More Nations Refusing to Attend UN’s Anti-Semitic/American “Durban III” Conference

From the Weekly Standard:

On Friday, the Czech Republic became the latest country to pull out of the upcoming U.N. “anti-racism” extravaganza known as Durban III. Canada, Israel, and the United States have already given thumbs down to the event, which the U.N. is bringing to U.S. shores on September 22, 2011. While Americans will be mourning the 10th anniversary of 9/11, the United Nations in New York will be “commemorating” the 10th anniversary of the first Durban conference – an outpouring of intolerance and xenophobia…

A good thing, too – and an update to the linked article indicates that Italy has also backed out. The whole purpose of the Durban conference is to attack Israel, the United States and the West in general.  No decent person, group or nation should have anything to do with it.  And if we had a government of any backbone at all, we’d demand the conference be held somewhere else…hold it in Zimbabwe, that nation which so greatly exemplifies the mindset of Durban.  True, might be hard to get running water and electricity there, but at least there won’t be any evil Americans or Israelis around.

Insane, Re-elected Democrat Sex Scandal

You might recall back on February 20th of this year that I took note of a story about Representative David Wu (D-WA).  What happened as regards Congressman Wu is that as the 2010 campaign went on, it became increasingly clear to his staffers that he was laboring under severe mental defect…he was going insane, to put it in blunt terms.  Given that all this involved Democrats, they did what comes natural – in order to ensure that someone with a “D” after his name won (even if insane), they covered it up.  Not a peep out of a single staffer…and as Wu went completely ’round the bend, they just took him off the campaign trail and counted on the heavy Democrat registration advantage to carry him to victory – which is what happened.

At the time, I noted this as just another disgusting example of the Democrats putting power over principal.  A man suffering under mental distress is not fit to be in Congress.  As it turns out, Wu may not have been fit to be in society, at all – as the Oregonian reports:

A distraught young woman called U.S. Rep. David Wu’s Portland office this spring, accusing him of an unwanted sexual encounter, according to multiple sources.

When confronted, the Oregon Democrat acknowledged a sexual encounter to his senior aides but insisted it was consensual, the sources said.

The woman is the daughter of a longtime friend and campaign donor. She apparently did not contact police at the time…

Not much detail is known, but it is reported that the incident took place around Thanksgiving (meaning shortly after Wu was re-elected with 55% of the vote) and that the girl graduated in 2010…meaning she was 18 or 19 years old at the time (Wu is 56).

What I’d like to do, now, is have Wu’s staffers called up to a hearing in the House to ask them why they figured it was best to protect Wu’s public image.  I mean, the man is insane and now he might have done a horrible thing to a young woman.  Was keeping a seat for Nancy Pelosi worth that? Was keeping their BS staffer jobs more important than the risks Wu posed to himself and to others?  Here is our nauseating politics for you – and here is the Democrat party laid bare. Because as Wu went crazy, it wasn’t just his staffers who noticed…other House staffers saw it, as did other elected Democrats.  No one said anything – no one put a stop to it.  Power is more important than everything.

HAT TIP:  The Other McCain

 

Poll: 63% Say Economy Getting Worse

From Rasmussen:

After falling to a new two-year low on Friday, consumer confidence fell even further on Saturday…

…Only 9% rate the economy as good or excellent while 61% say it’s in poor shape. Sixteen percent (16%) say it’s getting better while 63% believe it is getting worse…

Trust me on this on, the debt talks and whatever results from them are not what is on Obama’s mind – it is what the economy will do over the next 16 months.

And that ain’t looking too good for Barry right now…

MoveOn Wants to Destroy Fox News

I got this from MoveOn in my e mail:

Dear MoveOn member,

Could this be the end of Rupert Murdoch and Fox News?

Allegations in the U.K. against Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, Fox’s parent company, just keep coming. Hacking into the phone of a 13-year-old murder victim, bribing government officials, and now claims of hacking into the voice mail of 9/11 victims and their families.

Now, the key is to find out how far Fox and the rest of Murdoch’s news outlets went here in the U.S. If they’ve been as corrupt and criminal here as it looks like they’ve been in the U.K., then we might just see Murdoch’s media empire crumble.

So we’re launching a new campaign to build unavoidable public pressure for full investigations. We’ll start tomorrow with a hard-hitting new ad asking whether Murdoch is “running a company or a crime syndicate.”…

Their desire is clearly the “News of the World” result…they are hoping to generate enough scandal that Fox News will be shut down.  Oh, glorious day for liberalism!  A voice that isn’t in lock-step behind the liberal party line will be silenced!  Across the Republic, only those who are good-thinkers will be heard and peace and blessedness will reign!

Of course, that won’t actually happen in the United States – but one really can’t blame the liberals for dreaming their fascist dreams.  On the other hand, the MoveOn e mail does ask for donations so there is a great chance that the MoveOn people will rake it in…ten thousand liberal dunderheads actually thinking that Fox News can be forced off the air because a NewsCorp subsidiary in Britain hacked some phones.  Ah, well, if they are donating to this cause it is that much less money donating to causes which might be more dangerous.

Obama Moves Towards Fixing the Housing Crisis

Only a bit late, but there is actually something good here – from the Wall Street Journal:

The Obama administration is examining ways to pull foreclosed properties off the market and rent them to help stabilize the housing market, according to people familiar with the matter.

While the plans may not advance beyond the concept phase, they are under serious consideration by senior administration officials because rents are rising even as home prices in many hard-hit markets continue to fall due to high foreclosure levels…

It was on July 27th, 2010 that I provided a revised plan for fixing housing.  Here is the central part:

…Essentially, increasing demand is not something we can do in any time frame that will work.  And, meanwhile, the longer we go on, the worse it gets.

If you can’t do much with demand, then it is to supply we must turn.  How do we lower the supply of houses actually or potentially on the market for sale?

You turn them in to leased houses.

Millions of potential home owners cannot buy homes because they are out of work, have reduced income or have wrecked credit.  With all that, they still have to live somewhere, and while some of them are in desperate straights, most of them have some sort of income (and, in a lot of cases, just as much income as they had before they lost their homes).  Can’t buy?  Rent.

The trouble is that banks don’t want to be land lords.  This is understandable, and I wouldn’t ask them to be.  But they can put the houses in to corporate structures which do manage rental properties and which can use at least part of the rental income to provide a revenue stream for the banks.  We can put a big incentive on this by making the revenue from rental housing tax free for five years.  The key is that time frame – though we can go as low as two years:  but we want these houses off the market until we have at least a chance of reviving the economy and thus providing a solid base for home demand.

The idea here is to take the massive number of foreclosed homes and lock them away for two to five years – to get out of the housing market the houses which simply don’t have a buyer, and won’t have a buyer for some years to come.  But we can’t just let them sit there unoccupied and deteriorating, nor can we expect banks to just sit on things which don’t produce any revenue.  We also don’t want to increasingly force the banks in to fire sale prices for the homes they hold as that will just accelerate and make worse the problem we have…

I don’t have hundreds of taxpayer-funded staffers.  I’m not some sort of brilliant economist.  I’m just this guy who thinks about things and then writes down what he thinks about – I figured this out a year ago (and, actually, longer ago than that – this is a revised plan, some months earlier I had put it out in a slightly different form).   It just amazes me how completely incompetent government is.  The fact that it is July of 2011 and the housing market has entered a double dip recession before someone in Obamaland starts thinking about this is a sad commentary on the people running the show…they haven’t a clue.  But 2012 is coming and that is starting to concentrate some minds over there.

The one thing we can’t afford to do, however, is have Obama actually in charge of the effort.  All he’ll wind up doing is ensuring that his cronies get a big payday.  We need to really move on this – my plan or something like it.  And to do it right it will have to be genuinely transparent, will have to benefit actual people, and should probably be handled by local banks rather than Obama and Bernanke’s buddies in the “too big to fail” entities.   And given Reid’s background in corrupt land deals, it would probably be better if he was kept away from it, too. The House should take up the idea, craft it in to legislation and then hand it to Obama – doing it in such a manner that it is such a well-done bill that Obama and Reid daren’t try to modify it.

One thing is certain – if we don’t do something, then housing prices could collapse entirely.  And I mean that – like a house worth $125,000.00 today being worth $50,000.00 a couple years from now…and with hundreds of thousands of homes essentially abandoned and deteriorating like Detroit housing.  We’re in a housing death spiral – we have to try and stop it; my plan is to take the houses off the market and leave them for the use of the regular, American people.  If someone has a better plan, I’m all ears…but we have to do something, and do it quickly.

Obama Scuttles Debt Talks

Seems that the President tried a bit of bait-and-switch in the negotiations – from NRO’s The Corner:

House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) offered his side of the story Friday evening, echoing the tone of his letter to House Republicans. He said negotiations with the White House broke down for two reasons: 1) President Obama’s insistence on raising taxes, and 2) Obama’s “refusal to get serious” about spending cuts and meaningful entitlement reform.

Boehner said “an agreement had been reached” earlier in the week that included about $800 billion in new revenue (but not through raising increases). However, the White House on Thursday “moved the goal post” by insisting on an additional $400 billion in tax increases, which Boehner refused to accept. “I take the same oath of office as the president…to do what is in the best interest of our country,” Boehner said. “And it’s not in the best interest of our country to raise taxes in this economy.”…

NRO reports elsewhere that Obama also messed around with some of the proposed spending reforms as regards entitlements.  The bottom line seems to be that a deal was in the making which was acceptable to the GOP but then when it became crunch time, Obama and the Democrats slipped provisions in the GOP had not – and could not – agree to.  I don’t know if this was a poison pill to kill a deal the Democrat didn’t like, at all, or an effort to blindside the GOP (ie, at the last minute put in things that were unacceptable and count on GOP fear of busting up the deal to force them to go along).  In either case it seems to have stopped things in their tracks.  President Obama has called for a White House conference tomorrow – so we’ll see how that goes.

But the good news is that the GOP is standing firm – the revenue increases Boehner agreed to were such that even TEA Partiers could grudgingly accept:  not a rate hike, but a reform of loopholes and such to increase revenues without hiking taxes and killing jobs.  The deal is still too weak in my view – especially as I’m certain that we don’t need to raise the debt ceiling at all – but it did have a solid reduction in spending.  Not nearly enough to get us out of the debt mess, but enough to put off the day of reckoning until at least 2015 or later, thus giving us a chance to replace Obama and get someone with sense in the White House.  My congratulations to the Speaker for smoking out the attempted scam and refusing to be a sucker.

Now, we’ll just see what happens…

Obamunism! Mass Layoffs Rising

From Yahoo Finance:

Putting pressure on an already lousy job market, the mass layoff is making a comeback. In the past week, Cisco, Lockheed Martin and Borders announced a combined 23,000 in job cuts. (See: Another Retailer Bites the Dust: Borders Doomed by Amazon Deal, Davidowitz Says)

Those announcements follow 41,432 in planned cuts in June, up 11.6% from May and 5.3% vs. a year earlier, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

Meanwhile, state and local governments have cut 142,000 jobs this year, The WSJ reports, and Wall Street is braced for another round of cutbacks. This week, Goldman Sachs announced plans to let go 1000 fixed-income traders…

As I’ve said before, I rate my chances of having my job by January 1st at 50/50.  Things are bad and getting worse…and getting worse all around the world.  China’s economy is crawling with bad debt and massively overheating.  Outside of Germany, Europe’s economy has already started to contract and Germany is only a bit above water.  Risk of default is spreading around the world.  Recession stares us in the face, and behind it the prospect of full blown depression.

Only a radical change of course can save the day…and Obama, I believe, doesn’t even suspect there is a problem.

HAT TIP:  Hot Air

Norway Attacked by (Lord Only Knows What)

From the New York Times:

Powerful explosions shook central Oslo on Friday afternoon, blowing out the windows of several government buildings, including one housing the office of the Norwegian prime minister. The state television broadcaster, citing the police, said seven people were killed and at least 15 injured; a spokeswoman for the prime minister, Jens Stoltenberg, said he was “safe and not hurt.”

Shortly after the explosions, which appeared to be a bomb attack, a man dressed as a police officer opened fire on a summer camp for young members of the ruling Labor Party on the island of Utoya in the Oslo fjord, about 25 miles from the city, and wounded at least five, a Norwegian security official said…

They’ve arrested a guy who is apparently a right wing nut job Freemason anti-Nazi college grad farmer who likes classical music… from the sources I’ve read…which goes to show one thing very clear:  while Islamists have taken credit for it no one knows what the heck is really going on.

Stay tuned.

UPDATE:  At least 80 dead.  What a complete horror.

Fighting Discrimination? No, Fighting Common Sense

A bit of an interesting story from CNA:

Catholic University of America is going ahead with its plan for single-sex residence halls despite a complaint filed on July 14 by Professor John Banzhaf, known for his lawsuits over fast food and women’s bathrooms.

In a July 19 statement provided to CNA, the university said it “is moving ahead with its plans to house the incoming class of freshman in single-sex residence halls when they arrive on campus next month.”

The university said it received a copy of Banzhaf’s complaint and will study it, but it remains “confident that the law does not require that men and women be housed together in residence halls.”…

The story goes on to describe Banzhaf as someone who fights against “discrimination”.  Here in modern America, we are conditioned to think of that as fighting against something bad – discrimination is bad, you see?  Trouble is, discrimination isn’t bad – and, in fact, each and every one of you is firmly in favor of discrimination.  You do it every time you make a choice.

You discriminate between peas and carrots.  Between Ford and Toyota.  Between paper and plastic.  Outside of those commonplaces, you also discriminate in choosing where to live.  Where to work.  Whom to associate with.  You are discriminating all the live long day.  So, why have we become conditioned to thinking that discrimination is bad?  Quite simple – some people wanted to perpetrate a series of injustices but they couldn’t sell it on those terms…so, they magically transformed their desire to do a bad, unjust thing in to a noble fight against “discrimination”.  Such as fighting against the common sense discrimination which would have us separate the sleeping quarters of young men and women.  Endless repetition did the rest – 40 years of fighting “discrimination” and having it endlessly hammered in to us that discrimination is wrong and we’re at the position where the application of common sense (in this case, separating young boys and girls) is startling, and the cause of a lawsuit.

A whole slew of things which are hideously wrong in our society – ranging from mixed-sex dorms to racial set-asides in college admissions as well as scores of other injustices – are built around the created need to fight discrimination.  If we were just after justice, we’d have long ago settled most of our problems and moved on. But there isn’t any money to be made in settling a problem – you can’t get famous that way; you can’t call in to existence vast bureaucracies; you can’t get on television talk shows and write best-selling books; you can’t have whole academic departments set up with cushy jobs and high pay if you are seeking justice.  It was unjust of us to once upon a time to deny opportunity to some people based upon their sex or skin color or religious affiliation…the solution to that problem was to stop doing that.  Presto, we’ve stopped doing that – no one in their right mind would dream of denying someone an opportunity based upon anything other than cold, hard qualifications.  But where is the advantage in such a thing to someone like Banzhaf?  Or an organization like NOW?  Or a whole bureaucracy like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission?

I’m telling you, good people, we’ve gotten ourselves tied up in knots here – we have been forced to abdicate our common sense and turn ourselves over to people who are scamming us like no tomorrow.  Think, for crying out loud – we have to discriminate.  If we don’t discriminate, then we’re simply not thinking.  You point out to me someone who is actually being denied something on grounds other than qualification and I’ll be right there at the barricades fighting along side you…but don’t anyone ever tell me that I have to fight against discrimination.  To me, that is asking me to fight against thinking – we have to judge circumstances and desired goals and figure out the best means of dealing with the former and achieving the latter.  We can’t do that if we allow cranks on the make to forbid thought because the first application of thinking would destroy their cash cow.

There are truths we must adhere to – right here and now, that college boys and girls should not sleep under the same roof.  Grasp that – hang on to that; make that the basis of your thoughts and actions, and a great deal of mental cobwebs will be swept away.  Discriminate between boys and girls – because boys and girls are different and have different needs and desires and it is up to adults to carefully guide them until they are fully ready to take their place as adults in society.  Once we’ve done that, we can then go on – and on and on.  We’ll start thinking, again…and at the merest touch of common sense, a gigantic amount of irrational nonsense will vanish from our society like a puff of smoke.

Democrats Kill Cut, Cap and Balance

From Hot Air:

The Senate just voted down the House Cut Cap and Balance bill, 51-46. Reid danced on its grave, proclaiming it “over, dead, and done.” Back to the Democrat plan:

Nothing!

Which is exactly right – the thing to do, now, is to re-pass it in the House, maybe adding a few changes.  You know, deeper cuts to spending, lowering income tax rates, imposing a wealth tax on the billionaires who back liberalism.  Send it right back to the Senate and see if they keep at it…or, some day, come up with an alternative plan.  Either way, we win.

UPDATE:  Turns out this bill is not quite dead – Senator DeMint is going to try and force a vote next week.  Could be done, you know – those “2012 Democrats” don’t want to have a bunch of votes on record against a balanced budget; only need a few of them to break lose and it passes – and then it will be up to Obama to sign or veto.  So, we don’t at this point need to re-pass it in the House…but we should be prepared to do so, just in case.