Democrats Play for the Political Middle

By playing up to those moderate, middle-of-the-road, “mom and apple pie” folks at….Planned Parenthood – From Life News:

The chair of the national Democratic party headlined a small rally in Florida yesterday for Planned Parenthood, in what is the latest event having Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz working with the abortion business.

Wasserman Schultz was named by pro-abortion President Barack Obama recently to take over as the head of the Democratic Party nationally and prepare for his re-election campaign next year. At the time of her appointment to the position, Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards praised Wasserman Schultz as a “heroine” for her extensive abortion advocacy. The appointment made it clear Obama would not run from his lengthy pro-abortion record…

Yeah, that is what the people of America want –  abortion on demand.  And, hey, if you can get it funded via ObamaCare in the by and by, so much the better.   When Americans get up in the morning, they aren’t worried about their jobs or the future for their children…the only concern they have is whether or not Planned Parenthood stays on the public teat, sucking up money for butchering children.  That is the way in to America’s heartland…be closely identified with Planned Parenthood.

These people are starting to make this too easy…

148 thoughts on “Democrats Play for the Political Middle

  1. js August 25, 2011 / 4:11 pm

    so is that it…libtards think that we need to kill unborn human babies so that…poor women…can have sex and not take responsibility for getting knocked up?

    what a sham…

    • Saul Sooth August 25, 2011 / 4:28 pm

      “libtards” don’t care about the children or the pregnant women, they only care about making one or both dependent upon the government..

      That’s how they get and keep power. .

      • Sunny August 25, 2011 / 5:09 pm

        And you base this truly stupid statement on what facts? What have conservatives done that would eleminate the need for such programs? I will agree that there are some out there that do not want to work and expect the government to take care of them – it is all they know. Their parent(s) grew up that way and they are following in their footsteps. However, what do you suggest be done to break this perpetual lifestyle of some? Education? Allow them to starve to death? I don’t know .. . provide some really practical ideas. I do not know of anyone who is out earning a living that likes the idea of others living off their hard work, but how do you break that dependency? Instead of nasty, insulting responses, do something useful for a change and suggest real solutions to these problems.

      • js August 25, 2011 / 5:36 pm

        we could throw all the liberal socialist marxists into a tub of hot oil and boil it…

        is that a solution?

      • Green Mountain Boy August 25, 2011 / 6:02 pm

        Not really. Have you ever smelled boiling libtard? Yuck.

      • neocon1 August 25, 2011 / 6:10 pm

        give tickets back to mexico, africa, europe to all that think it sucks so bad here.
        NO handouts for more one child.
        end of welfare queens.
        If you can afford a large screen TV, Computer, cell phone, designer clothes, gold teeth then you do not need food stamps, housing allowances, or welfare.
        national sales tax ALL pay the same rate.
        END the murdering of our children by you filthy monsters.

      • neocon1 August 25, 2011 / 6:11 pm


        I have smelled a lot of DIRTY ones.

      • Green Mountain Boy August 25, 2011 / 6:21 pm

        They havent learned about a recent invention called “deoderant” yet. 😛

  2. Green Mountain Boy August 25, 2011 / 6:37 pm

    Ignore him Neo. Frustration is getting to him.

    • neocon1 August 25, 2011 / 6:39 pm


      like pulling a string in front of a kitten.
      to stupid to know better.

  3. Green Mountain Boy August 25, 2011 / 6:39 pm

    Neo, Get yourself a gravatar. It will help sort the dross from the real.

    • neocon1 August 25, 2011 / 6:47 pm

      where how?

  4. Rightlane August 26, 2011 / 1:53 am

    The abortion debate use to center on when life began, but that is not the case any longer. Both sides of this debate have their respective problems where abortion is concerned, those problems being a lack of honesty and courage.

    On the left, we know the “non-viable tissue mass” or any of a number of euphemisms and clinical jargon used to dehumanize the fetus, thereby making abortion less repugnant and more saleable publicly, by those who support the murder of the unborn, has been counter by hard scientific evidence. That argument will not hold up to honest scientific examination any longer.

    Like Al said dishonestly about AGW, abortion opponents can honestly say it is pretty much settled science, at this point, that human life begins in the womb.

    However, that has not stopped the left from changing their arguments in support of abortion. That is part of the lie. They were never interested in when life began. They want government-funded abortion to be available on demand, at any stage of development, based solely on the mother’s desires – another lie, as any woman that kills her child in her womb is many things, but certainly not a mother at least to that child – for now. Given time, they will undoubtedly demand state imposed abortion in certain situations for the good of the collective.

    The left real agenda is the maintenance of their power, which they attempt to accomplish by making themselves indispensable to a large enough segment of the electorate. The problem is they insist on using my money to do it.

    They do not care about woman or for that matter the collective. They care about power so much they are willing to open the treasury and spend tax dollars to create a poor base population dependant on the dole.

    If you don’t believe me here is a little evidence for you. Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:
    Number of States won by: Obama: 19 McCain: 29
    Square miles won by: Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000
    Counties Population: Obama: 127 mil McCain: 143 mil Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1

    The Court was too cowardly to take on a case so as to decide the when life begins. Since the Court is considered conservative, I concluded this problem lies on the rights and is due to the lack of courage to tackle a social problem of this magnatude.

    • neocon1 August 26, 2011 / 3:42 am

      a retard on the short bus knows when life begins, this whole argument is BS
      athiest commies love death and murder period.
      try stepping on a turtle egg no matter when it was laid then use the clump of cells as you go to prison
      what a sick society.
      55,000,000 MURDERED babies in the US
      hell is rejoicing, buck up tommy and scummy, you will join them one day soon enough.

    • Green Mountain Boy August 26, 2011 / 11:37 am

      Thats because for some reason a lot of conservatives are “uncomfortable” with the social issues. Dont ask me why, they just are.

    • thomasg0102 August 26, 2011 / 1:11 pm

      hey idiot, you do know that you are posting blatant lies that take about 4 minutes to uncover right?

      Number of States won by: Obama: 19 McCain: 29

      ummm…Obama carried 28 states plus DC. McCain carried 22

      Square miles won by: Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000

      wrong. it’s called factcheck or snopes. Look it up.

      Counties Population: Obama: 127 mil McCain: 143 mil Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1

      completely a lie. This was the same email people sent in 2000, instead the replaced Bush with McCain and Gore with Obama. Seriously, get a life, or don’t, it won’t matter to the sane world.

  5. Rightlane August 26, 2011 / 5:04 pm

    Funny, your lies and stupidity are immediately apparent. No fact check required. Thanks for taking the hook moron…

  6. Rightlane August 26, 2011 / 5:33 pm

    Tom, you don’t think for yourself. You should start. Let me spell this out for you, because I know you still don’t get it. The hook, when fishing for trolls, is something obvious. In this case all one has to do is to know Obama took 52.9% of the popular national vote. Ergo, he could not have lost the county vote. That would be impossible as everyone lives in a county. Why go to fact check for that. You went because you don’t think. You are stupid, loud and obnoxious like most trolls and I’ve just proven that in your case beyond a shadow of a doubt. Develop a though then come back and discuss it, but it must be your thought.

Comments are closed.