Blogs For Victory

From AlterNet:

In the immortal words of Megatron in Transformers: The Movie, Herman Cain’s speech at CPAC really is bad comedy. As you know, I find black garbage pail kids black conservatives fascinating not because of what they believe, but rather because of how they entertain and perform for their White Conservative masters…

…Herman Cain’s shtick is a version of race minstrelsy where he performs “authentic negritude” as wish fulfillment for White Conservative fantasies. Like the fountain at Lourdes, Cain in his designated role as black Conservative mascot, absolves the White racial reactionaries at CPAC of their sins. This is a refined performance that Black Conservatives have perfected over many decades and centuries of practice…

If you decide to subject yourself to the whole article, you’ll note that not even once does the author attack Cain on his positions – the entire attack is upon him. He is considered not really black because he’s a black man who is conservative…and thus he’s just a Tom, playing up to the Honkey in hopes of getting some crumbs from his master’s table…the fact that Cain is a fabulously wealthy businessman who doesn’t need to get anything from anyone isn’t even mentioned. In fact, nothing which is relevant or true about Cain is brought up, because to do so would entirely explode the leftist myths about race in America.

That myth has it that nothing but unrelieved evil has been perpetrated on black people; that while people (except those who are properly liberal, of course) are inherently racist; that our society deliberately holds down black people; that the only way a black man can get ahead is via government subsidy…or, in the case of a man like Cain, by being a toady to Whitey. If you actually present the real Herman Cain to America, then all that is shown to be false. And, so, the attempts to slander him, and all those he associates with.

They are deathly afraid, my friends. Our liberals are scared to death that in people like Herman Cain and Allen West and Tim Scott. They are afraid of the large number of black people who ran as Republicans in 2010. They are afraid that the liberal grip on the black vote is slipping – knowing as they do that if even 20% of black voters switch to the GOP, it will be a disaster for liberalism. They had thought that the election of Barack Obama had sealed their power for a generation – now they worry that his victory was a fluke, and liberalism is doomed. And so they attack in the most hateful and nasty ways.

Endure it. Listen to it so that you know where you stand and what you’re fighting against, but pay no real heed to it. The last shrieks of the defeated hold no terrors for the victors.

Yes, you read that right – from the KOB.com:

State election officials say they won’t be purging voter rolls this year.

(New Mexico) Secretary of State Dianna Duran says U.S. Department of Justice officials have informed her that doing so would violate federal law…

So, about 60,000 ineligible names will remain on the voter rolls – and thus allow for widespread voter fraud to continue. And that is what Justice really wants – the story in the link about someone forgetting to dot an “i” or cross a “t” in the bureaucracy is just a cover for the reality. Democrats like voter fraud; they win close elections because of it; they see it as their ace in the hole – they will never, ever stop doing it until we send a very large number of them to jail over it. And, unfortunately, we won’t be able to do that until we get a Republican back in the White House – and not just any Republican, but a Republican who will enforce all the laws, all the time, even if Democrats get offended over it.

A clean vote is a necessity in a democratic republic – and more and more, our Democrats are determined on a dirty vote. Having lost the battle of ideas, Democrats have decided that they’ll just keep power by cheating at every opportunity. We have to bring this to and end – the future of freedom in the United States depends upon it.

I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.

And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. – Barry Goldwater, July 16, 1964

While the groundwork was laid by others, it was these words by Barry Goldwater which launched modern American conservatism on its path – initially to crushing defeat, eventually to sublime victory. Goldwater was much criticized for those few words, with some holding that the use of the word “extremism” doomed his candidacy in 1964. If that is the case, then never was defeat more glorious. Goldwater stood forth and, in an America which had been fed on liberal, Democrat lies for three decades, told the truth.

We are faced, here in 2011 and going in to 2012, yet another of what Ronald Reagan called, “a time for choosing”. We will decide, over the next 21 months, just what sort of America we’ll have. We will either rise to the occasion and rescue our nation from the last gasp of liberalism, or we’ll fail and our nation will suffer calamity. As we go through the battles of the next two years one thing we will need is unity. All of those who are in favor of liberty – religious, personal and economic – must unite against the common foe. Only thus can we be sure of victory – and a victory resounding enough for us to obtain the power necessary to undo what amounts to a century of folly. In pursuit of this unity, some are calling for a muting of what we fight for – a truce, as Governor Mitch Daniels of Indiana termed it. A burying of the social conservative/libertarian hatchet in favor of victory in 2012. Daniels explains it:

…Here I wish to be very plainspoken: It is up to us to show, specifically, the best way back to greatness, and to argue for it with all the passion of our patriotism. But, should the best way be blocked, while the enemy draws nearer, then someone will need to find the second best way. Or the third, because the nation’s survival requires it.

Purity in martyrdom is for suicide bombers. King Pyrrhus is remembered, but his nation disappeared. Winston Churchill set aside his lifetime loathing of Communism in order to fight World War II. Challenged as a hypocrite, he said that when the safety of Britain was at stake, his “conscience became a good girl.” We are at such a moment. I for one have no interest in standing in the wreckage of our Republic saying “I told you so” or “You should’ve done it my way.”…

Indeed, Churchill did do that – and one should note that back in 1911, the British Empire spanned the globe. One fourth of the world’s people were under the British crown. Now Britain is a decidedly second-rank power – really dwindling to no more than the island off the coast of Europe it was in days long gone by. While Winston Churchill’s claims to our affections will never die – he did stand up against monstrous evil when others were willing to compromise with it – in the end he did compromise with evil. Sure enough, to fight an immediately more threatening evil…but when you shake hands with barbarians, you will lose. At the end of his life, Churchill noted that he had accomplished much to, in the end, accomplish nothing at all. What he fought for – a strong Britain as a pillar of the liberty and peace of the world – was done for.

There is no first, second and third best way to do things. There is a right way to do things, and a wrong way. We must always try to determine the right way to go, and then go that way. Nothing must ever deter us from doing what is right – certainly, we must not surrender part of what is right to defend another part more immediately threatened. Governor Daniels is absolutely correct that, at the moment, economic and fiscal matters predominate. We must get our financial house in order and we must restore our economy – but we must never lose sight of why we need to fix our financial and economic systems: because of the need to provide a financial basis for decent, hardworking men and women to create, grow and defend their families in the world. The family is the foundation of all – right now, it is besieged by a host of enemies, and the frail economy and threatened national bankruptcy risk the whole institution.

It will, though, behoove us nothing to have restored the economy if, in the meanwhile, the enemies of the family are able to advance the other parts of their destructive agenda. If, say, we’re concentrating on lower taxes while they are concentrating on advancing gay marriage. If we’re busying eliminating the Department of Energy and they are expanding pornography and violence in the popular culture. If we enact a balanced budget amendment while they indoctrinate yet another generation of kids via the public school system. We have to do what is right – not just in one area, but in all areas. Temporary expediency has its place in politics and compromise is always a requirement in democratic republic…but never, ever surrender the battle. Never declare a truce, because the other side will never abide by it.

Pleas don’t think I’m picking on Governor Daniels here. He’s just the most articulate and reasonable advocate for the so-called truce over social issues. He’s clearly a man who has thought about things and isn’t acting from any animus towards social conservatism. He’s just, in my view, got it wrong. We must fight the whole war – lest in winning one battle, we lose the whole thing.

Well, that’s an interesting poll result – from Roll Call:

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio led a field of potential Republican Senate candidates in Arizona with 21 percent in a poll of likely GOP primary voters last week.

Rep. Jeff Flake, who announced his candidacy for the seat of retiring Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) on Monday, finished second with 16.8 percent in the Summit Consulting Group survey. Former Rep. J.D. Hayworth took third, with 16.6 percent. He was unsuccessful in his primary challenge to Sen. John McCain last year…

“Undecided”, however, leads the field with 27.5%, so the Sheriff should hold off on the victory celebrations, if he is really planning on getting in to the race. In the end, I doubt that Arpaio is really good Senate material – just too blunt a man for that body…though it would be fun to watch.

It is a confused field right now for the GOP (even freshman Congresscritter Ben Quayle scores 6% in this poll) – the party is strong in Arizona (much stronger now after a good 2010) and everyone wants to get in to the act. It will take a while for things to settle out – meanwhile, the Arizona Democrat party is so moribund that the best they can come up with is Rep. Giffords – who, in spite of her remarkable recovery, may never be up to resuming her current office, let alone seeking a higher one.

Zero Hedge neatly encapsulates what it means:

The consensus expectation for Chinese CPI was 5.4%. Zero Hedge’s expectation based on just announced manipulated CPI data was 4.9%. Guess who was correct… In the meantime, Chinese food prices are not increasing by 5% every ten days, or over 400% annualized. Or at least, they are not doing so on rice (most likely fake) paper.

Earlier, Zero Hedge noted that China announced a change in the way China’s CPI is calculated – greatly reducing the input of food prices in to Chinese inflation. This done because of the fact that China’s food prices are increasing at an astronomical rate. China’s economy is massively overheated – made that way by a round of money printing and easy credit which would make even Ben Bernanke blush (not that he’d actually refuse to do it – he’d just blush while he did). Whatever you do, don’t believe whatever numbers you see out of China – they are walking on the knife’s edge of economic collapse and are determined to hide it…and hope that some how, some way, the global economy really does recover before the piper had to be paid.

The bad news for us is that there is no indication that Uncle Ben will refuse to send us in to this kind of inflation. There is nothing be said or done, that is, which tells us that the latest round of “quantitative easing” (ie, money printing) is the last…that when this bag of fake money runs out, Bernanke won’t just print up another one. And, so, dear Americans, we are at risk of this kind of inflation – not that it definitely will happen (in the United States, there are still plenty of downward pressures on prices), but that it is a real risk.

Maybe we really should all invest in canned goods and shotguns?

Andrew Stiles over at NRO’s The Corner gives us the main points:

…$46 trillion — total spending over the next decade.

$8.7 trillion — total new spending over the same period…

The bottom line about Obama’s “cuts” is that for each of the next ten years, the federal government will spend more than the previous year. Pardon me for pointing out the obvious – if you cut spending, it means you spend less than you did before. Obama’s budget doesn’t even cut so much as a dollar – and yet he gets up there and flat out lies to us that there will be steep cuts. This is what we get when we dare to elect politicians like Obama: he has nothing but contempt for us and presumes that we won’t notice he’s full of bull feces.

Well, maybe once upon a time Obama would have been right about that – but not any more. I think we’re wide awake now, and people are swiftly seeing through this scam of a budget proposal (even some Obama cheerleaders are noticing the stench of dishonesty). The times have changed – and we, the people, have changed. If Obama viewed this budget as the platform for his 2012 re-election effort it will prove, instead, the final nail in his political coffin.

We must slice and dice this budget – hold it up for the ridicule it deserves and explain endlessly how we’ll never get out of this mess while someone like Obama is running the show. The man can’t be trusted – he has proven himself, at last and forever, a dishonest, cretinous politician on the make with this budget. He had his chance – he could have come out with a budget which actually offered some cuts, even if they were symbolic in nature. All Obama offered us was money being moved around and then some hocus-pocus about “cuts” which are non-existent.

And now it is our turn – our turn to tell the truth, offer real cuts and win the confidence of the American people.

UPDATE: Also from NRO’s The Corner, Rep. Ryan’s reaction to Obama’s budget: “debt on arrival”.

It isn’t just “Valentine’s Day” – a day to shell out a bit for a greeting card and flowers. There really was a St. Valentine and he is the patron saint of Love, Young People and Happy Marriages.

Your tax dollars at work, or how to make $190.00 an hour as a consultant for government.

Everything manufacturing is moving to Asia. Because we’re letting it happen. And we don’t have to.

Religion of Peace Update: Christian convert in Afghanistan faces death penalty. Unless and until Islam allows freedom of religion, they’ll never be civilized.

Sherrod is suing Breitbart – We’ll see how this plays out. Keep the word “Pigford” in mind – you’ll start to hear more about it, soon.

Organizers for an MLK event boxed up a statue of George Washington so that it couldn’t be seen by participants. Not a smart move – and some wonder why regular folks are getting so angry…maybe its because of serial insults like this?

Nevada conservative activist Chuck Muth has joined GOProud’s advisory council. Muth is a long time conservative activist (full disclosure, I’ve done some writing for his Nevada News and Views website) and an excellent choice. I see this as an wonderful opportunity to bridge gaps between libertarian conservatives like GOProud and social conservatives such as myself.

King Putz and the Riddle of the Sphinxter.

From our “Death of Civilization” file – via Jammie Wearing Fool:

Sex is fine. They’re just not down with the bunga bunga.

More than 100,000 Italian women and their supporters turned out across the country to protest against Premier Silvio Berlusconi, saying his dalliances with young women humiliate the sex as a whole and degrade female dignity…

If you click on the link, you’ll see a picture of Italian women holding up signs saying, “We Like Sex, not Bunga Bunga”. What is “bunga bunga”? Not entirely sure, but it isn’t having tea with the queen. This article in The Telegraph goes a bit in to it, but its still unclear if its actual sex, or just being a geezer politician paying young floozies to hang around with him. Demonstrating the universality of civilization’s death, the demonstrations are in Italy, but the signs are in English.

Berlusconi is claiming that the demonstrations are politically motivated. No, kidding. Wonder if he figured that out all by himself or did he need a team of consultants to work it out? This scandal demonstrates a truth that conservatives in America should pay heed to – you can’t be conservative unless you are actually trying to live a moral life. Its not that people can’t fall short – we all do; but there must be a conscious effort, every day, by those who propose to lead a conservative movement to live a decent life. Berlusconi may fall from power over this – an old, successful and powerful man to be brought down because of a nauseating desire on his part to use women as tools for personal pleasure. This will not only wreck him, but also probably lay his party in ruins, thus paving the way for a leftist party or coalition of some sort to gain control of Italy. All that Berlusconi wanted to do undone because he lacked the wit to understand that morality comes before everything else.

Here in the United States we have a lot of people saying we conservatives should lighten up about sexual matters. Not be too concerned about marriage. Be ok with abortion and birth control. Don’t dare try to purge the pornography and violence from our popular culture. Get “with it”, as it were. Well, if we do that, we’ll be destroyed – we’ll eventually be led by a herd of Berlusconis who will destroy everything we’re working for. We’ve already found enough trouble in this area – we don’t need to invite even more of it in to our house.

So, no to bunga bunga – let’s have a conservative movement of strong moral courage; a movement to be proud of and a movement which will lead to victory.

From Midas Letter:

Moody’s cut the ratings of Irish banks to junk status on Friday following Dublin’s decision to defer previously agreed capital increases until after this month’s general election.

The downgrade means the unguaranteed unsecured senior bonds at Ireland’s six banks are now rated as non-investment grade, or junk…

What is happening here is that the Irish people are not having any of this – they are not, that is, about to have themselves taxed in to poverty in order to bail out banksters who made idiotic investments. Sure, the people of Ireland are partially responsible for their plight – they bought the notion of easy money and get-rich-quick. But that notion was sold to them by the banks who are now bankrupt and demanding taxpayer funds.

What effect this will have first on the Eurozone and then on the rest of the world remains to be seen. The problem is that the EU is keeping itself afloat on the perception that the financial crisis has been managed and no one will default…not Greece, not Ireland, not Portugal, not Spain, not anyone. But this perception is based upon the assumption that, in the end, the people of Europe will continue to play the part of sucker. I think that in Ireland, at least, they have decided not to be fooled any longer. Reports indicate that the center-right opposition party, Fine Gael, is pledged to ditch the bailout and is rising high in the polls, with the election scheduled for February 25th (as a side note, the party’s finance spokesman is a man named Michael Noonan – showing that we Noonans are (a) all alike and (b) continuing our centuries long plan for taking over the whole world).

As Mish points out, the best outcome here is for Ireland to go ahead with their “go to heck” to the European Union and then have a real negotiation in which everyone, not just Ireland’s taxpayers, pays the price for the economic folly. It is either that, or Ireland just flat out defaults and the bond holders lose everything – if this election goes as hoped in Ireland, then we might finally see a people taking a distinct advantage over the bankers…for once, the bankers will have to dance to someone else’s tune, and that would be a good thing.

A shot across the bow of Libertarianism, as such:

The National Board of Young Americans for Freedom (YAF)—America’s oldest conservative-libertarian activist group—has, per curium, voted to purge Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) from YAF’s National Advisory Board.

YAF’s concern with Rep. Paul stems from his delusional and disturbing alliance with the fringe Anti-War movement.

“It is a sad day in American history when a one-time conservative-libertarian stalwart has fallen more out of touch with America’s needs for national security than the current feeble and appeasing administration,” said YAF’s Senior National Director Jordan Marks…

As I’ve noted before, Ron Paul’s foreign policy views are just flat wrong – we can’t live in a world without a muscular application of US power at need. The defense of the United States does not just involve the defense of our physical territory but also requires a defense of those forces which are aligned with us. The United States must strike a balance between the need to defend these interests and not getting dragged in to every conflict around the globe – Ron Paul essentially proposes that we stay out of everything. This is done on the absurd theory that the reason we are hated is for what we do, rather than what we are.

To be sure, US actions can cause enmity – or create friends – depending on the nature of the action. But the primary reason we are hated is akin to the reasons for Judaism and Christianity being hated: when you stand for self-evident truth and refuse to be swayed from it, those who live off of lies determine to destroy you. It doesn’t matter what we do, we will be attacked by evil people because evil cannot co-exist in a world with good…it must strike it down, lest good overcome it.

Lately I have had some kind things to say about Ron Paul and I still assert – and will go on asserting – that in his current position as inquisitor of the Federal Reserve, the man and the hour have met. I believe this action by YAF is probably a bit more than was necessary, but I understand why it was taken. It is to be hoped that Ron Paul and the YAF will find a way to reconcile because all of us who are opposed to the left must unite. That said, it must be made clear that the main line of conservative foreign and military policy is a robust defense of US interests around the world.

The peril of viewing the United States as a baleful force in the world is twofold – first off, it allows a person to easily fall for utter nonsense discreditable to conservatism in general. While Ron Paul has not, himself, advocated the idiocies of the “9/11 truthers”, he has failed utterly to condemn them with sufficient force. Secondly, when you take it to heart that the US – rather than America’s enemies – is responsible for the ills of the world, you go in to tacit alliance with the worst of the left. The part of the left which acts the part of traitor in the debates over foreign and defense policy.

Long ago, conservatism purged itself of the poison of the John Birch Society. This was the 1960’s version of the “9/11 truthers” – screwballs who refused to see reality and lived, instead, in a fantasy world of conspiracy theories. Ron Paul is very much old enough to remember this – and his refusal to act in accordance with wisdom has now resulted in this action by the YAF. It is to be hoped that the lesson will be taken to heart – by Ron Paul and all conservatives of a libertarian bent.