There is a heavy amount of gloom and doom on the Right this day on social media. It is all over. We’re done. Doomed!
Why?
Well, we lost the Wisconsin Supreme Court race.
To be sure, we lost it very badly – absolutely destroyed in a landslide loss. We were especially crushed in the suburbs where white women came out in droves to elect a Commie to the Supreme Court because she is pledged to invent a right to an abortion in the Wisconsin Constitution. Looking at this, the Right now sees nothing but Death and Despair.
But that’s because the Right, by and large, is kinda stupid. Its why the GOP has long been known as the Stupid Party. Stupid in, stupid out, dear people.
It is past time we stop being stupid.
While the loss at the WI SC is bad, less noticed is that we won a special election to the Wisconsin Senate and now have a super majority in it. We’re two shy of a super majority in the WI House but what happened last night means the Wisconsin legislature can pretty much impeach any State official they want and have them removed. Some are already talking of impeaching the Democrat governor but the smarter people are talking about impeaching the lower Court Democrat judges who have been soft on crime…you know, the judges who let Antifa and BLM skate all through 2020. That’s the place to start – get Evers (the Dem governor) if you can but much better to get rid of the lower level officials…the people who make policy happen.
We also obtained in North Carolina a super majority in the State legislature via a Democrat party switcher. The GOP Legislature there can now override the Democrat governor at will. That is a pretty cool power, guys. And altogether it means in two battleground States which will play a key role in 2024, the GOP is popular enough to secure legislative super majorities. Perhaps – and I’m just spitballin’ here – the GOP isn’t as toxic as MSM and Never Trump wants us to believe? That they may be – and I know this is shocking to even consider – lying about us because they are so desperate to get rid of Trump and MAGA that they’ll say anything even if 180 from reality?
Don’t get me wrong here: we’re very far away from the days of wine and roses. We’re in a really bad position. We suck at politics and are heavily divided. Democrats are good and politics and are firmly united. I do expect us to lose the White House next year no matter who we nominate. Be pleased as punch if we win, but I’m not expecting it. But what has happened in WI, NC and other State and local campaigns does give us cause for hope. Nobody is really looking into it – because it doesn’t support the Narrative – but my bet is that on the State and local level, the GOP is more powerful than its ever been…even in the aftermath of the Civil War. Last night while Chicago was electing a Commie lunatic as mayor, Springfield’s mayoralty went GOP for the first time since 1967…and the lady who won is pretty darned Trumpy. That is a bit of a watershed, guys. A thing that isn’t supposed to happen. But it did.
We do need some tactical changes. Clearly, middle and upper class white women are fanatics in favor of abortion. This is weird because, overall, such women hardly have abortions. But, it is what it is: you make a campaign about whether abortion should be legal or not, and these ladies will turn out for Democrats in huge numbers. I am, as you know, a raving, pro-life fanatic and I can’t moderate my views on it because I’m not a lunatic who thinks human beings are disposable…but the pragmatic facts of life are that abortion is, right now, a toxic issue for the GOP. It doesn’t do me the least bit of good to lose while insisting on the pro-life maximum position: that just means that the pro-death fanatics of the Democrat party get in. So, we have to carefully re-think our tactics…certainly do not go for any ban after 15 weeks. When we get into the fight, relentlessly point out that the Democrats position is abortion to birth (I’m serious: “so, GOP candidate, what do you think of your opponents tax plan?” “Well, Fred, first I’d like to point out that he wants the taxes to pay for abortion to birth”: like that). We have to start backing big, expensive programs for pre- and post-natal care. We trust in God’s time the American people will come to the Pro-Life position and we’ll be able to ban the hideous, anti-human practice…but, meanwhile, lets take what we can get and at least neutralize the issue against us.
We also need a make-over on how we present ourselves overall. In a sense, it is time to ditch the label “conservative”. We’re not conserving anything: everything we wanted to conserve is gone. What we’re trying to do is reform everything…to take power away from insane, corrupt, anti-human Progressives and rebuild our nation. We’re in a very real sense revolutionaries. And we should start acting like it – but like all revolutionaries, you start at the bottom. Sure, try to win Congress and the White House. Maybe you will. At least you’ll keep your finger in the pie there. But the real action for us is, as I’ve said a lot lately, down at the State and especially the local level. Just 12 years after we take over a school board we have a crop of 18 year olds who are literate, sane, healthy patriots. If, meanwhile, we’ve also taken over high education, then they won’t be turned into Commies on us. These kids will then step out into the larger world, laugh at their illiterate, blue-haired peers from Democrat areas, and proceed to take over the country.
What I’m ultimately saying here is nil desperandum – get a grip! Sure, it sucks. It will probably suck worse. In fact, it probably has a to suck a lot more worse before we have a real shot at national power. So be it. This is the Progressive’s world. It is very stupid, a lot more gay than we expected and it is failing. They don’t know what to do. They are incapable of thinking. They are just bloody-minded pressing forward with their stupid ideas because, being quite mindless, they don’t know what else to do. It will all come crashing down. We will pick up the pieces. It is just a matter of time…and if we’ve laid the groundwork, then when the time comes the Revolution will be quick and complete.
Blogs For Victory 
“We’re two shy of a super majority in the WI House but what happened last night means the Wisconsin legislature can pretty much impeach any State official they want and have them removed. ”
Once again we see that you reject the process of democratically electing representatives just because you don’t agree with some of them. You are un-American.
The terms anarchy and tyranny seem like they are contradictory. Anarchy means no state. Tyranny means nothing but state. What possibly could anarcho-tyranny mean?
It’s a phrase coined by the right-Hegelian political theorist Samuel Francis, whose dark worldview was never my cup of tea, to say the least. Even so, he was insightful, especially concerning the ambitions of the left.
He said that if they get their way, the United States and much of the Western world will descend not to “socialism” classically understood but to anarcho-tyranny, which is arbitrary law as the normal way of conducting public life. No one can count on any rules. Everything is fluid and constantly changing. There’s only one feature we can expect: whatever happens, it will be compulsory; that is, backed by the threat of violence.
The violence can be of the mob but it will be behaving as a proxy for power, such as the Red Guard under Mao. When the mob quiets down, powerful public officials step up to pronounce what they did as good or bad depending on the political priorities of the moment. Bad mobs (those opposing the left) get locked up but good mobs (those who shout down university speakers or trans activists breaking into the Tennessee Capitol) are defended and valorized.
…………………
In this Marcusian view, “freedom” itself was purely an illusion fabricated by a structurally racist and fascistic system of overlords. There is no “free market,” no “free speech,” no “freedom of religion.” These are just slogans deployed as a mask for a system deeply oppressive to all non-normative groups. The only way to achieve authentic freedom, in this view, is to undertake a complete dismantling of the rule of law, first by intellectual efforts, then grassroots efforts, and finally regime efforts to dismantle Western codes of law, including restraints on government.
The social system they envision isn’t a “dictatorship of the proletariat” but a dictatorship of elites who buy into the upside-down and convoluted worldview of the “woke” left and its Joker-like ambitions to tear it all down. In the Franciscan analysis here, genuine freedom depends fundamentally on constitutions, traditions, a people educated in a classical tradition, respect for norms, and a robust culture depending on faith, family, and community.
Francis believed that all of this was more fragile than people believed. Dismantling it was possible once the foundations of civilized life were eroded through ideological indoctrination—not of the old left but of the woke left, and there is a massive difference—and the mass cultivation of ignorance. He predicted that we might wake one day and find that everything we take for granted had crumbled beneath our feet, and we would be left only with arbitrary dictates. Courts wouldn’t work to bring fairness and justice but rather to impose inequality and partisan rule.
The phrase anarcho-tyranny is the opposite of what America was founded to be. We had a republican form of government that established strict limits on government power. The people would be in charge through their elected representatives. We had checks on power. There were balances within government. Elections would assure that the power would never finally be taken away from the people.
What we are witnessing is a fundamental subversion of this vision and its replacement, for now, by anarcho-tyranny. It’s government that knows no limits to its power and even disregards its own laws, spreading chaos as far and wide as possible.
That is all so spot on: it started in the 60’s, of course, that decade so absolutely disastrous on every level. The old Left was dying because the workers they supposedly championed were gaining wealth in the Capitalist system. Old line Socialist parties like Labour in Britain and the SDP in Germany were becoming bastions of middle class respectability. The USSR was moribund…and, so, the New Left comes along. Filled with youngsters with a smattering of education (enough to question, not near enough to understand) who were ripe for a new siren song of utter rejection of all norms. They started with tearing down sexual morality (and Youth – and middle aged male degenerates – were quite pleased with that!) but it never stopped. One thing after another was attacked and then destroyed.
One interesting thing I’ve seen in this is the rise of what I’m calling the anti-Left gay. A pretty liberal guy or gal who was in the fight for SSM and who had no initial problem with adding the “T” to the mix but who now stands back appalled at what is happening with “Drag Queen Story Time” and other such outrages. I haven’t the heart to point out to them that they lead the way in the final tipping point…so eager in their desire to get SSM, they went along with these nihilists in saying, “love is love”. They just didn’t realize what they were doing…that to say that, to assert that gay is the same as straight, was to lie…and in that lie you utterly destroy your ability to assert truth…such as, “drag performances shouldn’t have kids in attendance”. As I’ve said many times, whether or no we should allow same sex couples to marry is a prudential judgement…but if we do, then it is still something different from heterosexual marriage. It was – and is – a new thing; an innovation in human relations. Something which had to be taken on its own merits with laws and regulations built up just for it…not just willy-nilly grafting SSM on to traditional marriage and calling it a day.
There is a video clip out there of a Canadian politician introducing legislation to make ti against the law in Canada to say anything mean within earshot of a drag performance. What is mean? Well, that’ll be whatever the Left says it is…just another bit of tyranny being imposed. What struck me about it was the audience…they managed to stick a wheelchair-bound person in there, I guess in a desperate attempt to make it seem normal, but the rest of the group were a bunch of clearly insane sexual weirdos dressed up in their freaky best. It was just absurd to look at…lectern, conservatively dressed politician, Canadian flags right behind…and then a clown car of men dressed like women…but not just like any, old woman…freakish styles and ridiculous makeup. It was as if you did a Presidential Press conference in a lunatic asylum. And everyone is supposed to pretend it was all normal…that we were talking about some rational policy.
There is a road back. We will win. But we must first recognize what we’re up against. They are crazy. They are liars. They like wicked things. They are having a ball destroying every shred of decency. These are not people we can compromise with. They will jail and shoot us just as soon as they believe they have the power to do so. They must be opposed all down the line, all the time, and when we get power we must punish them.
SSM?
Same sex marriage
Thanks.
“whether or no we should allow same sex couples to marry is a prudential judgement…but if we do, then it is still something different from heterosexual marriage. It was – and is – a new thing; an innovation in human relations. Something which had to be taken on its own merits with laws and regulations built up just for it…not just willy-nilly grafting SSM on to traditional marriage and calling it a day.”
I used to make the same argument, but as usual the howling minority prevailed. Of course now many of these “marriages” are failing, and having to go through legal dissolutions instead of merely breaking up These relationships tend to be less stable anyway, and adding the legal complexities of marriage, which is a legal contract and not just a symbol with a ring and a cake, means reality has hit hard for a lot of these people.
It’s a phrase coined by the right-Hegelian political theorist Samuel Francis, whose dark worldview was never my cup of tea, to say the least. Even so, he was insightful, especially concerning the ambitions of the left.
I agree with Mark — spot on, and I also agree that we will win. It may be after I’m gone; I kinda hope so, although part of me wants to be in on the fight. And make no mistake, a fight is what we’re in for, a fight for the very soul of our Republic.
I think this great lady speaks for all of us
‘I’m done with this sh**!’ (see link below)
Funny story, and something that needs to start happening all over this country. Bad things happen when good people do nothing, and we all have been doing nothing for too f***king long. It’s time we assert our selves in the public square by being vocal about the rudeness, insanity, and mental retardation of Democrats. One thing I’ve noticed is that Democrats love their accusations, they love to demean, belittle, shame, and mock their political opponents, all of course from a position of self perceived moral superiority. Well, let’s fight fire with fire. We need to start accusing prominent Democrats with the most heinous crimes possible, keep up the heat, and make them defend themselves. We also need Red State Ag’s to begin investigating prominent Democrats and bring all charges possible, whenever possible. I’m sure Hunter, Joe, or Jim Biden have done some shady things in Florida … so Ron get after them. Investigate and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law.
Remember folks, Democrats are not good people and considering their actions over the last 3 years, they are more than deserving of all things negative coming their way.
This being said, I am in the beginning stages of moving to Mexico. In a few more years, when I retire, I am moving to Mexico and will live at least 9 to 10 months out of the year down there and away from this country. I have always loved the culture and the people of Mexico and I trust the cartels more than the American government. But moreover, I no longer want to live in a country that likes to start wars all over the world, a country that thinks men can become women, a country that sexualizes their children, a country whose leaders target and prosecute their political opponents, a country where federal bureaucracies and favored corporations hold power, or a country who awards social credit to people based on skin color, sexual or political affiliation.
This is not a country I was raised in, nor one I want to stay in.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11944591/Dramatic-moment-Ohio-school-bus-driver-resigns-yelling-students.html
I love the T shirt and I love the community for standing up for her
I trust the cartels more than the American government.
Now there’s a distinction without much of a difference
LOL
It’s starting …
Country singer Travis Tritt drops all Anheuser-Busch beers from his tour in fury at Bud Light signing up trans activist Dylan Mulvaney
Women hit out at Nike for making trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney, 26, its new brand ambassador and paying her more than $50K per post to model its sports bra
The “chicks with dicks” movement may be reaching peak destructive insanity, and let’s make sure the Democrat Party is held accountable for foisting this bullshit on this country.
Paying “her” ? This Dicksie Chick didn’t even realize he was “really a woman” till the last year or so, when he realized he could get lots of attention and even money for pretending to be a travesty of a male stereotype of a woman.
Slightly off topic but not really:
I always thought that companies targeted their messaging to demographics most likely to use their products. So I am baffled by the sudden surge of companies taking steps to alienate their core markets in what looks like efforts to court markets unlikely to reciprocate.
Are we likely to see a sudden increase in female impersonators going to gyms or running marathons? Have you SEEN these people? So what’s the marketing plan here, Nike? Trying to pander to a demographic unlikely to use your product and in so doing ticking off the athletic demographic that is your bread and butter? Who comes up with these genius plans?
Let’s see the ads, guys. Let’s see Ru Paul and his buddies do a workout in Nikes. Let’s see Mulvaney run in a marathon, prancing along flapping his arms because that’s the way women run, you know. If SNL still wanted to be funny they could do a devastating skit of fat hairy drag queens in outlandish getups trying to do workouts in giant men’s sized Nikes, with huge fake breasts flapping and elaborate wigs askew.
Ditto for Budweiser. Does some 50-pound head in Marketing really think transvestites sit around slamming beers and will be happy to switch to Bud if the advertising is right? Wow. Talk about lack of market research.
And who drinks light beer anyway? Mostly women, I think. So sure, let’s skip having a real woman as a figurehead and pick a dude whose whole schtick is to ridicule women by pretending to be one, and in a very insulting and demeaning way, building a persona on unflattering stereotypes.
I just don’t get it. But I hope the public does, and slams them for it.
I spread “Dicksie Chick” to Twitter where its already a hit.
Thank you, she replied modestly. Now we can wait for the lawsuit
My “soon to be” new country’s President gets it
“Supposedly legal issues should not be used for electoral, political purposes,” López Obrador said. “That’s why I don’t agree with what they are doing to ex-President Trump.”
“It should be the people who decide,” he added.
López Obrador has been joined by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban in publicly speaking out about the charges.
Thank you AMLO
https://news.yahoo.com/mexico-president-slams-trump-arrest-183858410.html
I rarely use scripture to support my point of view, but 1st Corinthians 5:9 is just too apropos to the conversation not to mention:
Paul addressing the people of Corinth:
“I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people;”
I can’t speak for the rest of the world, or even for all of this country, but this phenomenon is happening on a breathtaking scale within my circle of friends. We are divorcing ourselves from anyone who advocates the destruction of western civilization. If we ever do attempt a national divorce from these people, I don’t think it’s going to be as difficult as we might think. They don’t like us, and we don’t like them.
Jesus said “love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,” and I do that. Well, I don’t know about the love part, but I pray for them that God might touch their hearts, and I’m tolerant of those who hate me and wish me harm, right up to the point where they attempt to actually do me harm. And I think the day is rapidly approaching when those people realize they no longer have any influence on our lives and they lash out in an attempt to get us to comply. To say they’re in for a rude awakening is an understatement.
They are already enraged at refusal to comply, and are already lashing out. So far I think it has been mainly in online keyboard coward attacks, but the fury is there. The spite, the malice, the venom, the sense of entitlement to attack and savage people merely for having differing opinions or perspectives, is all uncovering a previously less obvious inclination toward tyranny and oppression. They are now openly calling for punishment of free speech and assembly and openly talking about “reeducation camps”. They are now quite happy to admit that they want dissent to be punished, and punished harshly.
They are now quite happy to admit that they want dissent to be punished, and punished harshly.
Wanting and getting are two very different things. There hasn’t really been any forceful pushback from the right yet, but it’s just a matter of time until someone or some group on the Left attempts to cancel the wrong person or group on the Right.
I think revolutions are often sparked by little things, or the accumulation of little things, and I am seeing little things mount up. Take the school bus driver, for example—her community is cheering her on, and the T shirt is hysterical and with any luck will show up all over town. Look at the refusal of parents to back down in school board meetings, challenging the “experts” to applause from the crowd. The Complicit Agenda Media tried to shut down the Transurrection meme, but they can’t silence social media. Not as much anyway, not any more.
While New Yorkers are smugly enjoying their Trump “victory” and trying to be outraged at the comments on how their precious city stinks, the rest of the country is less impressed by the self-styled “intellectuals” of the decaying Big Apple, and I think the ridicule of Bragg and by extent his support system is going to have an effect. He thought he’d be a national hero to the whole Left, and he is so inept even most of the Left doesn’t want anything to do with him.
The media haven’t covered the number of people fleeing Leftist cities, but when that nice young tech executive got stabbed to death in San Francisco the other day the stories had to include the fact that he had moved away, to Miami, because of the rampant crime in San Fran. He went back on business and got killed. (And when he showed his stab wound to a driver and asked for help, the driver drove away and left him to die.) The story also had to mention the fact that the man’s friend, who was interviewed, had also moved away due to the crime in the city. It will slip out, a little here and a little there.
Maybe we should start a refugee program for white people in Chicago, now that they have been officially branded as enemies by a population that elected a mayor based on his anti-white stance. Much like cities advertised for law enforcement officers fleeing anti-cop cities, maybe there should be a movement offering to help defray moving expenses and help find housing for white refugees fleeing Chicago’s racism.
It might take a while for a real powderkeg to assemble, but once it does I don’t think it will take much to set it off.
I rarely use scripture to support my point of view
Something we should all probably do more of ….
They are now quite happy to admit that they want dissent to be punished, and punished harshly.
Because they are communists. They demand conformity like all communist leaders require and the fact these mouth breathing Democrat voters don’t see that, speaks to the ineffectiveness of Americas public education. The dumber you are, the weaker you are, and the more susceptible you are to conform to the communist mob.
How many gajillion times have I pointed out that not a single Dem sock puppet I have queried has had the slightest idea of the nature of the system he is enabling and supporting by attacking the Invented Other provided to him by his masters?
They don’t know and they don’t care. They are trained to hate whichever target is put in front of them. Remember, the innocuous and inoffensive George W. Bush was savaged nearly as much as Trump. Trump just exacerbates the abuse by standing up to it, and of course by actually being a threat to Leftist control of the nation, but anyone on “the Right” will be attacked mercilessly, and with great ignorance and stupidity, by the willing mouthpieces recruited by the Left.
These are the people who were hiding in their homes, closing down their businesses, strapping scraps of paper or cloth onto their faces so they would be allowed (ALLOWED !) to go out in public, and obediently lining up to be injected with dangerous and ineffective experimental drugs, all under Executive Orders from a man not authorized to impose these restrictions, while claiming Trump is a fascist. That’s a level of purposeful stupidity that is hard for us to understand, but it defines the base of the Democrat Party.
Well said
“How many gajillion times have I pointed out that not a single Dem sock puppet I have queried has had the slightest idea of the nature of the system he is enabling and supporting by attacking the Invented Other provided to him by his masters?”
This is just a lie. You know and we all know it. Many left-leaning posters, including me, have responded to you by explaining the “nature of the system” that they support, or their political philosophy—always at your request. And yet you pretend no one has ever done so.
Ok; I’ll pick up the challenge.
The nature of our system is a Federal Republic where the central government has strictly enumerated powers with all other powers – mentioned or otherwise – reserved to the States.
What action would you take if, say, Idaho formed a volunteer militia and allowed these militia members to have in their possession automatic weapons and light artillery/armored vehicles?
“Ok; I’ll pick up the challenge.”
You read the comments here, so you know as well as the rest of us that Amazona is lying when she says “not a single Dem sock puppet I have queried has had the slightest idea of the nature of the system he is enabling.”
Also, you know as well as I do that referring to other commenters here as “sock puppets” is an insult, which according to you and her—I mean, “the moderator”—is an offense worthy of having one’s comment deleted. Why are you letting her comment stand?
As for your challenge, the U.S. Constitution permits state militias as prescribed by Congress. If the militia you propose adheres to the laws passed by Congress under its authority granted to it by the Constitution, then fine. If not, then not.
The correct answer is: nothing. The Congress has no power over the State militia unless called into Federal service. The State may raise a militia and as long as they are at least as well armed as the Militia Act requires, there’s nothing else to do. So, you don’t really know our system. Rather QED for Amazona.
You bleat, so indignantly, Amazona is lying when she says “not a single Dem sock puppet I have queried has had the slightest idea of the nature of the system he is enabling.” and then you go on to assert: Many left-leaning posters, including me, have responded to you by explaining the “nature of the system” that they support, or their political philosophy.
Well, no. That has not happened. OK, it happened once, a long long time ago, when a true Marxist who had studied and adopted Marxist theory, did so. Other efforts, the two or three times they were attempted, were along the lines of vapid Miss America contestant comments: “Well, like, well like I think everything should be FAIR, you know, and, like, EQUAL…”
But OK, here’s another chance. Go for it. Speak for yourself, and even those other “left-leaning posters” you seem to remember answering the question. You won’t be graded on how well your carefully explained system works, just on your ability to explain the actual structure of Leftist political philosophy and governance.
Remember. my own explanation of my own theory is short, simple and concise. The federal government must be restricted as to its size, scope and power, with most authority left to the states, or to the people. But you get more words if you need them to carefully and accurately explain and define your own belief of the best blueprint for governing our nation, or of official Leftist dogma if there is a difference.
Are you saying your posts are deleted only because they contain insults? Is that your whine? How about that they substitute insults for content and reflect not a desire to engage in objective civil discourse but merely as forms of expressing your disdain and contempt for the Invented Other that obsesses you so that you are compelled to come here to attack it?
How about the belief that this blog owes you nothing, especially not the right to use it as a litter box for your emotional and mental excretions?
“No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.”
Article 1 Section 10 Clause 3.
I’ve responded to you. Now you respond to the rest of my previous comment.
Troops refers to a professional army.
Militia: The whole body of physically fit civilians eligible by law for military service.
You really gotta look into what was going on from the mid 17th century in England to the time the Founders wrote the Constitution. They were trying to prevent a Charles I or a Cromwell.
Now you respond …
Well, aren’t you just the bossiest little thing? Assuming the authority to demand anything. But then that is the authoritarian Left for you…YOU WILL COMPLY
Have you brought up this clause to the organizers and signers of The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact ? According to you, these Leftists have violated Article 1 Section 10 Clause 3 of the Constitution.
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among a group of U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to whichever presidential ticket wins the overall popular vote in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The compact is designed to ensure that the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide is elected president…
They even call it a Compact! Brazen anti-Constitutionalists! Not just entering into a multi-state compact, but one designed to subvert the Constitutional creation of the Electoral College!
Thanks for reminding us of this effort to undermine our Constitution to try to influence presidential elections. Wow, the list of efforts to do this just keeps getting longer, doesn’t it?
Also, Mark, to respond to the topic of your post, the actions of the Tennessee legislature today make me think the Right has no chance of winning in the long run—the young people will make sure of that. I haven’t been very hopeful about the state of the country in a good while, but this gives me hope. I actually think the Right in its current formed is doomed, though I’m not sure I’ll still be around to see it.
That’s laughable – they’re only heroes to your side. TN is R+23. Sure, those creeps will get back in if they want by running in a huge D area, but what they did was morally wrong and illegal and they were justly ejected for trying to overthrow the will of the people.
Get ready for more of this: we are in the mood to punish. We will no longer roll over for Democrat bullying. Your accusations of “racist” and “sexist” and so forth no longer have power over us. We don’t care what you think. We know what you’re going to say about us before you say it.
Sure, maybe your side will nominate one of those two hate-filled, ignorant, bigoted clowns for Senate or some such and they’ll burn through $50 million to lose by 20 points. That’ll just make it more funny.
Our next step is to start investigating Dems – they never really have been, you know? The few times they’ve been caught have been almost entirely by accident and it never leads to the top. Well, now we’ve got incentive…and its a target rich environment. These slime-balls you think are the Tribunes of the People are just lying, stealing sacks of sh**…and we’re going to get them.
The political history of the two main American parties, Republican and Democrat, has always been of one party—the Dems—being rowdy, rioting in the streets, building bombs, etc. while the Republicans joined country clubs, wore bow ties and were meek and passive.
The Dems had head-breaking in its union-busting, Bull Connors and fire hoses and dogs, the Weather Underground, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorhn, the bombing of police stations and the riots at the Democrat Convention in Chicago. There is an unbroken path, all the way from that same Bill Ayers (once on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted List) who got off on charges of planning to bomb a police station at change of shift when it would have the most officers inside, on a technicality thanks to his uber-rich daddy stepping in, who stood on the courthouse steps and bragged “Free as a bird and guilty as hell” going on, with his lovely bride and murderer Bernadine, becoming best friends with an up-an-coming mystery man named Barack Obama and becoming his mentors and his introduction into Chicago politics. That is, bombing and rioting and the Dem party all the way through the Obama years to the Steele dossier to the federal agent incitement of the riots on January 6 to the Mar-A-Lago raid to the Trump indictments. The nature of the thuggery changes a little, and the government support and involvement grows, but it’s the same basic theme.
The Right had lawyers.
There is an unbroken chain, with many links, through the history of the Democrat Party—a history of thuggery, corruption and violence. The Black Panthers were the race feature of this, political fathers of Black Lives Matter and sources of violence and murder. “Red diaper baby” David Horowitz, born to hard-core Communist parents and picking up the red flag to be a Communist activist, running the Communist paper Ramparts, supporting every Leftist group and cause there was, finally got disgusted with the movement when he saw its hypocrisy and then when the Black Panthers murdered his friend and secretary he left the Left for good and now lectures on its defects and crimes. He get shouted down when he speaks by Leftist thugs.
Then one day in Tallahassee, Florida in 2000, a small group of Republicans, in their white shirts and neckties, actually pushed past a gang of Democrats trying to block them from a room where ballots were being counted, and the Left exploded in horror—-HORROR!! I tell you!—at the violence this represented! Republicans just didn’t DO that! And since then, we seldom have.
Till now. Now suddenly the party has changed, and is now no longer represented by suits and ties and urban gentility. It is now the party of Flyover America, of working people, of people who won’t be pushed around. Now the suits and ties represent the Dems, who no longer do their own bombing but have gangs of thugs acting for them, but the Right knows history, and knows that mercenaries seldom fight with the dedication and ferocity of those whose lives and families and devotion to country are on the line.
Now we have Average Americans going to school board meetings and telling the Libs who have become so complacent in their efforts to use our children to undermine our society that they can’t do that any more. And the Libs are freaking out. Now we have Average Americans looking at the evolution of a police state, and realizing that about half of the country supports this, and realizing it is up to us to stop it.
And the Left is realizing this, and furthermore knows we can stop it if we get any more furious. So for now we get the whining simpering online keyboard warriors like forty and the trolls and bots who infect so many online forums, in their hope this will make a difference.
Hint: It won’t.
While we are evaluating our strategies for face-to-face confrontations (and you can interpret that any way you want) we are also looking at the other tools we have, and one of them is the one the Dems have been wielding with such fervor. That is, the weapon of investigations. We now have a muscular bench in the House, and it’s fed up and loaded for bear. And the Dems have set up a scenario for us increasing our size and power in Congress through its hubris in making its love of tyranny and police states center stage.
“But OK, here’s another chance. Go for it.”
A democratic republic governed by a constitution.
https://blogsforvictory.com/2022/09/26/gloria-allitalia/#comments
You’re kidding, right? You’re really not trying to pass that off as a coherent political philosophy, are you? Are you really trying to slip in some vague global philosophy, to try to evade discussions about our own country?
I’d say “nice try” but it doesn’t even come close. We here talk about the best blueprint for governing OUR country, not some unnamed abstract “democratic republic” somewhere in the universe. I’m pretty sure I’ve actually used the phrase “the best blueprint for governing the country” without the slightest hint this might mean some other country, somewhere.
I’ll bet that even weasels are ashamed of this effort at weasel-wording. But then you can’t really admit to understanding the structure of the political system you enable and support by attacking those who support and defend our Constitutional model, can you? Because then you would be in the uncomfortable position of admitting that you choose to enable and support a collectivist system based on consolidation of power in the hands of a few, creating a Central Authority form of top-down government in contrast to the bottom-up system created by our own constitution. In other words, tyranny.
Short of admitting that, you would have to admit that your efforts here are not really efforts to support and defend a coherent political system, but are just examples of an emotional dependence on hostility and negativity which you have chosen to direct at an Invented Other. You’d have to admit you just get off on bickering and snarling and attacking people, just because you like it.
That is, confirming our opinion of you.
“Are you saying your posts are deleted only because they contain insults? Is that your whine?”
No. I’m saying that you insult other commenters on a routine basis.
But speaking of comments that get deleted, here is one I wrote last night, responding to the topic of Mark’s post. See? No name-calling.
“Also, Mark, to respond to the topic of your post, the actions of the Tennessee legislature today make me think the Right has no chance of winning in the long run—the young people will make sure of that. I haven’t been very hopeful about the state of the country in a good while, but this gives me hope. I actually think the Right in its current formed is doomed, though I’m not sure I’ll still be around to see it.”
How about that your posts substitute insults for content and reflect not a desire to engage in objective civil discourse but merely as forms of expressing your disdain and contempt for the Invented Other that obsesses you so that you are compelled to come here to attack it?
How about the belief that this blog owes you nothing, especially not the right to use it as a litter box for your emotional and mental excretions?
“Militia: The whole body of physically fit civilians eligible by law for military service.”
I have to admit, I found it a bit bizarre that your bar for being able to describe the “nature of the system he is enabling” is to answer a question about the validity of Idaho forming a volunteer militia. It’s like demanding that I describe a particular tree you have in mind in order to justify that I know what a forest is. It’s just silly gotcha games.
Oh dear—are we not following the Bickerson rules for responses? Tsk tsk.
“Have you brought up this clause to the organizers and signers of The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact ? According to you, these Leftists have violated Article 1 Section 10 Clause 3 of the Constitution.”
It’s a valid question that will be resolved in the courts should the NPV get that far.
“Thanks for reminding us of this effort to undermine our Constitution to try to influence presidential elections.”
Actually, the NPV doesn’t “undermine our Constitution” because each state determines how it appoints its electors. But you know that.
To ignore the Electoral College purpose of overriding the popular vote by having each state vote independently would be a violation of the Constitution. The Compact specifically states that the popular vote would be the only consideration. But you know that, Bickerboy.
“You’re kidding, right? You’re really not trying to pass that off as a coherent political philosophy, are you? Are you really trying to slip in some vague global philosophy, to try to evade discussions about our own country?”
What part of a “democratic republic governed by a constitution” do you disagree with?
You seemed to want a very concise response, so I gave you one. You can read the longer answer at the link I provided. I don’t feel like writing it again because, based on past history, you will have forgotten I wrote it by tomorrow (or at least you will pretend I never wrote it).
I read your “longer answer” at the link. Here it is:
I support a democratic republic governed by a constitution. Don’t you? Assuming you do, then we probably disagree with some of the details. Such as, I have no problem with a robust federal government. For instance, it would be silly for many reasons to have 50 Social Security administrations. I think the Electoral College is an anachronism that we would be better off without. But those are details in the grand scheme of things.
The United States was founded based on liberal philosophy in which citizens have inalienable rights, and consent of the governed as embodied by the fact that we elect our representatives as opposed to them being appointed for us by a king or some other arbitrary means. This makes the US different from monarchies or hereditary aristocracies. I fully support such a form of government as opposed to monarchies or hereditary aristocracies. Again, don’t you?
Among areas where you and I probably differ is that I support full rights for all Americans, including those who have historically been persecuted and had their rights abridged. I don’t see a reason why a homosexual person, for instance, should not have all of the same rights as any other American, and I think a fundamental purpose of government in a liberal democracy is to ensure that all citizens can not only fully enjoy their rights, but also be free from persecution. That goes for everyone. You might think of as modern liberalism and disagree. Do you?
Historically, I view Democrats and Republicans in the United States as both rooted in liberalism, just with varying degrees in the details. However, I’m less confident of that going forward given the direction that the Republican Party has moved, starting with the election of Barack Obama, and which has dramatically accelerated since Donald Trump ran for the presidency.
I have no problem with a robust federal government. Weasel wording. You either support the Constitutional model of a federal government severely restricted, as repeated by the Founders in the 10th Amendment just to make sure it was clearly understood that the powers of the federal government could NOT exceed those delegated to it, or you want to expand those powers and excuse that expansion with the weasel words “robust federal government”. You even back that up with a federal program which blatantly exceeds the delegated authority, but which is tolerated because of its embedded nature.
I think the Electoral College is an anachronism that we would be better off without. Yet it is created in the Constitution and is an integral part of it. Therefore, another element of our constitution you would just discard if you could.
Among areas where you and I probably differ is that I support full rights for all Americans, including those who have historically been persecuted and had their rights abridged. See what I mean by snark and bickering? You can’t just state a belief without an insult. And, of course, a wholly invented philosophy you attribute to me. Then you go on to invent a violation of rights: I don’t see a reason why a homosexual person, for instance, should not have all of the same rights as any other American followed by a smarmy platitude: I think a fundamental purpose of government in a liberal democracy is to ensure that all citizens can not only fully enjoy their rights, but also be free from persecution. That goes for everyone. followed by another delusional attribution of a belief to me You might think of as modern liberalism and disagree. followed by another of your smirky challenges to whether or not I agree.
I really don’t understand why you wanted me to go back to see the utter inanity and snark of your feeble efforts to sound erudite and thoughtful. You should have been happy to see this buried in the archives.
But…it’s your link, so….
From what I can sort out of your jumble of pseudo-political semi-thoughts is that you, in the most general terms, claim to believe that the best form of government is a democratic republic in which representatives are elected, and which is governed by a constitution.
You just don’t think it should be OUR constitution, because it doesn’t provide for a “robust federal government” and has elements you don’t like and would change.
You do stop short of advocating for an EXTREMELY “robust federal government” though you have implied, through various snarky comments, that for example you supported the very very VERY robustness of our executive officer imposing draconian restrictions on the liberty of citizens in requiring them to practice certain rituals to be allowed to participate in society.
So it is possible to agree that, in a way, you have indirectly conveyed a political philosophy. I would stop short of calling it “coherent” and it is certainly fragmented and incomplete, but it seems to meet your own political needs, so whatever. And it IS full of smarm and snark, which I gather is very important to you.
“To ignore the Electoral College purpose of overriding the popular vote by having each state vote independently would be a violation of the Constitution.”
Each state chooses the manner in which it appoints its electors. Do you not know this?
As usual, you are arguing something not said. Of course the Constitution says he manner in which a state appoints its electors is up to the states. You just stop short of the purpose of appointing electors is to choose a president based on the votes of those electors representing the total votes in the Electoral College allotted to that state, for the presidency. It is not for them to concede their votes to an unconstitutional compact designed to subvert the intentions of the Constitution to avoid having the presidency chosen by popular vote.
Let me simplify that for you: The very existence of the Electoral College is to prevent the election of a president by popular vote. Therefore—-and try to follow along here—-subverting the purpose of the Electoral College by manipulating its votes to cause the election of a president by popular vote would be a subversion of and violation of the Constitution itself.
And where did you ever get the impression that smirky “Do you not know this?” or “Do you agree?” comments add to what you obviously want to be considered erudite discourse?
I’m going to admit—I might be just a tad bit unfair to forty.
Remember Dana Carvey’s Church Lady? Remember that smug little smirk of assumed moral superiority? Well, that is the image I get whenever forty pulls one of those “Don’t you agree?” or “Don’t you?” gambits—that coy little duck of the head and pinched-lip squinty-eyed smarmy smirk.
And that might not be fair. Obvious, perhaps, but possibly not fair.
Why do you keep insisting that I am arguing with the ability of states to choose their own electors?
You keep fighting with an invented straw man, as you insist: They aren’t conceding their votes. They are choosing how their electors are appointed. If the founders truly didn’t want states to choose the manner of appointing their electors, they wouldn’t have allowed them to do so. If the founders wanted to limit the ways in which states choose their electors, they would have done so.
You just don’t like this particular manner of choosing electors because your side keeps losing the popular vote and is likely to continue to do so in the future.
Yet I have not said a single word about how the states can or cannot choose their electors. Here—let’s let Wikipedia explain what I AM talking about.
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among a group of U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to whichever presidential ticket wins the overall popular vote in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The compact is designed to ensure that the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide is elected president
Now please stop blathering on about something I never said, and try to focus on the real issue. That is, that the purpose of the Compact is to subvert the clearly stated and codified intent of the Founders to not allow the president to be chosen by the popular vote.
Maybe you should consider being deleted as a response to your just being so tiresome
That’s what I thought you’d say. Now go away.
“So it is possible to agree that, in a way, you have indirectly conveyed a political philosophy. I would stop short of calling it “coherent” and it is certainly fragmented and incomplete, but it seems to meet your own political needs, so whatever.”
Oh good. Now you can stop pretending no one has ever been able to offer a political philosophy to you. (But you’ll probably figure we ever had this exchange by tomorrow and will be back at it.) As for it being “fragmented and incomplete,” it’s certainly more complete than your single sentence. Just for starters, you leave why the federal government should be limited in scope. You leave out whether a system of government should guarantee any rights of citizens, or whether citizens even have any rights. You leave out how the various levels of government should be constructed; that is, are there representatives? If so, how are they appointed? Or maybe, like Mark, you prefer a king that dictates to all? You don’t at all address what powers that levels of government below federal should or should not possess, and why. You don’t even explain why there should be levels of government, but just assume so. You criticize me for give an opinion about the Electoral College while you don’t address it at all. So your political philosophy, as expressed in this thread, isn’t even “fragmented” because there are no fragments to begin with.
Oh, dear. Quibbles is back with a furious vengeance. Katy bar the door and get ready for an attempted slap fight!
Just for starters, you leave why the federal government should be limited in scope
True. I merely referenced the delegated duties of the federal government and the reinforcement of the 10th Amendment, without quoting them verbatim. Evidently that put too much of a strain on poor forty. But here’s the Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. And by the way, I have quoted this several times on this blog. As for those delegated powers, if forty cares s/he can look them up. Not that I expect this to happen. Gets in the way of all the quibbling and bickering, you understand.
You leave out whether a system of government should guarantee any rights of citizens, or whether citizens even have any rights. Awwww, now poor forty is all frazzled because I gave a PHILOSOPHY, not a full constitution. Again, not enough meat on those bones for a full-on quibble and bicker session. Wahhhh wahhhh wahhhh
I’ve always been clear that my personal political philosophy refers to governance of our own country. Period. And it is that OUR federal government must be restricted as to its size, scope and power, with most authority left to the states or to the people. That is the core belief system of how we must be governed. That is the foundation of the house, and forty is all breathless and outraged because I didn’t go into the colors of the curtains. (That is, to borrow a forty’s comment and fix it up a little, I am acting as an architect and s/he is fluttering around like a frustrated decorator.)
Who has time for this pretentious wannabe pundit who is really just striving for relevance by pretending to engage in discourse but really just nitpicking, sniping, and generally being an ass?
You don’t at all address what powers that levels of government below federal should or should not possess, and why.
Well, DUH! If a power is not delegated to the federal government, nor forbidden by the Constitution, it is up to the states or to the people. Couldn’t be clearer. So a state can decide that after a certain date no fossil-fuel-powered vehicles can be sold in the state. Fine. The nature of vehicles allowed to be sold in a state is not addressed, one way or another, in the Constitution, so the states can legislate any way they choose.
As I don’t strive to tell others what to do or how to live their lives, I don’t try to tell states what laws they can or can’t pass.
Another DUH! coming—-You don’t even explain why there should be levels of government, but just assume so. “Assume” as in referring to two levels of government in the statement, you mean?
An advanced degree from Nitpick U does not convey automatic acceptance on this blog. You were misinformed. Those voices in your head are messing with you.
Amazona already answered this but I’ll put my two cents in: all powers not granted by the Constitution to the federal government, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, or the people. It has been greatly eroded by Leftwing illegality, but the bottom line is that we’re supposed to have a federal government of strictly limited powers. The States didn’t want an all powerful federal government…just a better means of defending the nation and paying off the national debt. You only got that by means of the Senate, the Electoral College and the Bill of Rights…the States were determined that they not be rolled over. Without the Senate, EC and Bill, there would be no United States. It was the only way to get the States to agree to form a more perfect Union. Now you want to do away with the Senate, EC and the Bill of Rights (I know you’ll deny that on the Bill of Rights but “hate speech” laws and a host of other Progressive demands are direct contraventions of the Bill of Rights). Why? Because they are inconvenient to y our desire for absolute domination of a unitary State.
You imply that my Monarchist tendencies are tyrannical…but who is tyrannical: The Monarch who allows local self rule and for a patch-work of laws, morals and manners or you insisting that 320 million people all do it the same way? The French Revolutionaries, the Bolsheviks, Fascists and Nazis were like that – the Nazis even had a word for it: Gleichschaltung. It wasn’t for everyone – just everyone who wanted to live. When Lenin and the Politburo got word that the Czar and his family had been murdered he didn’t skip a beat and said, “we’ll now proceed to the second reading of the proposed health law”. Here was Lenin – a completely ignorant man sitting on high and deciding how health would be maintained for a nation of 150 million people across six time zones…as if he had the first f***ing clue about it. But it was to be all the same! Odessa to Vladivostok, the same rule…as if the needs and desires of the people were the same everywhere.
That is what you want – some central authority just laying down the law. And you’re like this because you don’t want to think. You’re afraid of it – afraid of freedom and you hate your own people.
The doctrine of enumerated powers—the main restraint on the new government—was most famously stated by James Madison: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”
The “problem” with this, to the Left, is that some people in some states might not do the “right’ thing. That is, whatever is desired by the ruling elites. This is why federal power is so important to them.
This is why the repeal of Roe was such a blow. It stopped the elites from imposing their credo on everyone, and returned authority to the states (ie: the people) and that was unthinkable. It undid decades of hard work and undermined the sanctity of the Central Authority.
Well, there is that and the loss of the word “right” regarding abortion. I hadn’t realized how important it was to the pro-death crowd to be able to wrap themselves in the noble word “right” to disguise the atrocity of their actions and beliefs until it was removed. They not only lost the veneer of decency conveyed by the word “right”, they were suddenly exposed to the opinions and will of the people, which had been silenced by Roe, and had to see what so many millions really think of their bloody dogma. But that’s another topic.
Madison also said The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government.
“The Father of the Constitution” wasn’t being cold‐hearted when he took this position during a 1794 debate in the House of Representatives over federal aid to refugees. Rather, he was merely recognizing that “the government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects.” Charity just wasn’t one of the specified objects. Of course, future politicians decided otherwise.
Today, most young Americans grow up in federally subsidized schools offering federally subsidized meals. They are inculcated to view the federal government as a benevolent caregiver that exists to provide Americans with housing, food, health care, and even income (to name just a few). Madison’s unfortunately quaint notion that the federal government isn’t supposed to be engaged in “charitable” activities would probably leave them dumbfounded.
Or outraged and furious and probably arguing that this is simply not so, the purpose of government is to take care of people and not just provide an umbrella of protections so people can take care of themselves.
Those who want a daddy government “giving” them everything they want or need don’t seem to realize (or care) that everything the government “gives” anyone it has first taken from someone else.
Remember, Mark, the Left reserves the right to define terms and then impose those definitions on us. So forty’s snapshot of the word “monarchy” was absolute rule by a single ruler. And, it was like his/her ongoing rant about the EC, the whole argument being based on a faulty or misstated definition of my position. It was long past time for Roseanne Roseannadanna to say “never mind” and move on.
You seem to be talking about a loosely defined form of mostly self government with a final authority, kind of like a referee, able to make a final decision if necessary. But it’s impossible to have a dialogue with someone who is constantly saying “But no, what you really mean is…”
Ask away, dumpling. Because you have no authority to ask anything. You are desperately trying to be relevant by getting your betters to engage you in your endless bickerfests. I only responded because others did, and I keep hoping that they will finally catch on to your silly schtick and stop chasing the strings you drag in front of them.
Your ego demands that you establish superiority by “winning” discussions with us, which is why your posts are always efforts to drag us into your endless and tiresome pseudo-discussions, which you use as platforms to tell us how stupid we are. And then you whine about being not welcome here. I mean, I can see why you have to come here—clearly this is not a characteristic that makes you welcome anywhere so you have to depend on online access.
But seriously, forty, just go the hell away. I am putting in a request that you not have your posts printed here. (Go ask your “source” how that works.)
A democratic republic governed by a constitution.
But hey, a constitution is a constitution is a constitution, right?
Amazona, I saw your comment running to daddy to have me kicked off the blog because you thought I was picking on you. One of the funniest things I’ve seen on this blog in a good while. We’ll meet another time…
“running to daddy”? But I thought I am the BOE. Could your “source” have been messing with you?
That’s right—-on Planet Forty you are the center of the universe. But not even your overweening ego can sell the fantasy that I am or ever was afraid of you. I merely find you boring, tiresome and did I mention boring? You are a waste of bandwidth who has never brought anything of value to this site.
As I said, an advanced degree from Nitpicking U does not qualify you to post here.
As far as who has been getting “picked on” I’m pretty sure that would be you, as you consistently get backed into rhetorical corners by me, and have to scramble to try to change the direction of the discussion to try to weasel out. You’ve never won an argument with me and never would, but if pretending that YOU have been picking on ME helps you get through the night then hang onto that delusion ’cause it’s all you’ve got. Bye, Felicia
Robert Malone’s Substack post today dovetails beautifully with the message of 1st Corinthinans 5:9.
I just read that article and, as usual, it is brilliant.
This is my favorite quote from John Adams …
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
No wonder Democrats don’t like it.
It’s impossible to define the level of disdain I have for people who never take responsibility …..
The White House released its congressionally-mandated post-mortem of the Afghanistan withdrawal Thursday in a report that heavily blamed the Trump administration for the chaos.
Hey, if Trump can retroactively commit fraud to influence the 2016 election a month after he was sworn in on January 20, 2017, he can sure be retroactively responsible for something Pudding Brain did months after he was out of office.
The man is diabolical, don’t you get it? He is so powerful nothing is beyond his demonic abilities.
Be very wary of Nikki Haley and Mike Pompeo. Both of them are military industrial complex candidates.
I like Pompeo and think he has the experience and gravitas to deal with foreign leaders, but I still don’t want him as president, and Nikki Haley is not a Natural Born Citizen.
I’m liking the entry of RFK Jr. into the Dem field. He is smart, has a lot to say, and I think can pull a lot of support from Biden. And attacking Bobby Kennedy’s son would be problematic for a lot of older Dems.
RFK Jr entered the race at Steve Bannon’s request as an agent of chaos. I doubt he will get much support.
RFK won’t get 4% in any primary – unless Pudding Brain kicks the bucket too late for anyone else to get in.
OTOH, he and Gabbard going Third Party could easily pull in 1.5 percent and that would be enough, likely, to ensure AZ and WI go GOP in 2024.
I think Casper is wayyyyyy overestimating the draw of Pudding Brain. Joe has a shot if he is the only alternative to Trump. As a person, as a candidate, he has nothing to offer. Put him in a debate with anyone and he will fall apart. He can evidently be propped up with drugs long enough to hold it together for a while, or at least that worked back in 2020, but if it still worked I think they’d still be using them. And they obviously aren’t.
His people keep frantically telling us what a wonderful president he is, but even if people like what has been done (???) they know Joe didn’t do it, so whoever else is in office will have the same machine behind him or her, doing the same thing.
“Anit-vaxx” is likely to be a big plus, as more information comes out, and Kennedy is articulate enough to explain the problems and the corruption.
And for the older Dems, the Kennedy name is still important. For the younger ones, well, he’s not decrepit, he’s not senile, he can speak in actual sentences, and he’s got something to say. For the generations most affected by the experimental drug fiasco, his message might resonate.
What we have to consider is that if his message does resonate, if he does get enough information out there to make a difference, the whirlpool will suck Trump down too—unless Trump finds the ability to override his ego and admit he made a mistake and shift the blame over to the Expert Class he was, after all, supposed to count on for good advice. He can claim the problems didn’t show up till he was out of office, which is true, and that if still in charge he would have done something, which is not true based on his ongoing bragging but would be a good story
That sounds like a conspiracy theory
Gabbard is MAGA and Kennedy is a antivaxer. They are more likely to pull votes from the Republican side.
You appear to be admitting that the desire to want America to be a great nation is restricted to Republicans. Not a surprise, but thanks for admitting it. Yes, Gabbard is a patriot, and you seem to think that would disqualify her for consideration by Democrats. Again, thank you for admitting that.
And Kennedy is not an “anti-vaxxer”—though kudos for so obediently parroting your tribe’s official narrative. He is for vaccines. Real vaccines, that is. Not for the fake vaccines forced upon the world, which have never undergone full FDA testing, never received full approval, and which have had disastrous results, while never even coming close to doing what they were supposed to do.
The only defense for them now is the weak comment, when people get the virus the drugs were supposed to protect against, “well, we’re pretty sure you would have been sicker if you hadn’t had the jab”. Which is, evidently, enough to convince weaker minds.
Casper, remember the olden times when you were still posturing as a teacher? Remember reading assignments? Well, here’s a reading assignment for you. Go back to the early articles by Doctor Robert Malone, about the mRNA drugs. It’s OK, Cappy—your masters won’t mind, as Dr. Malone is a certified member of the Expert Class—or was, anyway. He may have been kicked out for heresy. In fact, he developed the technology of the mRNA drugs.
Doctor Malone carefully lays out the problems with the technology and the false assumptions made about spike proteins. I know, I know, this would be foreign and probably dangerous territory for you, going off the reservation and exposing yourself to information not pre-digested and spoon fed to you by your masters. So I don’t expect you to do it. But I’m just telling you that there is a source (one of many) on the actual science of the spike protein theory and reality, and it is not what your approved “sources” have been repeating ad nauseum.
But be careful. You might accidentally stumble on the fact that what you and your fellow travelers all worship as “vaccines” are not vaccines at all. Oops
Uh, Oh. President Biden Stashed Classified Documents in Chinatown
And according to Congressman Comer: “The boxes were not in a ‘locked closet’ at the Penn Biden Center and remained accessible to Penn Biden employees as well as potentially others with access to the office space. We need to find out who had access to these documents.”
The left will be hard presses to do ANYTHING related to Trump’s classified document situation, unless they also hang Bidum out to dry for his worse, totally unsecured classified documents (a possible scenario) or they may attempt some other contortion of the law (another possible scenario), none of which will happen without paying a price, but that doesn’t seem to bother them.
Mar-a-Lago: Locked room, second lock installed at request of archivist after leaving documents there, and Secret Service guarding the building. Just a tad bit more secure than a garage, an office building or wherever in Chinatown some Biden docs might have been
dumpedstored.The Windy City isn’t safe year-round, but in summer, you’re most likely to catch a
South Side mosquitobullet. Chicago’s yearly “Festival of Lead” begins on Memorial Day weekend every year and runs to Labor Day.As of this writing, Chicago has already seen 578 people shot and 131 murdered.
Chicago had a total of 3,620 of its denizens perforated last year and 737 total murders. That breaks down to a person getting ventilated every 2.26 hours and someone killed every 11.56 hours.
And this is before the city elected a mayor on an anti-white campaign. That ought to make life there very interesting.
The new Chicago Mayor could be worse than the previous one, Bettlejuice’s daughter, and that would be hard to do, but I think he’s up to it.
Gavin Newsome thinks he has some kind of future, and being a Democrat he probably does. How anyone, who has governed the complete disasters that are San Francisco and the State of CA, feels like they are ready for the next level is beyond me. Rational, non narcissistic people would resign in shame. BUT NOT DEMOCRATS
Chicks with dicks are becoming a real problem in this country
‘She was hit multiple times by a guy in a dress’: Terrified Riley Gaines is ambushed by screaming trans activists who ‘physically attacked her’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11949057/Terrified-Riley-Gaines-ambushed-screaming-trans-activists-physically-attacked-her.html
When I said a while back that I didn’t think this current crop of Leftists had the patience of their ancestors, I never dreamed that the violence would manifest itself in the trans community. There’s a message in there somewhere, and I don’t think it’s about men wanting to become women and women wanting to become men.
I think it’s the ultimate societal disrupter. Democrats love to normalize abnormal people. I have said before that because Democrats have pandered to every fringe element of society, they have put themselves now into indefensible positions. And defending mentally confused violent men who wear makeup, is entirely indefensible.
Not to lay claim to the Orwell crown, but many years ago I observed that the Left recruits people with personality disorders, validates those pathologies, and sends them out as cannon fodder as part of their strategy of disordering society and destabilizing our culture. The Left cannot gain traction in a stable and happy nation. They must have disorder, chaos, negativity and fear, and when these do not occur naturally as the outcome of government problems or war or other events then the Left must step in and create them.
This headline says it all. The chicks with dicks are communists
Trans Colorado woman, 19, is arrested over plot to shoot up THREE schools and churches by cops ‘who found detailed plans and communist manifesto’ four days after Nashville massacre
It is happening, and if so, it may restore our country. And that is the moment Democrat voters become victims of the people they vote for.
‘SF is a complete s**thole. I am a registered Democrat…liberal politicians are ruining cities’: Music mogul David Foster’s daughter slams lawmakers over murder of CashApp founder Bob Lee
What cracks me up is the truly amazing lack of self awareness of San Francisco. As a city already dealing with a lot of crime, it defunds police and stops prosecuting crime, leading (naturally) to even more crime.
This results, to some extent, in losing some of its tax base as smart people leave, understanding the natural arc of dissolution this kind of government is creating. But the city spends its decreasing revenues on enabling and supporting and, naturally, encouraging mental illness, drug use and homelessness by subsidizing them.
Then the nearly bankrupt city, dying in the throes of rampant crime, societal breakdown and depleted revenues, votes to give any citizen of the city who identifies as African American five million dollars.
And within a few days of this the mayor goes begging the American taxpayer, who has been watching this self-destruction with amazement, to pay for more police to deal with the crime the city has incentivized.
But that’s not even the craziest part. They might get it.
Finally, someone is asking the right question:
Then ask why Leftists demand that this be
acceptedpromoted.(Hint: they are the same people who demand that sexually graphic material be kept in school libraries, where even very young children can see drawings of how boys can orally service other boys, etc.)
Did I read that Amazona coined the phrase “Dicksie Chicks” ??? 😂😂😂 brilliant
Well, I never heard it before I used it, so maybe I did.
From Doctor Malone: From Mind Viruses and Their Vectors
As I look out across the torn and tortured psy-ops battleground terrain remaining after over three years of globalized total unrestricted information warfare, the fields of diseased, dead and dying, the shreds of what were once the battle standards we carried into the conflict as both sword and shield – that are the Declaration of Independence, US Constitution and Bill of Rights- lie trampled into the soggy clay of our collective consciousness. And who do we have to thank for that? Who did we expect to fight for truth by our sides, but instead took the metaphorical 30 pieces of silver to become a pharma and government-sponsored mercenary force deployed against us? That would be corporate and social media and the information technology giants of the Western United States.
Da man writes good………