Blogs For Victory

Not at all good news from NRO:

On March 10, Lt. Gen. Ronald Burgess, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, testified that North Korea “may now have several plutonium-based nuclear warheads that it can deliver by ballistic missiles and aircraft as well as unconventional means.” It is uncertain whether Lt. General Burgess’s statement is based on new intelligence reporting or a higher level of confidence that DIA has in the new analytic assessment.

His remarks were disturbing because most experts to date have held that North Korea has not yet mastered the requirements to miniaturize any nuclear warhead sufficiently to put it on a missile…

A regime which likes to use blackmail may have nuclear warheads capable of being launched on ballistic missiles. Do keep in mind that “close” counts in three types of activities – horse shoes, hand grenades and nuclear war. Its not like a NK missile has to have pinpoint accuracy…if they can get it in the general direction of Japan or Hawaii, they have the capability to cause massive damage. And they’ve got the lunatic reputation necessary to convince everyone they would be willing to do it.

What to do is the tricky part – but like all such totalitarian regimes, there are those big celebrations they put on with massed slaves marching in step. Perhaps at the next such event we can figure out a way to kill the entire leadership with pin point strike? Yes, I know it would be difficult and risky – but leaving nuclear weapons in the hands of the North Korean regime as currently constituted doesn’t commend itself to me.

Once again, the bad news: Obama is President. Whatever course of action we choose, it will probably wind up being the very worst we can get…some combination of alternate kowtowing and chest thumping…the sort of thing to convince the NK’s we’re cowards while also angering them enough to try something stupid…

HAT TIP: The American Catholic

Seems that the fight against wasteful government continues – from Reuters:

Voters in Miami-Dade, one of the most populous U.S. counties, removed Mayor Carlos Alvarez from office in a special vote on Tuesday triggered by popular anger over a hike in property taxes.

With 707 of 829 precincts reporting, official results showed 88 percent of voters backed the effort to oust the once-popular mayor, who is his second four-year term…

Do keep in mind that Alvarez is a Republican – and this means yet another RINO has bit the political dust. The lesson should now be learned by all RINOs – the people aren’t about to tolerate Republicans who are nothing more than tax collectors for Big Government. It isn’t enough to have an “R” after your name: you actually have to carry out the Republican polices of low taxes, tight budgets and accountability to the people.

This is not even close to the end – we’re going to keep up with this through 2012 and beyond.

That is the rising call among the Luddites of the left. Never failing to take advantage of catastrophe, some are urging that we start shutting down nuclear reactors in the United States – especially those of a similar design to the reactors failing in Japan.

First off, it should be kept in mind that the reactors in most trouble are those of a much older design – some of them are decades old. Technology has advanced a bit over the past 30 or 40 years and so the reactors we want to build today will be far more robust and able to take disaster much easier. There is no perfect technology in the world. Everything human beings do will be flawed and bear with it the chance of complete failure. To make our plans based upon suppositions of the very worst case scenario is asinine.

Secondly, figure the odds. Japan was hit by a 9.0 earthquake triggering a gigantic tsunami within minutes – there was no chance to prepare or take emergency steps to lessen the chance of a major failure at the nuclear plants. Now, there is the chance of the very same thing happening in California – which, as I understand it, has two operating nuclear power plants. So, there is cause for concern and those plants should be reviewed with this catastrophe in mind and whatever needs to be done to prepare for it should be implemented. But to shut down all the power plants when hardly any of them are at risk of any sort of Japanese-style disaster is stupid.

Rational policy dictates that we learn from the past, not run in fear from it. Now we know yet another thing which can happen and we should prepare for it. All nuclear power plant designs should be reviewed for earthquake preparedness, sudden loss of power and floods. Any deficiency in such areas should be remedied – and if we determine that any existing power plants simply cannot be made to meet the known threats then they should be scheduled for shut down as soon as replacement capacity is ready, not before.

Life is risky. In fact, you can eat right and exercise all you want – you’re still going to die. Sooner or later everyone you know, including yourself, will be dead. We don’t want to take wanton risks with human life, but there is no way to live without risking your life. Wake up in the morning and your risk starts right away.

If anything, given what is happening elsewhere in the world, this is a time to go on crash course of nuclear plant construction. America needs vast amounts of readily available and inexpensive energy from proven technology if we are to rebuild our manufacturing, mining and agricultural sectors. Unless we want to build a lot of coal or other fossil fuel plants, the only way we can get this amount of energy is from nuclear power. With modern technology bulked up by the lessons learned in the Japanese earthquake, we can build these plants swiftly and durably.

Unfortunately, the leadership we have today is a set of frightened rabbits – and rabbits who want to please the left wing base in advance of the 2012 elections. While noises have come out of the Obama Administration that we’ll still advance on the nuclear power front, you can bet your bottom dollar that no such thing will happen. Leftist pressure to go slow or stop it altogether will be immense, and Obama isn’t the man to stand up against pressure. And, so, we’ll continue to wallow and attempt to advance in a quixotic attempt at “green energy”, which is a great form of energy as long as you don’t need to turn your lights on every day. As in all things, America’s only real hope is to get rid of Obama in 2012 and hope for new leadership with bit of courage and sense.

From the comments on this article (which is, itself, a must read):

Every trillion squandered on global warming, is a trillion not spent on earthquake preparedness.

Resources are limited and everything human beings do involves a trade off. It is much more likely (in fact, inevitable) that California or Missouri will suffer a catastrophic earthquake than that the ocean levels will rise in a manner causing an equal disaster. Which do you want to prepare for: polar ice caps melting, or a 9.0 quake in California? We can’t do everything. Choose.

From the New York Times:

…So far, oil-rich Saudi Arabia has successfully stifled public protests with a combination of billions of dollars in new jobs programs and an overwhelming police presence, backed by warnings last week from the foreign minister to “cut any finger that crosses into the kingdom.”

Monday’s action, in which more than 2,000 Saudi-led troops from gulf states crossed the narrow causeway into Bahrain, demonstrated that the Saudis were willing to back their threats with firepower.

The move created another quandary for the Obama administration, which obliquely criticized the Saudi action without explicitly condemning the kingdom, its most important Arab ally. The criticism was another sign of strains in the historically close relationship with Riyadh, as the United States pushes the country to make greater reforms to avert unrest…

I don’t think we’re going to get anywhere with urging Saudi reforms – the fact that they are furious with us for not backing Mubarak plus the fact that they are sending their goons in to suppress dissent in neighboring Bahrain is a clear indicator of Saudi intentions: no change; not now, not ever. The Ruling Class of Saudi Arabia is holding firm in defense of its largely un-earned privileges (they get their wealth, after all, because westerners drill for their oil and then they pamper themselves by importing other foreigners to do the hard labor in Arabia). If there was ever a good moment for a shift in US policy, this is it – we don’t want to be seen as tied to the Saudi regime any longer.

I realize that breaking with the Saudi’s is a gigantic shift with unknown consequences, but the brute fact is that we should never have made common cause with them. The Saudi government is really no more than a gang which gained control of a State which turned out to float on oil. They represent no one but themselves – if a different gang gets in it might prove difficult for us, but the new gang also might be easier to work with. And good or bad, having no ties to the past or commitments to the future in Arabia will at least allow us to develope policy entirely in line with what is best for us. In the end, whoever runs that corner of the world will want to sell oil and as we control the seas, we control the major part of that traffic at will (we always think of the Saudis having us over a barrel – no pun intended – but the fact of the matter is that they are at our mercy, should we merely choose to exercise our absolute command of the seas in that area).

The rule must be: no more tyrants. We are Americans; we hold to the self-evident truth that governments derive their powers from the consent of the governed. No nation governed otherwise should in any way, shape or form think of the United States as its friend. American policy should be supremely one of justice – and it can’t be as long as we’re tied to something as corrupt, cruel and incompetent as the Saudi regime.

From The Telegraph:

The arrival at the newly-established Patrol Base Shamal Storrai (Pashto for “North Star”) in late August 2009 of Serjeant Tom Potter and Rifleman Mark Osmond marked the start of an astonishing episode in the history of British Army sniping.

Within 40 days, the two marksmen from 4 Rifles, part of the Welsh Guards Battle group, had achieved 75 confirmed kills with 31 attributed to Potter and 44 to Osmond. Each kill was chalked up as a little stick man on the beam above the firing position in their camouflaged sangar beside the base gate – a stick man with no head denoting a target eliminated with a shot to the skull…

Why is this important? Here’s why:

…On one occasion they killed eight Taliban in two hours, ‘I wasn’t comfortable with it at first,’ said Osmond, ‘you start wondering is it really necessary?’ But the reaction of the locals soon persuaded him. ‘We had people coming up to us afterwards, not scared to talk to us. They felt they were being protected’…

It is rough business, make no mistake about it – and while these two Brits do seem a prodigy, I’ll bet that plenty of American sniper teams can tell similar tales. I don’t envy these men their job – it is a terrible thing to take another man’s life and while the troops will do it and, likely, tell us that they don’t worry about it the fact of the matter is that decent men always agonize over such things. But the enemy they kill, especially the leaders, are not like the men who kill them.

It was once said, I believe, that if you really can’t argue someone out of doing evil, then you must put a sword through him as far as it will go. Think about that – I’m not talking about trying to argue someone out of having more more drink than necessary: but trying to convince someone that, say, setting off a bomb in a civilian setting is wrong. If you can’t convince a man of the hideousness of his desire, then you’d better do something before innocent people get killed. That is what these snipers are doing – the Taliban are bent on killing the innocent and it seems that nothing short of the sword – in this case, a well-aimed sniper bullet – will do the trick.

And the payoff is in what happens – the innocent people come forward with a sense of relief. That is, in my view, the ultimate truth of radical Islam…whether or not most Moslems feel this or that way about it all, I am convinced that most Moslems just want to be left alone to live their lives as they see fit. Sure, we can expect that these people will not want to have the rank immorality of the West imported to their lands (and who can blame them for that?), but at the end of the day the Moslem father wants his sons and daughters to live; to grow, to have families of their own. Not have the lives cast away in suicide missions, or be executed because the strayed over some Taliban line in the sand. By killing the perpetrators of the evil, the snipers are giving the innocent the chance to express their real desires.

And this is why I’m still certain that we must see Afghanistan through to victory. There must be, by the time we leave, some reasonable approximation of democracy in Afghanistan and a general sense that the Afghans, themselves, can mind their own affairs without being used as tools by ambitious men. This is not to say that a post-war Afghanistan will become a vacation destination for Americans – in fact, I can’t imagine any possible Afghan government which I would be ok living under, even as a tourist…but that is their business. And as long as they aren’t harboring people who wish to kill my fellow Americans and as long as the average Afghan is just living his life, then that is all the victory we need…and more than enough to put paid to the Islamist lie that only Islamo-fascism can bring happiness to the Moslem people.

A sniper’s bullet is not a lovely thing – but the effect of brave men fighting for justice, is. And we owe it to these men – American and allied, and including those Afghans who do fight along side us – to see this trough to victory.

Just wow:

An early decline in Japanese shares picked up speed Tuesday afternoon, with the main index skidding 14.4% as the country’s prime minister warned of a high risk of elevated levels of radiation from a reactor at the Fukushima nuclear-power plant after another explosion earlier in the day…

Meanwhile, Mish notes that all major world stock exchanges are an ocean of red at the moment – and the US futures for Tuesday are looking pretty grim. We can expect a bit of bounce back from this, but clearly things are turning to the worse…and at a time when a fragile US and global economy just can’t take the strain.

The Bank of Japan is firing up the printing presses to try and staunch the flow and, naturally, central banks around the world will follow suit. We’ll see how long this holds – it may weather this crisis, but until genuine wealth creation resumes, doom stalks the economic landscape. And the really bad news is that only a very few governments around the world are working on that wealth creation thing – most are just borrowing and printing and crossing their fingers.

UPDATE: Really, really bad news about those nuclear reactors. I hope to God that all this turns out to be a mistake…that early reports are just over-reactions. But it looks pretty darn bad…

Graciously hear us, O Lord, when we call upon You,

and grant unto our supplications a calm atmosphere,

that we, who are justly afflicted for our sins,

may, by Your protecting mercy, experience pardon.

Through Christ our Lord.

Amen.

From White House Dossier:

President Obama’s conference on bullying Thursday was deeply ironic to some in the White House press corps. That’s because every reporter who regularly covers the place knows that President Obama’s staff has a policy – an actual, pre-conceived policy – of bullying.

It’s a tactic that amount to no less than suppression of speech. By the “openness” administration.

The White House bullies reporters to try to ensure favorable coverage. When White House officials, particularly members of the press office, see a story they don’t like, they often call and verbally abuse the reporter who wrote the piece.

In diatribes often peppered with obscenities, they complain of profound injustice, bias, lack of relevance – anything they can think of to get reporters to back off their story…

Surprised? Of course you aren’t. This is just par for the course – not just from Obama and Co, but from all of the liberal leaders. Liberals don’t like dissent. It infuriates them – and it doubly angers them when the dissent is scoring points.

On the other hand, the MSM pretty much just lays down for this. For the most part, they know their job – slavish devotion to liberalism in general and Obama in particular. The MSM’s task is to spin reality in a manner which makes the continuation of Obama in office seem palatable. But every now and again a story comes up which is both unflattering to Obama and so clearly vital to know that the MSM has to cover it…and that, it seems, is when Obama’s troops go ballistic. And one has to wonder – if you are a White House reporter your whole existence is based upon access to White House personnel…if they are screaming bloody murder at you, you don’t have access. So, the next time a negative story about Obama comes up, what do you do? Risk your career to tell the truth, or suppress the truth so that you can at least report about the White House?

Gangster government is what we get when we fill our Executive branch with people from Chicago…where the ethos of Al Capone still dominates in what amounts to a corrupt, one-party State. This will not change and, indeed, will probably get worse as time goes on. The only cure for it is to ensure that Obama is sitting down and listening the next time someone takes the oath of office.

From the NY Daily News:

Seventeen U.S. Navy crew members have been contaminated with low-levels of radiation during disaster relief missions in Japan, military officials said Monday.

The radioactivity was detected when the service members returned to the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan aboard three helicopters. They were treated with soap and water and their clothes were discarded.

“No further contamination was detected,” the military said…

The good news is that the contamination was slight; the bad news is that it could have been much, much worse. The aircraft carriers of the United States Navy are the most valuable military asset of the United States. While they are made to be put in harms way, they should only be placed in that position for reasons of vital national security. To have them loitering around an area where nuclear meltdown is possible and, additionally, there is a very real risk of of yet another massive quake and subsequent tsunami is not worth the risk. Even the temporary disabling of an American carrier battle group is a high risk, while the loss of such would be devastating.

This is not to say that the United States should not provide aid – it is our moral duty to help where we can. But we can, perhaps, recondition retired aircraft carriers to serve as floating hospital/rescue platforms. In mothballs, right at the moment, are the carriers John F. Kennedy, Forrestal, Ranger, Independence, Kitty Hawk and Constellation. All of these ships, relatively modern, can probably be made usable with a minimal expenditure of resources and can be crewed by retired or reserve naval personnel. These should be the ships – never to be hazarded in battle and, indeed, kept almost completely disarmed – which should step in when a platform is needed for rescue work. Probably be more effective, anyways – rather than storing large amounts of weapons and fixed-wing aircraft, such re-conditioned ships could have large hospitals and carry many more of the helicopters more usable in rescue work.

The United States armed forces are designed to break things and kill people – their job is war and any time spent away from war training is that much less readiness for war. And less readiness means more risk of war, as well as losses in war. It is time for the military to be made just that – and humanitarian actions taken over by organizations specifically trained for the task.