Have yourself a population which, despite your best efforts, still bitterly clings to old-fashioned morality? Well, here’s you answer – just get hold of the school system and start brainwashing the kids in to rejecting that old-fashioned morality. From Life Site News:
Equity policies purporting to combat “homophobia” amount to “ethical cleansing” that aim to eliminate opposing moral views, says the Catholic Civil Rights League of British Columbia.
In a July 6th letter, CCRL BC Director Sean Murphy criticized the BC Civil Liberties Association’s support for an equity policy that passed in the Burnaby school board in June. The policy aims to combat “heterosexism,” which it defines as the “assumption that all people are heterosexual and that heterosexuality is superior and more desirable for all people than any other sexual orientation.”…
Which works out, in practice, to a program of telling the kiddies that being gay is just as good (well, better, really) than being straight. As I’ve been saying for many years now, the so-called “gay rights” movement is not about securing tolerance for homosexuals but is instead an effort to legally enforce the notion that homosexuality is morally the same as heterosexuality. The activists (which are not by any means the same as all gay people – quite a few of whom want no part of the totalitarian nonsense of the gay left) don’t want to be free to live their own lives…they want to grab hold of society and shape it to fit their ideas of what is right and wrong. It is a legislation of morality they want – their own morality, as opposed to the morality held by the overwhelming majority.
In my view, the ultimate reason for this is that most gay people probably realize, deep down inside, that they are doing things they ought not to. Understanding that gay people can have a deep-seated attraction to members of the same sex, it still sits there quite starkly – sex is not just for personal pleasure; ultimately, its purpose is children, and sex which is not at least in theory for the creation of children is disordered sex (s0, yes, liberals; older couples past their time and infertile couples can still have sex…because it isn’t absolutely impossible that a child will result, as is the case when two men engage in sex). But with this realization there is still the very strong desire to do what they do…and whenever someone does something, it is nearly automatic that they will seek to rationalize their action…and also to seek approval of their peers. Its the difference between a gay person knowing his neighbor resignedly tolerates his behavior and his neighbor actively applauding it. Gay rights people want the applause.
And, so, “ethical cleansing” – a clearing out of the public square any hint that some where, some how, someone might have an objection to homosexual sex. Not good enough to be tolerated; not good enough that every sign of unjust discrimination is removed; it must be a societal approval of homosexuality as being the same as heterosexuality. We must instruct the children, regardless of their parent’s wishes, that if they choose to engage in homosexual sex, it is perfectly ok…great, laudable…something to be proud of. And anyone who disagrees is a homophobic bigot.
This species of liberal fascism must be stopped – we must not allow liberal ideologues, for whatever reason, to undermine the inculcation of parental morality. If a parent wishes to teach his child that homosexuality is the same as heterosexuality, that is fine…wrong, but within parental rights. But if a parent wishes to teach that homosexual sex is inherently disordered and can never be approved, that is also within parental rights…and we can’t have the public school system saying otherwise. At bottom, if you can’t get a societal consensus on teaching a certain moral precept, then the public school must not teach it. The issue of homosexuality is not one of those issues we can all agree on (like, say, teaching that stealing is bad) – so it is better for the schools to remain silent on the subject and let each set of parents impart what knowledge they will. Might lead to a wide variety of opinions and this wouldn’t be conducive to a liberal-fascist world view, but it would be just and workable.
Blogs For Victory 
http://www.queerty.com/teenager-justin-aaberg-killed-himself-over-gay-bullying-his-mom-wont-let-anyone-forget-20100914/
http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20281884,00.html
http://www.edgeboston.com/index.php?ch=news&sc=&sc3=&id=110923
3 reasons why it has to be dealt with in schools and not by parents, because clearly not all parents are doing a good enough job of teaching their children to be decent human beings. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being gay, whats wrong is that some people feel they have to hide who they are.
As for “its ok, because its not impossible to have kids”, yes it is. Either change your argument or accept that infertile (infertile means no ability to have kids naturally) and older couples (unable to have kids, effectively infertile) should not have sex at all.
Mark: “(so, yes, liberals; older couples past their time and infertile couples can still have sex…because it isn’t absolutely impossible that a child will result, as is the case when two men engage in sex).”
How about if the man has had a vasectomy? Or the woman a tubal ligation? Is that disordered, depraved and fascistic sex as well? According to your morals, would a medically sterile couple engaging in sexual activity be morally equivalent to gay sex?
the part about natural and normal missed your IQ completely dennistooge…you have no concept of reality when you ignore the truth…and that is about all ya got there…the drivel of a mental midget will never rise to intellectual debate…
Dennis,
It is, then, considered disordered sex…the Catholic church, correctly, calls it morally wrong to use any form of artificial birth control as that cuts off the sex act from that “gift of life” which is integral to well-ordered sexual activity. I already mentioned that infertile couples are ok…it all has to do with intent, Dennis.
But that is also not the point of this essay – so strop trying to go off on a tangent because you don’t want to address the issue. What about the fascist attempt to teach kids in direct contravention of parental morals? Anything to say about that?
Mark,
The Constitution gives you the right, barring harm to others, to worship as you please. The US fought several wars against a religious people who thought they could live outside the laws of the United States. Morals change over time as a society matures.
Today, you have the right to worship and live as you please. What you don’t have is the right to tell others how to live because you are offended by what they do. It is legal in the United States to be homosexual. I don’t feel that there are enough conservatives in America to vote homosexuality illegal. America has changed its morals in regard to slavery, interracial marriage, women’s rights, black equality and the rights of the handicapped in the last two hundred years and the Union is still whole.
Belive what you wish, shout it from the roof tops just know that you don’t have the right to denigrate the lives and loves of others.
morals dont change…people do…the truth of it all…is that right and wrong are still right and wrong…the failure of peoples moral behavior is what drives you folks to justify immoral behavior…
simple…true…and you cant change the truth…you can shake it up…spin it…ignore it…lie about it…but in the end…the truth is still there…you just made a lot of hissyfit noise because it feels good…
Diane,
Get back to me if you want to comment on the actual post.
Morals do change js they are changed when society admits that it is denying individuals the right to self determine their lives. Religious people don’t have the right to not be offended nor do other groups have the right to take away a religious person’s right to worship as they please. That is the very nature and essence of a democracy. There is no universal right and wrong only laws made by secular governments that have to remain fluid to protect the rights of all citizens.
dream on…science…empirical science…and maturity…are the two things you dont have working for you….i dont care how many idiots you can drum up that want to agree with you…sodomy is not sex…sex is an act of reproduction…and two men can never have sex together…its a lie…same lie lesbians try to hawk…
and you cant change it…medical science is so far beyond this that you lost before you walked in the door…
like…get a clue bimbo…stop pushing stoogepoo…you cant change the truth…period…
oh and…if you want to jump into a democracy…you need to leave the USA…we are a republic…no mob rule here…
“It is a legislation of morality they want ”
It is a legislation of morality that you want. And I might note that with each passing year, you lose more ground on this issue. People are getting past the bigotry you want them to hold, Mark, and you’re just going to have to learn how to deal with it like a grown-up, which means not screaming “fascist!” all the time, for starters.
You, too.
Well, at least you didn’t scream “fascist!” again. That’s progress, I suppose.
its not bigotry to reject a lie…honestly…forcing change by accusing folks of bigotry is…noting but another lie…
people will fall back to moral constructs when immmoral behavior blows up in thier faces…take roe v wade for example…roe is solidly anti abortion these days…the lie…just like homosexual behavior…will always be a lie…you can love another human being without sodomizing them…but you can never have a family without a man and a woman…and thier children…not even adoption can solve this issue…it only creates another lie…and injures the moral development of children in society…
get the homosexual agenda OUT OF SCHOOLS…its destroying america…sending it straight down the tubes
Interesting stuff thank you. Gay or straight, it matters not as long as you’re a good person. Are you?