Democrats are stoutly asserting that the discovery of 6,000 illegal aliens registered to vote in New Jersey is proof that there is no fraud. No, seriously: that’s what they’re saying.
But do note: what they said was never happening at all is now admitted to be happening. They’re just absurdly claiming it doesn’t matter. This, by the way, is mere battle space prep – in the wake of Trump’s election integrity speech, they know what is coming…that is, they know DOJ has been looking into this and is likely about to blow the lid off it. This is an attempt to get out in front and implant into the public mind the concept that it doesn’t matter.
It is my contention that the deeper Blue the area, the less the reported votes are real. The deep Blue areas don’t really have elections…the powers that be determine who is going to win and just manufacture the vote totals to match. Think about what happened in LA – Pratt clearly came in second. Now, given how Democrat the city is, this still probably would have been a loss in November…but the Ruling Class in LA wasn’t going to take any chances, so they simply manufactured enough votes to get the Super Commie (who had tearfully conceded on election night!) into second place. And then the Super Commie just stopped campaigning. Bass – the Ruling’s Class’ stooge in office – is going to win by default. And, yes, there will be some votes actually cast in LA this November. And those votes will skew heavily Democrat. But the reported number will bear no relation to the number of people who actually bothered to vote. Nobody really votes in a One Party State except those who have a vested interest in that State. Everyone else gives it up as a useless exercise. Sure as heck the welfare bums won’t bother – and don’t ever bother. Used to be in olden days the Democrats would provide “walking around money” to get street thugs to push welfare bums to vote…these days, they just get them registered and then cast the votes for them. Much cheaper. Easier, too. And no chance at all that the welfare bums will vote the wrong way even by accident. Democrats know all this – and there is a very strong chance Trump is about to expose it all.
Trump continues his drumbeat against Communism. Naturally, his critics are saying he shouldn’t do that. We need to concentrate on “affordability”! Just ask any Democrat or RINO and they’ll tell you so! The American people don’t care about Communism…all they care about is grocery and gas prices. To be fair, we do care about that – we want very much for those prices to go down. But there is also only so much the President can do on that and anything effective takes time…like years of time. Reshoring our manufacturing, spurring American ranching and agriculture and getting the supply chain straightened out is going to take time. And it is already working: inflation is easing. But the existential threat to the United States isn’t $4.25 a gallon gasoline…it is the Communism. Trump is jumping on it because it is the actual issue of 2026…as much as immigration and “they/them” were the 2024 issues (and they remain the issues of 2026, but now Trump is tying them to their source…the Communist infection of the United States). Back in 2024 Trump was advised to stay away from immigration and “they/them” – he ignored those critics and went on to win. Will this concentration on Communism work in 2026? Can’t know. But I think it will.
You see, Democrats have been pushed ever further Left since Humphrey lost in 1968. Year by year, the people who rioted outside the DNC in 1968 have taken more control of the Party and allowed in increasingly Leftist screwballs. People like Carter, Clinton and Obama could mute it – cover it up with soaring rhetoric which hid the inner Maoist. But now there’s no hiding it…its out there, in the open, and being touted for the 2028 nominee. This will probably be Harris, again, because of all the insane people running, she’s the black woman and so will scoop up sufficient early wins to make her nomination a foregone conclusion…and the Democrat leaders will be relieved because if it isn’t her, its AOC or someone even more insane. The Democrats are committed to ending ICE (that is, ending all immigration enforcement), allowing criminals to run free, keeping up the drumbeat for “they/them”…every last lunatic Leftist position is endorsed and advanced. Only a few Democrats (most notably Fetterman) are even mildly objecting to it. The rest are either openly embracing it or keeping silent, lest they be condemned and removed via a far Left primary challenger. What Trump is going to do between now and November is merely point this out – to make this a national election and a referendum on Trump/MAGA. It is the path to victory if there is one at all – trying to hide things and go with the flow is the sure path to defeat. Victory comes with ruthlessly pointing out how insane the Democrats are…and tying the most lunatic Leftist around the necks of every Democrat everywhere.
We continue to whack Iran – they managed to get four of our own, and Trump says they’re going to pay heavily for that. This is what we must do. Eventually we will get to the point where even the most insane Islamist will want to call it quits. Remember, all the drawn-out wars we’ve had since WWII were drawn out defeats because we never seriously went after our enemies. We let them off the hook. We essentially told them that if they just endure for a bit, we’d quit. No more of that – failure to obey our orders means it is just going to get hideously worse for you and even if you can get a few of our along the way, we’re going to get far more of you.
Blogs For Victory 
Democrats are stoutly asserting that the discovery of 6,000 illegal aliens registered to vote in New Jersey is proof that there is no fraud
Actually, that’s just what they’re admitting to. The DOJ says it’s at least 35,000, and could be more.
I’m not sure why anyone is surprised by this. It’s been going on for a LONG time. I recall Amazona telling about a horse trainer from Peru that worked for her under a green card and was asked when he applied for a driver’s license if he wanted to register to vote. That was what, Amazona, 10 years ago?
Estimates of the number of illegals in this country are just that, estimates, but no one would be surprised if it turned out to be at least 20 million, and I’ll bet at least half of them are registered to vote. Now maybe only a small percentage actually do vote, but I’ll bet, as Mark notes, ballots in their name are cast with regularity. I hope this current investigation gets to the truth, and a lot of people go to jail.
Yep – jail has to happen. And keep in mind that it is a conspiracy and no particular person has to be aware of the conspiracy to be part of it. All it takes is being a willing participant…so even if so-and-so Dem pol can reasonably claim ignorance of the intent of the conspiracy, the fact that they let obvious parts of the conspiracy happen means they’re part of it.
It was not just this person. I helped several seasonal workers who worked at the local resorts, and experienced this EVERY TIME. Every time it happened I would point out the fact that the clerk had just issued a license due to expire the date the visa expired, that he had just examined the passport, and every single time was told “It’s the law—we HAVE to offer the chance to register.”
And then, when they go back home, what are the chances they inform the county clerk they are gone? Let’s play a quick game of “What If?” In this case, what if someone who is politically active works for a big resort, such as Vail Resorts or Sun Valley, and jots down the name of every foreign worker he meets. Then, at the end of the season when foreign workers have gone home, he compares his list with voter registrations from the past 1-2 years. That would give him a list of “orphan” registrations. Because the person in question is now back home, that registration will not be revoked, so every year that list will grow longer as new names are added. It could turn out to be a nice little source of votes. Do some change of address work in the off season and then just have someone pick up those piles of ballots sitting in lobbies of small apartment buildings with several dozen “residents” per studio apartment, etc. It’s simple work, easily assigned to low-level volunteers.
The Left likes to pretend that any election fraud has to be, in addition to “big enough to change the outcome”, elaborate and requiring all sorts of coordination and expertise. But a lot of grift and graft is due to simple foot soldiers following easy instructions. Those people caught dumping dozens of ballots every night in different collection boxes were not clever conspirators.
It’s not complicated. It comes down to (1) get a ballot, and (2) get that ballot counted. Then, when it has been accepted as a valid vote and folded into the fungible stream of other votes, the second stage can progress, which is the ear-splitting howling of THE VOTES HAVE ALREADY BEEN RECOUNTED !! Yes, they have. The good votes, the bad votes, all have been recounted. There might need to be a little sleight of hand, like “accidentally” destroying all the envelopes, but hey, what’s a little “oops” every now and then?
Indeed – and as I point out, nobody cheats just a little bit. Everyone who cheats does so sufficient to get their desired outcome if at all possible. Whatever fraud we see is mere tip of the iceberg.
Is there any truth to this??? If true and made public … it’s a complete game changer
BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard Confirms Former President Obama Authorized Assassination Attempt on Trump
By Jonathan Gregory
Washington, D.C. — July 21, 2025
In what may become the most explosive revelation in U.S. political history, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced that declassified intelligence files directly implicate former President Barack Obama in authorizing a covert assassination attempt on then President-elect Donald Trump. The files, set to be publicly released, detail a sprawling, top-secret program initiated in the final 30 days of Obama’s presidency, with the explicit goal of preventing Trump from ever taking office.
“Operation Silence was not just surveillance. It was an organized, multi-agency plot to eliminate the President-elect,” Gabbard said during an emergency intelligence briefing. “The documents outline everything, from recruitment of black ops teams, to manipulation of communications, to the final phase; physical removal.” According to sources close to the investigation, a failed attempt on Trump’s ’s life was thwarted only days before the inauguration, thanks to an anonymous whistleblower inside the National Security Command Center.
Redacted transcripts reveal that Obama, under the pretense of national security, convened an off the books task force of senior intelligence officials and military advisors at Camp David in late December. One document, marked Eyes Only 44, reads: “The threat Trump poses to institutional stability cannot be overstated. Removal, if necessary, is justified.” While Obama has not commented publicly, legal teams are reportedly mobilizing behind the scenes. As the files prepare to go public, the country teeters on the edge of political reckoning, and the question now isn’t whether there was a plot, but how far it went, and who else was involved.
It would take an exceptional level of evidentiary proof before we could run with that.
Sometimes the simplest images are the best.
When you think it over, Democrats are only patriots when they are in charge. The Civil War had lots of causes and both sides contributed to the breakup but the ultimate force that drove it was the Democrats realizing that they were losing national power. That the rapid growth of the North the Northern orientation of westward settlement meant that there would come a time when no Democrat could win a national race…so the southern Democrats decided to cut out.
And if that’s not enough:
For a party that seems to put narrative and optics above everything else, this really looks bad. If Republicans are smart (and that’s often debatable), they’ll turn this meme into billboards all over the country this fall.
I think they are still coasting on the image of being solely responsible for unions, and that was in a different economic era long past. These days unions are often just mechanisms for grifting and limiting the ability to work for many people, and providing funding for Leftist politicians.
When you think it over, Democrats are only patriots when they are in charge
I’ve always thought the opposite. I guess it kind of depends on how you define patriotism. Now this new breed of Socialist Democrat has kind of broken the mold; they actually campaign on hating America, but I don’t think, if they were ever able to gain significant power they would all of a sudden become patriotic. And without massive cheating, they would be relegated to the status of a minor party.
I also find it interesting as well as amusing that when we first started discussing Democrats cheating in a significant way back in 2020, all our trolls kept insisting there was no evidence of enough cheating to change the election. Not hearing much from them these days as the evidence of the hidden part of the iceberg is slowly revealed. Everyone knew, though, when Biden got 16 million more votes than Obama or Hillary, that something was fishy, but the agenda media’s message was “ignore the man behind the curtin.”
Another thing that is humorous but annoying is the constant drumbeat of so-called MAGA Conservatives who are constantly asking where all the arrests and indictments are. They are either BOTS, or they’re really not paying attention. There has never been prosecution of fraudsters in my lifetime that comes close to comparing with what we’re witnessing, and the fact that the agenda media is trying its best not report on it, doesn’t make it less real.
As I think a lot of us grew up thinking that “patriotism” and “nationalism” were pretty much the same thing, it appears to me that the new Democrat Party has taken the position that nationalism is by definition bad, by definition part of “white supremacy” and in general they find it offensive and unacceptable.
This is, to me, just another example of the redefinition of words that allows the Dems to just make up their own rules. Here is an AI definition of terms:
“Patriotism vs. Nationalism
Patriotism: Focuses on love of home, civic duty, and unity among citizens. It is generally defensive and peaceful.
Nationalism: Focuses on the belief that one’s nation is superior to others, often seeking power and competition over cooperation.”
Here we can see the spin put on the definition “Focuses on the belief that one’s nation is superior to others” giving it a malignant characteristic, as if believing that one’s nation is superior to others automatically leads to or includes “seeking power and competition over cooperation.” This is essentially a meaningless “definition” as it fails to explain power over what or whom, competition for what and with what or whom, and failure to cooperate with what or whom. But even this vague and fatuous pseudo-definition is enough to imply a nefarious character to the word.
As far as the AI “definition” of patriotism, it too is generalized gobbledygook. “Focuses on love of home, civic duty, and unity among citizens.” Huh? It manages to completely eliminate the concept of a nation, pride in that nation, allegiance to that nation, and commitment to that nation, substituting the generic “home” for all of these and then adding a few social engineering agendas such as civic duty and unity among citizens.
One of the concerns about AI has always been based on the GIGO concept, which is clearly illustrated here. But when/if this kind of fatuous crap is accepted, it will continue to foster justifications for hating the United States and instead just suggesting loyalty to some cliches, while allowing posturing as “real patriotism”. (And who came up with the idea that patriotism is “generally defensive and peaceful”?
Getting away from the indoctrination element of AI, there are some better definitions of both words. For nationalism, for example, there is this:
spirit or aspirations common to the whole of a nation.
(He describes how the intense and unconquerable nationalism of India’s hundreds of millions contributed to the decline of the British empire.)
devotion and loyalty to one’s own country; patriotism.
(The promotion of a healthy nationalism is part of the responsibility of the leaders of a newly independent, diverse nation.)
the desire for national advancement or political independence.
the policy or doctrine of asserting the interests of one’s own nation viewed as separate from the interests of other nations or of the international community.
(There’s a struggle between integration and global values on the one hand, and uncompromising nationalism on the other.)
None of these definitions and examples relate in any way to the Left’s distortion of the word to weaponize it.