The Boss Of Absolutely Everything, no matter who does actual moderation.) Years of experience have led to the realization that the true purpose of the posts in question is really just to manipulate the legitimate posters into focusing on the Entitled Ones and get sucked into endless bickering. It’s narcissism thinly and unconvincingly disguised as political commentary.
If someone comes into your house, uninvited, and then litters your floors with rotting meat, broken glass and various forms of garbage and smears the walls with feces and then uses your decision to scrub the walls and sweep the floors and identify you as someone whose presence has always led to a shift toward the stench of an old Dumpster, this is seen by a certain mentality as proof of a moral victory for the litterer.
Elon Musk commiserated with Jeff Bezos by saying “rockets are hard”. I think a similar comment could be directed to our sad, surly, rejected blog vandal wannabes peering forlornly at the people who get to participate in actual exchanges of real ideas: “reality is hard”.