Are you Tariffied?

I brought this up on X yesterday but I want to do to a bit more on explaining my tariff views – and, indeed, my overall economic views. So, here goes:

You’ve seen this picture of some variation of it, probably many times: the driving of the last spike in the Transcontinental Railroad. This was a major development in the growth of the United States – tying together the East and West and ensuring rapid settlement of the Great Plains. But what most people don’t know is that the rails used to build that railroad and the tires (wheels) on the trains in this picture were probably made in Germany, by Krupp. Here’s the logo of that company:

De drie ringen – the three rings. After the World Wars a lot of foreigners thought the three rings stood for Krupp cannon as Krupp was the premier gun maker for both the German Empire and Nazi Germany…but the truth is much more prosaic. Alfred Krupp was the first major German steel manufacturer and his firm struggled mightily early on. He did, indeed, realize his steel would be excellent for cannons and rifles but the military establishment of Prussia (his homeland) and the rest of Europe was skeptical of the newfangled thing, preferring to retain their cast-iron muskets and bronze cannon as tried and true (it was only after the astonishing performance of Krupp cannon in the 1870 Franco-Prussian war that everyone was sold on steel guns). What allowed Krupp to take off was two things: the exceptional quality of their steel and their invention of a new method of making steel railroad tires which produced a product superior to everyone else. The Krupp firm made so much money off the tires that Alfred Krupp decided to make three railroad tires his company logo – de drie ringen. Krupp’s rails and tires were so good that we Americans bought them in huge quantities. Krupp-steel was used to crisscross our continent with railroads.

But during all this time, we lived under a Protectionist trade policy. Sure, everyone loved the quality of Krupp products but they were expensive, as such, and then you had to pay the tariff to import them to the USA. Modern Free Trade nimrods would say we should have lowered the barriers to allow more Krupp steel in…but what happened was that the high tariffs induced American manufacturers to get into the game…by the 1890’s American-made railroad tires and tracks were only slightly less good than Krupp’s and being made at home and not subject to tariffs, were a lot cheaper. Boom: American railroads started buying American products. Here’s the key thing to remember: had we not had Protection, the American industries created to make railroad tracks and tires would have not come into existence. German labor costs were lower than American. The German product was better than we could produce out the gate. No tariffs would mean the German product would not only be better than we could ever make, but cheaper.

Now, think about this: had we not developed domestic railroad suppliers, what would have happened to us during the two World Wars when German imports were no longer available? We would have been in one heck of a bad situation…at a time when American rolling stock would be massively used, we would lack the domestic means to maintain and expand our rail system. Absolute catastrophe. Thanks to tariffs, we didn’t need German products. The loss of Germany as a trade partner meant absolutely nothing to us.

The economy, my friends, is not something to make your stock portfolio grow. It is what we do for a living – how we get our daily bread. Just think of all the things you use every week – by and large, everything you use should be made domestically if at all possible. We’re not talking luxury goods like an excellent French wine or some delicate silk fabric from the storied East…we’re talking about the bread and butter in your pantry, the pipes that bring water to your home and carry away waste, the gasoline in your car, the power lines that carry electricity to your house, the shoes on your feet, the shirt on your back. These are the things we need to do for ourselves…because in a crisis, nobody is going to do it for us. Point blank: the more dependent we are upon foreign suppliers for our basic necessities the more advantage foreign enemies have over us. And here’s another thing to consider – the US dollar is the global currency and nobody is going to want to dispense with it mostly because nobody trusts any other nation to hold assets…this has worked out well for us because we can print as many dollars as we like and buy cheap foreign goods with them…but in a real crisis, your wealth isn’t your money: it is what you can make, mine and grow.

Money was invented so that I don’t have to exchange a sack of potatoes for a bushel of wheat. It is a convenience – something standing in the place of me exchanging goods for goods because much easier to hand money to someone instead of the tedious transactions of a barter economy. But behind that money, you’d better have something someone wants. We used to back our money with gold, silver and copper…now we back it with “full faith and credit” which is meaningless support for a myth. If foreigners ever perceive that having US dollars isn’t the way to go – like, say, if we’re at war with China and not doing well – then they’re going to essentially demand goods for goods. Perhaps still denominated in dollars, but there better be something behind that slip of paper. And if we don’t make, mine and grow things? What then backs up our currency?

To have wealth, we must make – and to be safe, we must supply as much of our needs domestically as we can. This isn’t to say that trade isn’t beneficial. It is, in fact, one of the most beneficial of human actions. It is trading nations who always do best. If you ever wonder why Africa – where humans originated – never developed a high sub-Saharan civilization then look no further than Africa’s geography: outside the Nile, none of Africa’s major rivers are navigable year-round at distance. The African coast has hardly any natural harbors. Basically, deserts and oceans isolated sub-Saharan Africa from the main cross-currents of human development and so when Europeans first went into central and southern Africa starting in the 16th century, they found people who simply could not withstand superior European technology and organization. Had Africa been able to trade as readily as Europe, it probably would have developed similar to Europe. Lack of trade is a society-killer.

But Free Trade between nations is a myth – it has never happened and never can happen. If you brought together the two most honest nations and negotiated the most fair and square free trade deal, you still wouldn’t have free trade because each nation is working under a different tax and regulatory system. Each nation will also almost certainly have developmental differences which means they might be better at this, worse at that and so on back and forth between them. So even with the most honest approach, you still won’t have free trade – the internal differences between the trade partners will work out that one of them gains an advantage over the other. And here’s the spoiler: outside suckers like the USA (and Britain in the 19th century when they became the first nation to try Free Trade), nobody is honest. Everyone is lying, cheating and stealing to the largest extent possible. Bribes, subsidies, secret tariffs and bizarre regulatory mazes are designed to wring every last advantage for their side. Back in the 1980’s when we were all upset about Japanese car imports hardly anyone noticed that the reason the Japanese were able to dump their products in the USA was because their market was protected…not officially but through a maze of regulations and social constructs which essentially kept American automobiles out of Japan (in spite of Japanese loving every last bit of American pop culture and thus being primed to buy a Chevy). On and on it goes like that – Trump is right: they have been ripping us off.

But, as noted, even if they weren’t stealing, free trade is still a blind. Because even if a foreigner can make something for us better, faster and cheaper that isn’t the only consideration. Our people need to work. Our people need to have dignified jobs and lives. Our nation needs to be safe in a crisis. We need to be able to do things.

The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore was partially collapsed in March of 2024 – officials now say they hope to have a replacement bridge up by the end of 2028. More than four years later! And if you really think a bunch of Democrats in Baltimore will meet that time line then I’ve got a collapsed bridge to sell you. It took less time to build the entire Golden Gate which is a bigger bridge. We’re currently constructing the USS Enterprise (CVN-80) which is a replacement for USS Enterprise (CVN-65) and the newer ship is going to take twice as long to build as the older even though there is no significant difference in tonnage or layout. We see things everywhere taking longer and longer and costing more and more – and, sure, taxes and regulations are playing their huge role here but it is also that we simply don’t make as much stuff as we used to so we’re dependent upon unreliable foreign suppliers and we’re increasingly using cheap, illegal labor which is totally unskilled (some of the new home construction done by illegals is atrociously bad). Suppose we got into a big war and needed to build lots of things very fast – as we had to in World War Two? Right now, we simply can’t do it – we lack the physical plant and the domestic skills.

In order to maintain the irreducible minimum of required capacity, we’re going to have to Protect certain industries and trades from foreign competition, even if that competition is superior (usually it isn’t, though; just compare your garbage Chinese-made drill with that American-made one that you’ve had in your garage for 40 years). In food, we must not import any of soybeans, corn, wheat, beef, pork, poultry and dairy products. In industry we must make all our own steel and aluminum, all our own lumber, all our own trucks, trains, planes, all our own power lines and associated equipment…we must as far as possible drill, baby drill for oil and natural gas and build sufficient nuke plants to ensure a glut of electrical production capacity. And we must do this even if it ends up more expensive – but it won’t because here is the dirty, little secret the Free Traders don’t want to tell you…prices in the USA fell continuously from the end of the War of 1812 until the creation of the Fed in 1913. The reason we need to import cheap consumer goods is because the deliberate use of inflation to sustain the banking system has priced us out of our own economy. If we go to sound money (I’d prefer the Gold Standard, but lets go baby-steps here) and try to eliminate inflation (rather than keep to the Fed’s ruinous and insane policy of ensuring at least 2% annual inflation) then we will see prices drop year over year as increased capacity and productivity drive down prices at the consumer level. We can start getting actually rich again.

And as we produce again, we can really trade again – it isn’t trade if I send a billion dollars I printed up for Chinese goods. That is just robbery. Trade is when I send China a billion dollars worth of goods and I buy a billion dollars worth of Chinese goods. Trade reciprocity…actual trade. I get this, you get that. Not I get your substandard consumer good and you get my money which you use to buy bonds and political influence over my Ruling Class. The exchange of goods and services is trade…not slips of paper. And it would be honest trade – and if China won’t buy from us because they demand I allow myself to be ripped off, then they are simply barred from my market…which they can’t survive, so they’ll actually have to be honest about it. Sucks to be them. I don’t care.

And here’s something to consider – once you think about it, this all makes sense. Certainly makes more sense than blaming tariffs for the Great Depression when you’re completely ignoring the massive financial, social and material dislocations in the period 1914 forward by war, disease and revolutionary overthrow of long-established nations and relationships. Tariffs certainly didn’t cause the Depression – if they played a role in extending it then this was secondary to all the massive government spending which misallocated resources from economic need to political favor. We’ve been living in an economic dream world since FDR…and in a Free Trade nightmare since Bretton Woods in 1944. Our economy is hollowed out, our technical abilities are atrophied, our people have fallen into welfare dependency and drug addiction…while a certain class is happy to sit back and watch as long as their stocks go up 7% per year. Enough of this. Back to the real world. As Trump said, the operation has been a success…the patient is on the mend. It is going to hurt – but healing from terrible illness and injury always does…but we’re restoring ourselves to health.

Open Thread

More and more people are coming to the conclusion that liberal women don’t like men because they hang out with liberal men – Dem Rep Ellison accused of abuse. The MSM has been offering excuses as to why this story – apparently around for years – is only now coming out. Seems they are claiming that they couldn’t verify the details…if only Ellison had written an entry into a high school year book…

Don Surber points out that, so far, Trump is winning the trade war. The bottom line is that the American market is the most valuable in the world. And not just by a little bit…we are vastly richer than any other nation. By a long ways. To be sure, there are a few nations with higher per capita income than us, but we’re the only nation in the top 30 with a population over 150 million people. Its not just that we, as individuals, have a lot of money but that there are so many of us. No nation wants to be excluded from the American market. Sure, China and India have more people (do you realize we’re the third most populous nation in the world? I don’t think most Americans know that), but they are a lot poorer…so, even though there’s more of them, they simply can’t buy as much as we can. Our leverage in international trade is absolute – we can pretty much force everyone to do as we wish simply by threatening to cut them out of our market. Trump is doing that – and the world will knuckle under.

Democrats are now in favor of socialism. No, this isn’t a report from 1980.

Lesbian professor sexually harasses gay man…um, isn’t that doing lesbian wrong? Or am I missing something here?

Trump hung out with some bikers and one of the bikers had a tattoo which said, in effect, “I love guns and titties”. Liberals grabbed their smelling salts. I admit that the sentiment is crude, but I think that a broad swath of the American electorate is in tune with it.

As an aside, I think the next Civil War may be rather short.

Kurt Schlichter points out that Never Trump is actually Never You.

DeBlasio had his bully boys haul away a reporter who asked an impertinent question. But, yeah, Trump is the threat to the press.

Tariffs

They are bad! Evil! No good! Or, so we’re told – they are at tax on consumers to benefit corporations! They stifle competition! They caused the Great Depression! Yadda, yadda, yadda. I used to believe all that. Seriously. Bought it hook, line and sinker. But over the past 10-15 years, my views have modified.

Britain was the first nation to really go for free trade. They enacted it in the mid-19th century in service to the Liberal view that the freer the market, the better for everyone. There is, of course, much to be said for this: certainly the “Corn Laws” which the British Liberals got rid of were a horrible anachronism which kept food prices for the poor high just to provide a higher profit for rich landowners. But the dogmatic idea that free trade is always good is, in my view, flawed. And I think the experience of Britain proves it.

Right about the time that Britain went for free trade, it was the economic powerhouse of the world. No one could compete with British manufacturing. If you wanted something, you pretty much had to buy it from Britain. In comparison, the manufacturing capacity of the United States and Germany at the time was negligible…while nations like Russia, Japan and France didn’t even really count in the global marketplace. The introduction of free trade did seem to work. Food prices dropped like a rock as cheap, American grain flooded into the British market and Britain’s economic dominance continued for some time. Until, that is, right around the mid-1870s. At that point, the Germans and especially we Americans started to rapidly overtake Britain economically. This shifting of economic dominance was temporarily obscured by the fact that Britain remained until after World War One the financial center of the world – with vast investments, especially, in the United States, Britain’s financial dominance continued unchecked…but in things like coal and steel production, Britain was rapidly feeling the pinch of growing American and German competition. And it was competition from German and American manufacturers who were still protected by tariffs.

The United States kept high import tariffs in place from the Civil War until after World War Two. There were fluctuations, but they were vastly higher than anything we impose today. In some periods of time, ten times higher than they are today. During the time of high tariffs, the United States went from an economic backwater to the economic master of the world. Trouble is, tariffs went into bad repute in the United States because a high tariff enacted at the start of the Great Depression was blamed for deepening and lengthening that economic blight. And, truth be told, it might not have been helpful to impose that tariff at that time. But, really, I don’t think the tariff made the Depression any worse. What I honestly think people miss when discussing the Great Depression is that a combination of war and disease had knocked out of the global economy about 20-30 million young people who would have been both highly productive and who would have also greatly increased demand…no just in themselves, but in the children they would have had. That sort of hole in the economy was going to cause a major problem eventually. In 1929 it did – but years before then, Britain was already mired in Depression and Germany was only kept afloat by loans from the United States (loans made possible by the massive amount sold by the US to the Europeans during World War One).

In the end, I think it is a mixed bag, as is usual in human affairs. Dogma is for theology and not much else…and Free Trade is a dogma who’s time has come and gone, in my view. In general, you do want a free flow of goods, ideas and people. The nations who trade the most tend to do the best because of the cross-fertilization of ideas and methods which results from that trade. What our Progressive friends call “cultural appropriation” is, in reality, how people develope and expand. The more streams of ideas which flow into your nation, the better off you’re likely to be in the long run. That said, there is also the other side of it: the absolute requirement that a nation, as far as possible, remain master of it’s own destiny. It is simply asinine to think that the United States is better off if a majority of, say, our steel making capacity is outside the United States. At the end of the day, we can’t rely on anyone but ourselves…and so we must have the capacity to take care of ourselves in an emergency. And that means we have to retain sufficient productive capacity to do so – and if that means we have to ensure that some level of American production remains via Protection, then that is what we must do.

You see, the economy is not just a number…it isn’t just how much money is flowing through the land. This is especially true now that we use fake money rather than gold and silver backed currency. The economy is what we do to make a living – what we eat, wear, drive, live in. We are 317 million people and in the final analysis we must retain the ability to survive without importing a single thing if necessary. It won’t do us any good to have a bank account fat with fake money if, when a war comes, we can’t produce enough steel to build the ships and tanks we’ll need to fight and win.

We have to strike a balance between the good of having trade and the good of having the ability to take care of ourselves. There is no “right” answer here. What works may change from time to time and we have to remain flexible. To just Protect a dying business is stupid…but to Free Trade ourselves to the point where our business is dying is equally stupid. I think we need to adjust how we measure our economy – throw out the GDP measure. Let’s measure what we make, mine and grow at home. That will tell us how we’re doing. If in Year X we’re producing 10 million tons of Good A, but we find that in Year Y it has declined to 5 million tons, we should look into why. Is it happening because we’re using less of it? Or is it because we’re now importing 5 million tons of it? And then we have to ask ourselves: in any emergency, how much of this stuff do we need to produce? On the flip side, if we find we’re producing 10 million tons but consuming 20 million, we should look into whether or not our tax and regulatory policies are harming our production or whether its a matter of we’re doing all we can and just can’t meet demand via domestic production. That sort of thing will tell us what needs Protection and what needs Free Trade.

The main thing is to not lock ourselves into a Dogmatic view of these things. We need to look at this in the largest sense of what is overall best for us – not for the world; not for the bankers and the mega-corporations…but what is best for us; the people who have to make a living off the economy.

Brazilians Smarter Than Americans

From Bloomberg:

Brazil will provide $16 billion in tax breaks and toughen trade barriers to protect manufacturers hurt by a currency rally that’s fueling a surge in imports from China.

The targeted tax breaks and incentives, which amount to 25 billion reais over two years, were announced today by President Dilma Rousseff after a report showed industrial production plunged 1.6 percent in June, the second biggest drop since 2008.

The plan, called “A Bigger Brazil,” will eliminate a 20 percent payroll tax for industries such as shoemakers and software firms hurt by the real’s 48 percent rally since the end of 2008, which has reduced the cost of imports and strengthened decades-old complaints by business about excessive costs…

A bit protectionist, to be sure, but the basic thing is to reduce the cost of creating wealth within Brazil in order to ensure that the free labor of Brazil is not undercut by the slave labor of China.  This is just rational policy.  Free trade is all well and good – but only between people who are mutually free.  Free trade with a tyrannical nation is a contradiction…there will be trade, but it won’t be free:  it will come at a high cost to the free labor of the one and even of the slave labor of the other, as their chains are more securely fastened.

I’ve been saying it for years, and it is another thing I’ll keep saying until everyone agrees with me, because I’m right:  we must ditch “free trade” and turn to “freedom trade”.  The American worker can and will out-compete every other workforce in the world…but he can’t compete with a government which deliberately keeps wages low, allows sub-standard products to be shipped to the United States and connives as the theft of American intellectual property.  As long as China is playing with loaded economic dice, it is asinine for us to allow them to enter our market place.  Let them institute free and fair multi-party elections and then we can trade with them…until that time, keep them out.

Go ahead and try and argue me out of this position, but be warned that you would ultimately be defending a position where US wealth is transferred to a China which is building up a military force for the purpose of challenging us.  Good luck with that.